ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 15, 1979
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 78—232
VILLAGE OF WYANET,
Respondent.
INTERIM ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
On September 29~ 1979 the parties requested that
a Stip-
ulation and Proposal for Settlement
(Stipulation) be adopted
by the Board.
The Stipulation requires that only $337.50
(10)
of the $3375.00 penalty be payable,
in that
90
would be sus-
pended provided that Respondent complied with the terms
of the
Stipulation.
The Board has frequently and fully voiced its disapproval
of contingent or suspended penalties.
EPA v.SundaleSewerCo~,
PCB 78—88
(July 12, 1979); EPAv.
Granite City Steel,
PCB 78—233
(August
23,
1979);
EPA&
MSD
v.
International Harvester,
PCB
75—12
(August 23, 1979).
Such penalties interfere with the
Board’s duty to determine the amount and conditions
of a pen-
alty as well
as prevent
the Board from either considering
mitigating or aggravating factors upon an occurence of non-
compliance.
Such “penalties” often encourage respondents,
which often are small municipalities with limited funds,
to
enter into penalty agreements that would eventuate excessive
payments
in any and all events
in which compliance was not
achieved.
The Board does not favor these penalties regardless
of
whether they include provisions
for either judicial
or Board
review.
The practical effect of these penalties
is in essence
a cosmetic one; they
do
not effectively aid in the present or
future enforcement
of the Environmental Protection Act or the
Board’s
rules and regulations.
The Board hereby rejects
the Stipulation.
The case is
remanded
for further proceedings consistent with this Order.
IT
IS
SO ORDERED.
Dr. Satchell dissents.
36—89
—2—
I,
Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
terim Order was
Control
Board, hereby ~
,
1979 by a
adopted
on
the
J$~~f~
day
of
_______________
vote
of
~—/
.
Christan L. Moffett
Illinois Pollution Control Board
36—90