ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
20,
1987
VILLAGE OF ROSELLE,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
PCB 87-39
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
INTERIM ORDER
OF THE BOARD
(by
J.
Anderson):
The Agency filed
its Recommendation to grant variance with
conditions,
on July 22, which late filing was accepted
by the
Board
by Order
of August
6.
The Village has filed
no Response to
this Recommendation.
The Board’s decision
in this matter is due
on September
8,
said date being calculated, pursuant to the 120
day statutory reauirement,
from the date of filing of
the May 11
amended petition.
The
regular Board meeting scheduled before
that date
is September
4.
In
its Recommendation
to grant variance with conditions,
the
Agency notes various
allegations
in the petition which are either
unclear or lacking support.
The deficiencies are noted
in:
Paragraphs 21,22,23
-
Sample Results and Effects of
Blending
Paragraph
24
-
Documentation regarding Lake
Michigan water source
Paragraphs
28
&
36
-
Hardship and persons
to
be served
by new water lines
The Board
agrees that additional
information would be helpful
concerning the latter two issues.
More troublesome
is the issue raised
in Paragraphs 21-23.
The existing record does not adequately address
the threshold
issue
in
a variance case: whether there
is
in fact non-compliance
requiring variance relief.
It is clear from the Village’s
sampling results that Well No.
5,
with
a combined radium content
of 6.1±0.8pCi/l,
itself does not comply with the 5.0 pCi/I
standard.
The analysis
of the distribution system samples which
the Village had taken
from locations
at the Waterbury,
St.
Walter,
Medinah Middle and Spring Hill Schools
in 1985 and 1987
indicate combined radium levels, respectively of
2.5
pCi/l;
and
1.7
pCi/l.
The relationship
of these figures
to the Agency’s
80—335
5.5 pCi/l distribution sample analysis
is
unclear;
this record
does not state
the location of the Agency’s
sampling point.
More specifically,
is the Village asserting that,
because of
its blending program, waters drawn
from any point
in its
distribution system would be
in compliance with the radium
standard?
If
so,
the Village would appear
to need variance
relief only until such time
as the Agency’s sampling confirms
these results,
a year
at most.
On the other hand,
is the Village
asserting that the Agency has correctly opined that distribution
samples taken from areas near Well No.
5 would show
a violation
of the combined radium standard?
The Village
is
given leave
to file
a late response
to the
Agency’s Recommendation
which addresses the concerns outlined
in
this Order.
On
or before August
31,
the Village
is directed
to
file either
a response,
or
a notice that no response will
be
filed.
If no response
is
filed,
the Board will decide the matter
on September
4.
If
a response containing new factual
information
is filed,
the Board’s decision timeclock will
be reset
as
of the
date of filing;
however,
the
Board would decide this matter as
expeditiously after
the filing of the response as
is
practicable.
Finally,
a motion for extension
of the time
in
which to file
a response will
be granted only if accompanied by
an appropriate waiver
of
the September decision deadline,
as the
Board wishes
to avoid issuance of
a variance
by default.
On or before August
31,
the Agency is given leave
to file
a
supplement
to
its Recommendation which addresses the discrepancy
in
the radium readings.
No extension of this filing date can
be
considered
by the Board absent
a waiver
of the decision deadline
by
the Village.
Finally,
given the tight timeframes involved here,
the
Clerk’s office
is
directed
to make service
of
this
Order via
first class,
as well as certified mail.
IT IS
SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy
M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify
that the above Interim Order was adopted on
the ~
day of ~
,
1987,
by
a vote of
~?
~
~
Dorothy
M. G~nn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
80—336