1. 73-442
      2. 73-453

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 23,
1986
IN THE MATTER OF:
HAZARDOUS WASTE PROHIBITIONS
)
R 86—9,
Docket A
EMERGENCY RULE.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
J.
D.
Dumelle):
Docket R86—9 was established by Order of February 26,
1986,
to consider
the implementation of rules pursuant to Section 39(h)
of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act
(Act) which
prohibits the deposit of all hazardous wastestreams
in
a
permitted hazardous waste site commencing January
1, 1987,
Uunless specific authorization
is obtained
from the
(Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
by
the
generator
and
the
disposal
site
owner
and
operator.”
On
June
11,
1986,
the
Board
proposed rules
to implement that program.
Four days of hearings
were held
to consider
that proposal on August
13 and September
3
through
5,
1986.
Several post—hearing comments were
filed.
At hearing
the Board
raised
the possibility of proceeding
to
an emergency rulemaking prior
to adoption of final, permanent
rules.
On October
2,
1986,
the Board adopted
a proposed
emergency rule for public comment.
However, on October
6,
1986,
the Board
reconsidered that proposal and vacated
the proposed
opinion and order.
On October
9,
1986,
the
Board once again
proposed the adoption of emergency rules and opened
a new docket,
R86—9,
Docket A,
for
that purpose.
This Opinion will not restate the matters addressed
in the
earlier opinions.
Rather,
this
Opinion
will
simply
respond
to
the
comments
which
have
been
made
concerning
the
proposed
emergency
rule
since
the
October
9th
Order
as
are
noted
and
explained
in
this
Opinion.
For
a
full
understanding
of
today’s
action
it is necessary to read each of the opinions issued
in
this matter
as being cumulative.
Several comments have been received since
the Board’s
adoption of a proposed emergency rule on October
9, 1986.
In
Public Comments Nos.
9
and 9A, Petrochem Services, Inc. states
its belief that immediate removals conducted by responsible
parties under Agency supervision should be exempted
from
the
Section 39(h)
process and that the proposal only exempts those
remedial actions which are financed by USEPA or the Agency.
Petrochem alleges that more than 90
of hazardous substance
releases are cleaned
up by responsible parties under
the
direction of either USEPA or the Agency and that the
failure to
73-427

—2—
include such clean—ups in
the Section 709.202 exemptions would
cause delay,
discourage voluntary action,
and waste both
governmental and private resources.
Furthermore, Petrochem
argues that other adequate protections exist
to ensure proper
disposal of such wastes, that the exemption would
not cause any
significant increase
in the landfilling of such wastes,
and that
a public health hazard may actually be created.
In Public
Comment No.
15, on the other hand,
the Agency states that while
it
“appreciates the Board’s intentions in exempting remedial
action wastes,” it does not believe that Section 39(h)
allows
for
such exemptions.
It takes this position despite
the fact that
in
Public Comment No.
3 the Agency requested expansion of the clean-
up exemptions to cover actions pursuant
to Section 4(s)
of the
Act,
a position with which the Board agreed.
The
Board
finds that in using
the word “wastestream”
in
Section 39(h)
the legislature evidenced its intent to cover only
those
wastes
which
are
“routinely
or periodically produced.”
(See Section 709.102).
Since spills would not ordinarily meet
that definition,
it makes sense
that such wastes should
be
exempted, especially where other safeguards
exist.
The Board,
therefore, will adopt
the language proposed
by Petrochem
in
Public Comment No.
9A as new subsection
(c) with
a minor language
change.
This action
is being
taken
to ensure that a public
health hazard
is not inadvertently created through the failure to
exempt
such
remedial
actions.
The
Board
is
uncertain
as
to
whether
such a hazard would
actually arise absent this action and specifically invites
further testimony on this exemption
in Docket
B,
but the prudent
course appears
to be
to allow it on an emergency basis.
In Public Comment No.
10,
the Shell Oil Company indicates
that surface impoundments should
not be subject
to Section
39(h).
The Agency also contends that the surface impoundment
provision
is “confusing,” and Citizens
for
a Beter Environment
(CBE) argues that such an exemption
is illegal.
(See
P.
C. No.
15,
p.
6
and
P.
C. No.
16 pp.
3 and 6—7).
The Board believes
that
a surface impoundment
(or waste
pile)
which will not have
all wastes and waste residuals removed
upon closure
is
in
practical effect the same as
a landfill and should be covered by
Section 39(h).
If these material are
all removed, then there
is
little
or
no basis
to have
it apply, and
the Board continues
to
believe that
it should be exempted.
Shell
also contends that wastes which no longer exhibit the
characteristics
of hazardous waste
in Part 721. Subpart E should
not be considered hazardous
for purposes of Section 39(h).
(P.
C.
No.
10, pp. 1—2).
The
Board agrees that non—hazardous wastes
should
not be covered, but that
is the purpose of Section
729.112(b).
If the waste
is non—hazardous,
it should be
delistable,
and
if
the
generator
can
establish
its
delistability,
no other
showing need
be made.
73-428

—3—
Shell
next contends that Section 729.122(e)
should not be
limited
to the consideration of rendering a waste
non—
hazardous.
Other
cominenters have also noted this.
These
comments are, unfortunately,
based upon
an error
in the October
9,
1986 Order.
The Opinion correctly indicates the Board’s
intent that the Agency consider the option of rendering the waste
less hazardous.
The Order, however, incorrectly states that it
cannot.
The Order has been corrected.
Finally,
Shell
argues that RCRA interim status should not be
considered as a permit, citing Section 702.110.
However, that
section specifically relates to Part 705 and
is being
used out of
context here.
This question was discussed at hearing,
and the
Board believes that interim status should be considered
the
equivalent of “permitted.”
In Public Comment No.
11
the Illinois Environmental
Regulatory Group
(IERG) urges quick action on emergency rules and
urges the Board,
if necessary,
to specify that the Agency can
continue
to process applications using
existing forms.
The
Agency and Peoria Disposal have indicated that the adoption of
emergency rules would disrupt the Agency’s processing
of
applications since procedures and forms would have to be revised
and prior
actions would have
to be “called back.”
(P.
C.
No.
15,
pp.
4—5).
The Board
fails to understand why this would
be
necessary.
While the emergency rules may cause some changes
in
the Agency’s decisionmaking process, that
is for the most part an
internal matter.
To the extent that the Agency’s application
form requires information which becomes irrelevant
under
these
rules, that information can be
ignored,
and there does not appear
to be any information which the
Board
is ordering
be submitted
or
which the Board
is ordering the Agency to consider which goes
beyond the Agency’s present procedures,
so that should not cause
any problem
If such information
is needed,
it can be separately
requested.
Finally,
if there
is any impact on previous
decisions,
the magnitude of that impact will only increase the
longer
the Board waits before adopting rules.
For these reasons,
the
Board finds that the adoption of emergency rules should
not
serve
to disrupt the ongoing processing
of applications.
In Public Comment No.
12 the Steel Group contends,
among
other
things, that there
is sufficient evidence before the Board
to establish technical standards for electric arc furnace dust
(EAF dust).
The Board
agrees that there
is evidence
in the
record
to establish that EAF dust is not treatable
so as
to
render
it non—hazardous and that
it cannot at present be reused
or recycled.
However, the
Board will
not adopt such a rule at
this time for two reasons.
First,
there
is evidence that EAF
dust
should not be allowed
in
all hazardous waste landfills
in
that it
is best managed
in
a monofill
or other
landfill which
maintains
a neutral pH, and there
is considerable work being done
to develop better
technologies.
Thus,
some limitations appear
73-429

—4—
appropriate while
the Board
remains uncertain as
to exactly what
should
be
required.
No
specific
language
has
been
proposed,
and
the
Board
does
not
believe
it
has
sufficient
information
to
make
its own proposal.
Second, the
intent of these emergency rules
is
to
set forth guidance
as to how the Section 39(h) program should
be implemented
and
is not,
in general, aimed toward remedying
all
specific problems.
Such problems are less in the nature of an
emergency
and
are
best
addressed
after
full
consideration
in
Docket
B.
In Public Comment No.
13 Waste Management,
Inc.
(WMI)
reiterates
its position that residuals should not be subject to
Section 39(h)
and argues that the Board has actually proposed
disincentives
to treatment which are contrary
to the intent of.
that
section.
Such
is
not
the
Board’s
intent.
Part
of
the
basis
of
WMI’s
concern is the error
in Section 729.122(e) which was
noted
above,
and
which
is
being
corrected
in
this
Order.
The
Board
intends
that
the
Agency
can
consider
whether
it
is
economically reasonable
and
technically
feasible
to
treat
wastes
so
as
to render them less hazardous rather than non—hazardous.
Secondly,
WNI
appears to have misconstrued
the effect of Section
729.112(b).
That section
is not intended
to preclude the
landfilling
of residuals unless
the applicant demonstrates that
the waste
is delistable.
Rather,
if the waste
is delistable, the
Section 39(h) process
is circumvented.
If
it
is not delistable,
then
39(h)
will
be
applied
in
the
same
manner
as
it
is
applied
to
any
other
hazardous
waste pursuant to Section 729.110(a).
In
Public
Comment
No.
15
the
Agency
restates
its
belief
that
emergency
rules
are
not
justified
and
would
be
disruptive
of
the
ongoing application process.
These
issues have been addressed
above.
The
Agency
also
presents
comments
on
several
of
the
proposed
rules.
The
Board’s
responses
to
significant
comments
which
have
not already been addressed follow:
Section
709.106:
The
Board
has
corrected
the
format
of
this
rule
arid
has amended
the date of timely filing
to November
15,
1986,
since
the adoption of these rules has been delayed.
Both the
Agency and CBE have again asserted that the Board
lacks
this
authority.
(P.
C.
No.16, pp.
3 and 7—8).
However, the Board has
already considered
the issues regarding the Board’s authority to
set a date of timely filing which would allow
for
a determination
after
January
1,
1987,
and
has
concluded
that
it
does
have
such
authority.
Section
709.llO(b)(2):
Under
this
section
a
non—complying
discharge
to
a publicly owned
treatment works would require
approval,
but such approval would
be unlikely at best.
This
would allow
for enforcement
for
failure
to obtain approval
in
conjunction with any other
violations.
73-430

—5—
Section 709.l10(b)(4):
The Board’s rationale for exempting UIC’s
from the universe of land disposal units remains unchanged.
CBE
has also again challenged
this exemption.
(P.
C.
No.
16, pp.
3
and 7—8).
Section 709.403:
The Agency argues that this is unnecessary.
It
is simply intended for
notice purposes and will be retained.
Section 729.100(çJ:
The Agency noted
an inadvertent loophole
in
this rule which is
intended
to
apply
only
to
empty
containers.
The word
“empty”
has
been
added.
Section 729.112(a):
The Agency believes that there
is no reason
to exclude wastes listed
in 721.133 from the universe of generic
hazardous wastes.
The Agency is correct and the rule has been
amended
to add the phrase “or 721.113.”
This was inadvertently
omitted when other changes were made to
the rules.
Section 729.122:
The Board
fails
to understand how it has
shifted
any burden of proof onto the Agency from the applicant.
The Agency
is simply to consider the information the applicant
submits to
it and determine whether
the requisite showing has
been made regarding economic reasonableness and technical
feasibility.
If sufficient information
is lacking, the
authorization can be denied as an insufficient demonstration.
This
is consistent with the legislative mandate.
The Board realizes that the rule
is somewhat awkward and
that some of the concepts have been forced
under
the
heading
of
economic reasonableness when they might be better placed
in other
sections.
However, the Board anticipates restructuring this rule
in Docket B and has determined that for reasons of administrative
convenience they should
be grouped
in this manner
for purposes of
this emergency rule.
In subsection
(a)
the Board does intend
to preclude
consideration of process substitutions and waste minimization.
The Board
finds that these concepts are contrary to Section 39(h)
of the Act which specifically lists
the appropriate
considerations which deal with “end—of—the—pipe” wastes.
The
Board does not mean
to suggest that process changes resulting
in
less hazardous wastes or less waste are anything but laudable,
but rather
finds that they are not part of the Section 39(h)
process.
CBE has again expressed
its opinion that these options
must be
included
in the Section 39(h)
process.
(P.
C. No. 10,
pp.
3 and 5—6).
In subsection
(c)
the Board
in no way intends the Agency to
bar in—state disposal simply because out—of—state disposal is
less expensive,
nor
is “public
health or environment”
in Section
729.123(c)
to be construed only as
to apply
to the State of
Illinois.
However,
if there are properly run, fully permitted
73-43 1

—6—
facilities out—of—state which can be utilized
in an economically
reasonable
and
technically
feasible
manner
and
there
are
no
such
facilities
in
Illinois
other
than land disposal units, those
wastes
should
not be
allowed
to be placed
in
an Illinois land
disposal
unit.
Subsection
(d)
may require
a time—consuming process, but
this rule
is intended simply
to reflect the mandate of Section
39(h).
A generator cannot simply decide not
to conduct treatment
off—site and then demonstrate that
it is not economically
reasonable or
technically feasible
to treat it on—site, nor can
he do the reverse.
If
a viable
alternative may exist,
it must be
pursued.
Subsection
(e) was incorrectly proposed
as discussed
earlier.
Section 729.123:
Under Section 709.310 the applicant has the
burden of demonstrating the lack of economic reasonableness and
technical
feasibility.
As such,
the applicant has the difficult
task of proving
a negative.
The only burden on the Agency
is
to
determine whether
an adequate showing has been made.
If the
Agency is aware of
an actual operation which
could be used, the
authorization can be denied.
If the Agency is unaware of such
actual operation, that does not, however, mean that the
authorization must be granted.
Only if the applicant
demonstrates that there
is
no actual operation
in existence has
the technical feasibility requirement been met
(as limited by
subsection
(b)).
Further,
under subsection
(c) the Agency can
consider
information concerning pilot plants or
studies which may
indicate the future likelihood of a technically feasible
alternative.
That subsection
is admittedly somewhat vague as
to
the
meaning
of
likely and further refinement may be possible
under Docket
B.
Beside
those arguments already noted, CBE has made
additional comments, which are deserving
of further discussion.
Two general comments which appear
to demonstrate
a
misunderstanding of the Board’s position will be
first
addressed.
CBE is disturbed that the Board’s October
9,
1986,
Opinion
states that the proposed emergency rule “is likely to
remain
in substantially the same form
in the final
rules.”
All
that was meant by that statement as that the format,
not
necessarily the substance, was likely to remain similar
in the
final
rul~s.
Secondly,
CBE
apparently
believes
that
the
Board
has taken
the position that Section 39(h)
is not self—
implementing and that the Agency could
not act
in the absence of
Board rules.
While
the Board
has noted that such an
argument
could be made,
it has not found that
to be the case.
The Board
has
stated
that
the
Agency
lacks
the
authority
to
adopt
substantive
rules
under
Section
39(h)
and
continues
to
believe
that
to
be
the
true.
73-432

—7—
CBE also appears to believe that the Board has precluded the
Agency from consideration of recyclability and reuse through the
deletion of that section.
Such
is not
the case.
The Board has
simply withdrawn its proposed guidance
on that issue
in response
to CBE’s concerns regarding
the language of the earlier proposed
section.
The consideration of those issues
is expressly mandated
by Section 39(h)
and must
be considered
by the Agency.
Finally,
CBE contends that the words “as much”
should
be
deleted
from Section 729.123(b).
(P.
C. No.
16,
p.
8).
The
Board does not believe that
in so doing
it has created
a
“presumption
in
favor of land disposal,”
but
it does agree that
insofar as technical feasibility
is concerned, the “as much”
language should
be deleted.
That change has been made to the
Order.
In Public Comment No.
17
the Agency has indicated
its
opposition
to dropping the exclusion
for persons who ship waste
to a treater
or
storer who bulks
the wastes with wastes from
other generators.
The Agency has finally recognized that
dropping
this exclusion would result
in the inclusion
in the
Section 39(h)
process of generators utilizing commercial off—site
treatment, thereby greatly enlarging the universe of regulated
persons and the administrative burden on the Agency.
The Board
had earlier recognized
this problem and proposed language
including the concept that the wastestreams “ceases
to exist”
for
purposes of Section 39(h)
to avoid
this burden.
That language
caused concern regarding the possible avoidance of CERCLA
liability which was not intended.
The Board agrees with the Agency that this burden
is
unjustified and will return
to the concept employed
in
its June
11, 1986 proposal with certain modifications.
The Board has
moved
the exclusion from the definition of land disposal
unit to
the personal exclusions of Section 709.202.
The Board has also
modified
the definitions of “Wastestream” and “Original
generator”
in such
a manner that
it cannot result
in any
infringement upon the
RCRA
or CERCLA programs while avoiding the
burden of duplicative applications.
ORDER
The Board hereby adopts the following emergency rules:
TITLE
35:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE
G:
WASTE
DISPOSAL
CHAPTER
I:
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
b:
PERMITS
73-433

—8—
PART 709
WASTESTREAM AUTHORIZATIONS
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
709.100
709.102
709.103
709.104
709.105
709.106
709
.
110
Purpose, Scope and Applicability
Definitions
Deemed—issued Wastestream Authorizations
Expiration of Supplemental Permits
Severability
Deemed—Issued Wastestream Authorization Pursuant
to
35 Iii. Adm. Code 709.200
Land Disposal Unit
Section
709.301
709. 302
709.310
SUBPART
B:
PROHIBITIONS
Hazardous Waste Authorization
Liquid Hazardous Waste Authorization
Exemptions
SUBPART
D:
REVIEW OF WASTESTREAMS
Section
709. 400
709.401
709. 402
709.403
709. 404
General Standard for Issuance
Standard for Issuance for Liquid Hazardous Waste
Negative Finding
Denial of Wastestream Authorization
Time Requirements for Agency Action
SUBPART
E: CONDITIONS OF
WASTESTREAM AUTHORIZATIONS
Section
709.501
709.510
709.520
Duration
General Conditions
Authorized Methods of Disposal
SUBPART F:
MODIFICATION,
REVOCATION AND APPEAL
Section
709. 200
709.201
709.202
SUBPART C:
APPLICATIONS
General Application fe! f4qt~4dHe?ardet~eWaste
Signatures
General Hazardous Waste Application
73.434

—9—
Sec tion
709.601
Modification
709.602
Revocation
709.603
Appeal
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Sections 22.6 and 39(h)
of the
Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat. 1985,
ch.
111 1/2,
pars. 1022.6 and 1039(h))
and authorized by Section 27
of the
Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1985,
ch.
ill 1/2,
par. 1027).
SOURCE:
Emergency rule adopted
in R83—28A at 8 Ill. Reg.
12678,
effective July
5, 1984,
for
a maximum of 150 days;
adopted
in
R83—28B at
9 Ill. Reg.
730, effective January
3,
1985;
amended
in
R83—28C at 10
Ill. Reg 4875, effective March
7,
1986;
emergency
amendment adopted
in R86—9A at 10 Ill. Reg
effective
,
for
a maximum of 150
days.
NOTE:
Capitalization
is used
to
indicate that the language
quotes or paraphrases a statute.
SUBPART A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 709.100
Purpose,
Scope
and Applicability
a)
This Part provides
for
the issuance by the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
of
wastestream
authorizations
required
by
Sections
22.6
and
39(h)
of
the Environmental Protection Act (Act).
b)
This Part applies to generators of hazardous waste
as
specified
in Subpart
B.
c)
35 Ill. Mm.
Code 729 contains technical standards
which are to be used
to determine
in what manner
a
waste
can be managed.
(Source:
Emergency added at
10
Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.102
Definitions
The
following definitions e~3~
Aâm~-ee~e~29~G~
apply to
this Party
4rt e~4t4ei’~
te ~A~e?e
ew4~~e~r~rs:
“Act” means the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat. 19835,
ch.
111 1/2,
par. 1001).
73.435

—10—
“Agency” means the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency.
“Board”
means the Illinois Pollution Control
Board.
“Generator”
is as defined
in 35
Ill.
Adni.
Code 720.110.
“Hazardous Waste”
is a hazardous waste as defined at 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 721.103.
“Hazardous wastestream” means
a “wastestream” which
includes
a “hazardous waste.”
“Land disposal unit”
is as defined
in Section 709.110.
“Liquid hazardous waste”
is as defined
in 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 729.301.
“Original generator”
is
a person who generates
hazardous waste
as
a result of an activity or
production process other
than the treatment of
hazardous waste,
or who combines wastestreams for
storage or
treatment pursuant
to
a permit and
wastestream authorization.
“Residual”
is any material other
than
a gas which
remains after, or
is generated
by,
the treatment of
a
hazardous waste.
A “residual” may itself be
a
“hazardous waste.”
“Treater”
is
a person who engages
in treatment of
hazardous waste.
A “treater” may be
a “generator,”
but
not
the “original generator.”
“Treatment”
is as defined
in 35 Ill. Mm.
Code 720.110.
“Wastestream” means
a “solid waste”
as defined
in 35
Ill.
Adrn.
Code 721, which is routinely or periodically
produced
by a certain generator as a result of a
certain activity, production process or treatment
process.
The Agency may issue multiple wastestreani
authorizations for
a
single wastestream, each
identifying
a different disposer
or disposal method.
The Agency may allow the combination of wastestreams
into
a single wastestream
if such combination does not
limit the possibilities
for
treatment,
recycling or
disposal
of the wastes.
For the purpose of determining
whether
a wastestream authorization
is required, and
only for
that purpose, when wastestreams are combined,
the consitituent wastestreams cease
to exist, and
the
73.436

—11
person who combined
the wastestreams becomes the
original generator of a new wastestream.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.106
Deemed—Issued Wastestream Authorizations
Pursuant to 35 Ill. Mm. Code 709.200
a)
Wastestream authorizations shall
be deemed
issued
if
the Agency fails to act within 90 days of the filing
of
the wastestream application as required by 3. Ill. Adm.
Code 709.404.
The wastestream authorization shall be
deemed
issued
for
the same time period as
a permit
deemed
issued pursuant
to Section 39(a)
of the Act.
b)
Wastestream authorizations shall
be deemed issued under
the circumstances and
for the time periods specified
in
Section 16(b)
of the Illinois Administrative Procedure
Act
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1985,
ch. 127,
par. 1016(b)), if
a
timely and sufficient application has been filed.
Applications filed with the Agency on or before
November
15,
1986 shall
be deemed timely filed
for
the
purposes of this subsection.
C)
Upon written request by the applicant, the Agency shall
issue
a statement that a wastestream authorization has
been deemed
issued pursuant
to subsections
(1)
or
(2),
above.
Section 709.110
Land Disposal Unit
a)
As used
in
this Part,
a “land disposal
unit” means any
“hazardous waste management unit”
as defined
in 35 Ill.
Adm Code 720.110, unless that unit
is specifically
excluded
under
subsection
(b). Without limiting the
generality of this definition,
the following are
examples of land disposal units:
1)
A landfill
2)
A surface impoundment or waste pile, unless the
owner
or operator demonstrates, by way of a
closure plan pursuant
to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 724.212
or 725.212, that all wastes and waste residues
will
be removed from the unit prior
to or upon
closure
3)
A land treatment unit, unless the owner
or
operator
demonstrates, pursuant
to 35 Ill.
Adm.
73-437

—12—
Code
724.372, that
the hazardous constituents
in
the waste can be completely degraded, transformed
or
immobilized
in
the treatment zone.
b)
Specific exclusions.
The following hazardous waste
management units are not land disposal units:
1)
A storage or treatment unit,
including an
incinerator,
for which the owner or operator
demonstrates, through
a closure plan pursuant to
35 Ill.
Adm. Code
724.212 or 725.212,
that all
wastes and waste residues will be removed
from the
unit prior
to or upon closure
2)
A discharge of water from a treatment unit
to
a
publicly owned
treatment works
(POTW), provided
the discharge is in compliance with applicable
pretreatment requirements imposed by the
POTW.
3)
A discharge of water from a treatment unit
to
waters of the State, provided such discharge is
authorized by an NPDES permit issued pursuant to
Section 39(b)
of the Act and
35 Ill. Mm.
Code
309.
4)
An underground
injection well
for which
the Agency
has issued
a UIC permit pursuant
to Section 39(e)
of the Act and 35 Ill. Mm. Code
704.
(Source:
Emergency added
at 10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART B:
PROHIBITIONS
Section 709.200
Hazardous Waste Authorization
a)
Hazardous wastes. NO HAZARDOUS WASTESTREAM MAY BE
DEPOSITED
IN
ANY
PERMITTED
LAND
DISPOSAL
UNIT
OF
A
TYPE
IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION
(c)
UNLESS A WASTESTREAM
AUTHORIZATION HAS BEEN ISSUED FOR THE DEPOSIT OF THAT
WASTESTREAM
(Section 39(h)
of the Act).
b)
Residuals. No person shall engage
in the treatment of a
hazardous wastestream
and cause, threaten or allow the
deposit of any residual
from such treatment in any land
disposal
unit of
a type identified
in Subsection
(c)
unless the Agency has
issued
a wastestream
authorization for that wastestream.
c)
This Section applies
to
all land disposal
units as
defined
in Section 709.110.
73-438

—13—
(Source:
Emergency added
at 10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum
of 150 days.
Section 709.201
Liquid Hazardous Waste Authorization
a)
Liquids:
NO PERSON SHALL CAUSE,
THREATEN OR ALLOW THE
DISPOSAL IN ANY
bANBPThb
LAND DISPOSAL
UNIT
OF A TYPE
IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION
(c) OF ANY LIQUID HAZARDOUS
WASTE UNLESS THE AGENCY
HAS
ISSUED A WASTESTREAM
AUTHORIZATION FOR THAT WASTESTREAM.
(Section 22.6(a)
of the Act).
b)
Residuals:
No person shall engage
in the treatment of
a liquid hazardous waste
and cause, threaten or
allow
the disposal
in any ~ei’té?4~ land disposal unit of
a
type
identified
in subsection
(c)
of any residual from
such treatment unless the Agency has issued
a
wastestream authorization for that wastestream.
c)
This Section applies
to
all types of land disposal
units
identified
in Section 709.110, except surface
impoundments and land
treatment units.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at
10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of
150 days.
Section 709.202
Exemptions
The wastestream authorization requirement does not apply to:
a)
The Agency or
its contractors with respect
to
management of wastes generated as
a result of remedial
action pursuant
to Section 22.7 of the Act
b)
The Agency, the United States Environmental Protection
Agency or
their
contractors with respect to wastes
generated
as
a result of remedial action pursuant
to
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act
(42 U.S.C.
9601 et seq.)
and
spill
responses pursuant
to Section
4
(s)
of the Act
c)
Voluntary cleanups conducted by responsible parties and
their contractors under
the supervision or direction
the Agency,
or
the United States Environmental
Protection Agency with respect to wastes generated as
a
result
of
immediate
and
remedial
action
pursuant
to
the
Comprehensive,
Environmental
Response Compensation and
Liability_Act_(42 U.S.C.
9601
et Seq.)
and s~pill
responses in accordance with Section 703.221 and
750.401(b);
and
73-439

—14—
d)
A generator who ships wastes to
a storage or treatment
unit:
1)
Which is not located at the facility at which the
waste
is generated;
and,
2)
Of which the generator
is not the owner
or
operator; and,
3)
At which the waste
is combined with wastes from
other generators for treatment or transportation
to
a treatment
unit; and,
4)
For which the owner or operator has obtained a
RCRA permit or
interim status pursuant to
35 Ill.
Adm. Code
703;
and,
5)
For which the owner or operator has obtained
a
wastestream authorization for disposal of
residuals from treatment of the combined waste.
(Source:
Emergency added at 10 Ill. Reg.
,
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART C:
APPLICATIONS
Section 709.310
General Hazardous
Waste
Application
a)
If the applicant seeks an authorization to deposit
a
hazardous wastestream in
a permitted land disposal
unit,
the applicant must provide, by way of narrative
description and sqpporting evidence, proof that the
waste meets the
standard
of Section 709.400(a)
and 35
Ill. Adm. Code
729.110(a).
b)
If the applicant seeks
to deposit
a residual
from the
treatment of
a hazardous wastestream
in
a land disposal
unit
the applicant may provide proof that
the residual
meets one of the standards of Section 709.400(b), and
35 Ill. Adm.
Code 729.110(b), instead
of proof pursuant
to subsection
(a).
C)
The Agency may prescribe the form
in which all
information required under
this Section shall
be
submitted.
~j
All permit applications shall
be mailed
or delivered to
the appropriate address designated by the Agency,
and
shall
be
sent
by
registered
or
certified
mail,
return
receipt
requested
or
delivered
in
person.
Applications
which are hand—delivered shall be delivered to and
73.440

—15—
receipted for by the Manager of the Agency’s Division
of Land Pollution Control
or his designee.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART
D:
REVIEW OF WASTESTREAMS
Section 709.400
General Standard for Issuance
a)
THE AGENCY SHALL ISSUE A WASTESTREAM AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE DISPOSAL OF A HAZARDOUS WASTESTREAM
IN A PERMITTED
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT ONLY AFTER THE GENERATOR HAS
REASONABLY DEMONSTRATED THAT THE WASTESTREAM MEETS THE
STANDARD OF
35 ILL.
ADM. CODE 729.110(a), AND THAT LAND
DISPOSAL IS NOT PROHIBITED OR LIMITED BY BOARD
REGULATIONS.
(Section 39(h)
of the Act).
b)
Residuals.
The Agency shall
issue
a wastestream
authorization for
the disposal
of
a residual from the
treatment of hazardous waste
if the original generator
or
treater demonstrates that the residual either meets
the standard
of subsection
(a), or:
1)
Is
a residual
for which the Board has promulgated
a technical standard under 35 Ill.
Adni. Code
729;
and,
2)
Will
be managed
as provided
in
that technical
standard;
and,
3)
Meets the technical standard;
and,
4)
Is not otherwise
restricted.
(Source:
Emergency added
at 10
Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.401
Standard
for Issuance for Liquid Hazardous
Waste
a)
Liquids:
THE AGENCY SHALL ISSUE A WASTESTREAM
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE LAND DISPOSAL OF A LIQUID
HAZARDOUS WASTE ONLY AFTER THE GENERATOR HAS REASONABLY
DEMONSTRATED THAT THE WASTESTREAM MEETS THE STANDARD OF
35
ILL. ADM.
CODE 729.310(a), AND THAT LAND DISPOSAL IS
NOT
PROHIBITED OR LIMITED BY BOARD REGULATIONS.
(Section 22.6(c)
of the Act).
73-441

—16—
b)
Residuals:
The
Agency shall
issue a wastestream
authorization
for
the land disposal of the residual from
the treatment of a liquid hazardous waste
if
ei~
aMy
4?
the original generator or
treater demonstrates that the
residual either meets
the standard
of subsection
(a)
or
meets one of the standards of 35 Ill.
Adni.
Code
729.310(b), and that land disposal
is not prohibited or
limited
by Board regulations.
e.~
Ne~e4.-i~e
Fi’t~
1~or
wea~e5w~4e1’~are i~e4~era
1’tese~euewae~e
tier a ree4thiM ?ref~t+.~e
t~ree+ieieti~e~a
4.4qt~4d+~a ~etie
Wastey
~1ie
A~etiey
n~ay4~et~ea
waatee+~ree~ra ~1ie~4~et4eti~pea a
ii~4ii~ t~e~
+A’te
~
4e
iiet at~ee~te
ei’iy
et~ier
4ati4444ti’g
~p~reM~4t4eti~
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10
Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.402
Negative Finding
If, after
reviewing an application for
a wastestream
authorization, the Agency determines that the waste
is not
subject
to
the requirement to obtain a wastestream authorization,
the Agency shall, upon request by the applicant,
issue
a
wastestream authorization including such determination.
Such an
authorization shall
include such conditions as are necessary to
ensure that the person continues to be not subject
to
the
wastestream authorization requirement, and defining
the methods
of managing
the waste
so
as to
avoid
the requirement.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.403
Denial of Wastestream Authorization
If the Agency denies any wastestream authorization required by 35
Ill. Mm. Code 709.201,
the Agency shall transmit
to
the
applicant specific, detailed statements as
to the reasons the
wastestream authorization was denied.
Such statements
shall
include the
factors enumerated
in Section 39(a) (1 )—(4)
of the
Act.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
,
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.404
Time Requirements for Agency Action
a)
An application for
a wastestream authorization shall not
be deemed
filed until
the Agency has received, at the
designated
address,
all information, documents,
and
73-442

—17—
authorization in
the
form and with the content required
by this Part. However,
if the Agency fails to notify the
applicant within 30 days after
the receipt of an
application that the application
is incomplete, and of
the reasons,
the application shall
be deemed
to have
been
filed on
the date received by the Agency.
An
applicant may deem
the Agency’s notification that the
application
is incomplete
as
a denial of the wastestream
authorization for purposes of review pursuant to 35 Ill.
Mm. Code 709.603.
~j
If
the A~encyfails to take final action on
the
application within 90 days from the
filing thereof, the
applicant may deem the wastestream authorization granted
on
the 91st day after
the application was filed.
c)
Any applicant may waive the requirement that the Agency
shall
take actions within
the
time periods of this
Section.
d)
The Agency shall
send all notices of final
action by
registered
or certified mail,
return
recei~p~
requested.
Final
action
shall
be
deemed
to
have
taken
place on
the date that such notice
is mailed
for the
purposes of computing the 35 day appeal period pursuant
to Section 40(a)
of the Act.
(Source:
Emergency added
at 10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART
E:
CONDITIONS OF WASTESTREAM AUTHORIZATIONS
Section 709.501
Duration
A wastestream authorization shall
be valid
for
a period of not
~eee t~eti
etie
tier
more than
three years.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for a maximum of 150 days.
Section 709.510
General Conditions
IN GRANTING A WASTESTREAM AUTHORIZATION THE AGENCY MAY IMPOSE
SUCH CONDITIONS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE PURPOSES OF
THE ACT AND WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH BOARD REGULATIONS,
including requirements
for the periodic testing of the
wastestream
to verify that it continues to meet one of the
standards of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 7293~.
(Section 22.6(c)
and
39(h)
of the Act).
73.443

—18—
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
TITLE
35:
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
SUBTITLE G:
WASTE DISPOSAL
CHAPTER
I:
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
c: HAZARDOUS WASTE
OPERATING REQUIREMENTS
PART 729
NBThI,SI-
PROHIBITED HAZARDOUS WASTES
IN LAND DISPOSAL UNITS
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL
HAZARDOUS
WASTE
RESTRICTION
Section
729. 100
729. 101
729.102
729.110
729.111
729.112
729.122
729.123
Purpose, Scope
and Applicability
Severability
Definitions
Hazardous
Waste
Restriction
Nonhazardous
Residuals
Residuals from Generic Hazardous Waste
Economic Reasonableness
Technical Feasibility
SUBPART
B:
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
Section
729.200
729. 201
729. 202
729. 203
729. 204
729.205
729.220
729.221
729.222
729.223
729.224
729.240
729.241
729. 242
729.262
729.263
Purpose,
Scope
and Applicability
No Circumvention
Incorporations by Reference
Waste Analysis Plan
Land Treatment Demonstration
(Repealed)
Effect on Wastestream Authorizations and Supplemental
Permits (Repealed)
Definitions
Halogenated Compound——Definition
Halogenated Solvent——Definition
Halogen Content Presumption
Partition Presumption
Non—aqueous Liquid Phases which are Halogenated Solvents
Aqueous Solutions of Halogenated Compounds
Solids Containing Halogenated Compounds
Recycling Residues
Small Quantity Generators
SUBPART
C:
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES
Definitions
Waste Analysis Plan
Incorporations by Reference
Section
729. 301
729. 302
729. 303
73-444

—19—
729.310
Liquid Hazardous Waste Restriction
729.311
Prohibition of Non—hazardous Liquids in Hazardous Waste
Land~s
Disposal Units
729.312
Labpacks
729.313
Biodegradable Absorbents
729.320
Test for Liquids
729.321
Load—bearing Capacity Test
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Sections 22(g),
22.4(b),
22.6 and 39(h)
of the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1985,
ch.
111 1/2, pars.
1022(g), 1022.4(b),
1022.6 and 1039(h))
and
authorized
by Sections 22.6 and 27 of the Environmental
Protection Act
(Ill. Rev. Stat.
1985,
ch.
111 1/2,
pars.
1022.6
and 1027.
SOURCE:
Emergency rule adopted
in R83—28A at
8 Ill.
Reg. 12668,
effective July 5,
1984 for
a maximum of 150 days;
adopted in R81—
25
at
8 Iii. Reg.
24124,
effective December
4,
1984;
amended in
R83—28B at
9
Ill. Reg.
718, effective January
3,
1985;
amended
in
R83—28C at
10
Ill. Reg.
4864, effective March
7,
1986;
emergency
amendment adopted
in R86—9A at 10
Ill. Reg
effective
,
for
a maximum of 150 days.
NOTE:
Capitalization is used
to indicate that the language
quotes or paraphrases a statute.
SUBPART A:
GENERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE
RESTRICTION
Section 729.100
Purpose,
Scope and Applicability
a)
The purpose of this Part is
to prohibit the disposal of
certain hazardous wastes in ~end~4Hs
land disposal
units.
“Hazardous waste”
is as defined in 35 Ill. Mm.
Code 721.
“Land Disposal Unit”
is defined
in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 709.110.
35 Ill. Adm. Code 709 requires
wastestream authorizations
for certain wastestreams.
~+
En~eesethefw4se 4nd4ee~ed7the reqd4~ementee~th4s
Pert epp~yto
idft~s7 or ~sen4teey
nd~tH&’as
de?4ned ~n the E~w4~enmentMProteet4en ~et +Aet+
+~a~
Rev~Stat-
~9&3y e~t7~i
~2y
pa~-~~G9~ et
seq~+~
nd~4He
4ne~debeti~nen—he~ardet~send 4ieze~deuswaste
~endHs
perm4tted
under
Beet~ons~+d+ e~2~+?+e~
the
Aet-~ Bn~essetherwtse 4nd~eated7~‘~end?4H&’
4ne~1udes
auffees 4mpoundments end waste p43es
4ri wl’~tehwaste
res4dues ass expeeted to sema4n after e~esuse7and ‘and
epp~4eat4on7
eb)
The provisions of
35
Ill. Adm. Code 721.105
notwithstanding,
the ~andf4H4ng
prohibitions of this
Part apply to all persons, including small quantity
generators,
unless otherwise indicated
in this Part.
73-445

—20—
dc)
The ~endf43~4t~gprohibitions of this Part do not apply
to residues of hazardous waste
in empty containers,
or
empty liners removed
from containers,
as defined
in 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 721.107.
ed)
The provisions of this Part are intended to supplement
the requirements of
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code 722,
723,
724,
725,
807 and 809.
No provisions of those regulations
should be read as permitting
the disposal of any
hazardous waste
in any manner prohibited
under
this
Part.
fe)
The provisions of this Part are intended
to proscribe
any conduct by generators,
transporters,
treaters or
disposers of waste
which results
in placement of
a
prohibited waste
in
a 4end?434
land
disposal unit.
(Source:
Emergency amended at 10 Ill.
Reg.
,
effective
),
for
a maximum
of
150 days.
Section 729.102
Definitions
The following definitions apply to this Part, except
as modified
in
individual Subparts:
“Act” means the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1985,
ch.
111 1/2,
par.
1001 et seq.).
“Agency” means the Illinois Environmental
Protection
Agency.
“Board”
means the Illinois Pollution Control Board
“Generator”
is as defined
in 35 Ill.
Adni.
Code 720.110
“Hazardous waste”
is
a hazardous waste as defined
at
35
Ill. Adm. Code 721.103.
“Hazardous wastestream” means
a “wastestream” which
includes
a “hazardous waste.”
“Land disposal unit”
is as defined
in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
709.110.
“Liquid
hazardous
waste”
is
as
defined
in
Section
729.301.
“Original generator”
is
a person who generates
hazardous_waste
as a result of an activity or
production process other
than the treatment of
73-446

—21—
hazardous waste, or who combines wastestreams for
storage or
treatment pursuant to
a permit and
wastestream authorization.
“Residual”
is any material other
than
a gas which
remains after, or
is generated
by,
the treatment of a
hazardous waste.
A “residual” may itself be
a
“hazardous waste.”
“Treater”
is a person who engages
in treatment of
hazardous waste.
A “treater” may be a “generator”,
but
not the “original generator.”
“Treatment”
is as defined
in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 720.110.
“Wastestream” means
a
“solid waste”
as defined
in
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
721,
which
is
routinely
or
periodically
produced
by
a
certain
generator
as
a
result
of
a
certain
activity,
production
process
or
treatment
process.
The Agency may issue multiple wastestream
authorizations for
a single wastestream, each
identifying
a different disposer
or disposal method.
The
Agency
may
allow
the
combination
of
wastestreams
into
a single wastestream
if such combination does not
limit
the possibilities
for
treatment,
recycling
or
disposal
of the wastes.
For
the purpose of determining
whether
a wastestream authorization is required, and
only for
that purpose, when wastestreams are combined,
the consitituent wastestreams cease to exist, and the
person who combined the wastestreams becomes the
original generator of
a new wastestream.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.110
Hazardous Waste Restriction
a)
Except as provided
in subsection
(b), NO PERSON SHALL
DEPOSIT A HAZARDOUS WASTESTREAM IN A PERMITTED
HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL UNIT OF A TYPE IDENTIFIED
IN SUBSECTION
(c) UNLESS THE GENERATOR HAS REASONABLY
DEMONSTRATED THAT,
CONSIDERING TECHNOLOGICAL
FEASIBILITY AND ECONOMIC REASONABLENESS, THE HAZARDOUS
WASTE CANNOT BE REASONABLY RECYCLED FOR REUSE,
NOR
INCINERATED OR CHEMICALLY,
PHYSICALLY OR BIOLOGICALLY
TREATED SO AS TO NEUTRALIZE THE HAZARDOUS WASTE AND
RENDER
IT NONHAZARDOUS.
(Section 39(h)
of the Act.)
b)
Residuals. Paragraph
(a)
notwithstanding,
a person may
deposit
a residual
from the
treatment of a hazardous
waste
in
a land disposal
unit
if:
73-447

—22—
1)
The Board has adopted
technical standards at
Section 729.111 and 729.112 which are applicable
to
the waste
2)
The person will manage the waste
in
a manner
authorized
by the technical standard
3)
The
waste
meets
the
technical
standard;
and,
4)
The waste
is not otherwise restricted
or
prohibited.
c)
This Section applies
to all types of land disposal
units
identified
in
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
709.110.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.111
Nonhazardous Residuals
~person
may deposit
a residual from the treatment of
a hazardous
waste
in
a land disposal unit if the person demonstrates that the
residual
is not
a hazardous waste.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.112
Residuals from Generic Hazardous Waste
a)
This Section applies
to residuals from
the treatment of
generic hazardous waste.
1)
A “generic hazardous waste”
is
a hazardous waste
which
is listed
in
35 Ill. Adm. Code 721.131
or
721.132
or 721.133.
2)
To conduct “treatment”
of hazardous waste,
a
person must have
a RCRA permit or
interim status
pursuant
to 35 Ill.
Adni.
Code
703, except insofar
as treatment without
a permit
is authorized
by 35
Ill. Mm. Code
702—726.
b)
A person may deposit a residual
from the treatment of
a
generic
hazardous waste
in
a land disposal unit
if the
person demonstrates that the waste could be delisted
pursuant
to
35 Ill.
Adni.
Code 720.122.
(Source:
Emergency added
at 10 Ill.
Req.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
73-448

—23—
Section 729.122
Economic Reasonableness
In
making
an
ERTF
determination
the
Agency
shall
consider
all
facts
and
circumstances
bearing
upon
the
economic
reasonableness
of recycling,
reusing, incinerating, or chemically, physically or
biologically neutralizing
the hazardous waste
and
rendering
it
non—hazardous.
In this regard,
the Agency:
a)
Shall
not
consider
process
substitutions
or
waste
minimization
b)
Shall
not consider
the profitability of the
generator.
Generators may, however, request variances
p~irsuantto 35 Ill.
Adin. Code 104 based
on a showing of
arbitrary or
unreasonable hardship
c)
Shall consider
the cost to transport the waste
to
the
nearest available treatment or
land disposal unit,
including units located outside the state
d)
Shall
consider
both
the
cost
of
conducting
treatment
at
the
site
of
generation
and
off—site
e)
Shall
consider whether
it
is economically reasonable
to
render
the
waste
either
non—hazardous
or
less
hazardous
f)
Shall not consider
unrelated information regarding
the
applicant’s
other
permits;
and
~gj
If
a waste management alternative is not economically
reasonable because of temporary factors,
the Agency
shall
provide that the authorization will expire at
such time as the Agency expects the temporary factors
to change. Temporary factors include, but are not
limited to,
the following:
1)
High costs due
to lack of capacity
2)
High transportation costs due
to lack of local
capacity
3)
Variable cost factors due
to fluctuating demand
for
a •product which is resold
4)
Seasonal cost factors;
and
5)
The applicant’s need
to obtain any RCRA permits to
install
or operate any treatment or storage units
which
may
be
necessary
in
order
to
implement
an
otherwise economically reasonable alternative to
disposal
in
a land disposal
unit,
the time
it may
73-449

—24--
take
to obtain such permits and the
time which may
be required
to
install such units.
(Source:
Emergency added
at
10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section
729.123
Technical Feasibility
This Section defines “technologically feasible”
for purposes of
application of Sections 22.6 and 39(h)
of the Act and Sections
729.110 and 729.310.
a)
A waste management alternative is technologically
feasible
if the alternative has been demonstrated
in
an
actual operation.
b)
A waste management alternative
is not technologically
feasible
if
it would result
in more risk
to public
health and
the environment when compared
to land
disposal of the waste.
c)
If the Agency determines that an alternative
is not
technologically feasible,
it shall provide that the
authorization will expire
at
a time at which
a
technologically
feasible
alternative
is
likely
to
exist.
(Source:
Emergency
added
at
10
Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART
B:
HALOGENATED SOLVENTS
Section 729.200
Purpose,
Scope
and Applicability
a)
This Subpart prohibits the ~andf4~44n! deposit in
a
land disposal unit of wastes containing halogenated
compounds.
Rules are
included
to differentiate
these
from other
wastes.
b)
Halogenated compounds are
a class
of organic
solvents.
As
a class halogenated compounds are not
very soluble
in water; therefore,
in
a complex system,
they will be found
in
a non—aqueous phase associated
with any other organic
solvents present.
This Subpart
assumes that any halogenated compounds present will be
more concentrated
in any non-aqueous liquid phase.
The
halogen concentration
in the non—aqueous liquid phase
is used
to determine whether
the phase should be
regulated as
an halogenated solvent or as an organic
solvent.
73-450

—25—
c)
Organic solvent phases, whether
they include
halogenated compounds or not,
pose
a threat
to the
impermeability of clay and synthetic 4and?4~-lliners.
d)
Aqueous solutions of halogenated compounds placed
directly into
the 4and?4~lland disposal
unit, could
damage synthetic liners and move into groundwater.
e)
Because of their differing
impacts on 4andf4~sland
disposal
units,
the
Board
intends
to
encourage
the
separation
prior
to
disposal
of
phases
in
multiphase
wastes,
and intends
to encourage the separation of
wastestreams
during
generation
to
avoid
the
formation
of multiphase wastes.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at
10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.203
Waste Analysis Plan
The owner
or operator of a land disposal
unit
endf441 disposing
of
hazardous
waste
must,
within
thirty
days
after
the
effective
date of this section, develop and follow a written waste analysis
plan
which
describes
the
procedures
which
the
owner
or
operator
will carry out to ensure that the facility complies with the
prohibition stated
in this Subpart.
The owner
or operator must
keep this plan
at the facility.
A copy of the plan
shall be
submitted
to the Agency within thirty days after the effective
date of this section.
(Source:
Emergency amended at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.204 Land Treatment Demonstration (Repealed)
PI’t4s
Su~Derts1’~el4net ~er the 4ssuenee of a R~RApernt4t
pursuant
to Seet4en 2l~f-~
of the Act end
asr H47
Adi~t-
eede
~O~3for
-lend
treatment of 1~esardeuswaste 4?
t4’te owner
er
eperetos
demenstretes7 pursuant to 3~HlT Adm-
eede
3~~T
end
4~3r~~
that any l’xele~eneted
ee~peunds
4n
t1’te waste
wH
~e
eempletey degraded7 trens?er~edas 4m~e~444sed
4n the treeti~ent
~ene-
(Source:
Repealed
at 10
Ill.
Reg.
,
effective
)
Section 729.220
Definitions
In addition to
the definitions of Section 729.102,
as As used
in
this Subpart,
terms have the
following meanings:
Aqueous phase:
A “phase”
in which water
is the
solvent, constituting more than 500 g/kg.
73-451

—26—
Component:
An element or compound present
in
a “phase”
or “system.”
Emulsion:
A “system”,
including
two or more liquid
“phases,”
which
is
not
separated into layers.
For
purposes
of
this
Subpart,
an
emulsion
which
does
not
form
layers
within
one
hour
is
one
phase.
Liquid:
A waste,
or part of a waste, which yields any
fluid when subjected
to
the paint
filter test described
in Section 729.320.
Non—aqueous
phase:
A
“phase”
which
contains
500
g/kg
or less of water.
One—phase system:
A “system” with one and only one
“phase.”
Phase:
A physically distinct portion of
a dispersion
or
solution
which
at
least
in principle could be
mechanically separated from the remainder of the
material.
For purposes of this Subpart,
a container is
not
a phase,
nor
is a vapor above
a waste.
Emulsions
and suspensions are a single phase
if they do not form
layers within one hour.
Solid:
A
waste,
or
part
of
a
waste,
which
contains
no
free liquid as determined from the paint
filter
test
described
in Section 729.320.
Suspension:
A “system,” including
a “solid” phase and
a
“liquid” phase, which
is not separated into layers.
For purposes of this Subpart,
a suspension which does
not form layers within one hour
is one phase.
System:
A single isolated “phase”
or
a
set of two or
more “phases” which are
in physical
contact.
TOX test:
Either of the tests
for
total organic
halogen
incorporated by reference
in Section 729.202,
ASTM D236l—66
(Reapproved 1978)
or ASTM E442—74
(Reapproved 1981).
Two—phase system:
A “system” with two “phases”.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10
Ill. Reg.
,
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.240
Non—aqueous Liquid Phases which are
Halogenated Solvents
73-452

—27—
No person
shall
cause or allow any hazardous waste containing
a
non—aqueous liquid phase
which
is a halogenated solvent
to be
placed
in any land disposal
unit
end?44.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10
Ill.
Req.
effective
),
for
a maximum of
150 days.
Section 729.241
Aqueous Solutions of Halogenated Compounds
a)
No person
shall cause
or allow to be placed
in any land
disposal unit lendf4ll any hazardous waste containing
an
aqueous liquid phase containing more than 14,000 mg of
halogenated compounds in any
1 kg.
b)
An aqueous liquid phase containing more than 10,000 mg
of
total
organic
halogen,
as
measured
by
the
TOX
test,
in any
1
kg
is assumed
to contain more than 14,000 mg of
halogenated compounds per kilogram, unless the contrary
is
shown
by
a
more definitive test whose validity is
demonstrated
to
the Agency.
(Source:
Emergency amended at 10
Ill.
Req.
effective
),
for
a maximum of
150 days.
Section 729.242
Solids Containing Halogenated Compounds
a)
No person
shall cause or
allow any hazardous waste which
is a solid
to be placed
in
any land disposal unit
lend?4ll
if
the
waste
forms
a
non—aqueous
liquid
phase
which is a halogenated
solvent when
a representative
sample
of
the
waste
is
mixed
with
water.
b)
The
prohibition
of paragraph
(a)
shall become effective
on July 1,
1986.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at
10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
SUBPART
C:
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES
Section 729.301
Definitions
The following definitions apply to this Subpart,
in addition
to
the definitions of Section 729.103:
means the En~4ronmenta~l
Preteet4en Act
-~-l7
Re~v~
&tat7 ~&3~ e~ ~
~
pes
3~GQIet seq~+
-“Agen’ey~means the
1114ne4s
Eiw4renmenta
Proteet4en
Agency
flBeard.U means the ~l~l4no4sPelut4on eontrel Beard
73-453

—28—
~Seneretor1’4s as def4ned 4n 35 Hh
Adm~Bode
GT~3~B
~Haserdeus Weste~4s a heserdeus waste as de?4ned at 35
H4~ Adm7 Bode
~-~‘&3
“Labwaste”
is a liquid hazardous waste generated by an
activity in a laboratory engaged
in teaching, testing
or research,
in
a quantity totaling less than 100 kg
per month
for the activity.
Wastes which are
periodically produced
as
a result of a production
process are not “labwaste.”
“LANDFILL”
IS A DISPOSAL UNIT OR PART OF
A FACILITY
WHERE HAZARDOUS WASTE
IS PLACED IN OR ON LAND AND WHICH
IS NOT A LAND TREATMENT UNIT, A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT OR
AN UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELL.
(Section 22.6(d)
of the
Act).
As
used
in this Subpart,
a “landfill”
is
a “land
disposal
unit”
as defined
35
Ill.
Adm. Code 709.110.
“Liquid hazardous waste”
is a hazardous waste which
yields any fluid when subjected
to the
test procedure
described
in Section 729.320.
“Non—periodic waste”
is a liquid hazardous waste
in a
quantity of less than 100
kg which will not be
generated
again by that generator.
~Br4~4nel genereter~4e
a
person
who
generates
haserdeus waste as a result of en e’et4v4ty or
preduet4en process ether than the treatment ef
haserdeus weste~
“Res4duel~45 any mates4e1 ether
than
a
gas
wh4eh
rema4ns a?tes7
er
4e generated hy~the treatment e?
a
14qu4d
l’tasard’eus weste~ A Ures4dual~~may 4tself be a
“l4~u4dhesardeus
~
UTseeteril 4s a person
who
en~a~es
4ri treatment ef
heserdeus weste~
A
~‘treetes-~
may be a ~enereter~’7 but
may not be the J’er4igdnel geneseter-~
“Treatment”
is treatment as defined at 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 720.110.
35 Ill. Adm. Code 703.123(h)
and
724.101(g) (10) notwithstanding,
as used
in this
Subpart, “treatment”
specifically includes the addition
of absorbent materials to
a liquid hazardous waste or
vice versa.
Provided, however, that “treatment”
shall
not include those activities carried out
to immediately
contain or treat a spill of a liquid hazardous waste or
a material which, when spilled, becomes
a liquid
hazardous waste,
to the extent
such treatment meets the
73-454

—29—
exemption of
35 Ill. Adm. Code 724.101(g) (8)
or
725.101(c) (11),
whichever is applicable.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.310
Liquid Hazardous Waste Restriction
a)
Liquids:
NO PERSON SHALL CAUSE, THREATEN OR ALLOW THE
DISPOSAL IN A LAND DISPOSAL
UNIT OF A TYPE IDENTIFIED
IN SUBSECTION
(d)
~~hNBP~1,1~
OF ANY LIQUID HAZARDOUS
WASTE, UNLESS THE GENERATOR HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT,
CONSIDERING CURRENT TECHNOLOGICAL FEASIBILITY AND
ECONOMIC REASONABLENESS, THE HAZARDOUS WASTE CANNOT BE
REASONABLY SOLIDIFIED,
STABILIZED OR RECYCLED FOR
REUSE,
NOR INCINERATED OR CHEMICALLY,
PHYSICALLY OR
BIOLOGICALLY TREATED SO AS TO NEUTRALIZE THE HAZARDOUS
WASTE AND RENDER
IT NONHAZARDOUS.
(Sections 22.6(a)
and 22.6(c)
of the Act).
b)
Residuals:
No person
shall engage
in the treatment of
a liquid hazardous waste
and cause, threaten or allow
the disposal
in
a land disposal
unit of
a
type
identified
in subsection
(d) 4andf43~of a residual
from such treatment unless the residual meets one of
the following standards.
1)
Non—hazardous Residuals:
The residual may be
deposited
in
a land dis~osalunit 1andf44~edif
it
no longer meets the definition of “hazardous
waste.”
2)
Liquid Removal:
For wastes
in which treatment is
accomplished only through extraction,
volatilization,
evaporation,
thermal
destruction
or other removal of liquids,
the residual may be
deposited
in
a land disposal unit landf4~ledif it
no longer meets the definition of “liquid
hazardous waste.”
3)
Solidification:
The residual may be deposited
in
a land disposal unit landf4led
if it no longer
meets
the
definition
of
“liquid
hazardous
waste”
and possesses
a
load—bearing capacity of at least
2.0 tons per square foot as determined by
application
of
the
test
procedure
described
in
Section 729.321.
c)
No person shall cause, threaten or allow the disposal
in a land disposal
unit of a type identified
in
73-455

—30—
subsection
(di
lendfd4.l of a residual from the
treatment of a liquid hazardous waste which does not
meet one of the standards of paragraph
(b), and for
which the Agency has not issued a wastestream
authorization pursuant
to 35 Ill. Adm. Code
709.401(a).
Reasonable reliance on a generator’s
description of the waste
shall
be a complete defense
to
violation of this paragraph.
d)
This Section applies to
all
types of land disposal
units identified
in
35 Ill. Adm. Code 709.110, except
surface impoundments and
land treatment units.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10 Ill. Reg.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.311
Prohibition of Non—hazardous Liquids
in
Hazardous Waste Landf4lls Disposal Units
No person
shall cause,
threaten or allow the placement into any
land disposal unit a landf4l1 permitted
to
receive hazardous
waste of any non-hazardous waste which yields any fluids when
subjected
to
the test procedure described
in Section 729.320.
(Source:
Emergency amended at 10 Ill.
Reg.
effective
I,
for
a maximum of 150 days.
Section 729.313
Biodegradable Absorbents
No person shall
cause, threaten
or
allow
the
disposal
in
any
land
disposal
unit lend?441 of any liquid hazardous waste containing
an absorbent material which, because of microbial action, will
degrade faster
than
the waste.
(Source:
Emergency amended
at 10 Ill.
Req.
effective
),
for
a maximum of 150
days.
IT
IS
SO ORDERED.
Board Members
R.
Flemal
and
B.
Forcade dissented.
I,
Dorothy
M.
Gunn,
Clerk
of
the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby
certify
that
the
above
Op).pion
and
Order
was
adopted
n
the
______________
day
of
~
,
1986
by a vote
of
_______________.
Dorothy
M. ~tinn,Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control
Board
73-456

Back to top