ILLINOIS POLLUTIOt~TCONTROL BOARD
November
19,
1981
!)ONALT) J.
HAMMAN,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 80—153
tF~LINOISENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
Respondent.
DISSENTING OPINION
(
BY J.D.
Dumelle):
Having voted with the majority in the initial Board decision
on January
8,
1981
I now dissent,
I would uphold the Agency’s
denial of the permit.
The rule at issue
Rule
316(a) (4)
requires information
on land use and population density of
the area near the proposed
landfill site.
This is not a useless rule hut was intended
to assist the Agency
in considering matters normally considered
by
a local zoning or planning commission.
Local
zoning, of
course,
has no force and effect by various court decisions.
The road to the site is, by all testimony, woefully made-
~juate. Heavy garbage trucks would undoubtedly tear it up
rendering
it impassable and indeed dangerous to other
traffic,
especially for school buses.
The majority finds
fault with the language of the Agency’s
denial and terms it an “unlawful delegation of its pernitting
authority”
(Opinion,
p.
11).
But we must
look beyond
the
words
to
the intent of the Agency.
The intent was
to not allow a
poor road to become a dangerous road to the public.
The daily danger posed
to school buses traveling a deeply
rutted road persuades me
to protect the public by upholding
the Agency permit denial.
-
Respectfully submitted,
1~
~
~
Jacob
D. Dumelle, Chairman
44—87
—2—
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control ~oard, hereby certify that the above Dissenting
Opinion was filed on the
S~’~
day
of
~
____,
1981.
Christan L. Moff~t~.,Clerk
Illinois PollutiónControl
Board
44—88