ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June 5,
    1981
    OLIN CORPORATION
    (Joliet),
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    81—40
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR.
    GEORGE
    H.
    PAIN,
    ATTORNEY
    AT
    LAW,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    PETITIONER.
    MR.
    DONALD
    L.
    GIMBEL,
    ATTORNEY
    AT
    LAW,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    RESPONDENT.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    D. Satchell):
    This matter comes before the Board upon a petition for vari-
    ance filed March 12,
    1981 by Olin Corporation (Olin).
    The petition
    requests
    a variance from the total dissolved solids
    (TDS)
    effluent
    limitation of Rule 408(b)
    in connection with Outfall 001 from its
    sodium phosphate factory
    in Will County.
    On April 22, 1981 the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    recommended that
    the
    variance
    be
    granted
    with conditions.
    This recommendation was
    amended
    on
    May
    26,
    1981.
    On
    March
    23,
    1981
    Olin
    filed
    a
    motion for expedited ruling.
    This
    was
    denied
    by
    the
    Board on April 16,
    1981
    after
    an
    objection
    was
    received
    from
    Margaret
    and
    Robert
    Whitler.
    A
    public
    hearing
    was held May 22,
    1981
    in
    Joliet.
    Olin
    presented
    oral and written
    testimony and Robert Whitler made a statement objecting to the
    variance.
    On June 1, 1981 Olin again moved for expedited considera-
    tion stating that total retention pond number
    1
    (TRP 1), which is
    the source of Outfall 001, was within two and one-half inches of
    overflowing.
    The motion for expedited consideration is granted.
    Olin owns and operates
    a plant located at the junction of
    Patterson and Laraway Roads
    in Joliet Township, Will County.
    The
    plant produces industrial sodium phosphates.
    Products include
    monosodium,
    disodium and trisodiuin phosphate,
    trisodium chlorinated
    phosphates, sodium tripolyphosphate, tetrasodium pyrophosphate,
    sodium acid phosphate, sodium hexametaphosphate,
    sodium silica
    fluoride and sodium fluoride.
    Sodium phosphates are produced from
    phosphate rock using the wet acid process.
    Phosphoric acid is pro-
    duced from phosphate rock and sulfuric acid.
    This serves as raw
    material for the other processes.
    42—59

    —2—
    The plant has three water recycle loops.
    This variance
    focuses on one recycle loop which includes
    TRP
    1.
    Wastewater from
    the sodium fluoride manufacturing process is discharged to
    TPP
    1.
    Suspended solids are removed and the clarified water is returned
    to the sodium fluoride process.
    TRP
    1 has a net filling rate of
    ten gallons per minute when the sodium fluoride process is in op-
    eration, plus additions from rainfall.
    TRP
    1 water cannot be used
    as process water for operations other than the sodium fluoride
    process,
    although Olin is experimenting with such use.
    Up to
    sixty gallons per minute of
    TRP
    1 water can currently be pumped
    to the stormwater process water system and discharged to the Des
    Plaines River under existing permit conditions.
    This quantity,
    however, depends on the rate of discharge from other ponds.
    Olin discharges by Outfall 001 to the Des Plaines River pursu-
    ant to NPDES permit No. IL0002020.
    This permit includes an efflu-
    ent limitation of 3500 mg/l based on the requirements of Rule
    408(b)
    of Chapter 3:
    Water Pollution.
    Olin requires
    a variance
    from Rule 408(b)
    in order to allow it to increase the drawdown
    rate on TRP
    1 from sixty to about 250 gallons per minute for a
    period of one year.
    This should bring the water level in
    TRP
    1
    down about twenty inches to a safe level.
    The increased rate of
    drawdown will result in TDS effluent concentrations of no more
    than 7000 mg/l.
    Olin believes that once
    TRP
    1 is brought down to
    a safe level, the existing water balance system could be carefully
    managed
    and TRP
    1 water could be treated at
    a rate consistent with
    permit requirements.
    Petitioner and Agency note that the Board has proposed to
    delete the Rule 408(b) TDS effluent limitation
    (R76-2l, Proposed
    Rule, First Notice, February 19, 1981;
    5
    Iii. Reg.
    2629, March 13,
    1981).
    Evidence in that proceeding indicates that there is no
    technologically feasible method to lower TDS levels.
    The available
    methods, including reverse osmosis and distillation, require con-
    sumption of large amounts of energy and result in the production
    of brine which is difficult to dispose of in an environmentally
    sound manner.
    TDS levels in the Des Plaines River average about
    500 to 550
    mg/l with a maximum of 810 mg/i, under the 1000 mg/i water quality
    standard of Rule 203(f).
    Under low flow conditions the increase
    from 3500 to 7000 mg/i would increase levels in the receiving
    stream from 810 to 818 mg/i TDS.
    The public comment at the hearing expressed concern for water
    quality and suspended solids levels in the river.
    Olin will not be
    authorized to violate water quality standards or to violate the
    effluent standards for individual constituents other than TDS.
    42—60

    —3—
    The Agency has recommended the grant of the variance for a
    period of one year or until deletion of Rule 408(b)
    in R76-2l.
    The Agency recommended a maximum level of 7000 mg/i as an interim
    standard.
    In its amended recommendation the Agency asked that Olin
    be required to report to it every two months on results of its addi-
    tional experimentation with reuse
    as process water of TRP
    1 water
    after treatment and dilution.
    The Board will include this condi-
    tion.
    The Board finds that it would impose arbitrary or unreasonable
    hardship to require Olin to meet the Rule 408(b)
    TDS standard
    during the pendency of the proposal to delete the standard.
    The
    variance will be granted with conditions.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and con-
    clusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    Olin Corporation is granted a variance from Rule 408(b)
    of
    Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution for discharge 001 from its sodium
    phosphate facility in Will County,
    subject to the following con-
    ditions:
    1.
    This variance will expire one year from the date of this Order
    or upon the effective date of deletion of the TDS effluent
    standard from Rule 408(b)
    in R76-2l, whichever occurs
    first.
    2.
    Effluent from Outfall 001 shall not exceed 7000 mg/i total
    dissolved solids.
    3.
    Commencing June
    30, 1981 and every two months thereafter,
    Olin
    Corporation shall submit to the Illinois
    Environmental Protec-
    tion Agency a report concerning the progress of its study to
    reuse the water from
    TRP
    1 in its other production processes
    until such time as the study is concluded.
    Olin shall also
    submit a report as to the final determination of this study.
    4.
    The Agency shall modify NPDES permit No.
    1L0002020 consistent
    with the conditions of this variance.
    5.
    Within forty-five days of the date of this Order, Petitioner
    shall execute and forward to the Illinois Environmental Protec-
    tion Agency, Variance Section, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinois 62706,
    a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement to be
    bound to all terms and conditions of this variance.
    This forty--
    five day period shall be held in abeyance for any period this
    matter is being appealed.
    The form of the Certificate shall
    be as follows:
    42—61

    —4—
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We),
    _______________________________,
    having
    read
    and fully undei~standingthe Order in PCB 81-40, hereby accept
    that Order and agree to be bound by all of its terms and con-
    ditions.
    SIGNED
    __________________________
    TITLE
    ____________________________
    DATE
    ____________________________
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L. Moffett,
    Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    ~
    day ~
    ,
    1981 by a vote of ~
    a
    ~
    rk
    Illinois Polluti
    ‘Control Board
    4 2—62

    Back to top