ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 8, 1987
VAN LEER CONTAINERS, INC.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 85—227
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
CONCURRING OPINION (by 3. Marlin):
I
am
reluctantly supporting granting this variance. The
Board has been extremely patient in allowing the container
industry additional time to comply with the VOC standards. It is
apparent that Van Leer has made substantial efforts to reach
compliance without installing afterburners. These efforts have
produced some results to date, but it is clear that the company
has a way to go if it is to reach full compliance. The basis for
the “natural oven incineration” credit is not particularly clear
and should have been elaborated on extensively at hearing. I
support the variance mainly to allow Van Leer a final chance to
attain compliance using the methods they have developed over the
past several years. It is unreasonable to force an alternate
solution when the company seems confident of success and is
making progress. If the program does not succeed, compliance
must be obtained by alternate means by the end of 1987. Any
claim of compliance which includes “natural oven incineration”
must be better supported than it was in this record.
The concerns regarding competiveness and fairness expressed
by Van Leer’s competition are serious and raise important
considerations. Illinois law, however, provides the variance
mechanism for companies which need additional time to achieve
compliance. It is apparent to me that in this situation, Van
Leer has used the variance provisions in an appropriate manner.
Hopefully, by the end of 1987 the container industry as a whole
will be in compliance and all manufacturers will be on an equal
footing regarding required VOC controls.
Jo n C. Marlin,
74-372
2
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Concurring Opinion was filed
on the
/..?~
day of
_______________,
1987.
Dorothy M./Gunn, Cleric
Illinois Pollution Cor~trol Board
74.373