ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
February
4,
1982
MERCY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB
81-~2O6
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
Anderson):
This matter comes before the Board on the December 30,
1981
petition for variance filed by Mercy Hospital and Medical Center
(Mercy)
to allow for landfill disposal of “hazardous”
(infectious)
hospital waste.
Mercy seeks,
for itself only,
an extension
of
the variance from Rules 902 and 903 of
Chapter 9:
Special Waste
Hauling granted to
it and several other hospitals in PCB 80—218
(December 19, 1980), which record is incorporated herein.
On
January 21,
1982 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency) filed
its Recommendation that variance be granted until
May 15,
1982 as Mercy requested.
Hearing was waived and none has
been held.
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center is a 526 bed,
42 bassinet
general acute-care hospital operating on the near south side
of
the City of
Chicago.
Since PCB 80—218,
and the subsequent
adoption of final rules concerning “hazardous
(infectious)
hospital
waste”,
Mercy
has
estimated
that
it
generates
a
total
of
88.45
pounds
of
such
waste
daily,
some
of
which
is
generated
in each area of the hospital
in which patient care
is rendered.
Mercy’s chosen method of reaching long—term compliance has
been
installation
of
a solid waste heat recovery incinerator on
its own premises.
On January
17,
1981 it ordered such a system,
to cost $530,000.
However, Mercy has been informed by the vendor,
Basic Environmental Engineering Co.,
that the equipment will not
be fabricated until February,
1982,
as equipment redesign was
necessary to fit the confines of the specified location for the
incinerator.
Mercy anticipates that the incinerator will be
installed in April,
1982 and “on—line” by May
15,
1982.
Mercy accordingly seeks variance until
that time to allow
for landfill disposal
of
its waste by Ace Disposal Co.
of
Calurnet,
as has been Mercy’s custom.
45—303
2
Mercy states that it currently has no sterilization equipment
which could be used to render
its volume of waste
innocuous.
While
it implies that such equipment could he rented “or otherwise
obtained”,
it believes that to require expenditures for such
interim compliance equipment is unreasonable.
Mercy has
spent, or committed itself to spend,
in excess of
$40,000 in consultant’s fees to arrive at the incinerator choice
in January,
1981,
$7,000 for design of a hydraulic
loader in
August,
1981,
and $5,000 for chemical treatment equipment ordered
in October
8,
1981.
In light of these costs and of the $530,000
cost
of the incinerator itself;
and its expeditious pursuit of
compliance during the variance period, Mercy maintains that denial
of continued variance would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable
hardship.
The Agency agrees that Mercy has been diligent.
It further
notes that “the environmental harm resulting from the disposition
of wastes at a sanitary landfill
for the time requested
is minimal.”
The Board finds that denial of variance would impose an
arbitrary or unreasonable hardship, particularly in that the
compliance delay is the result of factors beyond Mercy~scontrol.
Variance will be conditioned, as previously,
on proper bagging
and containment of the waste, and its disposal by an authorized
landfill,
The variance will not expire until
July
1,
1982,
so
as
to allow a cushion for vendor delays or startup difficulties.
This Opinion constitites the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
1.
Petitioner, Mercy Hospital and Medical Center
(Mercy)
is
hereby granted variance from Rules
902 and 903 of Chapter
9:
Special Waste until July
1,
1982 subject to the following
conditions:
a)
Mercy shall suitably bag and/or contain its
hazardous
(infectious) hospital waste
so as
to prevent
the
spread
of
the
waste’s
infectious
agents
before
it
is
transported
to
and
disposed
of
in
an
authorized
landfill.
b)
Mercy’s hazardous hospital waste
is hereby
authorized
to
be
accepted
and
disposed
of
by
any
landfill
having all necessary permits for disposal
of such waste.
c)
Mercy shall install and employ its proposed
incineration system as expeditiously as is practicable.
2.
Within
forty—five
days
of
the date of this Order,
petitioner
shall
execute
and
forward
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency, Enforcement Programs,
2200 Churchill
Road,
45—304
3
Springfield,
Illinois
62706,
a Certificate of Acceptance and
Agreement to be bound to all terms and conditions of this
variance.
This forty—five day period shall be held in abeyance
for any period this matter
is being appealed.
The form of
certificate shall he as follows:
CERTIFICATE
I,
(We),
_____________________
____________,
having read
the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 81-206,
dated
_____________________________
____,
understand and accept
said Order realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
conditions thereto binding and enforceable,
Petitioner
By:
Auth~izedAgent
Title
Date
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member
I. Goodman abstained.
I,
Christan
L.
Moffett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control Board,
her9b,y certify th~ the
above
Opinion
and
Order
was
adopted
on
the
ij’~
day
of
_____t~,
1982 by a
vote
of
~___.
Christan
L.
Moffe
,
lerk
Illinois
Pollution
trol
~oard
45—305