ILLINOiS POLLUTiON CONTROL BOARD
    July 16, 1987
    CITY OF OGLESBY,
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 87—37
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND OhDLR OF THE BOARD (by 3. D. Dumelle):
    This matter comes before the Board on the March 20, 1987
    petition for variance filed by the City of Ogiesby (Oglesby)..
    Oglesby seeks a five year variance from 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    602.105(a), Standards for Issuance, and from 35 Iii. Adm. Code
    602.106(b), Restricted Status, but only to the extent those rules
    involve
    35
    Iii. Adm. Code 604.301(b) (combined radium—226 and
    radiujn—228 concentration). On April 27, 1987, the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed its hecommendation
    in support of grant of variance. Hearing was waived and none has
    been held.
    The City of Oglesby, located in LaSaile Count~i, provides
    drinking water from its wells for a population of 4,000
    residential and 150 industrial and commercial utility customers
    representing some 8,000 residents and some 150 industries and
    businesses employing approximately 3,000 people. The water
    supply system includes two deep wells, two treatment plants,
    (iron removal and softening) pumps and distribution facilities.
    The system is provided to all users. The City by ordinance
    imposeo a user charge.
    By letter dated August
    23,
    19?i, the City was first advised
    by the Agency that the maximum allowable concentration of
    combined rac~ium-226 and radium-22b was exceeded. The Agency
    report indicated a combined radium-226 and radium—228
    concentration of b.0 pCi/i, exceeding the
    5
    pci/i standard. The
    Agency’s report was apparently based on the analysis of a
    composite of four consecutive quarterly samples. Oglesby was
    placed on the April, 1986, Restricted Status List for its
    exceedances of the combined radium levels.
    Oglesby states that prior to November 1981, it used a water
    softening process within
    its
    water distribution system. Because
    of concern over excessive amounts of sodium being added to the
    water, Oglesby elected to reduce the sodium content by removing
    79. 127

    —2—
    the water softening process. Oglesby was unaware until August
    23, 1985, that, as a result, concentrations of combined radium-
    226 and radium—228 exceeded allowable limits. After receiving
    notice of the exceedances and its placement on Restricted Status,
    Oglesby sought Lcientific data and analyses to resolve the
    problem concerning the excessive combined radium—226 and radium—
    28 in its water and determined that the radium level could be
    reduced through the reemployment of its water softening system.
    Oglesby, believing this to be the best and most economical
    treatment method available, reinstituted its water softening
    process, treating the water through ion exchange using common
    zeolite resins, and has determined by subsequent testing that the
    water softening system has reduced the amount of radium to a
    combined radium—226 and 228 level of less than 3.9
    +
    0.1 pCi/l.
    being less than the amount determined to be unsafe under the Safe
    Drinking Water Act.
    Oglesby requests variance for five years from grant of
    variance or until the Agency accepts the data demonstrating that
    Oglesby is in compliance with the sate Drinking hater Act.
    Oglesby asserts that denial of the variance during the period of
    time required for it to establish proof that the public water
    supply has been modified and operated so as not to cause a
    violation of Board rules would impose an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship. Oglesby notes that because it is on
    restricted status, the Agency cannot lawfully issue permits for
    the following water main extensions:
    a) Hickory Hills Subdivision, located at 500 W. Clark
    Street, Oglesby, Illinois, consisting of 40 single
    family residences, with an expected population of 160
    persons. Each house would have a separate hookup to
    the proposed water main.
    b) All real estate recently annexed to the City and
    located at the tar west portion of the City consisting
    of approximately 640 acres.
    Apparently, no formal assessment of the environmental impact
    has been made. However, Oglesby is of the opinion that there
    will not be a negative impact on human life in the affected area
    as a result of the issuance of this variance. The Agency, in its
    Recommendation, notes that while radiation at any level creates
    some risk, the risk associated with the level in Oglesby’s water
    is very low. Also, the Agency notes the testimony presented by
    Richard E. Toohey, Ph.D., of Argonne national Laboratory, on June
    25, 1985 in PCB 85-54, the Aurora variance hearing, and in the
    hearings for the Agency rules change proposal R85-l4. The Agency
    believes that an incremental increase in the maximum allowable
    concentration (MAC) for radium even up to a maximum of four times
    the current 5 pCi/i should cause no significant health risk for
    79-128

    —3—
    the limited population served by new water main extensions for
    the time period of this recommended variance.
    Oglesby alleges, and the Agency concurs, that the Board may
    grant the recommended relief consistent with the Safe Drinking
    water Act (42 U.S.C. 300 (f)) and the USEPA Drinking hater
    Regulations.
    The Agency’s conclusion is that:
    “the hardship resulting from denial of the
    recommended variance from the effect of being
    on Restricted Status would outweigh the
    injury of the public from grant of the
    variance. In light of the cost to the
    Petitioner of treatment of its current water
    supply, the likelihood of no significant
    injury to the public from continuation of the
    present level of the contaminant in question
    in the Petitioner’s water for the limited
    time period of the variance, and the
    possibility of compliance with the AMC
    standard
    ...
    the Agency concludes that denial
    of a variance from the effects of Restricted
    Status would impose an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship upon Petitioner.
    The Agency observes that this grant of
    variance from restricted status affects only
    those users who consume water drawn from any
    newly extended water lines. This variance
    should
    .
    not affect the status of the rest of
    Petitioner’s population drawing water from
    existing water lines, except insofar as the
    variance by its conditions may hasten
    compliance. Grant of variance may also, in
    tne interim, lessen exposure for that portion
    of the population which will be consuming
    more effectively blended water. In so saying,
    the Agency emphasizes that it continues to
    place a high priority on compliance with the
    radium standards.”
    Based on all the facts and circumstances here presented, the
    Board finds that denial of variance would impose an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship.
    The Board notes, however, that the Agency recommended a
    grant of variance with conditions for the full five year term.
    Oglesby’s petition for variance requested the variance “for five
    years from grant of variance or until the Agency accepts the
    data demonstrating Oglesby is in compliance witn the
    Safe
    79.129

    —4—
    Drinking hater Act.” Once compliance is attained which satisfies
    the Agency, Oglesby will be taken off the Restricted Status List
    and the variance will be rendered unnecessary. Therefore the
    Board will grant the variance for five years or until
    satisfactory compliance is achieved, subject to the conditions
    listed below. Finally, the Board notes Oglesby’s correct concern
    about excessive amounts of sodium added to the water. Excessive
    amounts of sodium can be harmful to human health. Therefore, the
    sooner Ogiesby determines precisely the amount of water softening
    necessary to maintain allowable concentrations of radium-226 and
    radium-228, the better for Oglesby’s residents.
    This Opinions constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    Petitioner, the City of Oglesby, is hereby granted a
    variance from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 602.105(a), Standards of
    Issuance, and 602.106(b), Restricted Status, but only as they
    relate to the 5 pCi/l combined radium-226 and radium-228 standard
    of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 604.301(a), subject to the following
    conditions:
    1. This variance expires on June 24, 1992, or at such
    earlier time as analysis pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm Code
    605.105(a) shows that compliance with the radium
    standards has been achieved;
    2. Oglesby shall continue to employ its water softening
    process, treating the water through ion exchange using
    common zeolite resins, to achieve compliance with the
    radium standards.
    3. In consultation with the Agency, Oglesby shall continue
    its sampling program to determine as accurately as
    possible the level of radioactivity in its wells and
    finished water. Until this variance expires, Oglesby
    shall collect quarterly samples of its water from its
    distribution system. shall composite and shall analyze
    them annually by a laboratory certified by the Sate of
    Illinois for radiological analysis so as to determine
    the concentration of the contaminant in question. The
    results of the analyses shall be reported to the
    Compliance Assurance Section, Division of Public hater
    Supplies, 2200 Churchill Road. IEPA, Springfield,
    Illinois 62794—9276, within 30 days of receipt of each
    analysis. At the option of Oglesby, the quarterly
    samples may be analyzed when collected. The running
    average of the most recent four quarterly sample
    results shall be reported to the above address within
    30 days of receipt of the most recent quarterly sample.
    79.130

    —5—
    4. Within four months of the grant of the .variance,
    Petitioner shall complete investigating compliance
    methods, including those treatment techniques described
    in the Manual of Treatment Techniques for Meeting the
    Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations, USF~PA, May
    1977, EPA—600/8-77-005, and submit to IEPA, DPWS, a
    detailed Compliance Report showing how compliance shall
    be achieved within the shortest practicable time, but
    no later then five years from the date of this
    var lance.
    5. Pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 606.201, in its first set
    of water bills or within three months after the date of
    this Variance Order, whichever occurs first, and every
    three months thereafter, Oglesby will send to each user
    of its public water supply a written notice to the
    effect that Petitioner has been granted by the
    Pollution Control Board a variance from 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 602.105(a) Standards of Issuance and 35 Ill. Adm.
    code 602.106(b) Restricted Status, as it relates to the
    MAC standard in question.
    6. Pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 606.201, in its first set
    of water bills or within three months after the date of
    this Order, whichever occurs first, and every three
    months thereafter, Oglesby will send to each user of
    its public water supply a written notice to the effect
    that Petitioner is not in compliance with the standard
    in question. The notice shall state the average
    content of the contaminant in question in samples taken
    since the last notice period during which samples were
    taken.
    7. Oglesby shall take all reasonable measures with its
    existing equipment to minimize the level of contaminant
    in question in its finished water.
    8. Oglesby shall provide written progress reports to the
    Agency, Division of Public hater Supplies, Field
    Operations Section every six months concerning steps
    taken to comply with paragraph E. Progress reports
    shall quote said paragraph and immediately below said
    paragraph state what steps have been taken to comply
    therein.
    9. within forty—five days of the date of this Order,
    Oglesby shall execute and forward to Thomas Davis,
    Enforcement Programs, Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois
    62794-9276, a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement
    to be bound to all terms and conditions of this
    79.131

    —6—
    variance. This forty-five day period shall oe held in
    abeyance for any period this matter if being appealed.
    I, (We) The City of Oglesby, having read the Order of the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board, in PCB 87-37, dated June 25,
    1987, understand and accept the said Order, realizing that such
    acceptance remedies all terms and conditions thereto binding and
    enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By: Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order was
    adopted on the
    ~
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1987 by a vote
    of
    ____________.
    ~7.
    Dorothy M. L~unn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    79. 132

    Back to top