ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARL)
    September
    20,
    1985
    J~NTHE MATTER OF:
    PETITION OF
    IT? OF PANA FOR
    )
    R84-44
    SITE sPEç~~cRELIEF FROM
    IHOSPW~1~X)US13?GULATIONS
    01R)ER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    3.
    Marlin):
    On August
    1,
    1985 the City of Pana
    (Pana)
    filed
    a motion
    to
    stay
    this proceeding.
    The reason given
    is that the Illinois
    Fnvironmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    represented at the end
    of
    the hearing held in Pana,
    Illinois
    on April
    9,
    1985 that it
    would be reviewing the
    1 mg/i phosphorous effluent standard
    of
    35
    Ill. Adm.
    Code 304.123
    (Tr.
    99—105).
    The Agency filed
    its
    response
    on August
    22,
    1985 stating that
    it would conduct
    a
    review of
    the phosphorous discharge limitations and would submit
    its findings to the Board by January
    1,
    1986.
    The Board hereby denies the motion to stay for two
    reasons.
    First, the Board frowns on keeping dockets open
    for
    Long periods of
    time,
    especially when
    an alternate relief
    mechanism
    is available.
    The variance process
    is available to
    Pana.
    Second,
    the Agency
    in
    its response has not stated that
    it
    would file
    a proposal for regulatory change,
    only that
    it
    would
    submit comments.
    Even
    if
    a proposal were filed,
    such proceeding
    could
    take one to two years
    for completion.
    Furthermore,
    page
    5
    of
    the petition appears
    to ask for regulatory relief or
    alternately, regulatory relief in the
    form of a variance.
    Even
    assuming that Pana meant
    for
    its submission to stand as ~
    petition for variance,
    it
    is
    insufficient
    in
    content.
    Therefore,
    Pana must consider whether
    it
    wants
    to proceed
    with
    the site—specific proceeding on the merits of the record.
    Alternatively,
    it
    could seek to voluntarily dismiss the action
    or
    seek dismissal and pursue relief through the variance process.
    Unless Pana informs the Board of
    its intentions
    in writing within
    thirty days of the date of this Order,
    this proceeding will
    be
    subject to dismissal.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby certify that
    the a
    ye Order was adopted
    on
    the
    ~
    day of
    _____________________,
    1985 by
    a vote
    of
    __________.
    ~
    ~
    L
    -
    Dorothy
    M. ~unn, Clerk
    T1~jfl~j~
    Pollution Control Board
    65-575

    Back to top