ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
6,
1987
WABASH AND LAWRENCE COUNTIES
TAXPAYERS AND WATER DRINKERS
ASSOCIATION and KENNETH PHILLIPS,
Petitioners,
v.
)
PCB 87—122
THE COUNTY OF WABASH
AND
K/C
RECLAMATION, INC.,
Respondents.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by
B. Forcade):
This action
is an appeal
filed August
6,
1987, pursuant to
Section 40.1 of the Environmental Protection Act
(“Act”)
(I11.Rev.Stat. Ch. 111—1/2, par.
1040.1.
Petitioners appeal the
decision of the County of Wabash (“County”)
approving site
location suitability for K/C Reclamation, Inc.
Record Before the County Board
P.A.
82—682, also known as SB—172,
as codified
in Section
40.1(a)
of the Act, provides that the hearing before the Board
is
to “be based exclusively on the record before the county board or
governing body of the municipality”.
The statute does not
specify who
is
to file with the Board such record or who
is
to
certify
to the completeness or correctness of the record.
As the County alone can verify and certify what exactly
is
the entire record before
it,
in the interest~.ofprotecting
the
rights of all parties
to this action, and
in order to satisfy the
intention of SB—l72,
the Board believes that the County must
be
the party to prepare and file the record on appeal.
The Board
suggests that guidance
in so doing can be had by reference to
Section 105.102(a)(4)
of the Board’s Procedural Rules and to
Rules 321 through 324
of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.
In
addition
to
the actual documents which comprise the record,
the
County Clerk shall also prepare
a document entitled “Certificate
of Record on Appeal” which shall list the documents comprising
the record.
Seven copies of the certificate, seven copies of the
transcript of the County hearing and three copies of any other
documents
in the record shall be filed with the Board,
and
a copy
of the certificate shall
be served upon the petitioners.
The
Clerk
of the County
(city or county)
is given
21 days from the
date of
this Order
to “prepare,
bind and certify the record on
appeal”
(Ill. Supreme Court, Rule
324).
80—139
—2—
Section 40.1(a)
provides that if there is no final action by
the Board within 120 days, petitioner may deem the site location
approved.
The Board has construed identical “in accordance with the
terms of” language contained in Section 40(b)
of the Act
concerning third—party
appeals of the grant of hazardous waste
landfill permits as giving the person who had requested the
permit
a)
the right to a decision within the applicable statutory
time frame
(now 120 days), and
b) the right to waive
(extend)
the
decision period
(Alliance for
a Safe Environment,
et
al.
v. Akron
Land Corp. et al., PCB 80—184, October 30, 1980).
The Board
therefore~construesSection 40.1(b)
in like manner, with the
result
that
failure
of
this
Board
to
act
in
120
days
would
allow
the
site
location
applicant
to
deem
the
site
location
approved.
Pursuant to Section 105.104 of the Procedural
Rules,
it is each
party’s responsibility to pursue its action, and
to insist that a
hearing on the petition
is timely scheduled
in order
to allow the
Board
to review the record and
to render
its decision within 120
days of the filing of
the petition.
Transcription Costs
The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed in
Town
of Ottawa,
et al.
v.
IPCB,
et al.,
129 Ill. App.
3rd,
472
N.E.2d 150
(Third District,
1984).
In that case,
the Court
ordered the Board
to assume transcription costs
(472 N.E.2d at
155).
The Supreme Court denied leave to appeal on March 14,
1985.
In cognizance of this ruling, the Board will provide for
stenographic transcription of the Board hearing
in this matter.
This matter
is accepted for hearing.
Hearing must
be
scheduled within 14 days of the date of this Order and completed
within
60 days
of the date of this Order.
The hearing officer
shall inform the Clerk of the Board
of the time and location of
the hearing at least 40 days
in advance of hearing
so that public
notice of hearing may be published.
After hearing, the hearing
officer shall submit an exhibit list, writ.ten schedule for
submission of briefs
if any and all actual exhibits
to the Board
within
5 days of the hearing.
Any briefing schedule shall
provide for final
filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
event later than
70 days from the date of
this Order.
If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or
if after
an
attempt the hearing officer
is unable
to consult with the
parties,
the hearing officer shall unilaterally set
a hearing
date
in conformance with the schedule above.
This schedule will
only provide the Board a very short time period
to deliberate and
reach
a decision before
the due date.
The hearing officer and
the parties are encouraged
to expedite this proceeding
as much
as
possible.
80— 140
The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver
of the decision deadline by the site location suitability
applicant and only for the equivalent or
fewer number of days
that the decision deadline is waived.
Such waivers must
be
provided
in writing
to the Clerk
of the Board.
Any waiver must
be an “open waiver” or
a waiver
of decision until
a date
certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the site
location suitability applicant provides an open waiver or
a
waiver
to a date at least 75 days beyond the date
of the motion
to cancel hearing.
This should allow ample time for the Board
to
republish notice of hearing and receive transcripts from the
hearing before
the due date.
Any order by the hearing officer
granting cancellation of hearing shall include a new hearing date
at least 40 days
in the future and at least 30 days prior
to the
new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall
be promptly
informed of the new schedule.
Because this proceeding
is the type for which the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets
a very short statutory deadline
for decisionmaking, absent
a waiver, the Board will grant
extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances.
Any
such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
decision, including response time to such a motion.
However, no
such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
set
a date pursuant to this Order.
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that~heabove Order was adopted on
the
~
day of
C
,
1987, by a vote
of
~,-c.
26~
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
80— 14 1