ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June
    16,
    1983
    IN
    THE
    MATTER
    OF
    SULFUR DIOXIDE
    EMISSION
    )
    LIMITATIONS:
    RULE
    204
    OF
    )
    R80—22
    (Docket
    B)
    CHAPTER
    2
    )
    (Winnetka)
    INTERIM
    ORDER
    OF THE BOARD
    (by J,D,
    Duwieiie):
    The
    record in this proceeding indicates some local problems
    with smoke,
    fumes,
    or odors.
    (R,1070,
    1075,
    1089—1094,
    1102—3,
    1238-9,
    1245,)
    However, insufficient information is available to
    determine the origin of these odors,
    Furthermore, should it be
    established that they emanate from the power plant, it is unclear
    whether or not the use of Illinois high—sulfur coal aggravates or
    reduces the problem.
    Therefore,
    the Board asks that the partici-
    pants,
    especially the Petitioner and the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency)
    supply the following information.
    During the one year period prior to,
    and during the period
    of the Petitioner’s operating permit issued April
    20,
    1982
    and
    expiring on January 20,
    1983:
    1)
    How frequently and on which dates did “soot blowing”.
    i.e.
    tube cleaning, occur at the Tower Plant?
    2)
    How often and on
    which
    dates were stack tests
    conducted?
    3)
    What
    other changes
    in the plant’s daily operations
    such
    as
    an increase
    in production,
    fuel switch,
    etc~,,
    or
    malfunctions have taken place and on which
    dates?
    Could they
    have
    created
    odors?
    4)
    How
    many
    citizen
    complaints
    were
    received
    about
    the
    plant’s
    operations?
    5)
    Were
    these
    complaints
    forwarded
    to
    the
    Agency?
    The
    Board
    also asks
    that
    copies
    of
    these
    complaints,
    if
    any,
    be
    provided~
    The participants are also requested to evaluate whether the
    use of Orient
    #4 coal
    in Boiler No.
    8 significantly changes the
    plant’s operations and if so,
    to
    what extent,
    Finally,
    an
    evaluation should be made as to whether these alterations create
    or aggravate odor incidences and if so, where the odors emanate
    from,
    52~385

    2
    The Petitioner is to consider whether a reduction in
    the
    stack’s diameter by means of a partition would increase exit
    velocity. Regardless of odor causation, the cost and feasibility
    of partitioning the existing stack for single boiler operation
    shall be presented.
    The plume rise attributable to increased
    stack gas velocity using a partition shall be computed.
    Answers to these questions and
    the
    information requested
    should be provided within sixty days of this Order.
    If neces-
    sary, an additional public hearing on the same may be ordered by
    the
    Board.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, christan
    L.
    t4offett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, herebx certify that
    e above Interim Order was
    adopted on the
    J(s’
    day of_____
    _______,
    1983 by a
    vote of
    4-a
    Illinois Polluti
    Control Board

    Back to top