ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 11, 2002
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Complainant,
v.
RICH WILLIAMS d/b/a C.R. WILLIAMS &
ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 01-144
(Enforcement – Public Water Supply)
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by N.J. Melas):
On April 20, 2001, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the
State of Illinois (People), filed a two-count complaint against the City of Pana, the Housing
Authority of Christian County (HACC), PrairieLand Construction, Inc. (PrairieLand), and
Rich Williams, d/b/a C.R. Williams & Associates, Architects (Williams).
See
415 ILCS
5/30(c)(1) (2000); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.204. Only the first count of the complaint
concerned Williams. The People allege that Williams violated Sections 15(a) and 18(a) of the
Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/15(a) and 5/18(a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3)
(2000)); Sections 601.101(b), 602.101(b), and 607.104(b) of the Board’s regulations (35 Ill.
Adm. Code 601.101(b), 602.101(b), and 607.104(b)), and Section 653.119 of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s (Agency) regulations (35 Ill. Adm. Code 653.119 (a) and
(b) (2001)). The People further allege that Williams violated these provisions by having direct
supervisory control over the construction of water and sewer mains less than ten feet apart.
The People alleged similar and additional violations of the Act, the Board’s regulations, and
the Agency’s regulations against the other respondents. The complaint concerns the
construction of a water main project at the Washington Court Housing Project in Pana,
Christian County.
On July 10, 2001, the People and HACC filed a stipulation and proposed settlement,
accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the
Act (415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2000)). This filing is authorized by Section 31(c)(2) of the Act (415
ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2000)).
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(a). The Board provided notice of
the stipulation, proposed settlement, and request for relief. The newspaper notice was
published in the
Pana News-Palladium
on July 12, 2001. The Board received a timely request
for hearing from PrairieLand on August 3, 2001.
See
415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2000).
On August 23, 2001, Respondent, PrairieLand Construction filed a cross-complaint
against the City of Pana, the HACC, and Williams for contribution.
2
On November 19, 2001, the People and Pana filed a stipulation and proposed
settlement, accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section
31(c)(1) of the Act. The Board provided notice of the stipulation, proposed settlement, and
request for relief. The newspaper notice was published in the
Pana News-Palladium
on
November 29, 2001. The Board received a timely request for hearing from PrairieLand on
November 30, 2001.
On March 28, 2002, the People and PrairieLand filed a stipulation and proposed
settlement, accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section
31(c)(1) of the Act. The Board provided notice of the stipulation, proposed settlement, and
request for relief. The newspaper notice was published in the
Pana News-Palladium
on April
1, 2002.
On April 15, 2002, PrairieLand filed a motion to withdraw requests for hearing.
Specifically, PrairieLand withdrew its requests for hearing in connection with the stipulations
and settlements involving both HACC and Pana. On May 2, 2002, the Board issued an
opinion and order accepting the stipulations and settlements involving the People and the City
of Pana, HACC, and PrairieLand.
On June 3, 2002, the People and Williams filed a stipulation and proposed settlement,
along with a request from relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the Act.
The Board provided notice of the stipulation, proposed settlement, and request for relief. The
newspaper notice was published in the
Pana News-Palladium
on June 6, 2002.
Since the request for hearing has been withdrawn, and no further requests for hearing
have been filed in connection with Williams’ stipulation and settlement, the Board grants the
Williams’ requests for relief from the hearing requirement.
See
415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2000);
35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(b).
Section 103.302 of the Board’s procedural rules sets forth the required contents of
stipulations and proposed settlements. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.302. These requirements
include stipulating to facts on the nature, extent, and causes of the alleged violations and the
nature of Williams’ operations. Section 103.302 also requires that the parties stipulate to facts
called for by Section 33(c) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/33(c) (2000)). Williams has satisfied
Section 103.302. Williams does not affirmatively admit the alleged violations yet agrees to
pay a civil penalty of $7,000. The Board accepts the stipulation and proposed settlement. This
resolves all issues as to all parties in this action, and the docket is closed.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
3
ORDER
1.
The Board accepts and incorporates by reference the stipulation and proposed
settlement.
2.
Williams must pay a civil penalty of $7,000. By August 10, 2002, which is the
30th day after the date of this order, Williams must make the first of seven
monthly payments in equal installments of $1,000 (one thousand dollars).
3.
Williams must pay the civil penalties by certified checks or money orders,
payable to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for deposit into the
Environmental Protection Trust Fund. The case numbers, case names, and
Williams’ federal employer identification number must be included on the
certified checks or money orders.
4.
Williams must send the certified checks or money orders to:
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Fiscal
Services
Division
1021
North
Grand Avenue East
P.O.
Box
19276
Springfield,
Illinois
62794-9276
Williams must simultaneously submit copies of the checks and payment
transmittals to:
Donna Lutes
Illinois Attorney General’s Office
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 62706
5.
If Williams fail to comply with any material requirement set forth in its
stipulation and proposal for settlement, Williams shall pay in liquidated penalties
the sum of $500.00 per month of noncompliance, until such time as the
requirements are complied with, said penalty to be paid to the Environmental
Protection Trust Fund in the manner provided above.
6.
Penalties unpaid within the time prescribed will accrue interest under Section
42(g) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/42(g) (2000)) at the rate
set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (35 ILCS 5/1003(a)
(2000)).
7.
Williams must cease and desist from the alleged violations.
4
8.
This docket is closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2000);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906,
102.706. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the
Illinois Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335.
The Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its
final orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 101.520;
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the
Board adopted the above opinion and order on July 11, 2002, by a vote of 5-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board