1. 53-13

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 14,
1983
VILLAGE OF LOMBARD,
)
Petitioner,
P03 82—152
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J~D.Dumelle):
This matter comes before the Board upon a June 27,
1983 motion
for rehearing and modification of the ~
June 16,
1983 Order,
a June
29, 1983 motion for intervention, rehearing and modification
and a July 13,
1983 motion for oral argument filed by George W.
Fyler.
The June
27 motion fails to allege any reasons for
rehearing while the June
29 motion alleges “new evidence of
continued fraud.”
Neither motion contains proof of service upon
the parties
although the June
27 motion does indicate that copies
were sent.
First,
Mr.
Fyler was an active participant in these proceedings,
hut the record does not indicate that he attempted to intervene
prior to the June 29 motion,
despite the fact that he refers to
himself as an intervenor
in his June
27 motion.
The June
29
motion for intervention is not timely as required by 35
Ill.
Adrn.
Code 103.142(a)
in that
a decision has already been reached in
this matter and to allow rehearing based upon untimely intervention
would not allow for an “expeditious hearing,”
Therefore,
intervention
is denied as are the other motions since Mr.
Fyler
has no standing
to request such relief.
Second, even
if intervention had been granted the remaining
motions would necessarily be denied in that they fail to specify
any reason for rehearing other than
the
bare allegation of fraud.
Without more, the Board could not determine whether rehearing would
be justified or even whether the Board would have jurisdiction to
hear the claims.
53-13

—2—
Third, the Board notes that its June
16 Order allowed a
construct—only permit to be issued.
Based upon a July
7,
1983
filing of
a letter from Mr. Fyler
to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, his allegations pertain,
at least in part,
to the likelihood that improvements and repairs to the Village of
Lombard’s sewer system will not remedy the overloading problems
on the Grove Combined Sewer or the Grove Storm Sewer such that
they may be removed from Restricted Status.
Such information was taken
into account in the Board’s Order which will not allow connection
to the sewer system prior to termination of Restricted Status.
Thus,
surcharging problems cannot be aggravated.
Finally, other allegations of “fraud, concealment of facts,
and falsification of data which indicates the need for a grand
jury investigation” appear not to be directed to the Board
(July
7 letter).
Therefore, all of
Mr. Fyler’s motions are hereby denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Bp~rdhereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
the
1’-f
day of ______________________,
1983 by a
vote of
Lj...-O
Illinois Pollution
trol Board
53-14

Back to top