1. Complainant,
      2. I. Complainant, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
      3. (hereinafter “Agency” or “IEPA”), is an administrative agency
      4. 1009(b) Sec. 9 (b) (1986)
      5. Section 9(b) of the Act, Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 111—1/2, par
      6. 1009(b) and 35 Ii?. Admn. Code 201.144, the Pollution Control
      7. Board’s Rules and Regulations as alleged in Count I of the Com—
      8. plaint.
      9. only printing presses in operation at the facility. A
      10. fourth press, a champlain rotogravre press, was disman-
      11. 75-42
      12. 12. The facility is located in an industrial area.
      13. As a result of settlement discussions between the parties
      14. arid action taken by Respondent, the parties believe the public
      15. interest will be best served by resolution of this enforcement
      16. ulations of the Pollution Control Board at its facility at 4656
      17. South Kinzie Street, Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.
      18. for Settlement and Brach and Sons agrees to pay the penalty
      19. 75,43
      20. tion Trust Fund within thirty (30) days of the date of which the
      21. 2200 Churchill Road
      22. case.
      23. 75-44

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CCNTRCL BOARD
January 22, 1987
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
V.
)
PCB 86—74
E.J. BRACH & SONS,
Respondent.
MS. SHEILA OWENS, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON BEHALF
OF COMPLAINANT.
MR. WILLIAM GOOD APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER CF THE BOARD (by J.D. Dumelle):
This matter comes before the Board upon a three—count
complaint filed on May 22, 1986 by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency) against E.J. Brach & Sons (Erach)
Respondent.
The Agency alleges in Count I of its complaint that Brach
has not applied for or obtained air emission source operating
permits for its printing equipment, thereby violating 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 201.144 (Operating Permits for Existing Sources) and
Section 9(b) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act). The
Agency alleges in Count II that Brach has never applied for or
obtained air emission source operating permits for its printing
equipment, thereby violating 35 Ill. Adrn. Code 201.143 (Operating
Permits for New Sources) and Section 9(b) of the Act. Lastly,
the Agency alleges in Count III that Brach has never applied or
obtained air emission source construction permits for its
printing equipment, thereby violating 35 Ill. Adm. Code 201.142
(Construction Permit Required) and Section 9(b) of the Act.
Erach filed an answer to the complaint on June 27, 1986.
Hearing was held on September 24, 1986 at which the parties
presented a Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement for
consideration by the Board.
Brach is a division of American Home Products Corporation, a
Delaware Corporation, and is authorized to do business in
Illinois. Brach is engaged in the business of manufacturing and
packaging a variety of candies and is located at 4656 West Kinzie
St., Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. (Stip. at 2).
75.37

—2—
The parties stipulated that Brach has on its premises four
printing presses. One of these presses has been non—operational
since 1978 and has been dismantled. The remaining three presses
are operable and are utilized in Brach’s business of candy
manufacture and packaging and are the source of the instant
complaint. (Stip at 2).
In the Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement, the Agency
moves to voluntarily dismiss Counts II and III and stipulates
that the three printing presses were purchased prior to April 14,
1972 and were, therefore, existing emission sources and
permitting requirements for new sources were not applicable. The
Agency’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
As to the remaining Count, the parties stipulate that Brach
has never applied for nor obtained air emission source operating
permits for its three presses as required by Section 201.144 of
the Board’s air pollution regulations and by Section 9(b) of the
Act, that Brach neither admits nor denies the violations of
Section 201.144 or Section 9(b) of the Act and that Brach has
applied to the Agency for the necessary operating permits for the
three presses on or about August 25, 1986. (Stip. at 2—3).
The proposed settlement agreement provides that Brach cease
and desist from further violations of the Act and Board
regulations at its Cook County facility. In addition, Brach
agrees to pay a penalty of $5,000.00 to the Environmental
Protection Trust Fund.
In evaluating this enforcement action and proposed
settlement agreement, the Board has considered all the facts and
circumstances of the complaint in light of the criteria set forth
in Section 33(c) of the Act and finds the settlement agreement
acceptable under 35 Ill. Mm. Code 103.180. Accordingly, the
Board will order Brach to cease and desist from further
violations of the Act and Board regulations at its Cook County
facility and order Brach to pay the stipulated amount of
$5,000.00 to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of the law in this matter.
ORDER
1. The Board hereby orders E.J. Brach & Sons to cease and
desist from further violations of the Environmental Protection
Act and Board regulations at its facility located at 4656 West
Kinzie St., Chicago, Cook County Illinois.
2. Within thirty days of the date of this Order, E.J. Brach
& Sons shall pay $5,000.00 (five thousand) which shall be in the
form of a certified check or money order payable to the State of
75-38

—3—
Illinois and designated for deposit into the Environmental
Protection Trust Fund. Payment shall be sent to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, IL 62706
ATTN: Mary Jo Heise
3. E.J. Brach & Sons shall comply with all the terms and
conditions of the Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement filed
on September 24, 1986 which is attached hereto.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Board Member 3. Theodore Meyer dissents.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Qpinion and Order was
adopted on the ~:
day of
~
,
1986 by a vote
of
-
.
/~
/
~
_~~/
Dorothy M. dunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
75.39

STATE OF ILLINOiS
)
S.S.
COUNTY OF COOK
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
AGENCY,
)
)
Complainant,
)
vs.
)
PCB 86-74
)
E.
~.
BRACH & SONS, a division
)
of American Home Products
)
Corporation, a Delaware
)
corporation,
)
Respondents.
)
STIPULATION AJD PROPOSAL FOR SETTLE~ENT
NOW COMES Complainant, Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency, by its attorney, Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of
the State of Illinois, and Respondent, E. J. Brach & Sons, a di-
vision of American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corpora-
tion, authorized to do business in Illinois, and do hereby submnil
this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement. The parties agree
that the statement of facts contained herein represents a fair
summary of the evidence and testimony which would be introduced
by the parties if a full hearing were held. The parties further
stipulate that this statement of facts is made and agreed upon
for purposes of settlement only and that neither the fact that a
party has entered into this Stipulation, nor any of the facts
stipulated herein, shall be introduced into evidence in this or
any other proceedings except to enforce the terms hereof by the
parties to this agreement. This agreement shall be null and vo~i
-1-
/_
4-
75-40

unless the Illinois Pollution Control Board (hereinafter “Board”)
approves and disposes of this matter on each and every one of the
terms and conditions of the settlement set forth herein.
ETATEMENT
OF FACTS
I. Complainant, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(hereinafter “Agency” or “IEPA”), is an administrative agency
established in the executive branch of the State government by
Section
4 of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act
(hereinafter “the Act”) (Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 111—1/2, par. 100.
et seq. (1983)), and charged, inter alia, with the duty of en-
forcing the Act, pursuant to Title 8 thereof.
2. Respondent, E. J. Brach & Sons (“Brach & Sons”), is a.
division of American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware cor-
poration, authorized to do business in Illinois. Brach & Sons is
located at 4656 West Xinzie Street, Chicago, Cook County,
Illinois.
3. Brach & Sons is engaged in the business of manufactur-
ing and packaging varieties of candies.
4.
Brach & Sons has on its premises four printing presses.
One said printing press has been non-operational since a date
uncertain in 1978 and has been dismantled. The remaining three
presses on the premises are operable and routinely utilized in
conducting Respondent’s business of candy manufacture and
packaging.
5. Brach & Sons has neither applied for nor obtained air
emission source operating premises for their printing equipment
as required by Section 201.144 of the Air Pollution Regulations,
75-41

35 Ill. Adm. Code 201.144
arid Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 111—12, par.
1009(b) Sec. 9 (b) (1986)
6.
Brach
& Sons neither
adixiit nor deny the violation of
Section 9(b) of the Act, Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 111—1/2, par
1009(b) and 35 Ii?. Admn. Code 201.144, the Pollution Control
Board’s Rules and Regulations as alleged in Count I of the Com—
plaint.
7. Brach & Sons has applied to the Agency for the neces-
sary operating permits for the above-noted printing presess on or
about August 25, 1986.
8. The Agency hereby voluntarily dismisses Counts II and
III of the Complaint as the three printing presses were purchases
prior to April 14, 1972; the printing presses were therefore ex-
isting emission sources, 35 111. Adm. Code
201.102; construction
permits were therefore not required, 35 Ill. Adm. Code 201.142.
9. Brach & Sons asserts the following:
A. The three aforementioned printing presses were pur-
chased prior to April 14, 1972.
B. The three aforementioned printing presses are the
only printing presses in operation at the facility. A
fourth press, a champlain rotogravre press, was disman-
tled and has not been operating since 1978 and has beez
dismantled.
10. Respondent’s candy manufacturing operation provides a
useful social and economic service to the corit~unityas a whole b:
production of its product and employment of local residents.
11. All data and information sought by the Agency from
Brach & Sons in the operating permit applications enables the
75-42

~gency to propery eF~.ess Brach & son’s compliance with the Envi-
ronmental Protection Act.
12.
The facility is located in an industrial area.
PROPOSAL
FOR SETTLEMENT
As a result of settlement discussions between the parties
arid action taken by Respondent, the parties believe the public
interest will be best served by resolution of this
enforcement
action
under the terms and conditions provided herein.
This
pro-
posal for settlement
is
expressly conditioned upon
arid
effective
only with approval thereof in all respects
by the Board.
All statements contained herein are agreed to for purposes
of settling this action only and shall be null and void and of no
effect in any further proceeding or cause of action if the Board
does
not approve this proposal for settlement in its entirety.
TERMS
OF SETTLEMENT
1. Brach & Sons agree to cease and desist from violations
of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act and
Rules and Reg-
ulations of the Pollution Control Board at its facility at 4656
South Kinzie Street, Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.
2. The parties enter into this Stipulation and Proposal
for Settlement and Brach and Sons agrees to pay the penalty
specified in this paragraph in order to avoid the substantial
costs, inconvenience arid uncertainties of further litigation. A~
—4—
75,43

a condition o~
se~+~le~ent,
Brach ar~r~~ors
agree to pay a pena~ty
of five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) to the Environmental Protec-
tion Trust Fund within thirty (30) days of the date of which the
Board adopts a final
order
approving, accepting, and
adopting
this Stipulation.
Payment shall be made by certified check or money order pay-
able to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund
and delivered to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois 62706
ATTN: Mary Jo Heise
The
Agency deems
said payment to be appropriate to aid with en-
forcement of the Act under the facts and circumstances of the
case.
WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent jointly pray that
the Board
adopt
and
accept the foregoing Stipulation
and Proposal
for Settlement as written.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY, Complainant
By:
~
—~-
Dated:
-~ ~
E. 3. BRACH &
SONS, R pondents
By:
___________
Dated:
_Se~f,~c~ ~
CJ,19~
—5—
75-44

Back to top