ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 30,
 1987
GERALD CLUTTS and LEE SIEGFRIED,
Petitioners,
v..
 )
 PCB 87—49
HERMAN
 L,. BEASLEY,
Respondent,
and
ALEXANDER COUNTY BOARD OF
 )
COMMISSIONERS,
Co—Respondent.~
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by
 B..
 Forcade):
This action is an third—party appeal filed April
 20,
 1987,
(date)
 pursuant to Section
 40..l of the Environmental Protection
Act (“Act”)
 (I1l..Rev..Stat.
 Ch.. 111—1/2,
 par..
 1040.1.
 Gerald.
Clutts and
 Lee Siegfried
 (“petitioners”)
 appeal the decision of
the Alexander County Board of Commissioners
 (“County”)
 approving
site location suitability approval..
Record Before the County Board
P..A..
 82—682,
 also known
 as SB—172, as codified
 in Section
40.1(a)
 of the Act, provides that the hearing before the Board
 is
to “be based exclusively on the record before the county board
 or
governing body of the municipality”..
 The statute does not
specify who
 is to file with the Board such record or who
 is to
certify to the completeness or correctness of the record..
As the County alone can verify and certify what exactly is
 the entire record before it,
 in the interest of protecting the
rights of all parties
 to this action, and
 in order
 to satisfy the
intention of SB—172,
 the Board believes that the County must be
the party
 to prepare and file the record on appeal..
 The Board
suggests that guidance in
 so doing can be had by reference to
Section 105.l02(a)(4)
 of the Board’s Procedural Rules and
 to
Rules
 321 through 324 of the Illinois Supreme Court
 Rules..
 In
addition
 to the actual documents which comprise
 the record, the
County Clerk shall also prepare a document entitled “Certificate
of Record on Appeal” which
 shall list the documents comprising
the record.
 Seven copies of the certificate, seven copies of the
transcript of the county hearing and three copies of any other
77-274
—2—
documents
 in the record shall be filed with the Board, and
 a copy
of the certificate
 shall be served upon the petitioner(s).
 The
Clerk of the County is given
 21 days from the date of this Order
to “prepare, bind and certify the record on appeal”
 (Ill. Supreme
Court, Rule 324).
Section 40.1(a) provides that if there
 is no final action by
the Board within 120 days, petitioner may deem the site location
approved..
The Board has construed
 identical “in accordance with the
terms of” language contained in Section 40(b)
 of the Act
concerning third-party
 appeals of the grant of hazardous waste
landfill permits as giving the person who had requested the
permit
 a)
 the right to
 a decision within the applicable statutory
time frame
 (now 120 days)
,
 and
 b)
 the right to waive
 (extend)
 the
decision period
 (Alliance for
 a Safe Environment, et al.
 v. Akron
Land
 Corp.. et al., PCB 80—184, October
 30,
 1980)..
 The Board
therefore construes Section 40..1(b)
 in like manner, with the
result that failure of this Board
 to act
 in 120 days would allow
the site location applicant to deem the site location approved..
Pursuant
 to Section 105.104 of the Procedural Rules, it is each
party’s responsibility to pursue
 its action, and to insist that a
hearing on the petition
 is timely scheduled in order to allow the
Board
 to review the record and to render its decision within 120
days of the filing of
 the petition.
Transcription Costs
The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed in
Town of Ottawa, et al.
 v..
 IPCB, et al., 129
 Ill..
 App..
 3rd, 472
N.E..2d 150
 (Third District,
 1984)..
 In that case,
 the Court
ordered the Board
 to assume transcription costs
 (472
 N.E..2d at
155)..
 The Supreme Court denied leave to appeal on March 14,
1985.
 In cognizance of this ruling, the Board will provide for
stenographic transcription of the Board hearing
 in this matter..
This matter
 is accepted for hearing.
 Hearing must be
scheduled within 14 days of the date of this Order and completed
within
 60 days of the date of this Order..
 The hearing officer
shall inform the Clerk
 of the Board of the time and location of
the hearing at least 40 days in advance of hearing so that public
notice of hearing may be published..
 After hearing, the hearing
officer shall submit an exhibit list, written schedule for
submission of briefs
 if any and all actual exhibits to the Board
within
 5 days of the
 hearing..
 Any briefing schedule shall
provide for final
 filings as expeditiously as possible and
 in no
event later than 70 days from the date of this
 Order..
If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
parties fail
 to provide an acceptable hearing date
 or
 if after
 an
77-275
—3—
attempt the hearing officer
 is unable
 to consult with the
parties,
 the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date
 in conformance with the schedule above..
 This schedule will
only provide the Board
 a very short time period to deliberate and
reach a decision before the due date.
 The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
possible.
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver of the decision deadline by the site location suitability
applicant and only for the equivalent or fewer number of days
that the decision deadline is waived..
 Such waivers must be
provided
 in writing to the Clerk of the Board..
 Any waiver must
be an “open waiver”
 or a waiver of decision until
 a date
certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the site
location suitability applicant provides an open waiver
 or
 a
waiver
 to
 a date at least 75 days beyond the date of the motion
to cancel hearing.
 This should allow ample time for the Board
 to
republish notice of hearing and receive transcripts from the
hearing before the due date.
 Any order
 by the hearing officer
granting cancellation of hearing shall include a new hearing date
at least 40 days
 in the future and at least 30 days prior
 to the
new due date and the Clerk of the Board
 shall be promptly
informed of
 the new schedule.
Because this proceeding
 is the type for which the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets
 a very short statutory deadline
for decisionniaking, absent
 a waiver, the Board will grant
extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances..
 Any
such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
decision,
 including response time
 to such a motion..
 However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
set a date pursuant to this Order..
IT
 IS SO ORDERED
I, Dorothy
 M, Gunn,
 Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the ~bove Order was adopted on
the
 3’O~7 day of _______________________, 1987,
 by a vote
of
 ~-o
 ..
Dorothy M/ Gunn,
 Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
77-276