1. PROTECTION AGENCY

ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
January
i2,~ 1984
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
Petitioner,
v.
PCB 79~i42
CITIZENS UTILITIES
COMPANY OF
ILLINOIS,
Respondent
CONCURRING
OPINION
(by
J,
D,
~)urneII.e)
The
penalty
set
by
the
majority
in
this
case
is
far
too
low.
It
wil:L
not
deter
others
from
making
a
travesty
out
of
the
requirement
to
reasonably
maintain
and
operate
a
sewage
treatment
plant.
I
recommended
a
penalty
of
$5,000
in
this
case.
Seven
months to perform a
routine
repair
on
a
primary
tank
is
far
too
long.
And
other
repairs
wero~~.
not
done
rQmP-.kY.
/i/t
L~cob
i)
Oumelle,
P
E
/
çlhairman
I,
Christan
L.
Moffett,
~c~1erk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
hereby
certify
that
the
above
Concurring
Opinion
was
filed
on
the
~
day
of
~
,
1984,
Christan
L~.
Moffe~t~~lerk
illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
~6-
21

Back to top