ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 14,
 1986
VILLAGE OF ADDISON,
Complainant,
v.
 )
 PCB 84—161
L
 & S INDUSTRIES,
 INC.,
Respondent.
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER OF THE BOARD
 (by 3.D. Dumelle):
On September
 5,
 1985,
 the Board entered an Interim Opinion
and Order, finding that L
 &
 S Industries,
 Inc.
 (LSI) had violated
Sections
 9 and 24
 of the Environmental Protection Act.
 That
Interim Order required LSI
 to prepare and submit
 a report on
methods of reducing or eliminating noise
 and odor pollution.
This
 report was due no later than December
 1,
 1985.
 However, no
such report was filed and by order
 of March 14,
 1986,
 the Board
provided LSI one last opportunity
 to cure this defect.
 LSI was
required to file with the Board and the complainant by May 1,
1986,
 a schedule for completion of the report on reducing odor
and noise pollution at
 its facility which was
 to call for a
complete and final report
 to be filed with the Board not later
than July
 1,
 1986, detailing all reasonable methods
 of reducing
odor and noise pollution,
 the type and degree of
 reductions
 possible with each method,
 its cost and the time required to
implement the method.
 Neither the schedule nor the final report
have been filed.
In its September
 5, 1985, Opinion and Order,
 the Board
stated
 that:
The record before
 the Board
 is presently
inadequate
 for
 the
 Board
 to
 order
 any
particular
 remedial
 actions.
 The
 last
 noise
survey
 in
 the
 record
 is
 from
 May
 19,
 1982.
LSI
 contends
 that
 operational
 changes
 since
that
 time
 have
 significantly
 reduced
 the
noise.
 While
 the
 record
 does
 contain
sufficient
 evidence
 to
 conclude
 that
 noise
violations
 continue,
 it
 does
 not
 contain
sufficient
 information
 on
 the
 extent
 of
present
 non—compliance
 nor
 does
 it
 offer
 any
further
 specific actions which could
 be taken
to assure compliance.
72-19
—2—
Nothing further has been entered into the record since that time
and those statements remain true.
Pursuant
 to Section
 31(c)
 of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act
 (Act),
 the burden
 is on the complainant to show
that the respondent has caused
 or threatened
 a violation of
 the
Act or the Board rules.
 If that is proven,
 the burden
 falls on
the respondent
 to demonstrate
 that compliance would impose an
arbitrary
 or
 unreasonable hardship.
 Where,
 as here,
 the
complainant meets his burden and
 the respondent
 fails to meet
his,
 the Board
 is
 to make
 “such final determination as
 it shall
deem appropriate
 under
 the circumstances,” pursuant
 to Section
33(a)
 of the Act.
 Pursuant
 to Section 33(b),
 “such order may
include
 a direction to cease and desist.”
Given
 the lack of sufficient information on which to base
any particular remedial program,
 there
 is little option for the
Board other than the imposition
 of
 a cease and desist order
 (in
addition to the earlier ordered monetary penalty).
 Therefore,
the only questions remaining are the scope
 of the cease and
desist
 order
 and when it should become effective.
 Given that L
 &
S Industries
 (LSI)
 had the opportunity
 to present evidence
regarding the reasonableness of compliance
 at the original
hearing in March of 1985 and was given the additional opportunity
to present
 a compliance plan by December
 1,
 1985, which was later
extended
 to July 1,
 1986,
 the Board will not be liberal
 in its
decision.
If the Board were simply to order LSI
 to cease and desist
violations of the Act
 by a date certain,
 the failure to attain
compliance would have to be relitigated
 to establish
 a continuing
violation before further action could be ordered.
 Such delay
would be highly inappropriate.
 Therefore,
 the Board must fashion
its order
 in such
 a way that compliance with that order
 is
quickly and easily determined.
 If the Board were able to order
specific compliance actions within a definite time period, this
dilemma would be solved.
 However, LSI’s inaction has precluded
such an order.
 Therefore, all that remains
 is for
 the Board
 to
order that LSI cease operations at
 its plant.
 Such
 an order is
highly unusual
 and,
 for that reason,
 the Board will
 offer LSI a
second last opportunity to avoid this result by taking
 expeditious steps
 to comply with the Board’s previous orders
(albeit belatedly).
The Board,
 therefore, orders that LSI cease and desist all
operations at its facility located at 920 National Avenue in
Addison,
 Illinois, on or before October
 13, 1986,
 unless it has
filed
 a report with the Board and the Village of Addison by that
date which evaluates,
 to the maximum extent possible,
 the type
and degree of noise and odor reductions possible by changes in
operation or construction of noise and odor reduction devices.
This report must be prepared by a competent individual or firm
72-20
—3—
and must consider
 all reasonable methods of control.
 Each
control option shall
 include anticipated pollution reductions,
the cost
 of implementation,
 and
 an estimate of
 a reasonable time
for implementation.
 If LSI
 fails
 to timely submit the required
report,
 the cease and desist order will remain effective until
such a report
 is filed.
 Once such report
 is filed,
 the Village
of Addison shall have
 30 days
 to respond
 to that report, and the
Board will take appropriate further action thereafter.
IT
 IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member
 J. Theodore Meyer dissented.
I, Dorothy
 M. Gunn, Clerk
 of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
the
 1~ra
day of
_____________,
 1986,
 by
 a vote
 of
___________
Dorothy
 M.
 thinn,
 Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
72-21