ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
December 28,
1983
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
ILLINOIS
v.
)
PCB 83—223
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPANY
(Certification No.
21RA~1LL~WPC~83~35
)
Revocation of Tax
Certification,
OPINION AND ORDER
OF THE BOARD
(by B.
Forcade)
This
matter
comes
before
the
Board
upon
a
Proposal
to
Revoke
Tax Certification
adopted by the Board on
December
6,
1983.
Hearing was
held on December 2O~,
L983,
Recently
enacted
Public Act (P~A
~)
B3~0883,
which became
effective on September
9,
1983,
an~endsthe
definition of
“Pollution Control
Faci1ity~
as
contained
in Section 21a—2 of the
Illinois Revenue Act of 1939
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
Ch.
120,
par.
502a—2)
in the following manner:
“For~urjosesofassssmevitsmadeafterJanuary~1,1
983,
~po1iution
control facilitiesu shall not inc
1
ude,however,
a)
any~y~t
em ~method,
construction, device
or
app I iance
~
insta
lied
or
~perated
for
the oriria~yj~urJ~se
of
(i)
eurnmat
inq~
containin~reventi~or reducin~j
radioactive_contarni-
nantsorener~y~or (ii)
treatiniiwastewater~oduced
~_~c
c~~L2
~
large
diameter pip~sor
pin~~ysterns
used
to
remove
sj~_wa~
in~
~jene
ration of
elect
nc
power~ or
c)
apy
equ~~ç~t
~
~p.
iance~pp~urtenantthereto,
~rated
by
any
person
other
than
a
unit
of government,
whether
within
or
outside
of
the
territorial
boundaries
of
a
unit
of
local
2~vernment,
for_sewaq~
disposal
or
treatment.
~
any
nor
certification in conflict ~iiththis
arnendatory act of
198 3
before
January
1,
l984,~
55~427
2
Pursuant to this statutory directive, the Board reviewed
Pollution Contol Facility Certifications and Applications for
Certification which were referred to the Board by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
•for decertification under this
language.
At hearing, Commonwealth Edison stipulated that they
are not a unit of government and that facilities
at Zion,
Dresden,
Byron and LaSalle are nuclear fueled electric generating
facilities
(R.
47).
Further,
Commonwea:lth Edison stated that the
facility subject to this proceeding falls within the language of
Public Act 83—0883
(R.
52), while reserving its objections to
,—
~.
4-
4
.~
4
,—
..
4-
4
.—~.,
-,
,..
,-.
.-. ,~,
,~,
~
4
,~
ç
4
~.
4
~.
4
..
-,
-,,,
.~
~_
~
~_
~.
~
.-
~
~J..
~
~
~
~
..
_~~_
m
~.
~
~
~.
constitutional violations
(Commonwealth
Edison Brief,
pp.
3—10).
For
procedural
infirmities,
Commonwealth Edison claims that
the Board’s December
6,
1983,
Proposal
to
Revoke
Tax
Certification, which
it received on December
11,
1983,
left
inadequate
time to properly prepare
for
a
December 20,
1983,
hearing..
Further,
Commonwealth
Edison asserts
that the Proposals
lack
documentation regarding the Aqency~s position
on
decertification
and
reasons
for
that position.
Since
Commonwealth
Edison
admits
that these
facilities
fall within the
language of
Pub:lic Act
83—03:38,
and
is presumed
to know the law
was enacted
on
September
9,
1983,
it
is
unclear what due process
advantage would have been
gained by longer
notice or an
explanation of the Agency’s
deliberative
process.
The Board
notes that Commonwealth
Edison did
not
request that Agency
personnel be deposed nor
call them
as witnesses at hearing.
The threshold question
before the Board
is whether is should
adjudicate these constitutional
claims,
The Board considered
that question
in ~
v..
Santa Fe
Park
EnterRrises,
PCB 76—84,
September 23,
1983.
That case involved the constitutionality of
P.A.
82—654,
amending Section
25
of the Environmental Protection
Act,
Ill,
Rev.
Stat.
ch.
111½,
par.
1025.
The Board noted that
it has generally
become
a matter
of
hornbook
law that “we do not
commit
to administrative
agencies
that
power
to determine
constitutionality of legislation,~
citing Davis,
Administrative
Law Treatise,
sec..
20.04,
and n.1, although there
is no authority in
Illinois
supporting
the
proposition that the
Board either
lacks or
holds
such
authority.
However,
the Board
held that
it
was
“persuaded
by
the
Attorney
General’s
argument that
the
Board
is
necessarily
empowered
to
consider
constitutional
issues,
and that,
~~pror
~iate
cases,
such
issues
should be
addressed
by
the
Board
in
the
interests
of
efficient adjudication
of
the
entire controversy before
it.
Given
the
constitutional underpinnings
of the
(Environmental
Protection) Act as explained below, the Board
55-428
3
finds
the general, administrative agency “no
authority”
rule inapplicable to its unique
statutory role
(as
established
in the
Environmental Protection
Act).”
(slip
op.
at
5,
emphasis
added).
The Board
does not find this
to he an
appropriate case for
adjudication by
the Board of the constitutionality
of this legis-
lative enactment.
The arguments accepted by the
Board in
Santa
Fe supporting
its
resolution
of
a constitutional
challenge
to an enactment
altering
the enforcement
mechanism
of
the
Environmental
Protection
Act
are inapplicable
here.
They do not
persuade
the
Board
that
it should enter
the
arena
of taxation law
to consider
the constitutionality of
a tax
benefit
provision of
the Revenue
Act,
The
Board therefore finds the Dresden
Sewage
Plant to fall
within
subparagraph
(c) of paragraph 502 a—2 of the
Illinois
Revenue
Act of 1939,
as amended and the subject
certification
will be
revoked.
This Opinion and Order constitutes the Board’s
findings
of
fact and
conclusions
of
law
in this matter.
ORDER
Tax
Certification No. 21RA—ILL~WPC~83-~35
issued to
Commonwealth
Edison Company
is hereby revoked.
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED.
I,
Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board, hereby certify that the ~ove
Opinion
and Order
was adopted
on the ~~~day
of
1983 by
avoteof
7—(2./
___
___
Chnistan L.
Moffett,
Cle
/
Illinois
Pollution
Conto
Board
55-429