ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July 11, 1985
    CITY OF DIXON,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 85—103
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by S~.J.Nega):
    This provisional variance request comes before the Board
    upon
    a July ii, 1985 Recommendation of
    the
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency (Agency).
    The Agency recommends that a 20—day
    provisional variance be granted
    to
    the City of Dixon
    (Dixon)
    from
    35
    Ill. Adm. Code 304.141(a)
    to allow necessary repairs and
    modifications
    to
    its wastewater treatment facility’s chlorine
    contact tank and chlorination system.
    (Rec.
    1).
    The City of Dixon owns and operates
    a wastewater treatment
    facility
    (WWTP)
    which has a design average flow of
    3.4 million
    gallons per day (MGD)
    and consists of raw sewage pumps,
    comrninutors, primary sedimentation, aeration tanks, grit removal,
    final
    sedimentation, disinfection, anaerobic sludge digestion,
    sludge storage,
    and sludge drying beds.
    (Rec.
    1).
    The
    Petitioner’s WWTP discharges
    its effluent to the Rock River
    pursuant
    to its NPDES Permit No.
    IL 0026450.
    The Petitioner’s NPDES Permit provides’ that the city’s
    wastewater treatment
    facilities must meet final effluent limits
    (or
    its main outfall 001 and
    is required
    to meet effluent limits
    of
    20 mg/i for biochemical oxygen demand
    (BOD);
    25 mg/l for
    total
    suspended solids
    (TSS),
    and a fecal coliform standard
    of 400/100
    ml.
    (Rec.
    1).
    During
    the past year, the Petitioner’s discharge monitoring
    reports
    to the Agency pertaining
    to fecal coliform and chlorine
    residual
    in its effluent have indicated the following
    concentrations:
    Month
    Flow (Ms))
    Chlorine Residual
    (rio/i)
    Feca.
    Coliform (#100 ml)
    May, 1985
    3.101
    0.35
    14
    april, 1985
    3.197
    0.25
    278
    March, 1985
    4.373
    0.20
    3,000
    February, 1985
    3.156
    0.30
    142
    65-79

    —2—
    Month
    Flow (MQ))
    Chlorine Residual (mg/i)
    Fecal Coliform (#100 ml)
    January, 1985
    4.046
    ——
    ——
    December, 1984
    3.255
    0.40
    223
    November, 1984
    3.114
    0.40
    313
    October, 1984
    3.124
    0.30
    166
    September,
    1984
    2.588
    August, 1984
    2.727
    July,
    1984
    2.918
    June, 1984
    3.164
    0.40
    7
    Average
    3.230
    0.33
    138*
    *G~metrjcMean
    (Rec.
    2)
    Although the petitioner added chlorination facilities to its
    WWTP in
    1967,
    no major
    repair
    work was done
    to these chlorination
    facilities since
    their installation.
    However,
    the Petitioner has
    indicated that,
    as an
    interim measure, some repairs were
    undertaken
    in 1984 when they became necessary.
    (Rec.
    2).
    The
    City of Dixon
    intends to discharge effluent from the final
    sedimentation tanks to the Rock River via its old outfall while
    its chlorination facilities are out of service.
    The outfall
    in
    question
    is
    a 20
    to
    30 foot long open channel which runs
    from the
    final
    sedimentation tanks
    to the Rock River.
    (Rec.
    2).
    Because
    there
    is no feasible way that chlorine can be added
    to
    the point where the Petitioner’s effluent leaves
    the
    final
    sedimentation tanks and since
    the open channel which will be
    utilized
    “does not allow for sufficient contact time before
    the
    effluent reaches the river”,
    there appears
    to be no practical
    alternative
    to discontinuing disinfection while the Petitioner’s
    chlorination facilities are out of service.
    (Rec.
    2—3).
    However,
    the Agency anticipates minimal environmental impact
    during
    the time period of
    the requested provisional variance due
    to
    the high dilution ratio of greater than 200
    to
    1
    of river
    water
    to effluent.
    Additionally, the environmental impact will
    be minimized because there are no public bathing beaches
    or
    potable water supply intakes downstream from Dixon’s discharge
    point
    to
    the Quad Cities.
    (Rec.
    3).
    The Agency has noted that the City of Dixon has applied
    for
    a standard variance
    in PCB 85—47
    for relief from the provisions
    of 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 304.120
    (deoxygenating wastes)
    until
    it
    installs new clarifiers at its WWTP, but emphasizes that the
    repair work that will be done on the Petitioner’s chlorination
    facilities
    is entirely separate and distinct from the repair work
    delineated
    in Dixon’s regular variance petition
    in PCB 85—47.
    (Rec.
    3).
    In reference
    to the
    instant provisional variance request
    in
    PCB 85—103, the City of Dixon has indicated that:
    (1)
    it has the
    necessary materials and manpower
    to expeditiously repair
    and
    restore the chlorination facilities at this time;
    (2)
    the
    chlorination facilities do not presently provide
    adequate contact
    65-80

    —3—
    time;
    (3)
    the condition of
    its chlorination facilities
    is
    becoming worse;
    and
    (4)
    if
    the requisite repair work
    is not
    promptly completed,
    the chlorination facilities may fail
    completely at a time when weather conditions might be unfavorable
    or
    when the appropriate manpower
    is unavailable, thereby
    resulting
    in the chlorination facilities being out of service for
    a longer period of
    time.
    (Rec.
    3).
    Accordingly,
    the Agency has concluded
    that compliance on
    a
    short—term basis with the requisite NPDES Permit standards would
    impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship upon the City of
    Dixon.
    Therefore,
    the Agency recommends that the Board grant
    the
    Petitioner
    a provisional variance until July 31,
    1985,
    or
    until
    the chlorination facilities are returned
    to service, whichever
    occurs
    first.
    Although the Agency was informed
    in
    a telephone
    conversation that the Petitioner began repair work on the
    chlorination facilities on July 1,
    1985,
    the Agency has
    recommended that the provisional variance shall commence
    as of
    the date of the Board’s Order
    in the present case.
    Pursuant to Section 35(b)
    of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Act,
    the Board hereby grants
    the provisional variance
    as recommended.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of
    fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The City of Dixon
    is hereby granted a provisional variance
    from 35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code 304.141(a), subject
    to the following
    conditions:
    1.
    This provisional variance shall commence on
    July
    11, 1985 and shall continue until July 31,
    1985,
    or until
    the Petitioner’s chlorination
    facilities
    are returned to service, whichever
    occurs first.
    2.
    The Petitioner
    shall contact Mr. Gary Reside of
    the
    Agency’s Compliance Assurance Unit via telephone at
    217/782—9720 when
    the chlorination facilities are
    returned
    to service.
    This telephone notification
    shall
    be followed—up within
    5 days with
    a written
    notification sent to Mr. Gary Reside at the
    following address:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Division of Water Pollution Control
    Compliance Assurance Section
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706
    Attention:
    Mr. Gary Reside
    65-81

    —4—
    3.
    Within
    10 days of
    the date of
    the Board’s Order,
    the Petitioner shall execute a Certificate of
    Acceptance
    and Agreement which shall
    be sent to Mr.
    James
    Frost of the Agency at the address specified
    in item *2
    of this Order.
    This certification shall have the following form:
    I,
    (We)
    ,
    having
    read the Order
    of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
    PCB 85-103 dated July 11,
    1985,
    understand and accept said Order,
    realizing that such acceptance renders all terms
    and conditions
    thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    i~it1e
    Date
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy
    M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby certijy that the above
    pinion and Order was
    adopted
    on the
    J/’~
    day of
    _______,
    1985 by a vote
    of
    ~
    ,~.
    Dorothy M.
    unn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    65-82

    Back to top