ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 14,
    1986
    BRAVO-ERNST DEVELOPERS,
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 86—10
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY
    arid COUNTY
    )
    OF DUPAGE,
    Respondents.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by B. Forcade):
    This matter comes to the Board on
    a January 16,
    1986,
    Petition for Variance filed by Bravo—Ernst Developers
    (“Bravo—
    Ernst”).
    Supplemental filings were made by Bravo—Ernst on either
    the Board or the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (“Agency”)
    on March
    5,
    1986, March 31,
    1986, April 10, 1986 and
    May 20,
    1986.
    No hearing was held.
    The Agency Recommendation
    that the Board deny the requested variance was filed July 15,
    1986.
    Bravo—Ernst has requested
    a variance from 35
    Ill. Adm. Code
    Section 309.241,
    to allow
    it
    to connect
    a proposed development,
    the Macedonian Heights Subdivision,
    to sewers owned
    by the DuPage
    Utility Company (“DUC”) with ultimate discharge
    to the DuPage
    County Department
    of Public Works
    (“DPCDPW”)
    Lisle—Woodridge
    sewage treatment plant.
    The segment of
    the sewer
    system owned
    by DUC is presently on
    restricted
    status.
    During the period that Bravo—Ernst has owned
    the subdivision property the Lisle—Woodridge STP has been put on
    and taken off restricted status,
    but
    it
    is the current restricted
    status of DUC which now prevents
    sewer connections
    to the
    subdivision.
    The DUC system has been experiencing problems with
    broken sewers,
    basement back—ups, manholes surcharging and
    illegal downspout connections.
    The Macedonian Heights Subdivision,
    as proposed, would be
    comprised of 12 single family dwellings located at the
    intersection of 59th Street and Dover
    in unincorporated DuPage
    County.
    The facts
    in this
    proceeding are extremely lengthy and
    convoluted but a brief description
    is appropriate.
    Bravo—Ernst
    purchased the property in question for development purposes on
    April
    1, 1977.
    At that time neither
    the DUC sewers nor
    the
    DPCDPW sewage treatment plant were on restricted
    status.
    Also,
    Bravo—Ernst had been assured that DUC was capable and willing to
    accept sewage from the Macedonian Heights Subdivision
    (Petition,
    72-30

    —2—
    Exhibit C).
    On March 30,
    1978, Bravo—Ernst made formal
    application to DUC but the application was rejected.
    Bravo—Ernst
    filed an action before
    the Illinois Commerce Commission seeking
    an order requiring DUC
    to provide service.
    However, while that
    action was pending DUC’s sewers were placed
    on restricted
    status.
    Bravo—Ernst’s 1981 attempt
    to secure sewerage from the
    Lisle—Woodridge sewage treatment plant were similarly frustrated
    by the imposition of restricted status.
    In evaluating
    a request
    for variance,
    this Board must
    balance any arbitrary or unreasonable hardship suffered by
    petitioner,
    if variance were denied,
    against the potential for
    environmental harm.
    The Board believes the Agency has succinctly
    stated Bravo—Ernst’s hardship:
    Bravo—Ernst
    has
    been
    unable
    to
    develop
    its
    property
    for
    the
    last
    nine
    years
    through
    no
    fault
    of its own...The developers of this tiny
    subdivision
    have
    become
    enmeshed
    in
    a
    bureaucratic
    morass
    of
    unusual
    complexity.
    They
    have
    been
    faced
    with
    two
    areas
    of
    restricted
    status,
    two
    state
    agencies
    arid
    three
    utility
    companies.
    They
    have
    had
    to
    bear
    not
    only
    the
    carrying
    costs
    on
    this
    property
    and
    the
    costs
    of
    proceeding
    through
    the above—described
    maze,
    but the frustration
    of
    clearing
    each hurdle
    in
    their path only to
    find
    another
    one
    in
    their
    way.
    It
    is
    the
    agency’s
    opinion
    that
    because
    of
    the
    exceptional
    circumstances
    involved
    in
    this
    case,
    if
    the developers
    could
    show that their
    proposed
    subdivision
    would
    not
    aggravate
    existing
    sewer
    problems
    then
    denial
    of
    this
    variance
    would
    constitute
    arbitrary
    and
    unreasonable
    hardship.
    (Recommendation,
    pp.
    5—6)
    The Board agrees that except for
    the environmental
    consequences, denial of variance would constitute arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship.
    The proposed Macedonian Heights Subdivision
    is located
    generally at
    the southeast corner
    of
    a residential area whose
    sewers flow to the northwest.
    In
    a 1978 Order
    (Petition,
    Ex.
    B),
    the ICC found
    that in dry weather,
    the sewage system runs at
    about 50
    capacity;
    however,
    in wet weather,
    about five days per
    year,
    the system has
    a considerable overload problem which leads
    to sewage back—ups
    in the homes of the Meadows Subdivision (along
    the western edge of the service area).
    The Agency notes recent
    complaints of sewage back—ups
    in basements
    in the area.
    Also,
    the Agency contacted one of the complaining citizens who
    confirmed sewage back—ups as
    recently as November 1985.
    72-31

    —3—
    Additionally,
    the Agency has been informed
    of manhole surcharging
    in the area.
    Bravo—Ernst’s proposed development would be
    directly tributary to these problem areas.
    In summary,
    the record discloses and
    the Board finds that
    basement back—ups and manhole surcharging
    in the Meadows
    Subdivision are pervasive and severe,
    that these problems
    continued
    as recently as two months before
    the present petition
    for variance was filed,
    and that Bravo—Ernst’s proposed
    development would be directly tributary
    to the problem area and
    would exacerbate the problem.
    Further,
    the Board finds that the
    back—ups and surchage problems are certain to continue as long as
    DUC fails
    to identify and correct the illegal sewer connections
    (sump pumps and drains) which cause
    the problem.
    The Board
    is
    aware that raw sewage back—up in
    a basement presents problems of
    the spread of disease and electrocution,
    as well
    as property
    damage.
    Regardless of the economic hardship suffered by Bravo—
    Ernst,
    the Board finds that
    its hardship
    is not sufficient
    to be
    arbitrary
    or unreasonable in
    light of the increase in the health
    and safety risk to the people
    in the Meadows Subdivision.
    Consequently,
    the Board, on balance, denies the petition for
    variance.
    This Opinion constitutes
    the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions
    of
    law on this matter.
    ORDER
    Bravo—Ernst Developers’
    request for variance from 35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code Section 309.241
    is denied.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gum, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order was
    adopte~~on
    the
    ,‘~/-~
    day of
    ______________,
    1986,
    by
    a vote
    Dorothy M. ‘Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    72-32

    Back to top