ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    July g,
    1981
    CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, ET AL
    •,
    )
    )
    Complainants,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB
    80—178
    )
    GENERAL
    IRON INDUSTRIES, INC.,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    MR.
    ROBERT
    GOLDSMITH
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALf
    OF COMPLAINMT.
    tIR.
    ROBERT
    3.
    LIFTON,
    BILANDIC,
    NEISTEIN,
    RICHMM, IIAUSLINGER &
    YOUNG,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    RESPONDENT.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    I.
    Goodman):
    On
    October
    1,
    1980
    Citizens
    for
    a
    Better
    Environment
    (CBE)
    filed this complaint against General Iron Industries, Inc.
    (General
    Iron),
    alleging violations of Sections 9(a) and 9(0) of the tilinots
    Environmental Protection Act
    (Act) and Rules 102 and 502(a) of
    Chapter 2 of the Board’s regulations concerning air pollution.
    Hearing was held on May 22, 1981, at which the parties presented
    a stipulation of facts and proposal for settlement for the Boards
    consideration pursuant to Rule 331 of the Board’s Procedural Rules.
    Testimony as to the
    proposed
    settlement was heard from
    one citisen
    witness.
    The Board has received no written public comment in this
    matter.
    There are a number of legal and procedural deficiencies tn
    the proposed settlement agreement as presented to the Board.
    The
    most obvious problem
    is
    the fact that the proposed stipulation
    contains conditions referring to and
    I.e signed by five citizens
    who are
    not parties to this proceeding.
    However, on
    review
    of the
    situation presented by this case, the floard has determined that
    acceptance of the proposed settlement agreement would be the
    most
    reasonable resolution of the environmental problem presented
    theroin and that no person would be prejudiced by such acceptance.
    The Board shall, therefore, on its own
    motion, correct certain
    deficiencies and waive all of the defects contained in
    the
    proposati
    settlement and accept the settlement as the resolution of this
    matter.
    The problem here occurred, as was cited in the stipulation o~
    facts, when General Iron accumulated several large piles of oily
    machine shop turnings at its Magnolia Street facility in antici-
    pation of processing and selling them to Wisconsin Steel Company~
    43—1

    2
    Wisconsin Steel Company subsequently shut down its foundry and
    General Iron found itself unable to move the turnings out of the
    facility.
    Subsequently, due to spontaneous combustion or to other
    unknown reasons,
    the piles of oily turnings began burning and
    continued to burn notwithstanding numerous attempts by the Chicago
    Fire Department to extinguish the fires.
    General Iron thereafter
    purchased fire hoses with which
    it has continuously applied water
    to the piles of scrap
    in order to prevent and retard combustion.
    During the initial period of uncontrolled burning, certain indivi-
    duals in the area complained to CBE concerning the smoke and odor.
    The result was the instant complaint filed by CBE, apparently on
    behalf of the complaining citizens.
    In the proposed settlement agreement the parties agree
    that
    this action shall be dismissed without prejudice in consideration
    of certain future rights and duties of the parties with respect
    to the pollution problem.
    General Iron agrees to refrain from
    storing combustible oil—coated machine shop turnings
    in the
    futurt~
    and to use its best efforts to sell and remove all such turnings
    presently located at the Magnolia facility while continuing to
    apply water to the existing piles for the purpose of retarding
    combustion.
    CBE and the residents agree not to pursue this
    matter
    so long as General Iron fulfills
    its
    duties under
    the
    proposed
    stipulation and agree that no fine or other monetary payments
    need be made by General Iron in connection with
    this
    action,
    The
    rights and duties as contained in
    the
    proposed
    settlement agreenent
    are recited in considerable detail: however,
    the
    foregoing
    is
    a
    fair summary of its terms.
    The Board finds that,
    notwithstanding the
    legal and technic~i
    deficiencies in the proposed settlement
    agreement,
    the
    settlement
    agreement constitutes
    a fair and reasonable resolution
    of
    the
    problem, particularly
    considering the inadvertent nature of
    the
    source of the pollution and
    the
    likelihood that
    it
    will not recurs
    The Board will therefore accept
    the
    proposed settlement agreement
    and dismiss the action herein without prejudice, but will
    order
    the parties to execute their duties under the agreement~ To
    this
    end the Board joins all nonparties who executed
    the
    stipulation
    and the settlement agreement.
    This Opinion constitutes
    the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in
    this
    matter,
    OflDE~
    1.
    The following named persons are hereby
    joined
    as
    complaining parties to this action pursuant to Procedural ~ule
    303(c):
    Joseph
    L.
    Strumidlowskie,
    1506 N. El~tonAvenue, Chicago,
    Illinois; Anne Brennan,
    1269 W. LeMoyne Street, Chicago,
    Illinois;
    John T. Woltjen,
    1507
    N. Elston Avenue, Chicago, Illinois~
    Bonnie Foley,
    1507 N. Elston Avenue, Chicago,
    Illinois: and Sam
    Delgado,
    1524 N. Throop, Chicago,
    Illinois.
    43—8

    3
    2.
    General Iron Industries,
    Inc.,
    Citizens for a Better
    Environment,
    and the five persons named in Paragraph
    1 above shall
    execute their duties pursuant to the settlement agreement filed
    before the Board on April
    17,
    1981, which settlement agreement is
    hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
    3.
    The complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    Mr. Anderson abstained.
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control board,
    hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
    was adopt~don the
    d(
    ~
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1981 by a
    vote of
    ~frO
    .
    •)
    ~)
    (
    j/~~
    ~
    !~)~1/
    ~ChristanL.
    Moffett’,~’94~erk
    Illinois Pollution ~ot~trolBoard
    43—9

    Back to top