IT

.‘

I L.

.OILJTION CONTROL

BOARD

ebruary 9,

1984

UNITY

VENTURES

Ps

sticner,

I

)

)

V.

IILINO~

P

V.1.1

P..

AGENC!

‘bf

&u1A~~t,

I

)

I

IROflCTIOI’

)

)

PCB

90—115

Pcsi

o’nt°

)

ORD3°

o~

tmBF

P

‘?

Age..ic’

tac.a&o

a

esei.flc

rczc.

~

t

is

ruc

‘ia

(a’

Os.

t’

ex’~

i’

to

L~J

Aaderson)

7

c

9-” Iccrd to teconsicer its

C.. cc ~

eq

‘he v~nance request-

-

qC

~

ec~on0.Is oppc°itionon

•

£

?~

j&•

~Y~&42

Ch’Iita

.

cr’fett,

Cler9’F

£j...jc.,,,

voltotiot

cntrol Board

V

a..

0a~,

r...

1.

~‘

a

—

—‘

t

t

‘e

o

y cne new iast.e for the Board’s

c

P

..rd

~t-~

..rcç.rooert’

relied upon the

0

‘rtaat.c.n

or

sC

it

iere

evidence thus

.,.

o toe rtatuv of proof

(Motion, ¶ 2).

I

‘

tvL

‘

a

ftUig

required by Sec. 37

zt.,,varrstsrcroducedasan

he

ida

Unity’s petition.

This

~i

-i’s

•inc

pleadings,

once

-

-

o~.d

h

ca te Board

iuat. consider.

ec

i....a ..on

i

d~niad.

-

.

a

.~.‘

C eric af tie

tliro~sPollution

j

that.

th2

above

Opinion

and

Order

•

day

_~tA.~ft.rji.

,,

1984

by

a

L...e

b—

aj

“ha

~i

t)

-

V

-

S.

—

1-~