It1LINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
April 2, 1984
INDUSTRIAL SALVAGE, INC.,
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 83—173
COUNTY BOARD OF
MARION
)
)
Respondent.
DISSF~NTING
OPINION ‘by
J. 0. Dumelle).
My reason for dissenting on the vote to deny the Motion to
Vacate
the Order lies in
the last sentence in the second paragraph
of the i~iajority ord~r.
It reads, “Since Marion did not provide an opportunity to
cross—examine by
the attorneys (and perhaps by the public)
this matter must he remanded.”
State’s Attorney Iiatoush’s motion filed March 26 states
in
Paragraph No. 3 that legal counsel for all parties had no
objection to the procedural aspects of the September 13, 1983
hearing at the County level and so stated at the Pollution
Control Board hearing on February 2, 1984. Mr. Matoush does
not give a record citation but he may be referring to p. 32
of the Feb. 2, 1984 transcript.
I feel that the above statement clears the air on the issue
of
the attorneys not cross-examining witnesses. They evidently
chose not to cross-examine and did not object to that procedure.
They have a right to do this.
The situation
in
regard to the public’s right to cross—
examine is less clear. At no point can I find a statement that
they could or could not cross-examine. The record is silent.
But, given the hotly contested nature
of
the proceeding, I feel
that someone would have objected (if in fact they were denied
cross-examination rights) or would have tried to
ask
a question.
For these reasons, I 3issent.
Respectful .y submitted,
,~ (~• ci\
5ãcob D.
Dumefle, Chai
57-349
2
I, Christan L, Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, here~y certify that
the above Dissenting Opinion
was filed on the
___________
day of
________________,
1984.
Christan L. Moffdtkj(Jflerk
In
~
Illinois Pollution Control Board
.
57-350