1. 65-345
      2. 65-346
      3. 65-348

ILLtNOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
21,
1985
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PRcYrECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 85-58
)
CTY
OF
WEST FRANKFORT,
)
an Illinois municipal
)
corporation,
Respondent.
MR.
JAMES
L. MORGAN AND MRS.
SUSAN VANTREASE,
ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS
GENERAL, APPEARED ON
BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT.
MR.
DONALD R.
LUCAS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE
RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by W.
J. Nega):
This matter comes
before the Board on the May
1,
1985
Complaint brought by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency).
This
two-count
Complaint
alleged
that
the
Respondent’s
municipal
sewage
treatment
facility:
(1)
discharged
effluents
containing excessive levels of ammonia nitrogen
(as
N), five-day
biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD5), and suspended solids, and
(2) failed to properly operate and maintain its plant
or to
submit
the necessary monthly discharge monitoring reports
to the
Agency in violation of
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 302.212,
304.105,
305.102(b),
309.102(a)
and Sections
12(a),
12(b) and
12(f)
of the
Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(Act).
A hearing was held on July
16,
1985 and the parties filed a
Stipulation
and Proposal for Settlement
(Stip.) on July
31,
1985.
The City of West Frankfort
(City), which is located in
Franklin County,
owns and operates
a trickling filter wastewater
treatment plant
(WWTP) which is rated at
1.4 million gallons per
day.
The WWTP provides tertiary treatment by an
aerated lagoon
which discharges
its effluent into the Middle Fork of
the Big
Muddy River pursuant to its NPDES Permit.
The Respondent was issued NPDES Permit No.
1L0031704 on
May 30,
1975.
This original permit was subsequently modified on
July
16,
1976 and was set to expire on December
31,
1978
65-345

-2-
(modified permit).
Although
a timely application for renewal of
the modified permit was submitted by the Respondent,
“the permit
could not
be renewed under Section 301(1)
of the Clean Water Act
of
1977,
33 U.S.C. Section 1311(1)”.
(Stip.
2).
Accordingly,
the Respondent’s NPDES Permit was later reissued on April
4,
1983
(reissued permit).
The modified permit that was issued to the Respondent
established effluent limitations on the WWTP’s effluent
of 10
~niiligramsper liter
(mg/i) for BOD5 as
a monthly average and
12
mg/i for suspended solids
as
a montFily average.
Additionally,
this modified permit provided that the concentration of ammonia
nitrogen
(as N)
in the WWTP’s effluent be limited in order to
prevent the waters
of the Middle Fork of the Big Muddy River from
exceeding the standards established in Rule 203(f)
of the Board’s
Water Pollution Regulations
(and later
35 Ill,
Adm. Code
302.212).
(Stip.
3).
The
Board entered an Opinion and Order on December
16,
1982
in PCB 82-117, City of West Frankfort v.
IEPA which granted the
City of West Frankfort
a variance until September
1,
1983 from
the ammonia nitrogen limitations
of
35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.212 and
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 304.301 as well as from the BOD5
and total
suspended solids effluent limitations
of
35 Ill. Adm, Code
304.120(c).
The variance that was
granted in PCB 82-117 provided
that the effluent discharged by the City’s WWTP would not exceed,
as
a
monthly
average,
20
mg/i
for
BOD5,
25
mg/i
for
suspended
solids,
and
15
mg/i
for
ammonia
nitrogen.
These standards were
incorporated
into
the
City’s
reissued
permit
as
interim
conditions.
(Stip.
3).
However, the final conditions in the~reissued permit set
stricter
limits
of
10
mg/i
for
BOD5
as
a
monthly
average
and
12
mg/i
for
suspended
solids
as
a
monthly
average.
Moreover,
the
final
conditions
in
the reissued permit mandated that the WWTP’s
effluent contain less
than 1.5 mg/i of ammonia nitrogen during
the time period from April through October and required less than
4.0 mg/i of ammonia nitrogen during the time period from November
through
March
when
the
downstream
daily
maximum
ammonia
nitrogen
concentration
of
the Middle Fork of the Big Muddy River exceeded
the levels delineated in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 302.212.
The City has admitted that, on certain specified dates
between
September
29,
1978
and
March
26,
1981,
it discharged
effluent from its WWTP which caused the waters
of
the Middle Fork
of the Big Muddy River
in the immediate vicinity of its facility
to contain concentrations of ammonia nitrogen
(as
N) which
exceeded the limits set forth in Rule 203(f) of the Board’s Water
Pollution Regulations
(now
35 Iii.
Adm, Code 302.208)
and in the
Respondent’s modified permit,
(Stip.
4).
The City has also admitted that,
on five specified dates
between September 2~1983 and September
28,
1983,
it discharged
effluent from its WWTP which exceeded the applicable limits for
65-346

—3—
ammonia nitrogen in violation of the interim conditions
of the
reissued permit, thereby causing the waters
of the Middle Fork of
the Big Muddy Creek to contain concentrations of ammonia nitrogen
above the limits prescribed
in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 302.212.
(Stip.
4—5)
Additionally, the City has admitted that, during various
specified months between July,
1981 and June, 1984,
it discharged
effluent containing concentrations of BOD5 and suspended solids
which
exceeded
the
monthly
average
limits
allowed
in its NPDES
Permits,
its
variance
in
PCB
82—117,
or
35
Ill.
Adm. Code 304.120
(Stip.
5—6).
Furthermore,
the
Respondent
has
admitted
that
it:
(1)
failed
to
submit
the requisite monthly discharge monitoring
reports
to the Agency as required by
its modified permit for the
months
of May,
1980,
June,
1980,
and July,
1980,
and
(2)
intermittently failed to properly operate and maintain
its
WWTP.
(Stip.
6).
In reference to the proper maintenance and operation
procedures
at the WWTP, Agency inspections have revealed that:
(1)
the
automatic
bypass
sluice
gate
had
to
be
manually
operated
and
the
comminutor,
flow
meters,
and
one
of
the
lagoon
aerators
were not working on September
27,
1978
and
September
29,
1978;
(2) “the automatic bypass sluice gate still had to be manually
operated and the comminutor and flow meters were still not
repaired” on July 11,
1979 and August
8,
1980;
and
(3)
the flow
meters were still not operational on March
21,
1984.
(Stip.
6).
The proposed settlement agreement provides that the
Respondent admits the violations alleged in the Complaint and
agrees
to:
(1)
cease
and
desist,
from
further
violations;
(2)
upgrade
the
plant
and
prevent
any
further
violations
by
cleaning
the
existing
effluent
polishing
lagoon;
conducting
the
appropriate
fecal
coliform
testing;
and
returning
the
facility
to
proper
operation,
and
(3)
pay
a
stipulated
penalty
of
$1,500.00,
(Stip.
7).
In
evaluating
this
enforcement
action
and
proposed
settlement
agreement,
the
Board
has
taken
into
consideration
all
the
facts
and
circumstances
in
light
of
the
specific
criteria
delineated
in
Section
33(c)
of
the
Act
and
finds
the
settlement
agreement
acceptable
under
35
Ill.
Adm,
Code
103.180.
The
Board
finds
that
the
Respondent,
the
City
of
West
Frankfort,
has.violated
various
specified
conditions
set
forth
in
its
modified
and
reissued
NPDES
Permits
as
well
as
in
its
variance
in
PCB
82-117
and
has
therefore
violated
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
302.212,
304.105,
305.102(b),
309.102(a)
and
Sections
12(a),
12(b),
and
12(f)
of
the
Act.
The
Respondent
will
be
ordered
to
cease
and
desist
from
further
violations;
follow
the
agreed-upon
compliance
plan;
and
pay
a
stipulated
penalty
of
$1,500.00.
65-347

-4-
Thi.s
Opinion
constitutes
the
Board’s
findings ol
i;icl:
and
~~)nctuS
ions
of
law
in
this
matter.
OR DER
It
is
the Order
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Boacd
1..
The
Respondent,
the
City
of
West
Frankfort,
has
vIolatL(~d
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
302.212,
304.105,
305.
L02(a)
and
Sections
12(a),
12(b), and 12(f) of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act.
2.
The Respondent
shall cease and desist from
al.1
Further
violations.
3.
The Respondent
shall take the following actions
in order
to upgrade its wastewater treatment plant and to
prevent any further violations
of the Act or
applicabic”
Board regulations:
(a)
The City has returned its wastewater treatment
plant to proper operation and shall continue to
properly operate the plant;
and
(b)
The City has cleaned the existing effluent
polishing lagoon and shall continue
to properly
maintain
it; and
(c)
The City shall comply with the provisions
of its
NPDES Permit and applicable Board rules
and
regulations regarding fecal coliform testing
and
effluent limitations.
4.
Within
45 days
of the date of this Order,
the Respondent
shall,
by
certified
check
or
money
order
payable
to
the
State
of
Illinois,
pay
the
stipulated
penalty
of
$1,500.00
which
is
to
be
sent
to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal
Services
Division
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois
62706
5.
The Respondent
shall comply with all the terms
and
conditions
of the Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement filed on July
31,
1985, which is incorporated
by
reference
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED.
65-348

—5—
I,
Dorothy
M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board hereby cQrtify that the above~Opinionand Order was adopted
on the
________
_______
day of ______________________, 1985 by
a
vote of
2-c)
.
Dorothy M. G~nn,Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
65-349

Back to top