ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

October 23, 1986

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

)

PROTECTION AGENCY,

)

)

Complainant,

)

)

v

)

PCB 81—144

)

MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY,

)

an Ohio corporation,

)

)

Respondent.

MR. JAMES

L.

MORGAN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON

BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT.

MR. JEFF BENSON AND MR.

DAVID

R. SAAD,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW, APPEARED

ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT.

OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD

(by J.D. Dumelle):

This matter comes before

the Board on the September

14, 1981

Complaint brought by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

(Agency),

as amended on November 29, 1982.

Count

I of the Amended Complaint alleged that:

(1) from

February, 1979 until November 29, 1982, the Respondent

failed to

report loading and concentration levels for trivalent chromium

in

effluent discharged from one or both refinery discharge points

(001 and/or

002);

(2)

from July,

1979 until November 29,

1982

(including, but not limited

to,

the months of July,

1979;

November,

1979; June,

1980; July,

1980; August, 1980,

and March,

1981), the Respondent

failed

to report

for Discharge Point 002

daily maximum concentrations for parameters

for which such

measurements are

to be taken pursuant to its NPDES Permit;

(3)

from March, 1980 until November

29,

1982

(including,

but not

limited

to, March,

1980; June,

1980; July,

1980; August,

1980;

March, 1981;

and May, 1981), the Respondent failed

to report with

respect

to effluent discharged from Discharge Point 002 water

temperatures

(in the receiving stream) and

zinc concentration and

quantity levels, and

(4)

in July, 1979, the Respondent failed to

report with respect to effluent discharged from Discharge Point

002 precise 30—day average load levels

for hexavalent chromium,

thus failing

to fulfill the requirements of Standard Condition 16

of the Attachment H

to its NPDES Permit

in violation of Rules

501(a)

and 501(c)

of Chapter

3: Water Pollution Regulations

(now

35 Ill.

Adm.

Code 305.102)

and Section 12

(f) of the Illinois

Environmental Protection Act (Act).

73.351

---

—2—

Count

II of the Amended Complaint alleged that:

(1) from

February, 1979 until November 29, 1982, the Respondent has caused

or allowed

the discharge from Discharge Point

003.

of effluent

exceeding those parameter quantity and concentration limits

specified

in its NPDES Permit for the effluent parameters of

five—day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), phenols, hexavalent

chromium, suspended solids,

chloride, and total dissolved

solids;

(2)

from March, 1979 until November 29,

1982, the Respondent has

caused

or

allowed the discharge from Discharge Point

002 of

effluent exceeding those parameter loading and concentration

limits specified

in its NPDES Permit for the effluent parameters

of BOD5,

oil, fat and grease,

phenols, hexavalent chromium,

sulfide, total

chromium,

cyanide, suspended

solids, and chemical

oxygen demand

in violation of Rules 410(a)

and 901 of the Chapter

3: Water Pollution Regulations (now 35

Ill.

Adm. Code 304.141 and

35

Ill.

Adm. Code 309.102)

and Section 12(f)

of the Act.

Count

III of the Amended Complaint alleged

that, on various

specified occasions between May, 1979 and November 29, 1982,

the

Respondent has caused

or allowed the receiving stream into which

it discharges effluent from Discharge Points

001 and 002

to

exceed

the

ammonia nitrogen concentration above

the levels

allowed

in its NPDES Permit

in violation of Rules 410(a) and 901

of the Chapter

3: Water Pollution Regulations (now 35 Ill. Adm.

Code 304.141 and 35

Ill. Adm.

Code 309.102)

and Section 12(f)

of

the Act

After extensive discovery and numerous pre—hearing

procedural matters were disposed of, the initial hearing

in this

enforcement action was held

on April 15,

1985.

Subsequently,

lengthy settlement negotiations between the parties occurred.

A

second hearing was held

on September 30,

1986

and the parties

filed their proposed Settlement Agreement (Stip.)

on October

2,

1986.

The Respondent,

the Marathon Petroleum Company (Marathon),

is an Ohio corporation which is duly licensed and authorized

to

conduct business

in Illinois.

The Respondent owns and operates a

petroleum refinery near the eastern edge of the City of Robinson

in Crawford County,

Illinois.

Marathon operates a wastewater

treatment system

in connection with its crude oil refinery.

The

effluent from the Respondent’s wastewater

treatment system

is

discharged into an unnamed ditch via two point sources:

Discharge

Point

001

(main process discharge)

and Discharge Point 002

(emergency bypass impoundment basin*).

The unnamed ditch flows

*In connection with its wastewater

treatment system, the

Respondent maintains

and operates two stormwater retention basins

which are collectively known as the emergency bypass Impoundment

Basin.

Discharge Point 002

(i.e., Outfall 002), which

is

designated as the Impoundment Basin Discharge

in the draft.

(continued)

73-352

---

—3—

about nine miles east into Sugar Creek which is tributary to the

Wabash River.

(Stip. 2).

The Agency issued

the Respondent NPDES Permit 11L004073

on

November 19, 1974, pursuant

to the requirements of the Federal

Water Pollution Control Act,

33 U.S.C.

1151 et seq., which

authorized,

inter

alia,

the

discharge

of

effluent

from

Marathon’s

wastewater

treatment

system

via

Discharge

Point

001

to

the

receiving

water.

This

NPDES

Permit

was

reissued

by

the

Agency

on

April 23,

1976

and again on November 10,

1978 and the applicable

discharge requirements were modified by Board action

in two

subsequent proceedings: PCB 78—176

and PCB 80—102.

(See:

Opinion and Order of the Board dated February 15, 1979

in PCB 78—

176, Marathon Oil Company v. IEPA,

32 PCB 545,

and Opinion and

Order

of

the

Board

dated

October

2,

1980

in

PCB

80—102,

Marathon

Oil Company v.

IEPA,

39 PCB 541).

During

the settlement negotiations after

the

filing of the

instant enforcement action, the Respondent contended that

it was

in full compliance with its NPDES Permit and all applicable

statutes

and regulations.

(Stip.

2).

However, the parties

concomitantly concluded

that there was a need

for an engineering

study to determine the availability and feasibility of an

appropriate means

for

reducing

the frequency and

size of

Marathon’s discharges from Discharge Point 002

(i.e., Outfall

002), assuming, arguendo, that corrective measures would

be

appropriate.

Accordingly, the Respondent retained Radian

Corporation,

an independent nationally recognized engineering and

consulting firm located

in Austin, Texas,

to conduct an

engineering study and comprehensive review of Marathon’s

stormwater management alternatives.

(Stip. 3).

On May 21,

1984,

the Radian Corporation submitted its final

report

to the Respondent and this report was subsequently

submitted to

the Agency for its review.

After carefully

considering

and evaluating the study made by its independent

engineering consultant, Marathon submitted

a stormwater

management proposal

to the Agency and the Radian Corporation

conducted a supplemental study directed specifically at the

Respondent’s proposal.

(Stip. 3—4).

In light of the results of

the previously mentioned engineering studies, the parties have

developed

a proposed settlement agreement and the Agency has

agreed

to issue

an NPDES

Permit to the Respondent containing

substantially the same

terms and conditions as contained

in the

draft NPDES Permit incorporated

as Exhibit A of the Settlement

Agreement.

(Stip.

4—5;

see:

Exhibit A of the Stip.).

NPDES Permit set forth in Exhibit A of the Stipulation,

discharges

from

the

Impoundment

Basin

into

the

previously

mentioned

unnamed

tributary

to

Sugar

Creek.

73-353

---

—4—

The

primary

goal

of

the

Respondent’s

stormwater

management

program

is

to

increase

its stormwater impoundment capacity and

to

properly divert its non—refinery stormwater runoff.

The proposed

program

is designed

to enable the Respondent to store

and treat

stormwater runoff from

a storm having

a return frequency of a 10

year/24 hour storm,

as per U.S. EPA guidelines.

(Stip.

5).

Although the

10 year, 24—hour storm event was used

as a design

criteria, both the Agency and the Respondent agree that this

criterion

is

not

adopted

under

any

statute, regulation or

ordinance.

(Stip.

5).

The effectiveness of the design of the Respondent’s

stormwater control program was confirmed

in a supplemental

analysis which was performed by the Radian Corporation, since

the

initial

storrnwater program included some of the Respondent’s own

proposals.

(See: Exhibit

B of the Stip.).

The Respondent’s

engineering consultant developed

an appropriate model

for use as

a

tool

to

evaluate

the

system

after

construction

and

evaluated

data suitable for developing

a tank dike management plan to

maximize the storage of stormwater behind

the tank dikes.

It

is

stipulated that both the engineering

study on stormwater

management alternatives and

the supplemental analysis report have

been reviewed by the Agency.

(Stip.

5).

The Respondent’s stormwater management program was developed

utilizing the selection criteria of:

(1) design capacity;

(2)

the

Respondent’s ability to

implement the program without bypassing

or upsetting

its wastewater

treatment plant;

(3) cost efficiency,

and

(4) the Respondent’s ability to

implement the stormwater

program

in the shortest time period vis—a—vis other possible

alternatives.

(Stip.

5—6).

It is anticipated

that, no matter

what levels of rainfall occur

in relatively short time spans,

the

Respondent’s stormwater control program will provide sufficient

stormwater diversion and storage capacity to appropriately cope

with the situation.

(Stip. 6).

The Agency believes that the

Respondent’s proposal “should provide sufficient stormwater

impoundment capacity and stormwater diversion to assure

Marathon’s compliance with it NPDES permit”

and “accepts the

Marathon program on the basis of the data provided

in the Radian

report and supplemental analysis”, assuming that the program is

properly implemented by the Respondent.

(Stip. 5—6).

The proposed settlement agreement does not provide

for any

admissions of violations.

(R.

2—3).

However, it is stipulated

that the Respondent

shall pay a

sum

of $10,000.00

into the

Illinois Environmental Protection Trust Fund for

the purposes of

environmental protection and related enforcement programs within

30 days of the date of the Board’s Order.

(Stip.

11).

Additionally, the proposed settlement agreement provides

that the Respondent

shall:

(1) divert stormwater

runoff from its

land treatment facility to two storage tanks

(existing tanks 806

73-354

---

—5—

and 807 which each have a storage capacity of 1,575,000 gallons)

for storage pending treatment

in

its wastewater treatment plant

in full compliance with all applicable federal and state

statutes, rules and regulations;

(2)

design and construct

a

totally enclosed diversion system through the oil refinery

in

order

to divert the stormwater runoff from about 128 acres of

non-refinery land located south of the refinery property line as

designated

in Exhibit

C of the Stipulation;

(3) complete the

construction of the totally enclosed diversion system by November

1, 1987;

and

(4)

dredge the Impoundment Basin, as necessary,

to

increase its impoundment capacity by about 4,000,000 gallons and

maintain its stormwater management system storage capacity by

dredging

at least every two years thereafter

as required for

compliance with the terms

and conditions of its NPDES Permit

(including

the proper handling and disposal

of the dredged

material),

Moreover, the settlement agreement also provides that

Marathon shall:

(1)

record on at least a daily basis (except

where otherwise noted)

the on—site rainfall data;

the Impoundment

Basin water

level; the volume of water pumped from the

Impoundment Basin

to

the waste—water

treatment facility; the tank

806 and tank 807 water levels and withdrawal rates;

an estimate

of the volume of water directed from, or bypassed

around, the

Wastewater Treatment System

to the Impoundment Basin; the volume

of water leaving

the API Separator; and

the concentration of

B0D51(weekly), COD,

(twice weekly), pH,

(twice weekly), TSS,

(twice weekly)

and oil

and grease

(twice weekly), separately

analyzed and reported on

a composite basis for both water leaving

the DAF Unit and

for Impoundment Basin water

being pumped

to the

Wastewater Treatment System;

(2) maintain the records pertaining

to the previously mentioned data

in item #5 at the refinery for

a

period of at least three years and make such data available for

Agency inspection within

a reasonable period, upon request, after

a discharge from Outfall 002;

(3) develop a procedure

to use

diked areas

in

the tank farm

to

retain stormwater

and

to minimize

or eliminate discharges via Outfall 002

in

an appropriate manner,

as well

as keeping the requisite data pertaining

to the

tank farm

for Agency persual

and

inspection;

(4)

operate the Impoundment

Basin

so that water

is withdrawn at the maximum possible rate

which can be treated without upsetting the Respondent’s

wastewater treatment system;

and

(5) retain

an independent

consultant,

if necessary,

if undue problems result after

construction of its diversion system, as per agreement of the

parties.

(Stip. 6—li).

In evaluating this enforcement action and proposed

settlement agreement, the Board has taken into consideration all

the

facts and circumstances in light of the specific criteria

delineated

in

Section

33(c) of the Act and finds that settlement

agreement acceptable under 35 Ill. Mm. Code 103.180.

Accordingly, the Respondent will be ordered

to pay the sum of

73-355

---

—6—

$10,000.00

into the Environmental Protection Trust Fund and

to

follow the terms and conditions of the compliance plan as

delineated

in

the proposed settlement agreement.

This Opinion constitutes the Board’s

findings of fact and

conclusions of law in this matter.

ORDER

1. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the Respondent,

the Marathon Petroleum Company,

shall, by certified check

or money order payable

to the State of Illinois and

designated

for deposit into the Environmental Protection

Trust Fund, pay the sum of $10,000.00 which

is

to be sent

to:

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

Fiscal

Services

Division

2200

Churchill

Road

Springfield,

Illinois

62706

2.

The

Respondent

shall

comply

with

all

the

terms

and

conditions of the Settlement Agreement filed on October

2,

1986, which

is attached

to this Order

and incorporated by

reference as if fully set

forth herein.

IT

IS SO ORDERED.

I, Dorothy

M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control

Board,

hereby certify that the ab ve7p~ini.onand Order was

adopted on the

~

of

__________________,

1986 by a vote

of

-

O

.

~Dorothy

M.

G nn, Clerk

Illinois Pollution Control

Board

73-356

---

K\I

OCT—2~986

~-rxrEOFl

~N0~F

N

~

i

L

F.

HART

I GA N

jOaU1~Qr4

CON~0~.

BOARD

ATTORNEY

GENERAL

STATE

OF

ILLINOIS

SPRINGFtELD

62706

September 30,

1986

Ms. Dorothy Gunn,

Clerk

Illinois Pollution Control Board

State of Illinois Center, Suite 11—500

100 West Randolph

Chicago, Illinois

6060.

Re:

IEPA v. Marathon Petroleum Company

PCB 81—144

Dear Ms.

Gunn:

Enclosed please find the original and ten copies of the

settlement agreement presented at the September 30th hearing in

the above-referenced cause for filing.

Please return one copy to

me with your file-stamp affixed thereto.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

/

.ames L.

Morgáln

C

Assistant Attörney General

Environmental Control Division

JLM:

rsr

Enclosures

cc:

Joseph

Wright,

Jr

Bruce Carlson

David

Saad

73-357

---

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,

Complainant,

MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY, an Ohio

)

corporation,

)

)

Respondent.

)

SETTLEMENT

AGREEMENT

Pursuant

to

35

Ill.

Adm.

Code

Sec.

103.180,

the

following

Settlement

Agreement

entered

into

between

Complainant,

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

(hereinafter

“Agency”),

the Respondent, Marathon Petroleum Company (hereinafter

“Marathon”) and the Illinois Attorney General

(hereinafter

“Attorney General”),

is set out for the purpose of approval of

the proposals hereinafter set forth.

It is expressly understood

and agreed by and between Marathon, the Attorney Genera.

and the

Agency that the agreements, plans, stipulations and statements

herein contained are not binding on the parties and shall be

deemed null and void and held for naught,

in the event such

approval is not obtained, or in the event additional terms or

conditions which are unacceptable to the parties are imposed.

No

statement, stipulated fact or admission contained herein shall be

used in any other proceeding or cause of action, except in a

proceeding to enforce the terms of this Settlement Agreement.

Subject to the foregoing understanding and agreement,

it is

further agreed as follows:

No. PCB 81—144

73.358

---

FACTUAL

BACKGROUND

1.

Marathon is a foreign corporation duly authorized to

do business in the State of Illinois.

2.

Marathon owns and has operated at all times

pertinent hereto a petroleum refinery near the City of Robinson,

Crawford County, Illinois.

3.

In connection with the operation of Marathon’s

refinery,

it operates a Waste Water Treatment System.

The

effluent from Marathon’s Waste Water Treatment System is

discharged via Outfall 001 into an unnamed tributary of Sugar

Creek which ultimately flows into the Wabash River.

The

confluence of Sugar Creek and the Wabash River is approximately

nine

(9) miles east of the refinery.

4.

In connection with the

operation of the Waste Water

System, Marathon maintains and operates two stormwater retention

basins collectively known

as the Impoundment Basin.

Outfall 002,

designated the Impoundment Basin Discharge in the draft NPDES

permit, described in Paragraph 5 below and attached hereto as

Exhibit A, discharges from the Impoundment Basin into the said

unnamed tributary to Sugar Creek.

5.

On or about November 19,

1974, Marathon was issued

NPDES Permit No. 1L0004073 pursuant to the requirements of the

Federal Water Pollution Control Act,

33 U.S.C.

1151 et seq.,

which authorized, inter a3ia, the discharge of effluent from its

Waste Water Treatment System via Outfall 001 to the receiving

water.

Said permit was reissued on April 23,

1976 and

November 10,

1979 and was modified by action of the Illinois

Pollution Control Board in two proceedings:

PCB 78-176 and

73-359

—2—

---

80-102.

A draft renewal NPDES permit is attached hereto as

Exhibit A.

6.

On September 10,

1981, the Agency commenced this

proceeding by filing a complaint in three Counts.

7.

Marathon contends that it is in full compliance with

its NPDES permit and all applicable statutes and regulations.

8.

After extensive discovery, the parties concluded

that there was need for additional data,

information and

knowledge in order to determine the availability of an

appropriate means of reducing the frequency and size of

discharges from Outfall

002,

assuming,

arguendo, that corrective

measures are appropriate.

9.

Therefore,

in an effort to provide a means to

resolve this matter without further litigation, expense and

delay, Marathon agreed to retain an independent engineering

firm

of

known

stature to complete a study designed to provide the

data,

information and knowledge discussed in paragraph 8 above.

Radian Corporation,

a nationally recognized engineering and

consulting organization located

in Austin, Texas, was retained to

conduct a comprehensive review of stormwater management

alternatives.

The

fees

and

costs

for

said

study

were

paid

by

Maratnon.

A

final

report

was

submitted

by

Radian

on

May

21,

1984, and thereafter submitted to the Agency.

Since that date

Marathon has submitted

a proposal to the Agency and Radian has

conducted a supplemental study directed specifically at the

Marathon proposal.

10.

The Agency, their agents and attorneys, Marathon,

their agents and attorneys and the Attorney General agree that

—3—

---

the study,

data,

observations, work papers, documents or

photographs forming the basis of the study shall be discoverable

by the Agency, but shall not be introduced into evidence or used

in any way in this proceeding (except for purposes of impeachment

of the author or authors of the study or any witness who purports

to describe the contents or conclusions of the study) without the

prior written agreement of the Agency and Marathon.

The

provisions of this Paragraph shall apply to any study conducted

pursuant to Paragraph 25, except that such study may be used as

evidence in litigating the appropriateness of Marathon’s

determination of a program of corrective action arrived at under

Paragraph 25.

Marathon’s agreement to conduct said studies shall

in no way be deemed an admission.

11.

The Agency, the Attorney General and Marathon agree

that the delay

in prosecution of this action necessitated by the

studies was reasonable in light of the need for a thorough

engineering study given the nature, extent and causes of the

above

alleged

violations,

the

nature

of

Marathon’s

operations

and

control

equipment

and

the

benefits

to be obtained as the result

of

the

study.

12.

In

view

of

the

foregoing,

Marathon,

the Attorney

General and the Agency have agreed to settle this litigation,

through Marathon’s implementation of the terms and conditions of

this Settlement Agreement and through the Agency’s issuance of an

NPDES permit containing substantially the same terms and

conditions as contained

in the draft NPDES permit attached hereto

as Exhibit A.

Nothing

in

this Settlement Agreement bars Marathon

from prosecuting an

appeal

of

any permit conditions imposed in

73-361

-

.,

—

---

the issued NPDES permit that differs

from the conditions imposed

in the draft NPDES permit attached hereto as Exhibit A.

13.

The object of the program to be undertaken by

Marathon is an increase in storawater impoundment capacity

combined with a diversion of non—refinery stormwater run-off.

14.

The program is designed to allow Marathon to store

and treat stormwater run-off from a storm having a return

frequency of a 10 year/24-hour storm.1

The program was derived

with regard to the alternatives and volumes identified in the

Radian Corporation report, Storznwater Management Alternatives.

Because the program does include some

of Marathon’s own

proposals,

the effectiveness of the design was confirmed in a

supplemental analysis,

a copy of which is attached hereto as

Exhibit B, and both reports have been reviewed by the Agency.

While the 10 year, 24-hour storm event was used as a design

criteria,

both parties agree this criterion

is not adopted under

any statute, regulation or ordinance.

Nonetheless,

in light of

the supplemental analysis performed

by Radian Corporation, the

Agency believes the Marathon proposal should provide sufficient

stormwater impoundment capacity and stormwater diversion to

assure Marathon’s compliance with its NPDES permit.

15.

The selection criteria for the Marathon program

were design capacity, Marathon’s ability to implement the program

1 Development Document for Effluent Limitations Guidelines and

New Source Performance Standards for the Petroleum Refining Point

Source

Category.

Effluent Guideline Review Office of Water and

Hazardous Material, U.S.E.P.A., April,

1974,

Doc.

#EPA44O/1—74—014, page 100.

73.362

-5—

---

—_c—-.~

—

—

—

—

-

cost efficiency and Marathon’s ability to implement the program

in the shortest time period relative to other alternatives.

Radian’s supplemental analysis supports the conclusion that

regardless of antecedent moisture conditions the program will

provide sufficient storage capacity and stormwater diversion.

The

Agency accepts the Marathon program on the basis of the data

provided in the Radian report and supplemental analysis and the

belief that the program,

if properly implemented,

should assure

Marathon’s compliance with the NPDES permit.

SETTLEMENT TERMS

16.

Marathon will divert stormwater runoff from its

land treatment facility to two storage tanks (existing tanks 806

and 807)

for storage pending treatment in the waste water

treatment plant, all in compliance with applicable federal and

state statutes, rules and regulations.

Each of said tanks has a

capacity of

1.575 million gallons.

Run—off from the land

treatment facility resulting from a storm having a return

frequency of a 25 year/24-hour storm has been calculated by

Marathon to be 1.75 million gallons.

The land farm was designed

to impound an additional

25 year/24-hour storm pursuant to 35

Ill. Adm. Code Section 724.373(d).

These storage tanks and land

treatment facilities are designated on a map of the Marathon

Refinery,

attached hereto as Exhibit C.

17.

Marathon will design and construct a totally

enclosed diversion system through the refinery for diversion of

stormwater runoff from approximately 128 acres of non—refinery

—6—

---

land located south of the refinery property line,

as

designated

on Exhibit C.

18.

Marathon will dredge the Impoundment Basin as

required to increase impoundment capacity by approximately 4

million gallons and will maintain stormwater management system

storage capacity by dredging at least every two years thereafter

as required for compliance with the terms and conditions of the

NPDES permit to be issued under Paragraph 20 below.

Dredged

material will be handled and disposed of in accordance with the

Illinois Environmental Protection Act,

Ill.

Rev. Stat.

1985,

ch.

ill 1/2, par. 1001, et seq.

(“the Act”), and 35 Ill. Adm.

Code,

Subtitle G.

19.

Since, according to Marathon, a full construction

season will be needed to complete the actions described in

paragraph

17,

if the Board approves this agreement on or before

March

1,

1987 the work shall be completed by November 1,

1987.

However,

if the Board’s approval of this agreement comes after

March

1,

1987 and before March

1,

1988, this work shall be

completed by November 1,

1988.

The initial dredging called for

in Paragraph 18 and the work in paragraph 16 has been completed.

20.

The Agency has circulated for public comment a

draft NPDES permit to Marathon for a five year period from the

date of issuance in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

21.

This

Settlement Agreement,

if approved by the Board

in its entirety and if fully implemented, will obviate the need

for, and be in settlement of, further litigation of the types of

violations of the Act and IPCB regulations alleged in the First

Amended Complaint in this cause,

occurring up to the date of this

73-364

---

Settlement Agreement.

22.

Marathon will record on at least a daily basis

(except where

noted

otherwise)

the

following:

a)

on-site rainfall data;

b)

Impoundment Basin water level;

c)

volume of water pumped from the Impoundment

Basin to the waste water treatment facility;

d)

tank 806 and 807 water levels and withdrawal

rates;

e)

an estimate of the volume of water directed

from or by—passed around the Waste Water

Treatment System to the Impoundment Basin;

f)

volume of water leaving the

API

Separator;

g)

concentration of the following contaminants,

separately analyzed and reported on a

composite basis for both

(1) water leaving

the DAT Unit and

(2) Impoundment Basin

water being pumped to the Waste Water

Treatment System:

1)

BOD5 (weekly)

2)

COD

(twice weekly)

3)

~

(twice weekly)

4)

TSS

(twice weekly)

5)

Oil and grease (twice weekly)

These records (including any of the described records

and analyses made more frequently than the periods set forth

above) will be maintained at the refinery for a period of at

least three years and will be available to the Agency for

inspection.

Copies of such records will be provided within a

reasonable period to the Agency, upon request, after a discharge

from Outfall 002.

The obligations imposed by this Paragraph 22

will be coterminous with the term of the renewal NPDES permit to

be issued.

To the extent any of the recordation obligations set

forth above are in addition to current recordation practices,

such additional obligations will commence immediately upon the

completion of the actions described in Paragraphs 16 and 17.

73-365

—8—

---

23.

Marathon

will

develop

a

procedure

which

will

utilize diked areas in the tank farm to retain stormwater that

falls thereon and will control the time and volume of stormwater

released therefrom so as to minimize or eliminate discharges via

Outfall 002.

Although development of the procedure will be

on-going as experience is gained, Marathon shall collect,

maintain and review at least the following data concerning the

tank farm:

(1)

A depth versus volume curve

(chart) will be

developed and used for each tank dike area to

determine actual stormwater storage volume.

In

addition, a tank dike level monitoring system will

be installed and the volume of stormwater in tank

dike storage will be monitored, and recorded on at

least a daily basis, records to be retained for

three years.

(2)

The Impoundment Basin in-flow/out—flow and storage

volume will be monitored in conjunction with tank

dike storage volume.

Based upon the impoundment

storage volume, tank dike storage volume, water

return rate to the waste water treatment plant and

weather conditions, storm water would be released

from

various tank dike storage area(s)

at a

controlled/monitored rate to the impoundment basin.

(3)

Tank dike area drainage rate will be monitored

closely to minimize the storage of water in the

dike areas while also maintaining as much excess

impoundment basin capacity as possible.

These records (including any of the described records and

analyses made more frequently than the periods set forth above)

will be maintained at the refinery for a period of at least three

years and will be available to the Agency for inspection.

Copies

of such records will be provided within a reasonable period to

the Agency, upon request,

after a discharge from Outfall 002.

The obligations imposed by this Paragraph 23 will be coterininous

with the term of the renewal NPDES permit to be issued.

The

73.366

—9—

---

obligations of this Paragraph 23 will commence immediately upon

the completion of

the

above.

24.

Marathon will operate

the

Impoundment Basin so

that

water

is

withdrawn

at

the

maximum

possible

rats

which

can

be

treated

without

upsetting

the

Waste

Water

Treatment

System.

25.

If Marathon experiences

a

discharge

from

Outfall

002 after

the

17 is to be completed

(as calculated in Paragraph 19), which

discharge contains a contaminant listed under

the

draft NPDES

permit attached hereto as Exhibit

A

for that Outfall,

as

that

permit exists now or may hereafter be amended, with the exceptior

of total suspended solids, which contaminant

exceeds

the

daily

maximum concentration and load limits, as calculated

under the

draft NPDES permit, Marathon will retain

an independent

consultant for

the

purpose of analyzing the nature of the

discharge,

its cause or

causes, and the need

for and type of

further corrective action,

if any.

However, the parties may

agree that no such independent consultant’s report is necessary.

In the event such agreement is not reached between the parties,

Marathon will

submit

a written

description for the scope of work

to be performed to IEPA for

its

review

and

comments.

Marathon

scope of work document to the Agency.

completed and submitted to the Agency within 6 months of the end

of IEPA’s comment period.

The

parties will discuss the report o

the independent consultant within

30 days of the submittal of

th

report.

If the consultant recommends

further corrective action,

73-367

—

10

—

---

Marathon shall prepare, within 90 days after the submittal of the

report, a program for appropriate corrective action, unless the

parties agree that no further corrective action is warranted.

Nothing in this paragraph shall bar the Agency from

seeking any relief of any type in any

forum

should Marathon elect not to take any corrective action deemed

necessary by the Agency, without regard to the findings or

recommendations

of

the

independent

consu1ta~t.

Further, nothing in this Agreement affects Marathon’s

responsibility

to

comply with,

nor the power of the Agency and

State

of

Illinois

to

enforce,

any

applicable

law

or

statute.

26.

Marathon agrees to pay a sum

of $10,000.00 to the

Environmental Protection

Trust

Fund for the purposes of

environmental protection and related enforcement programs.

Marathon agrees to make such payment within 30 days of the date

of the approval of this Settlement Agreement.

Marathon waives

its right to have any unused portion of said payment returned to

Marathon.

MARATHON

PETROLEUM

COMPANY

BY:_________

DATED:

9-.~S—~

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

BY

:~~L

BY:_____________

DATED:

9

~

DA431

‘~o/~

~

73-368

—

11

—

---

NPDES

Permit

No.

1L0004073

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

Division

of

Water Pollution

Control

2200

Churchill

Road

Springfield,

IllinoIs

62706

NATIONAL

POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM

Reissued (NPDES) Permit

Expiration

Date:

August

1,

1991

Issue

Date:

Effective

Date:

Robinson,

Illinois

62454

Crawford County

In

compliance

with

‘e

provisions

of

the

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Act, Subtitle

C

Rules

and

Regulations

of

the

Illinois

Pollution

Control

Board,

and the FWPCA, the above-named permittee

is hereby authorized to discharge at

the above

location to the above-named receiving stream in accordance with the

standard conditions and attachments herein.

Pennittee is not authorized to discharge after the above expiration date.

In

order to receive authorization to discharge beyond the expiration date, the

permittee shall

submit the proper application as required by the Illinois

Environmental

Protection Agency (IEPA) not later than 180 days prior to the

expiration date.

Thomas

G.

McSwiggin,

P.E.

Manager, Permit Section

Division of Water Pollution Control

EXHIBIT A

Name

and Address of Permittee:

Facility Name and Address:

Marathon Petroleum Company

Robinson

Refinery

539

South

Mai n

Street

Findlay,

Ohio

45840

Marathon

Petroleum

Company

Robinson

Refinery

Illinois

Refining

Division

Marathon

Avenue

Discharge

Number

and

Name:

Receiving

Waters:

001

—

Treat.i~entPlant

Dis:

;~

002

—

Impounc~nentBasin D~narge

Unnamed

~

butary

to

Sugar

~

Unnaine~

•-‘

outary

to

Sugar

~4:YS:ds:579lC,sp

a

73-369

---

NPDES

Permit

No.

1L0004073

Effluent Limitations and Monitoring

LOAD LIMITS

CONCENTRATION

lbs/day

LIMITS

mg/l

30

DAY

DAILY

30

DAY

DAILY

SAMPLE

TER

AVG.

MAX.

AVG.

MAX.

FREQUENCY

m the effective date of this permit until the expiration date of this permit, the ~

liowing discharge(s) shall be monitored and limited at all times as follows:

Outfall(s):

001

MGD)

Daily

C

See

special

condition

no.

1

2/week

Gi

ature

See

special

condition

no.

2

2/week

Gi

241

*~~*

61 2****

10

20

2/week

Suspended

ds

~9****

735****

12

24

2/week

Ci

9767~~

l882l*~

2/week

C

ats&

~se

36l*~~~

763~~

15

30

1/week

M

C

Is

4~5***~

0.2

2/week

C

a-N

763

l679~*~

2/week

C

7.4

16.5

2/week

C

ium

(total)

lO.4****

3Q3*k**

1.0

2.0

2/week

C

lum

(hexa-

~nt)

l.8****

0.1

2/week

C

700

2/week

C

Dissol ved

Ids*~

3500

2/week

C

ilzed

alTunonia

as N*~~*

2/w~ek

C

special

condition

no.

3

e

special

condition

no.

4

ee

special

condition

no.

8

See special condition

no. 14

73-370

---

HPDES Permit No. 1L0004073

Effluent Limitations and-Monitoring

LOAD LIMITS

CONCENTRATION

lbs/day

LIMITS mg/i

30

DAY

DAILY

30 DAY

DAILY

SAJ4PLE

~TER

AVG.

MAX.

AVG.

MAX.

FREQUENCY

1

Outfalls:

002*

When Djscha~

~MGD)

Daily

See

special condition no.

1

Daily

£AAA

~

10

20

Daily

Suspended

____

____

Ids~

£AA*

*Ak*

12

24

Daily

rats &

~se

15

30

Daily

Ia Nitrogen~

Daily

0.3

0.6

Daily

lum (hexa

-____

AA~

~

0.1

0.3

Daily

Ium

1.0

2.0

Daily

~al

)***

****

****

****

****

Daily

special

condition

no.

13

e

special

condition

no.

11

ee

special

condition

no.

8

73-371

---

Page 4

NPDES Permit No.

IL0004073

Special Conditions

1.

The

pH

shall

be

in

the

range

6.0 to

9.0.

2.

DIscharge of

wastewater

from

this facility must

not

alone or in

combination with other sources cause the receiving stream to violate

the

following

thermal

limitations at

the

edge of

the

mixing zone

which is defined by Rule 302.102, Illinois Pollution

Control

Board

Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1:

Water Pollution, as amended:

A.

Maximum

temperature

rise above natural

temperature

must

not

exceed 5oF (2.lBoC).

B.

Water temperature at representative locations in the

main

river

shall

not

exceed

the

maximum limits

in

the

following

table

during

more

than

one

(1)

percent of

the

hours

in

the

12-month

period

ending

with

any

month.

Moreover,

at

no

time

shall

the

water

temperature

at

such

locations

exceed

the

maximum

limits

in

the

following

table

by

more

than

30F

(l.6’°C).

(Main

river

temperatures

are

temperatures

of

those

po’~tionsof

the

river

essentially

similar

to

and

following

the ~amethermal regime as

the

temperatures

of the main flow of the river.)

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

~

June July

~.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

OF

60

60

60

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

90

60

O~

15.6

15.6

15.6

32.2

32.2 32.2 32.2

32.2

32.2

32.2

32.2 15.6

3.

Mathematical

composites for oil, fats and greases shall consist of a

series

of

grab samples collected over any 24—hour consecutive

period.

Each sample shall

be analyzed separately and the arithmetic

mean of all

grab samples collected during a 24-hour period shall

constitute a mathematical composite.

No single grab sample shall

exceed a concentration of 75 mg/i.

4.

The

terms and conditions of PCB 85-83

are

hereby incorporated by

reference as If fully set forth herein.

5.

Sample taken in compliance with the effluent monitoring requirements

for discharge #001

shall

be taken at a point representative of

discharge

#001

but

prior to mixing with discharge #002.

73-372

---

Page 5

NPDES Permit No.

1L0004073

Special Conditions

6.

Sample

taken

in compliance with the effluent monitoring requirements

for discharge #002 shall

be taken at a point representative of

dIscharge

#002.

but prior to mixing with discharge

#001.

7.

The

permittee

shall

record

monitoring

results on

Discharge

Monitoring

Report

Forms

using

one

such

form

for

each

discharge

each

month.

The completed

Discharge

Monitoring

Report

forms

shall

be

submitted to

IEPA no later than the 15th

day of

the

following month, unless

otherwise specified by the permitting authority.

Discharge

Monitoring

Reports

shall

be

mailed

ta the

TEPA

at the

following

address:

Illinois

Environmental

Protection

Agency

Division of Water Pollution Control

2200 Churchill Road

SpringfielJ,

Illinois

62706

Attention: Compliance Assurance Section

Additionally,

Discharge

Monitoring

Report

forms

shall

be mailed to

United States Environmental Protection Agency

in

Chicago on a

quarterly basis.

The pennittee shall

submit the reports as follows,

unless

otherwise

specified

by

the

permitting

authority.

Period

Report

Due

At

U.S.

Environmental

Protection

Agency

Jan,

Feb,

Mar

April

28th

April, May, June

July

28th

July, Aug, Sept

October 28th

Oct,

Nov,

Dec

January 28th

Reports shall

be addressed to United States Environmental Protection

Agency as follows:

NPDES Compliance Unit

United

States

Environmental

Protection

Agency

Region

V

230

South

Dearborn Street

Chicago,

Illinois

60604

73.373

---

Page 6

NPDES Permit No. IL0004073

~pecialConditions

8.

Storm Water Credit:

An additional

storm water credit for the following parameters shall

be calculated based on 100

of the storm water flow as defined

below.

Pounds per

1000

gallons of storm water flow

Parameter

Average

Maximum

COO

1.6

3.1

Oil and Grease*

0.067

0.13

BOD

.22

.4

TSS

.18

.28

Hexavalent

Chromium

.00023

.00052

Total

ChromIum

.0018

.005

Phenolic

Compounds

.0014

.0029

Dry

Weather Flow

-

The

average flow from the

API

separator for the

last

three consecutive

zero precipitation

days.

Previously

collected

storm

water

shall

not

be

included.

Storm Water Flows

-

The storm water runoff which Is treated in

the

waste

water

treatment facility

shall

be

defined

as

that

portion

of

the

flow greater

than

the

dry

weather

flow or

which

is

discharged

from Outfall

002.

The storm water credit does not authorize the pennittee to exceed the

concentration limits contained in Effluent Limitations and

Monitoring, Page 2.

In computing monthly average permit limits to include storm water

credit, the pound credit calculated above

shall

be averaged along

with process pound limits over the 30 day period.

Explanatory

calculations and flow data shall be submitted together with discharge

monitoring reports.

The total

quantity

(of any constituent for which

there

is a load

limit’ prescribed on page 2 of this permit under Outfall 001)

discharged from Outfalls 001

and 002 shall

not exceed the sum of the

storm water credit plus the load limits listed on Page 2 of this

permit under Outfall

001, subject to Special Condition No.

13.

*At no time, the pertnittee shall exceed more than 918 lbs of fats,

oil and grease in the discharge from Outfall

001.

9.

The permittee shall monitor Outfall

001 twice per year and Outfall

002 during two separate discharges associated with two distinct

precipitation events at least if two such discharges occur during a

calendar year, as follows:

a.

Polynuclear*

aromatic

hydrocarbons

using

U.S.EPA

method

#

610

(44

FR

69514), and

b.

Benzene, toluene and ethylbenzene using U.S.EPA method #

602

(44

FR

69474)

73.374

---

Page 7

NPDES

Permit

No.

1L0004073

Special

Conditions

Sample

type

shall be a 24 hr. composite sample.

The results shall

be

submitted

during

April

and October to both IEPA and USEPA unless

otherwise specified by the Agency.

If

the

permittee,

after

monitoring

the

above items (a) and (b)

twice,

can

demonstrate

to

the

satisfacti on

of

the

Agency

that

the

parameters

are

not

found

at

a

level

of

environmental

or

human

health

significance

during

the

one

year period,

upon written

request

by

the

permittee,

the

Agency

shall

review

the

monitoring

requirements

and

may,

at

their

discretion,

revise

or waive

these

monitoring

requirements.

List

of

Polynuclear

Aromatic

Hydrocarbons

Benzo

(a)

anthracene

(1

,2-benzanthracene)

Benzo

(a)

pyrene

(3,4-benzopyrene)

Benzo

(b) fluoranthene

Benzo

(k) fluoranthene

(11 ,12—benzofluoranthene)

Chrysene

Acenaphthyl ene

Anthracene

Benzo

(g,h,i)

perylene

(l,l2-benzoperylene)

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Indeno

(1 ,23-c,d) pyrene (2,3-0-phenylenepyrene)

Pyrene

If

the

Agency

determines

that

any

of

the

parameters

are

being

discharged

at

a

level

of

environmental

or

human

health

significance,

the

permit

may

be

reopened

to

incorporate

limitations,

In

accordance

with

the

Federal

and

State of

Illinois

Rules

and

Regulations.

10.

This

permit

does

not

authorize

the

permittee

to

operate

an

onsite

sludge disposal facility or the land application of sludge onsite.

11. At the option of the

Illinois Environmental

Protection Agency, the

monitoring and reporting of BOO5, total

suspended solids

ammonia

nitrogen, phenol, chromium (hexavalent), chromium (totals and COD as

listed on the effluent limitations and monitoring page for outfall

002

may, at their discretion, revise or waive these monitoring

requirements,

providing

that

the

following

conditions

have

been

met:

A.

No

violations

of

the

maximum permit limitations

are

observed

during

the period of which

the parameters were monitored.

73.375

---

Page 8

HPDES

Permit

No.

110004073

Special

Conditions

8.

Monitoring

of

the

parameters

indicates

a

consistent

average,

with

little

deviation

at

a

point

below

the permitted

average

concentration.

C.

The parameters

indicated have been

monitored

for a continuous period

of

6 calendar

months

and at

least three

discharge

occurrences

have

been

monitored.

The

peraittee

must

make

the

request to

discontinue

the

monitoring in

writing

and

include

a

summary

of

the

data

collected.

12.

In

accordance

with

applicable

federal

and

State of Illinois

regulations,

the

Agency

may

modify

this

permit during

its

tens to

Incorporate

requirements for

biological

toxicity

testing

of

discharges

or

receiving

waters,

and

to

incorporate

additional

requirements

or

limitations

based

on

the

results

of

such

testing,

following public notice and opportunity for hearing.

13. Any discharge that occurs from Outfall

002

is considered to be a

bypass, as defined below, and subject to the condition contained

below:

Bypass

(1)

Definitions.

Ci)

TMBypass”

means

the intentional diversion of waste streams

from any portion of a treatment facility.

(ii)

“Severe property damage” means substantial physical

damage

to property, damage to the treatment facilities which

causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and

permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be

expected to occur

In the absence of a bypass.

Severe

property damage does not mean economic loss caused by

delays in production.

(2)

Bypass not exceeding limitations

The permittee may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause

any effluent concentration or quantity limitations to be

exceeded, but only if it also Is for essential

maintenance

to

assure efficient operation.

These bypasses

are

not subject to

the provisions

of paragraphs

(3) and

(4) of this condition.

73.376

---

Page

9

NPDES

Permit

No. 1L0004073

Special

Conditions

(3)

NotiCe

(i)

Anticipated

bypass.

If

the

permitte?

knows in advance of

the need

for

a

bypass,

It shall

submit prior notice, if

possible

at least

ten

days

before

the

date

of

the

bypass.

(ii)

Unanticipated

bypass.

The

permittee

shall

submit notice of

an

unanticipated bypass as required in 40 CFR 122.41 (16)

(24—hour notice.)

(4)

Prohibition of bypass

(I)

Bypass

Is prohibited, and the Director may take

enforcement

action against a perinittee for bypass, unless:

(A)

Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life,

personal

injury, or severe propt~rtydamage;

(B)

There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass,

such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities,

retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during

normal periods of equipment downtime.

This condition

is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should

have been installed in the exercise of reasonable

engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which

occurred during normal periods

of

equipment

downtime

or preventive maintenance; and

(C)

The permittee submitted notices as required under

paragraph

(3) of this condition.

(ii) The Director

may

approve an anticipated bypass, after

considering its adverse effects, If the Director determines

that it will meet the three conditions listed above In

paragraph

(4)(l) of this condition.

14. The amonia as (N) concentration

shall

not exceed 1.5 mg/l during the

months of April

through October or 4.0 mg/l during the months of

November through March, unless the unionized ammonia concentration

does

not exceed 0.04 mg/l.

15.

The Permittee’s discharges shall

not,

alone or in combination

with

other sources, cause a violation of any applicable water

quality

standard.

73-377

---

C~RPORA?ION

3 January 1985

222—103-02

Vicki

May

Marathon Petroleum Company

1000 Marathon Avenue

Robinson, Illinois

Dear Vicki,

As per our telephone conversation, enclosed

is

a copy of the model output for

the Marathon stormwater proposal.

We are preparing a letter which will discuss the

use of this model

as

a tool

for

evaluation

of

the

system

after

construction,

Also

this

letter

will

specify

the

data

needs

for

developing

the

tank dike

management

plan

for

optimizing the storage of stormwater in the

tank

dikes.

If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to call.

Robert

C.

Wallace

Staff Engineer

RCW:dla

Enclosure

RECEIVE

JAN

05

J. E. FORT

a

—

73.378

EXHIBIT

B

---

Ift~t~f

!f*41’EJ!

ISIIIk.

M24

fgJI(

LMAClf

vtLtc

IAL!k4’

!iVfjWlS)

i$M.LNJ

164110W’

sirE

SUE

USE

IIv

:41

2.r4641

6.*.t6

PM3

FUll

FM

FM

.fleee.e._

a—..—

~

ass

zr

3a4E.u

•.cs’u

— ....ee.e—.—e

eeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

iwapanL

FIVE Nb

tIM

I

ItilIlalt

1WL2d t~

EkE

~g

irna

io

isa

uu

IiZ~*’tt

FkLI?

NECU

MISER

au

Lt611

likE!

VLI4L

WMFL5S

PZd

tuE

Wh5s

fltA 15?

S

flEE

iIlInESI

IImIEU

(ffjla)

gvauavI

1IkWI~

i&LtAi’

uEki~4f’

ISR.tfaia

(OUSt)

IDüV~

LV

2

S.b’i

I

Ia~0I

4

0*

S

0.404

I

0.000

0.640

51

1.414

O.K’s

—2.6Mg,)

5.~tZi~4

0.C4E.*4

—4.!~E~tS 1.55E’O$

b.E~iZ’*

~M.4

1

LOOt

v.600

01

1.454

0.00

-2.Iti’*

5.41fr*

•~j.,Ctjj •4.f~’:3

5.Ibnc4

0.t41’C

$28

•

I.t.t

4.000

73

3.05

0.0*

-.kE”)S

!.2vr:4

0.0’,E*

4.5.E45

LL4E.te

0.tOE.40

1’4.6

9

4~(.j4

0.400

73

3.17)

0.0(4

—t.M’tS

~.9.U’4

0.’0E.OO

lilnuS

5.1*46

,.0If’(a

1#1.6

Ii

v.04

13

3.M

I.I~’t

—2.ianOS

4.66L’Ot

0.00E’43

4.5k45

7.74ft4$

t.v’4*)

3~4.6

1$

0.360

4.440

73

3.699

tOut

-2.63E’IZ

4.41(15

O.v4E’Ov

-1.!2E.$S

7.25(46

0.Oti.O0

131.6

12

tiC)

0.064

71

3.699

4.W0

‘~t.6sEt45

4.hi’3e

0.ut’E9t4

—4.5.gtC$

6.14s’$6

•.4n$(

1I!.o

II

4.404

0.760

01

1.49’

ISv

-2.61!’$S

Iatt4s

4.4(4tH

-4.5tE$6

6.3ks46

0.141*;

ilf.0

14

Iii

3.760

51

1.61’

L*,

—2.601.05

3.5’i’te

O.G0E’0t

-4.52145

5,3j,fr

,(43

$g7~

iS

•.a9

t.10

17

1.494

(‘.C4v

—2.IIEe

J.Iit..t

•.4CE41

4.5iE½

5.45(46

4.KEuI

lfl.6

Is

Lust

0.760

07

1.04

OM

•

-2.641*5

;.o1.&e

~.v0teà

4.Zit.5

5.t’i-t’I

b.Es’

121.1

11

3.040

(‘.104

31

L04

LI*t

-2.oaEtOS

2.731”e

v.60E40

—,.5fsu5

4.SE”s

u.NE*i

Il.!

13

L(.)iP

I.’Mt

73

3.645

~‘.C$

—2.ehsvS

2.D:Mn

9.tu.’It

.4~Qg~,t15

4.$grt’6

t.O’j-’s.’

l~5.l

1’?

4.0’)

0.0W

73

£69)

f.ttO

—2.t*”)E

2.2.Z’t~

t.G.t’~c

-4.:2z.c~

1.biE$6

•.‘4E’~O

121.1

t.4~

t’a4

13

3.691

4.0:4

—2.ebEsb

1.a~’.,s

I.~’E.S0

-4.514$

!.2J.N

(.EE’4

I~.7

2$

•.v3I

0.04

13

3.699

taO$

-2.IE4t

l.ln.!,’s

t.e(t~4 —4.521.45

2.11(46

0.tIC’00

131.7

e.sIO

•.141’

73

3.699

0.043

—2.iEEwS

1.44E4t

•.M’JO

-4.LtiOG

2.32E’36

ListiK

It.?

23

,.6N

0.15$

13

3.699

4.4,4

-L61fl(5

l.:IEsn

4.401,40

.4~53f,4

I.NE’v6

L’4t.v4

It?

---

Df.~~i~iE

I1~E~P.EtiT

IhITL~L

9hE4

iwi

c~~~c:i~

V~LLY.E

tC~5~ (1i’L/~’IN,

~

I6:~LL~5)

W~E

D!~E

120

i8L

2.56Es01

8.Ct~E~6

P3.~

F’ND

~

5)~

:.24E-o7

1,0E~~7

i~Lftk~!~L

FIVE

1~A~

~L”~VE

S

1~Ct~E~At.

)~Lt~W

T’2

1~E

i!?

~

i~

.:~

L1~!~

~

~L~E

c:’~

V~E

~V~t.ti,

F~iiD

V~iVE

~

s...’

~

~R

liCi

f~AiE

t~U~1~1

(INC~ES)

tI$~Hi~)

Ib41,~Y) ~

t~1•~~)

l.i~i/Lht~

(3~LLr~~

(~LLLi~

~

24

~

0.710

ai

i.i~4

-2.6~E+t.5

9.E’~~

0.tOEwO

~4.5~E~t:

1.41t’~

u..~0E—’L

~7

1.494

0.OtC.

—2.~E’~r

~

~

-4.3~2s~5

~

~

0.68’)

81

1.494

0.~

5.E~U~ t.~•.

t.~Es~0

7.23Esu4

~

0.v~’t~0)

13~.4

C

2?

0.~40

1.28u

95

~.526

0.021

—1.~~v5 5.65i~

U.½E—•..~

—2.

~7Es(5

7.9.E.~5

*E~’

~

.5

N

C..47u

1.330

~3

O.52b

0.l4~

4.UE’~

1.~E~j6 0.00F~~* i.2~E’(~

1.5ZE•~

CE’~

2~

1.3~u

~5

0.526

0.0.~0

-2.~’5

7.~~5

~

-4.~E’C5

i.06~’6

~

•~t~

~3~•3

I.

38u

~

0.526

C.. (‘0

—2.

~

4.

9i~

~5

t.

t~E-

—4.

~405

6. 11~05

0.0~’0

14L.

~E:

I

0..~

1.3~

~5

0.~26

~

—7.61~4

4.~5~s.5

~Es&’v

—!.~E+~5

4.67E~5

~).l;~E~0~

~L9

2

~

1.t’~c’

37

I.4~4

~.l

I

-2. 1~E~‘5

~

~

-~69E’(’5

9.8if~v4

~

I43.~

I. 190

~5

0.526

3. 2~4

I.UE-.ii

i.s;~-.~

0.v~E~(&

2.52E+iii

2.5~E~0J

0.t~~+~R)

31.8

4

~.‘30

4,~)

95

0.526

0.

15~.

4.94iF~5.

1.fr4E~Y

0.~Es00

/.7k+~5

2.60Et~1

0,iH.E4.:

2B,Z

5

0.31)

~I0

15

0.526

0.t’~1

~

I.o~E•~~1

:~‘w~

—‘.0i~+~’3

2.6~Es~7

v.0’.E’()

:a.s

5.320

~

o.sio

o.o~o

-2.~Et0~

Lb1E~7

0.~:.0E~c -4.52E+~5

2.5bEst.’7

Q.;~+s~C

5.OBe

95

0.526

~

-2.t8E’0~

!.5~f~’

•:i.o~s~t~

-4,5:E•03

2.5~E+ui

~uE0~

0.~0

4.6~)

~i5

0.526

0.~

-2.~BE-05

I.3~Es’~i

0.

0E+~C

-4.5E~5

2.4iE•~I7

0.0;Es.’C~

34.4

9

~

0.820

87

1.494

~‘(‘t’

—2.~EE~5

I.

~E~•7

0.0~Es~0 —4. 52E ~S

2.4~i~~?

U.0.E4?~0

4

G. 1:0

s.i.34~

;3

3.69

(..u~0

-~,~+vS

l..i~L~7

“.~L’~4~0

-4.~Esv5

?.3~E.~7

0.00E’~ui

3~,4

H

~

0.

1~

13

3.

~99

OMt

—2.~?~5

I.4i~Z~u

0.(~5~00-4.~2~’0~

~.33~1

~

4~.4

32

0.

130

73

~

~

2.6~~O5

j.4~:4!j~

•:.cc~~~’~

—~2Et:s5

~.2~E~01

~0

42.~

13

3.b’i9

~.0~iJ

—2,6fEt:~

1.~2~”Y

~

—4.~2E

-05

2.24~.~? t’.~~(?~0~

~

0.

~o

0. 1!~

i3

3.6~?

0,

t’~‘I

—2.~.’.’5

I.si~

~

l~.

~•O

—4.~2Et.’I5

2.2~E’..1

~

~t.4

~5

0.220

u.2~..

73

3.~,99

0.0”j

-2.~~3

~

~

—4.;’2~+(’~

2.t5E~u!

~

‘~.4

i.

&..~

..

~ct.

ii

i

~

~

—~

~i’:~..c

,

~

.~

~

.~

—~c;~+,v~

~1IF’07

u.0f.Esi)0

~0.4

---

t’Wt

U

I ‘.a

..

Stilt’ GE

ir.mt

T

13171?..

V.15

WE

*P4UTf

b’i.iE

11t5131

itt”PC

tM L5Ii$ Wtj*;

WE

Slit

514

5111

.——

.______

.e—e

100

:4!

2.36147

6.40146

FM

Ml

POll

FCC

Sli

3.241’Ol

1.04147

oee.e.

ItPEWflt

—

Fill

54?

ESE

—-

S

IICREIIEIISL

1FLI

70

‘

tat

•iti

IVLC1i

76

15111

P0)

?1314!CE

P41(1~

F.EUP

*1154

aS

11FF

DikES.

i&CtE

SVEIILIt

P211

VLfl

twill

FS~

101

53

6071

II#thESI

‘0~e———

•flee

S.~

IICIIUI

~eeeefl

.e~n.fl

lThtifls

—

$14J01)

flnfl.

IMU$lE.

.e..e.

134U.IIE)

101dM,)

IGILLOIuS)

(1*1153)

UEEIa

—

Ii

0.000

4.290

13

3.699

4.000

-2.61(45

1.371441

4.04140

-4.521.45

2.061

41

0.04*

52.4

II

(.0*

0.290

73

3.699

0.04

1.61(445

l.2e1’4,.

S.IvE’*

4.5(.45

2.41(47

0.401400

5’.S

19

0.070

0.2*

73

3.699

1.400

‘2.65(45

1.~tE’~7 4.00:440

4.521t5

I.97E07

0.00(400

36.~

.1

4.(t’)

0.~

73

3.699

0.000

—2.skne

1.2mG?

v.Ok’00

-4.5J-45

1.92141

4A~Cut,

5nC

21

0.40

v.4.0

13

3.619

4.406

—I.M1~S~

l.211’u?

•.OvEWJ

-4.SJ’IS

1.111441

0.’?0Fw4

SC.!

23

0.413

~.03S

71

3.699

0.14

‘2.tatSS

I.lInt’?

4.01’00

-4.121’03

1J1147

4*40

62.5

23

0.040

4.414

73

3.69)

0.S°0

-2.601’s)

l.Iet’07

t.eet’s

-I.5.s’O5

1.1914?

4.006440

0.5

24

4.49

4.110

13

3.699

0.114

2.llni.5

1.1cn$?

i.00C4*

4.4oLwS

IJ2t*1

0.(4f.~)

62.5

35

1.304

1.530

95

1.526

0.529

3.791446

1.5a’t•1

4.44-00

6.atE’iS

2.44(47

4.041’e*

~.6

26

0.054

2.350

95

144

0.04

2.61145

I.SM’41

•.Ovt*

4.521*5

2.31n,1

OaIE*

Th6

21

0.170

2.04

95

0.526

0.311

1.551*5

1.651w?

0.rZs00

2.461.t6

2.646401

4k~n’4

2k?

2$

0.020

3.6*0

95

4.526

0.600

—2.61E’OS

i.ou’a1

I.(41,C0

—4.52E’vS

2.59141

t.c&4k

.0.?

a

0.04

3.590

95

0.826

4.400

—2.65(445

l.fr4E’0?

O.0E.44

-4.521.45

2.551407

4.tinOO

31.1

30

0.000

2.140

95

4.526

0.000

-2.652•tl

1.6,:’”?

va)Me10

4.52E*5

2.501407

•atE4I

32.1

3!

0.440

0.540

01

1.414

0.0*

-2.9.445

l.21’47

0.tOE’03

—4.52145

2.461401

•.oot.a

~I.1

56

1

0.104

3.794

07

1.094

0.0(0

-2.60(45

lJtnvl

t.0k-’*

-4.!a’05

2.4*1.01

0.4Mw

a.s

2

0.0*.

4.020

71

3.699

4.00.

‘2.61(45

l.3!c’4s

4.Oki*

4.igEtvS

3.311th

4.0*1.40

30.7

0.000

0.00)

73

3.699

0.410

-2.601’GS

l.5’?’tl

(‘.EEflO

4.52J’35

7.321st?

0.M’*

Lv.?

*

v.640

4.0~0

73

3.699

0.~00

—2.ME’46

1.44141

5.43(444

-4.L’145

2.25(41

t.MsH

42.3

5

ISO

J.000

73

3.6w

0.070

1.60(545

1.C007

$..

.

‘4.5ntS

2.2*4?

0.tt.n

44.5

6

0n44

4.0k’

13

3.699

0.04

—2.69C4&5.

1.4~E*7

0.40(40)

-4.521465

2.19147

~‘.fC1440

46.1

7

0.400

0.004

13

3.699

LOuD

-2.53645

l.4t?41

4.a.se

4.SAstS

2.1*147

0.0014C

*..t

•

Lie

tIN

fl

1699

0.13

-Za11.45

1.3’14?

0.*’*

-4.5*05

3.$k41

0.01o34

54.1

---

O’16

h4’314’0

lIsP3i

~43EVP’•‘er,4•e

w’e3,n

W’3fffl-

flu

ton

u

in,

.rzs

~

10.3011

LPE1

‘I’IWO

9t.fl11

Sanh~~.

434.4

669•1

U

Ito

OI~1

•.~

•*~r•

t..1vI•I

v~3rt- (0’3’Y’•~

9ã.3&’,’I

~

•~q•~

tOn

U

OI0’O

9

V?6

$(,3a3.$

1)’34I~I

ç,,p;.p.

4@’34’~~

~~pr•5

5S.3c9l~..

4:r4

‘

4091

Cl

011.4

*4

•.fl

04.3310

10.3011

f(.eIf9.4..

•4.30I~b

9*qI;’o

g~p91g..

~

649’f

ft

Ito

eor

it

o’41

c4.;vo

10.3911

cs3tc’s

403~4•4

p,Iwo

CJ.30fl..

0f~’,

001

II

0190

IN’I

97

no

s~s.o

rn~it•

4.2fç•4

O0.310’I

97.Kr6

10.191-

iwo

0601

13

our.

‘ion

eu

cc.w1e

Inn1

ç9t3~1p.

C,4,4~

w3r6

Øfl99’f.

oio.4

sot;

ii

owe

iii’,

5144

44434•$

Loefl~T

3i431t1.

~*3Q0~49flI3ç•~

f4.lfl•f..

Oi~$

ow;

ii

4090

0010

6’.!

404W0

L0.~0’I

ç~,~t~Up

$fl44.4

cs’;ro

R+’fll-

000.9

6L9’f

ft

o~••

it

6,41

~$3$~~

104311’I

c)crrp

4$160~i

L4.374’I

~1+~fl’j—

oo’1o

on

U

544’O

oc:’t

ni

44.3r,.,

0~ES1

cc.rro- oswo

ie.rr;

co.rrc-

ooo•o

ton

U

3304

~

6

‘1

0t’3G~J’0

1049491

5’~3Wt-

OI$3~0.4

flflfll

30.3591—

•~yq

6M~f

IL

54~’0

0010

61

6CL

3qflP44

jOflç9’;

cs~ci

404310”t’

1’l’3311

~

tla’i

66,1

(i

cwi

040

01

6.39

4’34’).0

1’’wl

3~~913~0’

04+3441

Le,3fl’I

3$!49’t—

OW!

669.1

ft

09414

çp4l,

a

fly

44-390’l

1th30~I

ShEn—

W.k’t~0

tC’tPfl’I

30,3~9.j

ClEf

6.91

U

940’0

f0I~)

9

S’tS

0’ø140’0

I0.391’I

~~“3G~fr-

14.300’I

1(”9I1

50.’fO’l-

W’YO

U~~t

ft

410’O

~M0

LI

9U9

44~3(’J’0

10.319l

~0~’S~1-

~

,e.:It.I

~

~~414

~f•f

ft

414’.

14?!

01

ra

iklkP

Lt’310’I

0+3f3•fr-

44i344’4

14.30t1

L4.39l~t-

0401

6691

U

Ofø’O

‘10O’~

LI

o~o:

~)t3M’4

14’3!61

SQ~3tfl-

O0.3100

L0’!WI

34.3391-

1054

66’l

U

4100

000$

£9

ft

P1C

W’3000

L0’3!6’I

onus’s-

~

L4t3’t’I

5)flji.

0000

6691

IL

C!4’O

540~4

II

roc

OstilEl

1*3101

.a_+lg.s-

40,3l,

L0.’WI

coan’i—

ciii

ooi

ç,j

4;

091

O~h330~0

Th.M~’i

1(.3t3~0—

Od$!3’fl

L4’3li’l

~P3QE!—

pro

j49lf

ft

910.4

o

iflGflI

IS1~I1VS)

l2~21”?0?

I’WlflI

(!tWf

I

5~Tt9$

flj(fls9~

i5)’~!)

14313511

Sf3521!!

310.9

fill

t ‘&~I

naii

W31

t*~

!fllftlN!

35W’)?

3!aIS

t~!1P1

P14

3N~*

413341

dliii

vs

~ciI

5’

rlSd

lift

‘ira

3:

14111

Wp3134301

S

Plifl

All

*11

lt’1RP&351

LielIO’I

13.30t’t

60!

1dM

CIII

(W3~

404*1

s043l~

ff1

411

311i

3’!9

310

lvii

._.________.___e_—_—

——.

——I

ISS’iTkl) ~3l!flhI

~d,CE~

IJIIV)

,u~i

;iTh*;

11*

ElI!

bluE

Al Viii

Th~Uii

---

ED~G(

If ~iE~T

!~ITlA~.

usjP

b~.T

C~ACUY

~UiUMi

t4Cc~S)

.~Lfl~1S~

.~Lt.~53)841.LDk5)

DDE

~DE

DIKE

~tkE

180

:ao

~.56E~07

6.~UE+06

POND

FOND

PO~D

POND

289

~0

3.24E.07

L.00E~07

1NtREh~1AL

F!~E

~AY

CURVE

S

IkRENENtAL

DtFLU~E13

~

DIKE

1~F1tWIC

FOND

PC~O ~I~A’~CE

fF~CIP

PR~CIP

NU$bER

VALUE

RL.~OF~

CitES

W~LflF

E~FLC~

Fa’.9

VCLtM~

0~E~FLCi

~

tiLl

DATE

II&hL~)

(LPi~ES)

(iNCt~i

(6ALIDk~)

(S~LLUN~

~LL~)NSi(~A1/~AYI LCALL~t~S

1~ALLO*.~I fIN1ES

E8

I

(.450

0.30u

~

3,699

0.cwo

-2.bBEiu5

7.27~t~ 0.0’iE~~j-4.5E405

1.OIE+vl

0.0~E.00

99.~

2

0..~9t

0.750

87

1.494

0.003

—2.42E.eS

7.~3Es’.’6

t3.00Et~0

-4.IIE+05

9.7IE’t~6

0.OOE4Oo

~jij.6

3

O.u25

1.140

9~

0.52b

0.000

—2.oBE+05

ó.76E’~

0.oCL’oO

-4.52Es~)5

9.2tEs~6

0.0cE~0)

502.8

4

u.uu3

0.875

87

1.494

0.~0O

—2.69~+O5

~

0~i(E4A0

4.52Es03

8.9iEs~)b

0.0’)E’OO

104.5

5

0.U~5

0.870

87

I.4~

0.~0O

—2.68E+05

6.22E+m

0.00E~0

-4.52E’05

8.36Es06

0.uof~00

1i6.S

6

0.09’

0.915

87

1.4i4

0.~00

-2.L8EtOS

5.E~fr6

0.uOE+oO

-4.SZE.5

~

O.0E’OO

i(iii.c’

1

(.C~2

0.505

91

I.4~4

0.00k

—2.ôEE’0~

~

0.OuEtvO

—4.52E+05

7.45EiuL

O.o)E.ot’

0.9

a

u.ouo

t’.IIS

73

3.~99

0~

—2.6~E+05

5~42~s~

~OE+~i~

-4.52Es03

7.0(E~06

000E.uO

11:.~I

9

0.0.0

0.090

73

3.6~

0.0’

0

2.6~E05

5,

15E~06

~E+~)0

4.523’05

6.5~t06

-

0,(tuE+0(

114.c

o.o:~e

o.ces

7~

3.699

0.OuO

-2.6~4o5

4.9E~’ti5

O+Ou

-4.52E’iS

6.I0~o6

u.uOE•vO

~s6.9

ii

o.OoO

0.u80

73

3.699

0.0~O

-2.6~E~~5

4.62~+0t

0.t.~’v0

-4,5i~05

5,65Esu6

0.001+00

519.9

12

0.v00

0.000

13

3.699

~.0(~0

—2.6EE~05

~

0.0~i+00

-4.521+05

s.lcE4c~6

o.ooEso~,

~2.9

Il

0.0)0

0.000

73

3.699

O.Ooo

—2.&6Es~5

~

t’.00E~0~

—4.5~Et~5

4.74E~O6

0.00~o0

122.9

54

0,~L’

C.u0o

73

3.6~9

0.000

-2.6fE’05

3.31~(*

0.(QE•0O

—4.SiE4t’ä

4.~+06

O.0CE+~0

524.c

55

0.~i00

0.000

73

3.699

(.0i~O

—2.~Es~5

3.L41’Oé

o.”~E+)0

-4.52:.~s

3.B4E~(6

(,.Q0~400

126.9

0.0w

t’.OOO

13

3.69c

0’)0

-2.baE’03

3.2f~t~b

u.uOE-~0

-4.52E~5

3.39E’Ob

0.’E~oO

1.~.0

17

~

0.000

73

3.699

O.0~’O

—2.6~Es’s5

.

3.~’~’0~0.u~E’~0—4.5~E.05

~.9f+06

‘~E+’~0

135.0

18

U.0~D

0.000

13

3.699

0.ut’0

-2.6SE’*5

2.742.:’~

0.0~Eso~-4.~E~t5 i.4~E.~6

u.v:E’itC

~

19

0.~t’0

0.uOO

fl

3.~3

0.000

-2.6~E~05

2.4/E+~6

0.001+00

-4.~2E•.’5

2.03E•ob

0.OOEOv

135.~

20

u.t’t*

0.00Q

73

3.69~

0.t~i0

-:.oeE~o3

2.2E~06

0.toEsu~-

-4.2103

t.58E.~b

0.~’~E.0o

l~Lt

21

0,UiO

C.00~

73

3.a99

0.*

-2.62E’OS

1.94~’06

0.0Cct0~

4.~2~+~5

1.131t’b

U..OE+00

U9.t~

22

0.t-00

~.tJ(0

13

3.659

0.0’:0

-2.681+t5

1.61E’u6

~.0oE00

-4.5;:E-•J3

6.74~+~.5

0.O0~s00

141.0

23

0

000

~ 0(0

13

3

659

t’

(JO

-2

~8E’s3

~s~)

I 5?’

~

2 22E+~5

0

0’E’00

~3

)

---

ot~t

00.3OirO

00+3000

~04~30r1- 0”3~)fl

00+i0)0

V~)+3Q9’~— ~o

669’f

£1

06~0

0L~’0

81

o-t~

00.300’)

~3’~fl’0

cn.3~rL—

~‘-~e3i)fl~0

0i~43~i~P0~+3c9’7-

0(’0’0

L69’~

£1

o~~o

06:’O

LI

(~‘ftT

0:430’~’0

00+3OIrI)

“e3(~1—

0v3.”~’0

~r0’i’0

‘~~‘~—

.

o:.00

689’s

LI

00.rO

‘)~‘)‘0

91

~

~~(i+~’~)

00i~0A”)

C’t4’~~~t—

+3~1~

~

•~-

n-00

~

o~oo

‘)~P1

+~)AA

~0~3~)’.~’0

~0i~O~I—

0(’t3~)’)

~

~~9’~-

‘s)0’~

~6q~

~L

(i~t

‘~

~p’I

0~~30fl’0 0fl30O~

cn’3~.~~t-

~Ql~’~

t~i31~I~0

~0’3~i~’~—

flfl~’~)

~

:L

oco’o

ii

0~b’l

‘~fl.~t)’0

~0+300.)

“)‘~(

~

0t~.30P~0 ~

0’~0’(P

~69~

LI

S6~0

0000

0’~~5 0~).3~~0

00’3000

c~e3~~I—

(~‘~~~o)’o

o~.3~r0~fl.3P9?—

0(’Y’)

669’f

ti

co~o

~oo

II

0’~”1

G0s?~’0

0043~)’O

~i-

00~N0~) (~30l~0 ~0+309?-

0.’OO

9~~0 ~6

~tI

0~0’0

(~f~

‘(~#~•“lI’A

C~).30(’fl

0~~’I-

((~43~)~C~fl’~’0

~043U9’~- 0~0i

9~c0

cb

~9’l

00~0

6

~

)i+3~0’0

)0s330~0

~.)4i~’t-

~0430.’’)

0.4300~0

~0~389~-.

flOO’0

9~~() Sb

0S9~1

SCO’O

6

0,~

~0+3’~0’O00+30~’0

+3~~(-

C0+~-)0’0

~“

•?9~-

fl’~0’0

9~S~0 ~6

fl091

I

s31.)~fl

43~•9

5fls3Z5~-

0’)~30(’~0

s3~5

S~~89~-

00’Y

9~ç’0

Sb

06~~1

9

9’Ib!

0O’3~00

~‘~~3I~S

‘+3I~S

(43~’A

S0i2’)~’t

~0.~0~’L

L~1~

669’t’

LI

‘)OO)

0~bi

c

Y4t1

0043C’~’)

00+!000

~“+30~’I-000.~~ (~‘~)~0 •3~9’~!— 0(’~’0

~

LI

0~)0’~

flO-Y4)

~

~~.3•W+~

0’)~00.)

5fl+)Q~(-

0’~’~’O’)”!

~

r~)~39.~

(‘00’)

~69L

LI

00fl~+)

£

~

~fl~3(~1~

V’3)fl0

‘4~’Z~I—

00.30~0

00434(.)

~0+~9’?-

4’~,)’0

(‘s)O•O

~

.)(~3.)(

~f

j10~

.i(~1-

0(~’~*~’

~

:)0i~’:~

;~+~rz-

~

~9~L

Li

0’~•~

I

1Jk~W

~

fl0’3~A

0~100’O

S~~—

~)(~30~Y,)

t’fl’30u’9

c0+3~9~:-

.~().~i)

~69i

£1

0Ifl’O

(0!Y0

~

~i+3~A~

AflW~

S0’3~’~-

0~+-’.~-)

~f9~’~

ç359~~-(+~)0

~69~L

£1

~I”0

0(’OO

c~”t

fl~,’(~r~)(~‘)43OO0

~0~’~-

00.3O0~0

c(~+39~~

So4~f39’~-

O’fl”i

66Cf

LI

OL0~

0C-’~’0

9Z

(~~p~i

.XI+~~0’0

0~+3~~r0

;37~~~

0~)’?)YG

~p9~

~(+3~9’~-

0~0’0

1i69’L

£L

0~V0

•w~’o

~

0~+3’0’0

00’300’0

+3~~—OO+3fl.~0

041~’I

S0.~9’~—W~00

68~L

U

~0O0

0t00

(~P

N0~1’~)(NJfl1~P)

(SNC1’~C)

(~11~Dt

(~VV1~J~)

(S3~~!4I)

~S3H~Il

~535’~$~)

~1W03I~

~!!

.~I)J1

i~l1~fl

~fl1~

~j~)

~gr~.y

~

IMIPi

5~3’1Wtl

dIlbd

~J1!1~~Ud

~hOd

3~I~

C..

r~1iN1

iN3W~~l

~

~fl5

AV~3MJ

‘~1~1W38~$

I0+3~0’l I0.3’~Z~

.0~

6ø~

90+3~9I0439~l

~

3•.4~

3~4l~

3~1~

.ICp~3’flj9)

(~‘5’~t~)

.

(~4(4/’~9)

(E~~~:~l)

1t,~!l.li

1~~.k’3~

~3~Itl~:3

---

1041,51

9ll*DEi;

.

1111141.

MIS

MTE

C4P4CI1f

0OWE

(41415)

;anum

(NLLM

(iNStIll

aeeaa.

pug

—

-.

out

putt

out

—

naaaa.flea_seflefl

136

2.ttl+07

6.604*6

.na

-

100

nuo

tea

tarn

ta

a~.

-afla_n_n_n

—

--

219

510

3.241+07

1.001+01

5aafle~

—

—

-

-.

114W!DL

n~t

in

Cdlbi

0

$UCIBIINTt

IPLO,

11

in

out

$WL~d

To

sat

rae

usva

nEll,

NEUP

114

01.11

t*F

HISS

OOUN

1VEFtOI

F1Il~

VSUfl

005

VLU

P541

10’

ii

Nit

(1111(10)

Saae.~Sas~aflaeaflaeaa.__

flirliFi’

(1111(111

—

iNLIifl)

liflLt*3)

(EflLtülIS

ML/40P)

s~LtiU)

IMLLOIU)

1ft1(15)

$9

0.000

0.160

07

1.4

01*

-2.68E’45

0.6040

0.0u1K4

-1.2*45

0.0140

0.01.00

144.0

20

0.91$

0.760

07

1.494

0.100

6.iinvS

6.lk.0)

0.60*

9.60u45

9.61t45

0.40140

139.1

21

0.005

1.613

95

0.526

0.000

-2.611*

3.431’45

0.60*

4.52145

5.60*

4.Ik*

14;.?

22

0.60

hObO

95

052o

0.000

-2.601’iS

7.521.0*

0.60*

-4.52140

5.511*04

0.0*00

113.1

33

0.0*

1,390

75

0.520

0.110

“2a661405’

0.01140

0.60440

-1.2*vS

0.0*40

C.I01’40

04.0

24

0.000

0.920

01

‘94

0.000

-2.60.45

0.011,00

0,441.00

-7.20.45

0.001+40

1.401*

144.0

25

0.000

0.920

07

1.494

0.010

1.60(40

0.051*)

0.60.40

-1.2k43

0.01140

0.6040

144.0

26

0.230

0.60

73

3.099

0.00)

-2.6&*

0.60410

0.6040

-1.2t*

0.*4e

0.iOtøO

144.0

21

0.610

0.230

73

3.609

0.000

-2.61E+vS

0.0(1+40

0.)IEsI0

-1.20c$0$

0.0*40

0.04140

144.0

0.320

0.900

01

1.494

0.400

1.601*05

0.K:’vO

0.001+00

-1.25445

0.60*

0.4(40

*44.0

ct

0.000

0.920

01

1.494

0.000

-3.601.45

0.041*

0.04140

-7.201*45

0.60*

0.60+40

144.0

30

0.060

0.420

07

1.494

0.040

-2.IeZlOS

0.001*

0.6040

-7.201+05

0.Ik’SO

$.&11’40

144.0

.3;

0.000

0.900

01

1.494

0.60

-2.6145

0.60+00

0.00140

-7.201445

0.00140

0.01*

144.0

UI

I

0.600

0.7’.,

07

1.49$

0.05*

-3.11144

0.001+40

0.60+00

-3.24140

0.001+00

0.60400

1N.S

2

0.3*0

0.00

07

1.494

.000

-2.6140

0.60*

0.60.0

-1.

lEnS

0.00140

0.(41’OO

140.4

3

0.030

0.970

07

1.49$

0.000

-2.6145

0.001+00

0.001w,

-1.201+45

0.60*

0.4fr’)O

144.~

4

0.005

1.000

07

1.494

0.400

-2.611445

0.60+40

0.60*

-1.201+05

0.011*

0.4(140

144.0

5

0.350

0.943

01

1.494

0.002

-2A4~sI5

0.011th

0.60-0

-1.071.45

0.60440

0.**iO

144.0

6

OUt

1.295

95

0.526

0.0*7

-1.03140

~

L0J1*

•5041’$

0.001+00

0.60+00

$44.0

7

0.4*

0.905

07

1.494

0.60

-3.613*

1/1140

0.6040

-1.20140

0.6040

0.10140

144.0

I

0.110

0.615

07

1.40$

0.60

-2.61145

0.0(1*

0.011*

-1.2$twS

0.60.10

0.6040

I44.~’

9

0.170

0a745

07

1.49$

0.010

1.61035

0.01Lw0

0.6044

-7.201+05

0.4t.I0

0.001*

$44.0

$0

0.000

0.910

01

1.494

oso.

-3.$g45

0.00.90

0.041*

-7.20(45

0.01*

0.11140

$44.0

---

~RAI~A~I~

1~E~1~EIV

INITIt.L

~.AiE

Ci~4~IiY

V6t.UNE

(ALHES~

IOPIThIN’

(6~t.L~3~55)

1E~LLflNS)

DiKE

DIKE

~I~E

~E

190

1~6

2.56E+~1

6.0~E~06

P~ND

~

i99

~00

3.24E+O)

l.OOE.C7

Ik~RE~EN~L FIVE DAI

CURVE

S

1~CRE~EN1~LINfL~~0

~IPE

D1~.E

I~FL~

TO

F’UHD

F~1D D151~CE

F~1P

PRECIP

NU~9ER

VA~.UE

Ri~NL.FF

£I~$

~iLU1:

0VE.ilFLt~

F’t~D

e(lLL1?~E

C’tERfLU~ 1~W~

1E~

MD

9AIE

tINChE~

u~Cw~S~

(1NCt~SI

~AL/O~\Y) I6hL-3k~)

(BALIONS)

t~AL!0~Y) (a~L1oN~)

I0AiLJN~)

(Ih~KS~

0.Oi~

0.840

97

1.494

0.CvO

-2.~8Es05

0.~t~E’v~i

0.0~400

-1.2oEiO5

0.UVE’OO

0.OOE+00

144.u

(2

v.060

0.440

73

3.~9

0.OvO

-2.8~E+~5• ~0~,00

D.U&E+i0

~7.2CE~05

0.~0E’00

0.’OEtOO

1’4.0

(3

t.S~0

0.420.

73

3.695

0.136

3.9i~Es0~

3;9&~5

0.00E’~.O

&.t~E’05

6.ISEsOS

0.COEsOO

141.3

14

0.430

1.940

95

0.~2b

0.124

3.30F’05

7.34E~0~

0.OvE’UD

5,20E~05

I.13L+06

U.0~E.+00

!3~.’3

15

0.0v1

2.100

95

0.526

•OuO

—2.8~s05

4.6aE+c5

0.UOE+00

4.52E~05

6.d3Es05

0.00E~00

14~.0

16

D.~J

~.020

95

0.526

0.000

-2.6EE~5

1.96E.~

0.0GEs00

-4.52~+0~

2.31E.05

0.00E~00

~

17

0.010

2.630

95

0.526

0.000

—2.8~E.05

0.s00

0.t~E+00

-7.~0~t05

0.OOEtUD

0.OOE#i0

l4~.0

19

0.uOO

I.98u

95

0.526

0.uOo

-2.6~Est5

0~j0Es0L

(i.Oi.E+’D

-7.20Etv5

0.t’OE’OO

~.00Ei’)0

144.0

19

0.C)0

0.430

13

3.~91

0,0w)

—2.68Es~

0.OOE.00

0.O~Esu~-7.20E+05

0.00E~vU

H.OOE”I0

~

20

0.0w)

0.030

13

3.699

0.w*

—2.6~E.5

0.00~+0t.~

6.00E+00

-7.20Etu5

0.OOf+uO

0.00~’00

141.0

0.C00

0.030

13

3.~?9

0.000

—2.6EE’0~

0.w)E’00

0.uOEsOO

-7.20E~05

u.V0E+00

0.OOEsCO

144.&

22

0.00~

~.010

73

3.699

0.0w)

-2.68E’05

0.u0EsO~

0.v0E.0’~

-7.20E.05

0.t’OE.OO

0.0eE~00

444.0

23

0.000

0.0)0

73

3.699

0.000

—2.6FE05

0.~c’E~00

0.00Esw)

-1.20E’vS

0.ODE’vO

0.(OE+(0

144.0

24

0.(4’O

0.000

13

3.679

0.0~0

2.b~E+05

0.00E~0

0.OOE+U0

-1.20E~05

0.Oc’E’uO

O.t*E+00

144.0

25

0.000

u.vOO

73

3.699

0.0w)

—2.6BE+05

0.w)Es:’o

O.OOE.w)

-1.2CE~s5

0.oot~0o

6.O0E+00

l44.t~

26

0.oOO

0.000

73

3.699

0.~wJ

-2.68~+’5

0.w)E~v0

0.00Et0J

-7.20E’u~

0.uuEsf’O

D.~Es0C

144.

21

0.0w)

0.~00

73

3,699

0.0t~

-2.6~E’~ &.00E+’iO

0.0~+0b

—1.20E’OS

0.v(E+

0.0~E+0~

t4s.o

23

0.500

0.0~0

73

3.699

‘:‘,o~’e

•2.h6~5

o.~oo

c.~’1E.U

-7.20~Es05

o.ooEt~o

0.001+00

1~4.C

0.030

0.~O0

87

1.494

0.000

-2.~EE~05

0.

0E41.0

0.CUE+0O

-1,2~E’O5

u.00E$00

0.v~E+G0

144.0

30

0.86D

0.530

87

1.494

0.1ã3

1.81E.o5

4.E1E•0~

(t.0EsUD

7.~0E.05

7.5vitOS

U.01*’00

14v.7

~

I

1.510

1.396

95

0.526

1.078

5.0’:Es~6

5.4EE~u6

0.oOE+0O

8.OtEsOb

8.75Es”6

0.OOC’OO

t0~.1

2

0.65k

2.960

95

0.526

0.211

l.OiEW6

6.57~+06

u.OOEtw)

l.1E~08

1.OSE’O7

0.v~’E~

9Y.4

95

0.52k

0.2~5

L32E.05

7.40E~”6

0.00E’Q~

l.3iE’oo

1.191+07

u.0~Es0u

‘l~.6

---

0*16011

l**IIIFNT

IIIFUL

1PM

WI

CUElif

VILdIE

ocou;

aio;~o’ i*tni

iwt~i

—-

ee.flane~.

y~

sn

EKE

0111

1111

bitT.

ee_saeflea

an.

—- -

-

eeene

100

106

2.561410.01+16

eeee.ee.e—

e

—

e_

na_san

lilt

PGI

NM

Nil

-eeeeeeeneee~

-

-~

at

sos

3.24141

1.01+07

IENPIIT*L

—

FlEW

-

Cfl

—

I

flitifit

IULIIII

SUE

$14

ItO

TI

Nil

Nil

Il31*~~t

tsw:’

NICIP

mrga

94111

1111FF

$1115

srn

OOUFJI

rim

c*tiit

$EWLFO

FEC!’ 1Y

011

(1*1111

(1t110)

t__eeeeeeeneeeaaeeeee

(111(11)

(00.10011

—

ea

a__

seaaaaae_

—.

t

(*3.255)

atzi

(SPLINT)

reS

—

-

—a.a

*41t1U3)

~L*I)

11114$)

- -

eeaeaaaaa

——

a_coca

—

—

4

0.040

3.690

95

0.526

0.400

•2.601+45

7.131*66

0.011*

-4.521*

1.1*41

0.0140

93.6

5

0.000

3.660

95

0.526

0.000

-2.61*

6.06146

0.60*

4.521*

1.0(141

0.011*

95.6

6

0.000

3.1W

93

0.326

0.100

-2.601+05

641146

0.00.40

1.531+05

1.01+01

0.6040

91.6

7

0.230

1.226

95

0426

0.024

-1.511445

0.44146

0.01*

-2.64143

1.021+11

0.001*

90.1

O

0.0(0

0.010

07

1.494

0.000

-3.6&*

6.$h46

0.041*

-4.521*

9.721+06

0.411*

$04.1

9

0.000

0.330

13

3.699

0.004

—2.60145

5.9*14*

0.431*

-4.52143

9.27146

0.00.40

$t~.I

10

0.60

0.230

13

3.699

0.000

-2.651405

5w64n(6

0.0tt43

4.e21.v5

1.111+06

0.0k+40

1(4.0

II

0.390

0.230

73

3.699

0.000

2.661+05

5.31146

0.001+40

-4.3a405

0.341*06

0.0(1+00

kI.0

12

0.400

0.630

01

1.414

Oa10

—1.121445

5.2i.146

&M+$0

-2.9145

0.441*06

0.011*

1*6.2

13

0.170

0.170

01

1.494

&ie*

—~.~E+i5

4.

1&+06

0.01140

-4.32115

7.61E+i6

0.00140

W&.2

14

0.490

1.040

01

1.494

0.422

-1.hktJS

4.71146

0.451*

-2.12145

7.33146

4.00t*

1*2.4

15

tOOl

1.530

95

0.336

0.000

~2.6&4i

4.SfmnO

0.00:4)

-4.531.05

6.01+0

OMEnS

1*3.4

16

0.00

1.620

93

0.326

0.000

-2.60145

4.4E’(4

0.vIl*

-4.52145

6.4*46

tEE’iO

115.4

17

0.60

1.230

93

0.526

0.010

-2.eiS

3.94146

Oh11s10

-4.531.03

5.97146

0.001*

1*1.5

II

0.100

0.751

37

1.49$

0.60

-2.61*05

3.10Es*

0.001*

1.521+05

5.53+06

0.60*

119.3

0.650

0.760

17

1.494

0.000

—2.611+46

3.43146

040.40

-4.3143

5.071+0

0.011*

$22.5

20

0.600

0.320

11

3.619

1.010

-2.601*

3.16146

0.401*

4.521+05

4.631+06

0.001+0

123.3

7$

0.250

0.230

73

3.699

0a$0

-2.605.05

2.fl146

0.061*

-4.571*

4.*71*

0.60+00

1.5.5

2.

0.390

0.411

73

3.609

0.000

-2.601+05

2.625n6

0.01.00

4.531*05

3.7*146

0.01*

$27.5

23

040

0.070

Il

1.494

0.000

-2.6145

2.3k’ts

0.001+00

-4.371*05

3.36146

0.001*

12..5

24

LIuO

0.150

07

3.494

0.040

-2.601*.

3.0’06

0.601+0

4.5Z’vS

2.O$(’vO

0.*K4

131.3

25

0.120

0.70

07

$.494

0.000

-2.60:445

$.0d’36

0.001*

4.521*

2.361+06

0.411*

133.3

20

0.00

0.020

07

1.49$

0.110

-2.611+45

1.551+16

0.441*

-4.521+01

$.911’IO

0.101*

j~,5

---

tFnI,~aE

1R1ME~T

INIT:AL

~fEA

1~1E

C4P~CI1Y

~1iLIiME

lACt~ES)

tGAL/I1~

(6~LLD1~9)

16AL1UN~)

DiKE

0i~E

~1kE

DikE

180

106

2.56E407

6.C~E+06

PoND

PUND

POtID

289

5u0

3.24E+07

LOOE’Ol

INc1ErENTAL

FIVE

DM

S

1~C~EftE$~AL1~FiU1~

10

~

Oi~E

IMFLC~tJ

10$D

~

P~EC1P

PhECIP

ku?*ER

VRLJJE

F

DiKES

~

Di~FLtA

PON~

Vl~Lti~E

QVE~Fij~FFOfl 1C

lL~

liME

IiktHk~)

IINCà?5)

IINCnES)

(E~1LiD4YI

ISI~iiU~)tGALU)PQ)

tSALIUhI)

I8PJ.1?~3)

I5ALLDt.S)

(1~1Cl~E~

27

0.~00

0.570

81

1.49$

0.000

-2.6SEsOt

1.2EE’~s

0.005+00

-4.52~5

L45E~o6

0.005+00

131.5

28

1.120

i,.18O

13

3.699

0.035

-9.41Esu4

l.I~E•0b

0.~0E~0L

I.i4E’0~

1.285+06

0.005+00

29

t.eoo

1.240

95

0.526

0.030

-2.685+05

9.2.E’~

U~+~0-4.525+05

8.28E~05

0.OOE+00

140.3

30

0.000

l.24u

95

0.526

0.O’~O

-2.65Es05

6.54~u5

0.~0~00

-4.52E+~5

3.75E~O5

0.OOE.00

I6~.3

31

0.000

1.i20

95

0.525

t~.000

-2.695*05

~.8LEt~50.005+00

-4.~2E’05

0.t’0?tt~0

0.00E•0~

144.0

1

0.0w

1.120

95

0.526

0.0i~0

.

—2.6~E+05

1.16.t~

~.0~Et0D

-4.52~~i5

0.ti0~+00

0.0’E.vt~

114.0

2

0.030

1.120

95

0.526

0,000

-1.58E~u5

0.(CE~0

0.i~0E400

-1.20E+0~

0.00Es~0

0.M*I*

144.0

3

1.620

0.030

13

3.b99

0.l6~

5.5~+5

5.5i~tU5

v.00E~0(~

B.16~s05

9.?6E~05

~

140.1

4

(~.0t0

1.650

95

0.526

1.000

-?.6SE’’S

15~0~

0.OtE+00

-4.525+05

4.24E+U~

0.0:EsuO

14k.!

S

o.ueo

1.650

95

0.526

C.00

-2.6~E4~5

2.31i’o4

~.0L’E~0~

-4.525.05

0.u’~E+~0

0.u~E~~0 ~44.2

8

0.6u

1.730

95

0.526

0.262

1.tiE.~6

l.~4~4

‘.X,E4~

1.605406

1.60E~06

O.0~?+0Q

1!~.9

1

li.Quo

2.360

95

0.526

&0:~0

-2.~8E~o5

~

0.0UE~’O

-4.52Est’3

l.15E~O8

~.0;’E’~Q

~

8

0.~”’0

2.330

95

0.526

0.0~0

-2.t.~E~5 ~

~.t

0E~00

-4.5~E~0~7.00F~05

~.00E~G0

140.9

0.710

87

1.494

0.(00

-2.~EE~05

2.322*05

0.00E~00

-4.S2~+~5

2.48E~05

0.’~E+0~

!42.9

1’:

o.0~)

0.110

87

1.494

Oui

—2.6à2~05

0.00l~i0

0.0~E*u0

—L~0E.~’5

0.00E+(’C

0.t0E+~0

i~4.0

11

0~u0

u.630

81

1.494

0.000

-~.6~E~05

0.u0~ev.

0.0~E~u0-i.2~E’05

Oo?sv)

0.E.~

I~4.0

12

0.0~.0

0.000

73

3.699

0.0’~

-2.8~E+05

0.0(5.:~o

c.00s.~o

—1.2~E+~

0.OOE+

0.~’Eso:

:4~.0

13

0.000

0.000

13

3.699

000

2.S5505

0.it’~.’;0

0.~E~v0

—I.02s~.’5

0.OOE.uO

0.0:E+U~

a44.i

14

0.

11~,

0.000

73

3.699

-2.6S5’~3

0.0t~0..’

05.00

-7.~0E~~5

o.oos+:’o

0.005+00

i4~.0

15

0.t’30

0.370

73

3.6~9

0.~’~b-?.fr~E4~5 ~E~0

0.~.~OE-00

-7.205*03

CMEtoO

u.005+0~

144.~

là

0.~00

(.200

13

~.699

O,~u0

-2.685*05

0.0~•E+C~

0.~E+:O

-L205tu5

u.0vE~i*

0.~E~tG

1~4.:

I?

e.OuO

0.2o’)

13

3.639

0.000

—2.t~E~5

0.0~0~

0.~iuEsi’0

-1.2t.545

0.v0E~00

u.u3E+t’O

144.0

a

t

f~(~‘~f~-7-k~+i~

0.01t~00

0.t’0E+00

—7.205+05

0.0uE~00

0.DVE’OO

144.0

---

Dk~1N+~GE

TREMhE~I

IldT!AL

AREA

RME

CAF4CIIY

~0LUP4E

IAC~iS)

(0AL/flil&~

lB~LLC~S3

(S4LLU~S).

DIKE

OhS

D1~E

DIt~E

180

186

2.56E~07 6.CuE*06

FbND

PDh~

POND

POND

289

500

3.24E~G1 1.005+07

1NC~E~Et1T4L

FIVE

OAY

CUkQE

S

IhLRI~ENTAL

1~FLQWTO

~KE

D1~E

1~FL0ilTO

f0N~

PEND

DIiTANE

P~ECi

PFECIP

l3dn~Efi

VALUE

huNOlf

!)IK5~

~OLt4tEUVERFLC~

F’LKO

VOL W~E

Ot’E~FLOb

F~0P1i~

flO

DAiS

IIWCHE3)

(IKOhESI

IINUiES)

(CAL/DAYI

(OALISN)

(EALL3kSI

tO~L/D~Y)

(bALLOkO)

1L~ONS)

(JNL)~551

39

0.5~’0

0.200

73

3.699

0.000

—2.685405

0.VCEsOO

(‘.005+00

-1.205+05

0.005+00

0.OOE+00

144.0

20

0.000

0.560

87

1.494

0.000

-2.685+63

0.o05~00

0.ODE’00

-7.205+05

0.601+00

0.OOE+oO

144.0

21

0.001,

0.530

97

1.494

0.000

-2.655+05

0.605s~0

v.005+00

-7.205+05

0.OOE+00

0.00E~00

144.0

22

0.000

0.530

87

1.494

0.060

-2.6~Es05

0.OoSiOO

0.00E+oO

-1.205+05

0.005+00

0.0(5.00

144.0

23

0,0u0

0.530

81

1.494

0.000

-2.695+05

0.001~v0

0.005+00

—7.205+05

0.GoE.uO

0.uOEtOO

144.0

24

0.000

0.53u

81

1.494

0.0~0

-2.885.65

0.005*00

0.005+30

-1.2E~05

0.OOEsoO

0.0~24o0

144.0

25

0.000

0.000

13

3.699

0.000

-2.e8E+05

0.005,06

0.005+00

-7.205.05

0.vOE.30

0.005+03

144.)

26

0.000

0.000

73

3.699

0.000

-2.685.05

U.00E~00

0.uOEsoO

-1.2C~#05

0.0vEt00

0.0~Et00

144.0

21

0.000

U.~0t~

13

3.699

0.000

-2.68E~05

0.005+00

0.005+00

-1.205+05

0.OOE.00

0.00E.00

344.0

28

0.080

0.000

13

3.699

0.000

-2.695+05

0.OOE’OO

0.005+00

-7.205+05

0.uOS+00

0.005+00

144.0

29

1.230

0.020

13

3.699

0.057

1.255+04

1.255*04

0.UUE+i0

-1.745+03

0.OOE+(0

0.005+00

144.0

0.030

h310

93’

0.526

0.000

-2.655405

0.00E’vO

0.0~Es00

-7.2uE’05

0.0~E+0O

o.OoE’OO

144.0

~a

1

0.000

1.310

95

0.526

0.000

-2,685.05

0.OvE+vO

0.uOE+00

-7.201+05

0.0oE.00

0.005400

144.u

2

0.000

1.310

95

0.526

0.000

-2.685+05

0.005+00

0.005400

—7.235+05

0,005.00

0.OOE’60

144,0

3

2.110

3.310

95

0.526

1.645

7.7/5+06

1a7E~06

0.005+00

l.25E~0i

1.255+07

0.0(5.60

88.8

4

0.700

3.400

95

0.526

(‘.316

1.275+06

9.053+06

0.vOE+00

2.02Es~6

l.4SEsol

0.ouE’00

fl.ó

5

0.000

2.810

95

0.521

0.000

-2.685+05

0.7øEsU6

u.00E.00

-4.525.05

1.405+07

0.005+00

81.6

6

0.000

2.810

95

0.526

0,00D

-2.68E’OS

8.515406

0.03L.00

-4.525+05

1.365*07

v.005.00

b~.6

7

0.000

2.870

95

0.526

0.000

-2.685+05

8.24~+06

0.001+00

-4.525.u5

l.31E.07

0.U~Et00

85.7

8

0.000

2.810

95

0.526

0.0uu

‘-2.655.05

7.991*06

v.005.00

-4.525+05

1.215+01

0.005+00

87./

9

0.000

0.700

87

1.494

0.000

-2.682+05

1.71E•06

0.005400

-4.525+05

1.225+01

0.005+00

89.1

10

0.000

0.000

73

3.69?

0.OuO

—~.o8E+05

7.44Esu6

0.005+00

-4.525.05

1.185+01

0.00E’Oo

91.1

IL

0.0u0

0.000

73

3.699

0.000

-2.681+05

7.315+06

0.005+00

-4.525.05

1.131+07

0.005400

9~.7

---

ORAP~A6E

I~?Al~ENT

INITIAL

AREA

R~’5

CM~ACITY

VOLtiNE

(ACRISI

l64~/1~1$J

1DALL0$~S) l6i~LL0~Sl

--

0D~E

DIKE

DDE

390

186

2.56E~07

6.005+00

FOND

PC’iD

289

5~

3.245+07

3.305+61

1NC~Efl5N!~4L

FIbS

DAY

~b8VE

S

P’ECIF

P~EL1P

HUfl9ER

VALUE

$0

DATE

(1~hE3)

(IUCI4ES)

1NLAE~ENI~L~

r~

oi’s

~n:s

INFLON

~o

potip

~1S~P)CE

8U?*bFF

L~DES

v(’LOfll.

E.~FLi~

FUND

YliLU~lE

£VERFLDó

FSOI

~Y

(1NOHES’

(6ALIDAI)

I6kLL0N~

ilul~LLiIN3)

LS~L/DA’v)

ISALLOJS)

(3ALLONS)

HNL,t13s

12

0.000

C.OOu

73

3.699

0.000

-2.655+05

6.905106

0.001+00

-4.515405

1.095407

O.00E~00

95.7

33

0.000

0.000

73

3.699

0.000

-2.68E~U5

4.645+06

0.005+00

-4.525+05

1.045*07

0.005400

97.1

14

0.000

0.000

13

3.699

0.000

-2.655+05

6.315+06

0.005+06

-4.521.05

9.965+06

0.005+00

91.7

15

0.0(0

0.000

73

3.699

0.600

—2.855+05

6.105+06

0.00E~00

-4.S2Eh’S

9.515+06

0.01,5+00

~uI.1

lb

0.000

0.600

13

3.699

0.600

-2.655+05

S.8.E~0a

0.U0Es00

-4.525.05

9.065+06

0.005+00

103.7

(7

0.0(0

0.000

73

3.699

0.600

-2.s95’05

5.585t0o

0.0~E+03

-4.515’35

8.615406

0.~0E~i0

105.1

18

0.000

0.000

73

3.699

0.000

-2.~5E~05 5.3flE,~

0.001+00

-4.52E+~5

8.155+06

0.005*00

~01.E

19

0.000

0.000

73

3.699

&0~0

-2.64.E’05

5.03E~’s

0.viE~o0

-4.~2Et05

/.104+06

0.00E’00

h’9.6

20

0.0t~

0.000

73

3.o99

0.000

-2.ôFi+05

4.7&i’~

t’.t~~E~0O

-4.21”S

1.255s0t

0.00E’0G

1)1.9

23

3,000

0.000

73

3.699

0.000

-2.695~05

4.4’~E’..i6

O,~05~00 -4.52E’uS

6.8~E’06

0.~i’5+60

11.b

22

0.OuO

0.003

73

3.699

0.(vO

—2.695’05

4.22(406

0.0’E’Ot’

-4.525+05

6.355’0b

0.0~E+0o

~15.5

23

0.000

0.060

73

3.o39

0.000

-2.655.05

3.9&44~8

(.OCE+06

-4.335.05

5.815406

0.OC’E’vi

1)7.4

24

~.210

(.000

73

3.699

0.600

-2.655.05

~.69Es06

0.ooEsOli

-4.525~05

5.445+06

0,005.00

119.8

25

0.130

0.230

73

3.699

O.oll

—2.8e5s05

3,~~i4~6

0.OUEtOO

-4.5i~05

4.9i~+0b

0.0(EsOC

121.5

26

0.000

0.34~

73

3.699

0.00’

-2,ê~E-05

3.t5Etv~

u.oos+oe

-4.52E.’5

4.54E~o6

0.005s(0

~23.&

21

0.v00

0.340

13

3.659

0.000

‘.6:E.O5

2.iE’36

0.005400

4.325+05

0.165400

l2~.5

2~

0.000

1~.340

73

3.69?

0.000

-2.855t05

2.62E~i6

0.04.5.00

4.~2Eh:5

~,63E+U6

0.005+Oii

127.8

?~

0!we

i..140

73

3.699

0.000

-2.665.4.45

2.3~E•&~

v.005.00

-4.525405

3.155*06

0.005’00

123.9

30

0.~0U

0.110

73

3.699

0.0:/0

-2.695+05

l.0LE~4.~

U.0~’5+o0

-4.~2E~05 2.13E~06

o.ot’s+eo

ill,?

33

0.400

0.060

73

3.699

0,000

—2.655.05

).uE.Oo

-4.52E’~3

2.25E+~~6

U.002’00

123.1

AVO

1

0.000

0.486

13

3.695

0.oUO

—2.6SSfL’S

l.~4E~”b

0.005+00

—4.5)5405

l.L~E408