ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 1, 1987
IN THE MATTER OF
EUGENE FUNK
)
AC 87—99
(IEPA
Docket
No. 85—73—AC)
Respondent.
DISSENTING STATEMENT (by B. Forcade):
I respectfully dissent from todayts decision. The majority
would hold that the General Assembly’s intention was to exclude
unpermitted landfills from the scope of Section 21(p) of tne
Illinois Environmental Protection Act (“Act”). This holding
unnecessarily eliminates an effective enforcement mechanism.
do not feel that the language of Section 21(p) supports this
outcome. Additionally, I am disturbed that the majority, by so
holding, dismisses this case on a theory that was not advanced by
the respondent and has not been briefed by either party.
Section 21(p) reads:
Conduct a sanitary landfill operation which is
required to have a permit under subsection (d)
of this Section, in a manner which results in
any of the following conditions:
1. refuse in standing or flowing waters;
2. leachate flows entering waters of the
State;
3. leachate flows exiting the landfill
confines (as determined by the boundaries
established for the landfill by a permit
issued by the Agency);
4. open burning of refuse in violation of
Section 9 of this Act;
5. uncovered refuse remaining from any
previous operating day or at the
conclusion of any operating day, unless
authorized by permit;
6. failure to provide final cover within
time limits established by Board
regulations;
7. acceptance of wastes without necessary
permits;
82— 161
—2—
8. scavenging as defined by Board
regulations;
9. deposition of refuse in any unpermitted
portion of the landfill;
10. acceptance of a special waste without a
required manifest;
11. failure to submit reports required by
permits or Board regulations; and
12. failure to collect and contain litter
form
the
site
by
the
end
of
each
operating day.
The prohibitions specified in this subsection
(p) shall be enforceable by the Agency either
by administrative citation under Section 31.1
of this Act or as otherwise provided by this
Act.
The specific prohibitions in this
subsection do not limit the power of the Board
to
establish
regulations
or
standards
applicable to sanitary landfills.
Section 21(p) of the Act applies to sanitary landfill
operations “required to have a permit.” The respondent’s
operation certainly was required to have a permit, in order to
comply with the Act and regulations that prohibit open dumping
and conducting disposal operations without a permit. The
majority effectively rewrites Section 21(p) so that it only
applies to those operations that “in fact, have a permit.”
The General Assembly’s intent on the scope of applicability
of the administrative citation mechanism is further reflected by
the specific types of violations enumerated in Section 21(p).
Section 2l(p)(7) allows the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (“Agency”) to issue administrative citations for
“acceptance of wastes without necessary permits.” It would seem
to me that the respondent is charged with acceptance of wastes
without the required Section 21(d) permit. Therefore, the charge
is certainly appropriate under Section 2l(p)(7).
I find nothing in the statutory language to preclude
issuance of an administrative citation against an unpermitted
landfill operation and Section 21(p)(7) seems to specifically
authorize it. Accordingly, I4issent
Member of the Board
82—162
—3—
I, Dorothy Ni. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above Dissenting Statement was
submitted on the
9~’-
day of
&_t-~_~~,
,
1987.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
82— 163