ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 15, 1979
VILLAGE
O~’ FISHER,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 79—170
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Goodman):
Petitioner requests that its present variance from the
total iron limitations
of Rules 203(f) and 402 of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution Rules and Regulations
(Water Rules) be extended
until
its facility improvements affecting its water treatment
plant become operational.
The Agency recommends
that a var-
iance be granted.
Petitioner waives its right to a hearing.
The Village of Fisher,
located
in Champaign County, oper-
ates a water treatment facility that removes iron from well
water that serve an estimated population of 1600.
On August
24,
1978,
in PCB 78—162, Petitioner received, inter alia,
a
one—year variance from Rules 203(f)
and 402
of the Board’s
Water Rules.
The record, Opinion,
and Order from that pro-
ceeding were incorporated by reference into the variance
petition now before the Board.
As a condition of the variance,
Petitioner proposed water treatment facility improvements that
were accepted by the Agency.
The proposed improvements inclu-
ded a new water treatment plant and the installation of a slow
sand filter for iron removal.
The Village of Fisher
is cur-
rently completing
the required preapplication documents for a
Federal Community Development E,lock Grant and expects funds
to be available by
late Spring of 1980.
Construction,
depending on weather conditions,
could begin in late 1980;
however,
the date when completion of construction
is antici-
pated
is not stated.
Failure oF one of the Village’s wells has caused an
immediate water supply shortage that has necessitated the
postponement
of the water facility construction project.
Village funds
for
the
proposed construction are presently
being
used For the development of
a new well and improvement
of the existing well.
Petitioner asserts that requiring the
construction of the slow sand filter at this time would impose
36—129
—2—
an unreasonable economic hardship on the Village and would
delay completion of the total water treatment improvements.
Petitioner,
therefore, requests a variance from the iron limi-
tations of Rules
203(f) and 402 of the Board’s Water Rules
until
all improvements to the water treatment system are
operational.
The Agency’s recommendation discusses several problems
with the Petitioner’s variance request.
The foremost consider-
ation is that the Agency’s grab samples
do not indicate that
the Village of Fisher
is exceeding the iron limitation of the
Board’s Water Rules.
The Agency,
therefore,
suggests that a
variance be granted for a period sufficient to allow the
Village to determine whether
it is actually exceeding the
total
iron standard.
If
it
is determined that the Village is
not exceeding this standard, then the variance should be ter-
minated.
The Agency recommends granting a six—month extension
to the variance
if testing indicates that the Village
is
exceeding the Board’s total iron standard.
The Board can find no reason that this variance should be
granted.
The only factual information available concerning
whether or not the Village of Fisher
is exceeding the iron
limitation in the discharge from its sewage treatment plant
indicates that it is not.
Three grab samples taken by the
Agency were all well below the 1.0 mg/l
total iron limitation.
The sewage treatment plant consists of
a modified activated
sludge package plant tributary
to a
five-day retention lagoon
with
a design capacity of 0.151 mgd.
The five—day retention
lagoon coupled with a discharge of 150,000 gallons per day
supports the evidence in the record of discharges of total
iron that are
low.
The Board
finds that the Village of Fisher
is not experiencing
a total iron discharge problem with its
sewage treatment plant inconsistent with Rules
203(f) and 402
and therefore does not grant the requested variance.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclu-
sions of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that the
petition for variance by the Village of Fisher
is hereby denied.
36—130
I,
Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, heç~ certify the above Opi ion and Order were
adopted on the
(S~
day of
_____________________,
1979
byavoteof
q.-ø
Christan L. Moffet~f~erk
Illinois Pollution ~~trol
Board
36—131