ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    April
    19,
    1984
    CITY
    OF
    OREGON,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 84—48
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
    BOARD
    (by W.
    3.
    Neqa):
    This provisional variance request comes before the Board
    upon an April
    19,
    1984 Recommendation of the Illinois Environ—
    mental Protection Agency
    (Agency).
    The Agency ‘recommends that
    a
    3-day provisional variance be granted to the City of Oregon
    (Oregon)
    from
    35
    Iii. Mm. Code 304.120(a),
    35
    Ii..
    Adm. Code
    304.141(a)
    and 35 Iii. Adm. Code 309.208 to allow a variance from
    its NDPES Permit requirements during the time that the Petitioner
    replaces a wall between the contact and reaeration tanks of its
    activated sludge process and to allow Oregon to apply liquid
    sludge
    from the aerobic digester and partially dried sludge from
    the
    sludge drying beds on nearby farmland.
    (Rec.
    1).
    The
    Petitioner owns and operates a wastewater treatment
    plant
    (WWTP)
    which has a design average flow of 0.626 million
    gallons per day
    (MCD).
    Oregon’s ~P
    provides:
    (1) primary
    settling;
    (2)
    secondary treatment
    (utilizing the contact stabil-
    ization modification of the activated sludge process);
    (3) aerobic
    sludge disgestion;
    (4)
    sludge drying, and
    (5) disinfection.
    (Rec.
    1).
    oregon
    is asking for a provisional variance to allow the de—
    watering
    of
    the contact and reaeration tanks of its activated
    sludge
    process so that a new wall can he
    installed between the
    tanks.
    (Rec.
    1).
    The Petitioner
    is proposing to allow the
    contents
    of
    these tanks to settle and then to pump the resultant
    clear
    liquid
    through the chlorination process.
    After chlorination
    occurs,
    the
    liquid will be discharged.
    The accumulated sludge
    will
    be pumped to a waste hauler and then applied to farmland by
    injection
    and plowing.
    (Rec.
    2).
    During
    the short time period that the contact and reaeration
    tanks
    are out
    of
    service, Oregon intends to treat the incoming
    raw
    sewage by:
    (1) providing primary treatment in the primary
    clarifier;
    (2)
    increasing settling
    in the primary clarifier by
    57-445

    —2—
    adding chemicals to aid settling;
    (3) providing chlorination
    before discharge;
    and
    (4) providing solids retention capacity by
    land application of the contents of the sludge drying beds and
    part of the aerobic digester contents.
    (Rec.
    2).
    Oregon believes that it will take about two days to install
    the new wall provided that no unforeseen difficulties are encoun-
    tered.
    As part of the Petitioner’s proposed plan,
    the dewatering
    of the tanks and installation of the wall will occur on a
    weekend.
    (Rec.
    2).
    During the weekend, incoming flows are
    expected
    to be reduced because there will be no flow from the
    Carnation Company’s plant which is the primary industrial contrib-
    utor to Oregon’s WWTP flows.
    (Rec.
    2).
    The Petitioner has
    stated that, before the dewatering of the tanks commences,
    all
    equipment,
    necessary parts,
    and sufficient personnel will be on
    the site to appropriately handle any contingencies that may
    arise.
    (Rec.
    2).
    Since January,
    1983,
    the Petitioner has reported the follow-
    ing levels for biochemical oxygen demand
    (BOD) and suspended
    solids
    (SS)
    on its discharge monitoring reports to the Agency:
    Month
    January,
    1983
    February, 1983
    March,
    1983
    April,
    1983
    May,
    1983
    June, 1983
    July,
    1983
    August,
    1983
    September,
    1983
    October,
    1983
    November,
    1983
    December, 1983
    January,
    1984
    ~
    1984
    Average
    Flow
    (MGI))
    0.237
    0.260
    0.243
    0.248
    0.246
    0.261
    0.274
    0.273
    0.238
    0.156
    data missing
    data missing
    data missing
    0.257
    0.249
    BOD
    (mg/i)
    14
    10
    8
    data missing
    5
    6
    4
    10
    6
    8
    data missing
    data missing
    data missing
    data missing
    7.9
    SS
    (mg/i)
    10
    12
    10
    data missing
    5
    8
    5
    10
    7
    9
    data missing
    data missing
    data missing
    7
    8.3
    The Board notes that the requisite discharge monitoring data
    is missing for the months of April,
    1983; November, 1983; December,
    1983; January,
    1984, and February, 1984.
    It is assumed that the
    Petitioner will expeditiously submit the necessary data to the
    Agency for the aforementioned months.
    Oregon plans to apply about 150,000 gallons of sludge from
    the aerobic digester and about 3,000 cubic feet of partially
    dried sludge from the sludge drying beds to the land.
    The sludge
    in question has a pH of approximately 7.8 and contains about 5
    57-446

    —3—
    organic matter.
    (Rec.
    3).
    The Agency believes that the Peti-
    tioner’s plan is practical and workable.
    Oregon’s sludge disposal
    plan is designed to dispose of the sludge while providing solids
    retention capacity during the time that the aeration tanks are
    out of service.
    (Rec.
    3).
    The Petitioner has asserted that,
    because of the high water
    conditions
    in the receiving stream during this season of the
    year,
    the environmental impact during the time period that the
    replacement work is done will be a minimal. The Agency agrees
    with the Petitioner and also indicates that there will
    he
    a
    minimal adverse impact on the environment.
    (Rec.
    3).
    The Agency believes that the provisional variance
    is appro-
    priate because it sees no alternative to bypassing and dewatering
    of the tanks since the wail must be installed
    in order for the
    treatment process to operate as designed.
    (Rec.
    3).
    Accordingly,
    the Agency believes that the denial of the provisional variance
    would impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship on the City of
    Oregon.
    Thus,
    the
    Agency
    recoramends
    that
    the
    Board
    grant
    the City of
    Oregon
    a 3—day provisional variance from Sections 304.120(a),
    304.141(a),
    and 309.208, subject to certain conditions.
    Pursuar~
    to
    Section
    35(b)
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Environmental
    Protection
    act,
    the
    Board
    hereby
    grants
    the
    provi~iional
    variance
    as
    recommended.
    This
    Opinion
    constitutes
    the
    Board’s
    findings
    of
    fact
    and
    con~
    clusions
    of
    law
    in
    this
    matter
    ORDER
    The
    City
    of
    Oregon
    is
    hereby
    granted
    a
    provisional
    variance
    from
    35
    Ill.
    Mm.
    Code
    304.120(a),
    35
    Ill.
    Mm.
    Code
    304.141(a)
    and
    35
    iii. Mm.
    Code 309.208
    to
    allow
    it
    to
    replace
    a wall
    between
    the
    contact
    and reaeration tanks
    of
    its
    activated
    sludge
    process and to allow the application of liquid sludge from
    the
    aerobic digester and partially dried sludge from the sludge
    drying beds on nearby farmland, subject to the following conditions~
    1.
    The provisional variance shall
    be
    for a period of three
    (3)
    days.
    2.
    The Petitioner
    mlst
    begin work prior to May 26,
    1984.
    3.
    The Petitioner
    shall notify James Frost of the Agency’s
    Compliance Assurance Section via telephone (Telephone
    #217/782—9720) the day before Petitioner intends to begin
    dewatering the tanks
    to allow installation of the new wall.
    57-447

    *
    4—
    4.
    The Petitioner shall pump the clear liquid from the
    tanks being dewatered to the chlorination process for disinfec
    tion prior to discharge.
    5.
    During the time period that the aeration tanks are out
    of service,
    the Petitioner shall provide primary settling
    and disinfection to the incoming raw sewage, and retention
    of captured solids from the raw sewage.
    The Petitioner
    shall operate and maintain the associated treatment units so
    as to provide the best treatment possible during this period.
    6.
    Each day that the aeration tanks are out of
    service,
    the
    Petitioner shall sample the treatment plant effluent and the
    receiving stream both upstream and downstream of the discharge
    at 10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.
    These samples shall be analyzed
    for BOD, suspended solids,
    and dissolved oxygen;
    and the
    results recorded.
    7.
    The Petitioner shall apply the liquid sludge from the
    aerobic digester and the partially dried sludge from the
    sludge beds uniformly to the 14.67 acre site indicated on
    the map submitted with the variance petition, maintaining
    necessary
    buffers
    around
    any swale areas located on the site
    and along the boundaries of the site.
    8.
    The Petitioner shall retain a minimum of 5,000 gallons
    of sludge,
    from either the aeration tanks or the aerobic
    digester,
    to be used as seed sludge to reestablish the
    secondary treatment process when the aeration tanks are put
    back into service.
    9.
    The Petitioner shall submit in writing the results of
    the tests performed on the samples collected as part of this
    variance to James Frost,
    and the dates and times that the
    work was begun and completed.
    This information shall be
    submitted within 15 days after the work is completed to the
    address below.
    10,
    Within 10 days of the date of the Board’s Order, the
    City of Oregon shall execute a Certificate of Acceptance and
    Agreement which shall be sent to:
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency, Division of Water Pollution Control,
    Compliance Assurance Section, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706.
    This certification shall have the following
    form:
    CE RTIF IC ATI ON
    I,
    (We),_________________________________,
    having read
    the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 84-48 dated
    April
    19,
    1984,
    understand and accept the said Order,
    realizing
    that such acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
    binding and enforceable.
    57-448

    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order
    was adopted on the
    ~g
    ~-
    day of
    ,
    1984 by a vote
    of
    ~
    --
    ~
    ~
    o~(
    Christan
    L.
    Moffe1~’,)~jlerk
    Illinois Pollution~ontrolBoard
    57-449

    Back to top