Ii~LIi~~i.~OLL~2~lOi~.CC~.~~OLBC!~L
    August 20, 1987
    CITY OF MACOMB,
    Petitioner,
    v
    )
    PCE 6~—lL9
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PRbC~jO~ A~LNC~,
    Respondent.
    CPi~iLii~k~L (.jt~DLks OF TnL BO~D (cy uL.. Durnelle):
    This provisional variance request comes before the Board
    upon an Au;ust l~, l9~7. heccml7encation of t~ne Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency). On August 14, 1987,
    tne Agency receive~a r uest for a 3U day extension on tine
    provisional variance, POE 87—100, granted July 16, 1987. The
    Agency
    rccornrre~ds
    tnat heca~se of an arbitrary and unreasonable
    hardship, tine City of Macorab (City) be granted an extension of
    tneir pLovisional variance subject to certain conditions to allow
    the City to exceed the effluent limitations in its NPDES permit
    for biochemical oxyge;~demand (BCL~) and total suspended solids
    (TSS).
    Tr~eCity owns and operates a wastewater treatment facility
    with a design average flow of 4.0 million gallons per day (MGD)
    and a cesign maximum flow of 7.5 MGL. The treatment facility
    consists of preliminary treatment, primary treatment, an
    activated sluc~e system, a tertiary lagoon anã chlorination.
    Discharge is to the Killjordan Creek.
    During construction of the new final clarifier, the paint on
    the new equipment was found to be defective. The repair work
    will require removal of tine paint by sand blasting. The
    repainting requires that the clarifier be taken out of service to
    perform tinis work.
    Tine City met its N~-D~SPermit Ii..0029688 limitations of lU/il
    mg/l monthly average respectively for BOD and TSS during June and
    July, l9u7. During these months only one clarifier was in
    service due to construction work.. The City believes that it will
    meet its N~DEs Permit limits during this repainting period under
    normal flow conditions.. However, the City is concerned that a
    hign flow cue to excessive rainfall may cause it to exceed its
    Permit limits with only one clarifier in service.
    Tne City contends tnat to be in cort~piiance it would have to
    construct a temporary treatment facility. The City argues that
    sucin a requrrement would impose an arbitrary and unreasonable
    80—373

    har~s~ip. ~rie Agency a;rees with tine City’s assessment that an
    arbitrary
    and unreasonable
    hardship would result.
    The Agency
    also b~Iieves that, if a provisional
    exception is granted,
    tine
    expected environmental
    impact will be minimal because secondary
    treatment
    i~
    being p:ovioed.
    After
    determining tiiat federal regulations would not
    preclude the granting of variance and that no public water
    supplies would be adversely affected, tine Agency recomrnendec that
    the City of Macomb be granted an extension of provisional
    variance from 35 111. Adin. Code 3u4.120(c) and 304.141(a) subject
    to the conditions listed in the Order below.
    Pursuant to Section 35(b) of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Act, the Board hereby grants the provisional variance
    as recommenoed.
    This Ojinicn cunstit~tes the
    Boards tindings of tact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    OhDLF~
    Th~ City
    OL
    ~accmd
    is nereby granted an extension of the
    provisional
    variance,
    granted in PCB 87—100, July 16, 1987, from
    35 Ill. Adr. Code 3~4.l20(c) and 304.141(a) subject to the
    following conditions:
    1.
    Tne
    vatiance shall begin August 18,
    1981,
    and stall
    continue until September 16, 1987, or until the
    clarifier
    is
    roturned to service, whichever occurs
    first.
    2.
    8f~luent snail b~ limited to 30 mg/i for both BOC and
    TSS as monthly averages and a daily maximum of 45 mg/i
    for bctn
    BCJLJ
    and T.~S. Effluent
    snail be samplea
    according to NPDES Permit No.. 1L0029688 as to frequency
    and sample type.
    Analysis results sriali be submittec
    to the Agency on the monthly discharge monitoring
    report (UMl~)
    3. Tine
    City of Macomt shall notif~’Gary Reside of the
    Agency’s Compliance Assurance Section via telephone at
    217/782—9720 when the entire treatment system is
    returned to service.. S’~ritten confirmation of the
    telepnone notification shall be submitted within 5 days
    to the Agency
    at the address given below:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Division of water Pollution Control
    Compliance Assurancc Section
    2200 Churchill Road
    S~ingfield,
    IL 62794—9276
    ATTN: Gary Reside
    80—3 74

    4.
    Ihe
    City of Macomb shall operate that portion of the
    treatment facility remaining in operation so as to
    preclude tne best eifluent possible.
    5. within
    10 days of the date of this Order the City of
    Macomb snall
    execute a Certificate of Acceptance
    agreeing to be bound by the terms and conditions
    of the
    variance.
    This Certificate
    of Acceptance shall be sent
    to James Frost at the Address given above.
    CER~1F1CATIOL
    I, (he) The
    City of Macornb, hereby accept and agree to be
    bound by all terms and conditions of the Order of the Pollution
    Control Board in PCB 67—luu, 3uly 16, l9~7..
    Petitioner
    By: Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    li Ia Su CADEREL..
    I, Dorothy M. ~unn, ClerK of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Opi~ion and Order was
    adopted on tine
    _______________
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1987 by a vote
    of
    ~-~)
    .
    0
    Dorothy M.. G~nn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    80—3 75

    Back to top