ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
June
10,
1982
BEKER
INDUSTRIES
RPRA,
)
Petitioner,
v.
PCB
80—224
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
)
AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
DISSENTING OPINION
(by D. Anderson):
On September 20, 1979, the Board entered an Order in
PCB 79-6 granting Beker Industries Corporation
(Beker)
a
variance subject to conditions which included a program for
neutralization of its cooling pond within 120 days.
Rather
than comply with these conditions, Beker filed this petition
for a variance from them some
14 months after the Order was
entered.
Beker failed to file a motion for reconsideration
objecting to any provisions of the September 20 Order.
According to analyses attached to the Agency Recommenda-
tion of May 21, 1981, water in the cooling pond has
a pH as
low as
2.7.
The water contains fluoride and heavy metals,
as well as many other pollutants.
Beker has incomplete information on the design of the
lagoon.
Agency data indicates that soils in the area are
permeable
with
high
water
tables
and are not suitable for
this
type of lagoon
(Amended Recommendation of February 8,
1982).
It is quite possible that the lagoon contents are
percolating into the ground water.
Accordingly the Board,
in its April 29, 1982 Order, required Beker to install moni-
toring wells prior to starting its new heated discharge to
the pond.
Beker has now come before the Board to request modifica-
tion of the monitoring condition, informing the Board for the
first time that it had started its new discharge
in. February,
1980.
This fact was not revealed in the December 9,
1980
petition
or
in
any subsequent
pleadings.
The
Board was thus
not given a full description of the process
as required by
Procedural Rule 401(a) (3).
~
Donald B. ~Anderson,Board Member
47-237
—2—
I, Christan
L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, do hereby cer~ifythat the above Dissenting
Opinion
was
filed
on
the
7
day of
~
,
1982.
Christan
L.
MofféW
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
47-238