1LLlNOL’~ IN Ri ~

PROTE rTO P

B1~PE~

~r ~

a D~lc

1 0

11.

~

~t’

0\~R0 RO ID

Ta~~er 26, 198’

ROB 82 122

P~

tabl~

)

rec’~

r~

n

~i

i

-

~?

~iIed a Joint

tot

c~ota~eof an

t ~i ~arended Time—

a ~-cc ~‘tc tiat the Board

t~

have submitted

(as

~

I c~a partial

consent

—*

i~lirois~

et aLv~ A&

i Action No~

8O~4395

e(

c enants~not~to—sue”,

era ucse in support

of

la sentence to

the

eient agreement~

~o sue -goes not

an

toi, which allega—

1l~t1

v to see that

ot find the argu—

proo~

the ~ at~.

to—s

probi

c ~rc o ra oent concern is to

o

~c

c~i i

o~ ent for the

People

of

pto ‘~ed amended

covenant~not~

~e

ouhlir

vulnerable

to undetected

c~er~ta

‘~ and, in the

Board~s

e a

expressed

by

the

ens o- 1~ 983, the

parties

La sue have

been

e v ~raental

enforcement

ALLan

IL

-

II

01 1~

11 J

tn

---

On page 4 ol ta~ 3oat

c~ ~sr 15 1983 Opinion,

it was

stated

that the Board

fOrj

t.tc copored settlement

agreement

generally

ac~ep~a

“Bows er

t

onpage

3

and s oul

a

settlerent

ajee ant

someb

it

fl0t~L3

-u~

~‘

ta

from di c

n t

-i-

ii

beyond Lu

i

i inc p

thac ~

‘~r~ ~o

~a ~

able t~ rJe~ ~ted or olei~

coatar

a

-

r

I

a d aL~

~1

~ect~.

S

1

Boaro

-

roci~ytI

s?tt

deie:iaj

parag uP

LI

Upon

50)

the

proposeS

L

and

should be

co

he Agency

a

1~a up

If e

oard

believes

~ec~’

g.blic

vulner~

a th~ arts

such

as

-ii:

~g~i~J2P~

I

he

r~nore~g~~

LI

g~ te

I.

greie t by

r~ s a

sup~l1ed)~

I-i-

naragraph

“J” of

crxn

te

unacceptable,

As a

con. say

-

tional days f o

-

they

wish to ar

I

be bound

by the

paragraph 6

or Is P a

a

ar~je,

oP

I

IL

-

-~

L)

T

I

I

t

-

I

-

be given 30

addi~

~cide whether

or not

and agreement

to

een

included as

If they decide o g toe cc

~

a e, th~Board

will look

favorably on

thelL

~j

a

a th

Lid

ale for

commencing

and completiar

t e

e~

a

r

However a~ pr

sign the

certiLi ate

in toto

and reniar

ings

-

a

do

not

wish to

1-o -~~ctthe

Stipulation

I

it

Ior further

proceed~

i

Lath

~

paragraph “J”

L

o is inappropriate

Li

t~d froa the

Li

arapl

~

includes

)

fliflt—

A

c~rti Ic,

be band by

mr

1

~ce~ ~

If

op

ficit

-

Si~i

t

1”

Accor

1

1

expedite

I

I c

-c~

c

re ‘ent to

t i~er~ ~~jfied

St’~~ulatioe

har~ been

~ (Ld~r.

0

A

0

Jn

IL

certi—

P

it

(t~ ~a

~

the

c

e~ation

and an

---

this

WOI Li

hive tha el ~r.

~.

~ mking LI e previously

proposed

settlement agret~neI nLl nd voL and would

moot

the

request for

amendiag the clR

A~I~5

~tLib e.

I Ci-ricti

oft

-

~r

the Illinois Pollution

Contr ~ Board

er y

‘

y -L~

-

e

athi e Order was adopted

on

the

f,~’~8ciy P

~

~

~ by

ote of~.

-

—~

~‘~—

r. thai

lcttett Cle II’

era °)llutlon Control