ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January
21,
 1982
FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF DUPAGE
COUNTY,
 ILLINOIS, AN ILLINOIS
MUNICIPAL
 CORPORATION,
Complainant,
v.
 -
 PCS
 79—52
E
 &
 E
 HAULING,
 INCORPORATED,
AN
 ILLINOIS
 CORPORATION,
Respondent.
RICHARD
 A.
 MAEARSRI,
 CHAPMAN
 AND
 CUTLER,
 APPEARED
 ON
 BEHALF
 OF
COMPLAINANT;
THOMAS
 W.
 MCNAMARA,
 JENNER
 AND
 BLOCK,
 APPEARED
 ON
 BEHALF
 OF
RESPONDENT.
OPINION
 AND
 ORDER
 OF
 THE
 BOARD
 (by
 I.
 Goodman):
This
 matter
 is
 before
 the
 Board
 upon
 the
 complaint
 of
 the
Forest
 Preserve
 District
 of
 Dii
 Page
 County
 Illinois
 (District)
alleging violation of Rules 202 and 310(b) of Chapter 7:
 Solid
Waste
and
Section 21(e) of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act
 (Act)
 by E
& E Hauling Corporation
 (E & E) at the H & S
sanitary landfill located at the Mallard Lake Recreational
Preserve in Bloo.ningdale and Lane Townships,
 flu Page County,
Illinois.
 Hearing
 was
 held in this matter on September 14,
 1981.
No citizens attended the hearing and the Board
 has
 received no
public
 comment
 in
 this
 matter.
Subsequent
 to
 the
 filing
 of
 this
 action,
 the
 matter
 became
the
 subject
 of
 litigation
 before
 the
 Circuit
Court
 in
 Dii
 Page
County
 and
 the
 United
 States
 District
 Court
 for
 the
 Northern
District
 of
 Illinois,
 Eastern
 Division.
 The
 Federal
 Court
 case
had
 identical
 parties
 and
 was
 dismissed
 by
 stipulation
 between
the
 parties
 on
 July
 17,
 1981.
 The
 Circuit
 Court
 case
 was
 brought
by
 the
 People
 of
 the
 State
 of
 Illinois
 with
 the
 parties
 herein
as
 defendants
 along
 with
 the
 Illinois
 Environmental
 Protection
Agency.
 The
 Circuit
 Court
 case
 was
 settled
 by
 an
 agreed
 judgment
entered
 June
 12,
 1981
 with
 the
 Circuit
 Court
 retaining
 jurisdic-
tion
 to
 enforce
 the
 provisions
 of
 the
 judgment.
 This matter
 has
been
 continued
 generally
 by
 agreenent
 of
 the
 parties
 and
 concur-
rence
 of
 the
 Board
 during
 the
 pendency
 of
 the
 matter
 before
 the
45—85
Circuit Court
 in Du Page County.
 The parties now request bhat
~theBoard dismiss
 this
 cause with prejudice stating that the
agreed judgment entered in the case of Peo~leof the State of
Illinois v. E&EHauling,
 Incg~oratedetal., 79 Ch. 240,
 18th
Judicial
 Circuit,
 Du Page County,
 Illinois
 (July 12,
 1981) ade-
quately disposes of the matters raised
 in this proceeding before
the Board.
 In addition, the parties state that the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency has no objection to the dismissal
of this action.
Rule
 202 of Chapter
 7 and Section 21(e) of the Act prohibit
operation and disposal of waste
 in a landfill,
 without a permit
and Rule 310(b) of Chapter 7 provides that hazardous waste or
liquid waste and sludges may be accepted at a sanitary landfill
only if authorized by permit.
 The agreed
 judgment bans the
deposition of hazardous waste at the Mallard Lake landfill site
a~i’~1states a number of conditions concerning the collection and
disposition oE leachate from the site.
 Other conditions addcess
the deposit of liquid or special wastes, the installation of
monitoring wells, responsibility for perpetual maintenance of
the leachate collection and monitoring systems, the general
configuration of final cover, collection and
 flaring of landfill
gases,
 inspection and sampling requirements, and the establishment
of an environmental responsibility fund with an initial contribu-
tion of at least $230,000 and subsequent total accumulation of
$2,000,000 to be used to pay liabilities imposed by the judgment
and other statutes and regulations relating to Forest Preserve
District landfills and to be maintained in perpetuity until
otherwise ordered by the Court.
 The agreed judgment also contains
 a paragraph disclaiming any intention to relieve any party of the
necessity of complying with all federal,
 state and local laws and
requirements.
Upon review of the agreed judgment, the Board finds that
 it
is a reasonable resolution of this action and adequately protects
the environmental interests of the State of Illinois.
 The Board
shall therefore dismiss this case, Docket Number PCB 79—52, with
prejudice.
This Opinion constitutes the finding of facts and conclusions
of law of the Board
 in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that Docket
Number PCB 79-52 be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
45—86
3
I,
 Christan
 L.
 Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
was adopted on the ~ !~day of
 ~
 ~
 ,
 1982
by a vote of~O
 ____
 7/
 7)
Christan
 L. Moff~t, Clerk
Illinois Pollutron Control
 Board
45—87