1. 67-375
      2. 67-376
      3. 67-378

ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
January 9,
1986
FEDDERS—USA,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 83—47
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
MR. JEFFERY FORT AND M. MS. THERESE YASDICK, MARTIN, CRAIG,
CHESTER
& SONNENSCHEIN APPEARED FOR PETITIONER;
MR. WILLIAM INGERSOLL AND
MS.
SUSAN SCHNEIDER, APPEARED FOR
RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.D.
Dumelle):
This matter comes before the Board
upon an April
11, 1985
Second Amended Petition for Variance filed
on behalf
of Fedders—
USA.
Fedders
seeks variance from 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 215.204(h)
which limits the amount of volatile organic material
(VOM)
delivered
to the coating applicator
for Large Appliance Coating
to
2.8
lbs./gal.
Fedders requests that the variance
run from
October
1,
1962
to April
1, 1986.
(Second Amend. Pet.
p.
1).
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency) filed
its
recommendation
on May 20,
1985,
advising that the variance
be
denied.
Hearing was held
on August
28,
1985 and briefs were
filed
by Fedders
and the Agency on October
16
and December
3,
1985,
respectively.
Fedders
operates
a plant
in Effingham,
Illinois which
contains 1.1 million square feet of floor
space
and employs
approximately 700 people
in the production
of room air
conditioners.
A portion
of the external metal parts used
in
constructing
the air conditioners
are painted
in
a flow coater
operation
in which the part
to be painted
is
flooded with paint
from nozzles
on all
sides and then transported
to
a vapor
chamber.
In the vapor chamber,
excess paint
is collected and
recirculated
to
the
flow coater and the solvent vapors are
exhausted
to the atmosphere.
After
leaving
the vapor chamber,
the parts enter
a bake oven
in which any remaining solvent
is
flashed—off.
The parts remain
in the bake oven for approximately
fifteen minutes
at 375 degrees Fahrenheit.
(Second Amend.
Pet.
p.
2).
The flow coat operation applies
a
0.6 mu
layer
of acrylic
epoxy paint
to the parts
in
a single pass.
The paint utilized
67-375

—2—
contains 4.669 lbs./gal.
of VOM.
Id.
However,
the paint must
be
diluted with
a
solvent
in
a
ratio
of four parts paint
to one part
solvent
in order
to be used
in the flow coater.
This solvent
contains 7.424 lbs./gal.
of VOM.
Additional solvent must be
added
to the paint upon recirculation
to maintain the
4
to
1
ratio.
Based on
1984 production figures, Fedders used 54,419
gallons of paint and solvent containing
a total
of 352, 703 lbs.
of VOM giving
a VOM content per gallon of 6.48 lbs.
(Second
Amend. Pet.
pp.
2—3).
Fedders
seeks variance from
35
Ill.
Adm. Code 215.204(h)
to
allow the VOM content
of
its paint delivered
to the coating
applicator
to exceed
the 2.8
lbs./gal.
standard and requests that
if the variance
is granted,
it be given retroactive effect and
ruci from October
1, 1982
to April
1, 1986.
The
issue before
the
Board
is whether denying the requested variance would
impose an
arbitrary and unreasonable hardship on Fedders by requiring
it
to
comply with the 2.8 lbs./gal.
standard.
For the following
reasons,
the Board finds that denying Fedders variance from
35
Ill. Mm.
Code 215.204(h)
constitutes
an arbitrary and
unreasonable hardship.
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
Fedders plant
is located
in Effingham County which
is an
attainment area for ozone.
CR.
44,
97).
There were no monitored
violations of the Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone during
1984.
(Rec.
p.
4).
Fedders and the Agency disagree on the
extent
the emissions from Fedders’ plant exceeds
its allowable
emissions.
The disagreement centers on whether the allowable
emissions should
be calculated using
a volumetric approach
or
a
solids approach.
The parties assert that
if the allowable
emissions are
calculated using
a solids approach,
then the excess
emissions are approximately 154 tons/yr.
(Rec.
p.
4).
In
contrast,
if
the allowable emissions are calculated using
a
volumetric basis,
then the excess emissions are approximately 40
tons/yr.
(Pet.
Brief p.
ii).
The
40 tons/yr.
of
excess
emissions are predicated upon Fedders substituting a water—based
glue
in its glue booth
operations and shutting down its degreaser
used on internal sheet metal parts.
Id.
At this time,
the Board
notes
that it
is
not specifying that either method
for
calculating
the allowable emissions
is correct.
Notwithstanding
this disagreement,
the Agency admits that Fedders’ excess VOM
emissions are not likely
to cause
an exceedance
of
the ambient
air quality standard for ozone
in the Effingharn area.
(Agency
Brief p.
4).
Also,
the Board notes that Fedders’ emissions will
have very little
impact on the ambient air quality in other areas
because of distance.
Therefore,
the Board finds that the
environmental impact
of
granting Fedders variance will
be
minimal.
67-376

—3—
HARDSHIP
Over
the
past
ten years, Fedders asserts
that
it has
experienced
a series
of economic setbacks
resulting in aggregate
losses
of over $162 million.
Fedders also contends that over the
last few years
it has closed or sold several of
its facilities
and consolidated its manufacturing operations into three
facilities located
in Effingham, Illinois; Buffalo, New York,
and
Frederick, Maryland.
(R. 149).
Compliance with 35
Ill.
Adrn.
Code 215.204(h) will require the installation of
a new paint
system ranging
in price from $0.9 to $1.4 million which,
because
of severe capital restraints, Fedders asserts it cannot afford.
(R.
50).
Fedders claims
it has been exploring various solutions
to the paint problem the most promising
of which
is changing
to
a
water—based paint.
Fedders contends that
it has contacted several paint
companies who expressed
confidence at one time or another
that
they could develop
a paint
that would comply with Illinois
regulations.
(R.
51).
Several trial
runs were conducted
at
Fedders’ plant by the paint companies,
none of which produced
an
acceptable product.
Id.
However,
one paint company, Man—Gil
Chemical Co.,
is close
to developing
a water—based paint which
would allow Fedders
to meet the requirements
of the Board’s
regulations
and
at the same time produce
a satisfactory
product.
(Second Amend. Pet.
p.
6).
Fedders claims that based
on the foregoing,
it has demonstrated diligence in seeking
a
compliance coating.
Id.
The Agency agrees with Fedders’ assertions but cautions that
Man—Gil’s confidence that
it can develop a compliance water—based
paint may be unfounded at
this time.
(Agency Brief p.
7).
The
Agency contends that compliance
by installing
a new paint system
is not necessarily an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship but
is
only more expensive than delaying until
such time
a compliance
water—based paint
can be developed.
The Agency also asserts that
Fedders has not proposed anything which
it will do to attain
compliance,
rather, Fedders merely offers
to report on
its
progress
to secure a compliance coating.
(Rec.
p.
5).
Therefore,
the Agency requests that
the variance
be denied.
The Board finds
that Fedders has demonstrated diligence in
seeking
a compliance coating and that immediate compliance with
35
Ill. Adm. Code 215.204(h)
requiring the installation of
a new
paint system would
be financially unattainable
for Fedders at
this time.
Furthermore,
since
the environmental impact of
Fedders emissions will
be minimal,
the Board finds that denying
Fedders’ variance from 35
Ill. Mm.
Code 215.204(h) constitutes
an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship and will grant
the
variance with the requested retroactive effect.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of
law
in this matter.
67-377

—4—
ORDER
Fedders—USA located
in Effingham,
Illinois
is hereby granted
variance
froni 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 215.204(h),
subject to the
following conditions:
1.
The variance period will
run from October
1, 1982
to April
1,
1986.
2.
Fedders—USA shall
cease using
a solvent based glue
in
its
glue booth operation.
3.
Fedders—USA shall shut down its degreaser used
on internal
sheet metal
parts.
4.
The volatile organic material content of
the paint and
solvent mixture delivered
to the flow—coater
on the Epon
paint
lines shall
not exceed 6.48 lbs./gal.
5.
within 45 days
of the date
of this Order, Fedders—USA shall
execute and send
to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Air Pollution Control
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield,
IL.
62706
a certification
of acceptance of
this variance
by which
it
agrees
to be bound
by its terms and
conditions.
6.
This
45 day period will
be held
in abeyance for any period
during which
this matter
is being appealed.
The form of the
certification
shall
be
as
follows:
67-378

—5—
CERTI FICATION
Fedders—USA hereby accepts and agrees
to be bound
by all
terms
and conditions
of the Order
of
the Illinois Pollution
Control Board
in PCB 83—47,
dated January
9,
1986.
Fedders—USA
By: Authorized Agent
Title
Date
IT
IS
SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certif~that
the above~Qpinionand Order was
adopted
on the
_____________
day
of
___________,
1986 by
a vote
of
_____________.
(1/
TT~
~
~
/
Dorothy
M.
c~unn,Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
67-379

Back to top