ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August
    6,
    1987
    WABASH AND LAWRENCE COUNTIES
    TAXPAYERS AND WATER DRINKERS
    ASSOCIATION and KENNETH PHILLIPS,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    )
    PCB 87—122
    THE COUNTY OF WABASH
    AND
    K/C
    RECLAMATION, INC.,
    Respondents.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by
    B. Forcade):
    This action
    is an appeal
    filed August
    6,
    1987, pursuant to
    Section 40.1 of the Environmental Protection Act
    (“Act”)
    (I11.Rev.Stat. Ch. 111—1/2, par.
    1040.1.
    Petitioners appeal the
    decision of the County of Wabash (“County”)
    approving site
    location suitability for K/C Reclamation, Inc.
    Record Before the County Board
    P.A.
    82—682, also known as SB—172,
    as codified
    in Section
    40.1(a)
    of the Act, provides that the hearing before the Board
    is
    to “be based exclusively on the record before the county board or
    governing body of the municipality”.
    The statute does not
    specify who
    is
    to file with the Board such record or who
    is
    to
    certify
    to the completeness or correctness of the record.
    As the County alone can verify and certify what exactly
    is
    the entire record before
    it,
    in the interest~.ofprotecting
    the
    rights of all parties
    to this action, and
    in order to satisfy the
    intention of SB—l72,
    the Board believes that the County must
    be
    the party to prepare and file the record on appeal.
    The Board
    suggests that guidance
    in so doing can be had by reference to
    Section 105.102(a)(4)
    of the Board’s Procedural Rules and to
    Rules 321 through 324
    of the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.
    In
    addition
    to
    the actual documents which comprise the record,
    the
    County Clerk shall also prepare
    a document entitled “Certificate
    of Record on Appeal” which shall list the documents comprising
    the record.
    Seven copies of the certificate, seven copies of the
    transcript of the County hearing and three copies of any other
    documents
    in the record shall be filed with the Board,
    and
    a copy
    of the certificate shall
    be served upon the petitioners.
    The
    Clerk
    of the County
    (city or county)
    is given
    21 days from the
    date of
    this Order
    to “prepare,
    bind and certify the record on
    appeal”
    (Ill. Supreme Court, Rule
    324).
    80—139

    —2—
    Section 40.1(a)
    provides that if there is no final action by
    the Board within 120 days, petitioner may deem the site location
    approved.
    The Board has construed identical “in accordance with the
    terms of” language contained in Section 40(b)
    of the Act
    concerning third—party
    appeals of the grant of hazardous waste
    landfill permits as giving the person who had requested the
    permit
    a)
    the right to a decision within the applicable statutory
    time frame
    (now 120 days), and
    b) the right to waive
    (extend)
    the
    decision period
    (Alliance for
    a Safe Environment,
    et
    al.
    v. Akron
    Land Corp. et al., PCB 80—184, October 30, 1980).
    The Board
    therefore~construesSection 40.1(b)
    in like manner, with the
    result
    that
    failure
    of
    this
    Board
    to
    act
    in
    120
    days
    would
    allow
    the
    site
    location
    applicant
    to
    deem
    the
    site
    location
    approved.
    Pursuant to Section 105.104 of the Procedural
    Rules,
    it is each
    party’s responsibility to pursue its action, and
    to insist that a
    hearing on the petition
    is timely scheduled
    in order
    to allow the
    Board
    to review the record and
    to render
    its decision within 120
    days of the filing of
    the petition.
    Transcription Costs
    The issue of who has the burden of providing transcription
    in Board site location suitability appeals has been addressed in
    Town
    of Ottawa,
    et al.
    v.
    IPCB,
    et al.,
    129 Ill. App.
    3rd,
    472
    N.E.2d 150
    (Third District,
    1984).
    In that case,
    the Court
    ordered the Board
    to assume transcription costs
    (472 N.E.2d at
    155).
    The Supreme Court denied leave to appeal on March 14,
    1985.
    In cognizance of this ruling, the Board will provide for
    stenographic transcription of the Board hearing
    in this matter.
    This matter
    is accepted for hearing.
    Hearing must
    be
    scheduled within 14 days of the date of this Order and completed
    within
    60 days
    of the date of this Order.
    The hearing officer
    shall inform the Clerk of the Board
    of the time and location of
    the hearing at least 40 days
    in advance of hearing
    so that public
    notice of hearing may be published.
    After hearing, the hearing
    officer shall submit an exhibit list, writ.ten schedule for
    submission of briefs
    if any and all actual exhibits
    to the Board
    within
    5 days of the hearing.
    Any briefing schedule shall
    provide for final
    filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
    event later than
    70 days from the date of
    this Order.
    If after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
    parties fail to provide an acceptable hearing date or
    if after
    an
    attempt the hearing officer
    is unable
    to consult with the
    parties,
    the hearing officer shall unilaterally set
    a hearing
    date
    in conformance with the schedule above.
    This schedule will
    only provide the Board a very short time period
    to deliberate and
    reach
    a decision before
    the due date.
    The hearing officer and
    the parties are encouraged
    to expedite this proceeding
    as much
    as
    possible.
    80— 140

    The hearing officer may extend this schedule only on a
    waiver
    of the decision deadline by the site location suitability
    applicant and only for the equivalent or
    fewer number of days
    that the decision deadline is waived.
    Such waivers must
    be
    provided
    in writing
    to the Clerk
    of the Board.
    Any waiver must
    be an “open waiver” or
    a waiver
    of decision until
    a date
    certain.
    Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
    of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be canceled unless the site
    location suitability applicant provides an open waiver or
    a
    waiver
    to a date at least 75 days beyond the date
    of the motion
    to cancel hearing.
    This should allow ample time for the Board
    to
    republish notice of hearing and receive transcripts from the
    hearing before
    the due date.
    Any order by the hearing officer
    granting cancellation of hearing shall include a new hearing date
    at least 40 days
    in the future and at least 30 days prior
    to the
    new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall
    be promptly
    informed of the new schedule.
    Because this proceeding
    is the type for which the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Act sets
    a very short statutory deadline
    for decisionmaking, absent
    a waiver, the Board will grant
    extensions or modifications only in unusual circumstances.
    Any
    such motion must set forth an alternative schedule for notice,
    hearing, and final submissions, as well as the deadline for
    decision, including response time to such a motion.
    However, no
    such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
    set
    a date pursuant to this Order.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that~heabove Order was adopted on
    the
    ~
    day of
    C
    ,
    1987, by a vote
    of
    ~,-c.
    26~
    Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    80— 14 1

    Back to top