ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
18,
1985
IN
THE
MATTER
OF:
)
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CLOSURE
)
AND
POST-CLOSURE CARE OF WASTE
R84-22C
DISPOSAL SITES (ECONOMIC
IMPACT
)
OF
TEMPOMRY
REGULATIONS AND
)
ADOPTION OF FINAL REGULATIONS)
)
IN THE
MATTER
OF:
)
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CLOSURE
)
AND POST-CLOSURE CARE
OF WASTE
)
R84-22D
DISPOSAL SITES
(REVISION OF
)
R84—22(B) AND
(C) REGULATIONS
)
PROPOSED RULE.
FIRST NOTICE
(R84-22C ONLY)
ORDER
OF
THE BOARD (by
3. Anderson):
By this Order the Board
is opening
two dockets, R84—22C
arid
R84—2ZDs
as
4—22C
On April
4,
1985
the Board adopted temporary regulations
under R84”~22B
prior
to receipt of an economic impact study (EcIS)
pursuant to Section 27(b) of the Act.
The Board notes that
Section 27(b)
requires
that procedures on
this docket be
completed no later
than 180 days atter
the filing of the EcIS.
The
EcIS wa8,filed by the Department of Energy and Natural
Resources (DENR)
on April
11, 1985.
The Board therefore opens
docket R84—22C
for
the purpose
of conducting economic impact
hearings
and
revising
the
temporary
regulations
as
necessary
in
response thereto, prior
to adoption of permanent rules.
Therefore,
the
Board
readopts
the
temporary regulations
under
R84—22C tot first notice pursuant
to the Administrative
Procedure
Act.
R84—22D
There
are
some remaining issues,
the merits
of which were
inadequately
addressed
in
the R84—22B proceedings and, thus, are
not
included
in
the temporary regulations.
In
the
R84—228 Opinion
of
April
4,
1985 the Board noted
three
issues
which
appeared
to
merit
further
consideration.
These
included
self—insurance
for
commercial
disposal
sites,
financial
guarantees
by units of local government, and
establishment
of
a
risk
pool
to
which
operators
could
contribute
83-529
—2—
instead of providing individual financial assurance.
The Board
also has acknowledged,
in response to the Joint Committee on
Administrative Rules
(JCAR)
the need
to explore certain areas
in
which
the
temporary rules may be ambiguous; however any proposed
corrective language must be addressed
at merit hearings.
In order not
to have these considerations, .an~development of
any new proposal cause
a delay
in the 180 day timetable
provided
in
Section
27(b)
of
the Act for R84—22C,
the Board opens docket
R84—22D.
Any rules eventually proposed
by
the
Board
in this
subdocket
could,
of course,
require DENR preparation of a
supplement
to the R84—22,
Docket B EcIS, and economic impact
hearings
concerning
the
rule8
and supplemental EcIS.
Dockets R84—22C and R84—22D, will be consolidated
for
the
purpose of hearings whenever possible.
The records
in R84—22(A)
and
(B)
are incorporated into the records
in R84—22
(C) and (D3.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
B,
Forcade dissented.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board hereby certify that the above Order was adopted on
the
/S~~-
day of
___________________,
1985 by
a vote
of
________
)‘77,
~
Dorothy, M.
Gunn, Clerk
I.linQiJ.a
Pbllution Control
Board
83-530