ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 16,
    .1985
    £4CHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    Petitioner,
    PCB 85—56
    COUNTY BOARD OF MCHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent.
    MCHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    )
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD
    OF NICHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent,
    )
    PCB 85—61
    and
    VILLAGE OF
    HUNTLEY,
    )
    Respondent—Objector.
    MCHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    )
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD OF NICHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent
    )
    PCB 85—62
    LANDFILL EMERGENCY ACTION
    )
    COMMITTEE
    )
    Respondent—Objector.
    P4CHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC~,,
    )
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD OF MCHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent,
    )
    PCB 85—63
    and
    64-79
    —2—
    NICHENRY COUNTY DEFENDERS,
    )
    Respondent-Objector.
    MCHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD OF MCHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent,
    )
    PCB 85—64
    )
    and
    ARTHUR T. MCINTOSH
    & CO.,
    )
    Respondent—Objector.
    MCHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD OF MCHENRY COUNTY,
    )
    Respondent,
    PCB 85—65
    and
    )
    VILLAGE OF LAKEWOOD,
    )
    Respondent—Objector.
    )
    MCHENRY COUNTY LANDFILL,
    INC.,
    )
    Petitioner,
    COUNTY BOARD OF MCHENRY COUNTY,
    Respondent,
    )
    PCB 85—66
    and
    HUNTLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
    )
    Respondent—Objector
    )
    64-80
    —3—
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J. Anderson):
    Transcription Costs
    The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
    in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed in
    Town of Ottawa, et al.
    v.
    IPCB,
    et al,
    ______
    Ill. App.
    3rd
    ______
    (Third District, No.
    3—84—0158)
    In that case,
    the
    Court ordered the Board to assume transcripton costs
    (Slip
    Opinion at 8—9).
    That Opinion was issued on November 30,
    1984.
    The mandate
    in Ottawa issued from the Third District on April
    15,
    1985,
    the Supreme Court having denied leave to appeal
    on
    March
    14, 1985.
    In cognizance of this ruling,
    the Board will provide for
    stenographic transcription of the proceedings in this matter.
    Cross Appeals
    On May 3,
    1985 six “cross—appeals” were
    filed by various
    persons, each bearing the docket number PCB 85—56.
    To avoid
    administrative confusion, each of these filings has been
    renumbered, and a separate docket number has been assigned
    to
    each.
    These are:
    85-61
    NIcflenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v. County Board of Mcflenry
    County, et al.
    (Village of Huntley;
    cross appeal)
    85—62
    McHenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v. County Board of McHenry
    County, et al.
    (Landfill Emergency Action Committee;
    cross
    appeal)
    85—63
    McHenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v. County Board
    of
    Mcflenry
    County, et al.
    (McHenry County Defenders;
    cross appeal)
    85-64
    McHenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v. County Board of McHenry
    County,
    et
    al.
    (Arthur T. McIntosh
    & Co.; cross
    appeal)
    85—65
    Mcflenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v.
    County Board of
    Mdflenry
    County,
    et al.
    (Village of Lakewood; cross appeal)
    85—66
    McHenry County Landfill,
    Inc.
    v.
    County Board
    of McHenry
    County,
    et
    al.
    (Huntley Fire Protection District;
    cross
    appeal)
    A motion to strike each of these filings was filed on May
    7,
    1985,
    also bearing the docket number
    85—56.
    This has also been
    renumbered to reflect the docketing change.
    The Board will make
    no disposition of the motion today,
    since no responses have been
    filed, but will schedule this matter
    for decision at
    its
    May
    30
    meeting.
    Finally,
    the Board notes that the pendancy of this motion
    should not delay the scheduling
    of hearing
    in PCB 85—56.
    Should
    64-81
    —4—
    the Board determine that the cross appeals are
    to proceed,
    they
    will be consolidated with PCB 85—56.
    IT IS
    SO ORDERED,
    3.
    Theodore Meyer dissented.
    I,
    Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board hereby certify that
    the above Order was adopted on
    the
    /&~
    day of
    _________________,
    1985 by
    a vote
    of
    ________________.
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    84-82

    Back to top