ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January
    21, 1988
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO
    )
    R88-l
    35
    ILL. ADM. CODE
    PROPOSED
    AMENDMENTS:
    REQUEST
    FOR
    PUBLIC
    COMMENT
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by R.
    C.
    Flemal):
    From time to time the Board, as well as practitioners before
    the Board, encounter aspects
    in the Board’s rules and regulations
    which warrant correction, but which are not of the nature to
    Justify the time and expense associated with conducting an
    individual rulemaking
    to address each.
    The Board proposes today
    to gather together these materials and address them within a
    single proceeding.
    In
    so doing, the Board borrows a page from
    the Illinois General Assembly, which often addresses
    a group of
    housekeeping matters
    in an “omnibus bill”.
    In this sense,
    the
    instant matter
    is meant to be the Board’s version of
    an omnibus
    rulemaking.
    At this stage,
    the Board invites comment on two aspects of
    this proceeding:
    (1) merits of the example amendments identified
    herein, and
    (2)
    suggestions for and merits of additional
    amendments suitable for inclusion
    in an omnibus rulemaking
    Proceeding.
    The comment period will extend until
    April
    30,
    1988.
    Based upon the responses
    it receives, the Board will gather
    the appropriate amendments into a formal proposal(s)
    and proceed
    thereafter with normal rulemaking
    steps.
    Inclusion of a
    suggested amendment within the proposal will be based at the
    minimum on
    (1) desirability of the amendment,
    (2)
    likelihood that
    the amendment will be non—contentious,
    and
    (3) likelihood that
    the amendment will not require an Economic Impact Statement.
    The following consists of some examples which the Board
    believes may be appropriate materials for inclusion in the
    omnibus rulemaking.
    SECTION 301.200:
    INTRODUCTION TO
    DEFINITIONS, WATER POLLUTION
    This proposed change would amend Section 301.200 by adding a
    qualifying
    clause
    preceeding
    the
    existing
    language,
    thusly
    85—337

    —2—
    A~
    t~se~
    ~iI~Except
    as
    otherwise
    provided
    within
    individual Parts
    of this Chapter,
    the following terms
    defined by Section 301.200 et seq.
    shall have the
    meanings specified.
    Over
    time
    various
    definitions
    have
    been
    added
    to
    the
    water
    pollution
    regulations
    in
    Parts
    other
    than
    Part
    301.
    In
    some
    cases
    these
    new
    definitions are possibly not consistent with the
    definitions presented in Section 301.200
    et.
    seq.
    This amendment
    to 301.200
    is intended to specify that,
    should conflict arise,
    the definition
    in the Part in question prevails.
    An example
    where conflict might exist
    is provided by the definitions of
    Publicly Owned Treatment Works
    found at 301.365 and in Part
    310.
    Although this specific example
    is proposed to be rectified
    as part of this omnibus rulemaking (see following),
    the Board
    believes
    that
    it
    is
    advisable
    to
    adopt
    the
    proposed
    301.200
    amendment to forestall other possibly existing inconsistencies
    and/or
    future inconsistencies.
    SECTION 301.360:
    DEFINITION OF PUBLIC
    AND FOOD PROCESSING ~JATERSUPPLY
    This proposed change would delete the word “surface” from
    the phrase “withdrawn from surface waters of the State”,
    in
    Section 301.360,
    as follows:
    Public and Food Processing Water Supply: Any water use
    in which water
    is withdrawn from si~tf~aeewaters of the
    State
    for human consumption
    or for processing of food
    products intended for human consumption.
    The affect would
    to be clarify that any water
    of the State
    is
    considered a public and food processing water supply if the water
    is withdrawn for human consumption or
    for processing of food
    products intended for human consumption.
    The desirability of this change was brought out
    in testimony
    received
    in hearings conducted in R86—8, A Plan for Protecting
    Illinois Groundwater.
    There
    it was noted that the definition
    found at 301.360 was a
    source of confusion,
    in that
    it allowed
    a
    reading that public and food processing water
    supply standards
    are to apply only to surface waters,
    at the exclusion of
    under9round waters.
    As was pointed out by the Board
    in its
    Report
    in R86—8
    (In the Matter of:
    A Plan for Protecting
    Illinois Groundwater, August 28,
    1986,
    ~.
    Iv—2),
    such
    a reading
    would clearly be inconsistent with Section 303.203.
    Section
    303.203 specifically identifies that public and food processing
    water supply standards apply to any underground waters which are
    a present or potential source of water for public or food
    processing supply:
    85—338

    Section 303.203
    Underground Waters
    The underground waters
    of Illinois which are a present
    or
    a potential source of water
    for public or food
    processing supply shall meet the general use and
    public and food processing water standards
    of Subparts
    B and C, part
    302, except due
    to natural causes.
    The reading that public and food processing water supply
    standards do not apply
    to underground sources of water supply
    is
    also inconsistent with the expressed intention of the Board when
    it adopted the water quality standards of Subtitle
    C,
    including
    Sections 301.360 and 303.203
    (then Rules
    104 and 207,
    respectively).
    In particular,
    the Board noted that public and
    food processing
    water supply standards are intended to “assure
    that water
    is satisfactory wherever
    it
    is
    taken”
    (3 PCB 763,
    emphasis added).
    Deletion of the word
    ‘tsurface”
    from Section 301.360 would
    make Section 301.360 consistent with 303.203 because “waters of
    the State”,
    as defined within the Environmental Protection Act,
    Section 3(oo),
    includes both surface and underground waters.
    SECTION 301.365:
    DEFINITION OF
    PUBLICLY OWNED TREATMENT WORKS
    This proposed amendment would delete the existing definition
    of Publicly Owned Treatment Works
    (“POTWs”)
    found at 301.365 and
    replace
    it by reference to
    the definition found
    in Part 310,
    thusly:
    Publicly Owned Treatment Works:
    A
    ea~me~we~s
    ew~e~~y a m~ e4pa4~~y7sa~~a~ya~te~7eo~~ye~
    a~a~e
    e~~
    ageriey7 a~ w1~t~e~
    ~ea~e
    ~eme~~e a~
    ~
    wa~esee~ee~e~
    ~y a p~e~y ewi’~e~e~
    fag
    a~e~sewer sy~em-~
    ~
    ~ea~me~
    wefks
    a~ep~e~y ow~e~a~
    rtai~ee~~y bor~±a~es
    e? p~~eage~e4esa~e~
    ~
    4~this ~e~er~
    As defined
    in 35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code 310.
    The Board in R86—44
    (In the Matter
    of: Pretreatment
    Regulations, December
    3,
    1987)
    adopted
    an extensive set of
    regulations applicable to POTWs, now found in Part 310.
    This
    action was initiated by
    a requirement
    for the State to adopt
    regulations “identical
    in substance” with federal regulations
    promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection
    Agency.
    The new regulations include
    a definition
    of Publicly
    Owned Treatment Works at Section 310.110.
    Although this new
    definition
    is similar
    to
    that also
    found at 301.365,
    it
    is not
    identical.
    To forestall possible conflict between the two
    existing definitions,
    the Board believes that
    it
    is advisable to
    make the amendment as here proposed.
    85—339

    SECTION 301.415: DEFINITION OF TREATMENT WORKS
    The proposed course of action and the rationale here are
    identical to that proposed for
    th.e amendment to Section 301.365,
    above.
    In particular,
    it
    is proposed that 301.415 be amended as
    follows:
    Treatment Works:
    v~ua~y
    Of
    eo
    ee~ve~ythese
    eo~s~e~e~s
    ef ~ev~ees +exeep~sewefs7
    at~
    exeep~
    ~
    Of
    ~ev~ees ~se~ fef the pfe~ea~men~
    0?
    was~ewa~ef
    ~f±ef
    ~O
    ~
    ~fe~ue~4oft~
    ~
    ewrte~
    Of
    feg~a~e~ea~mei~wOf4~3+~se~
    ?Of
    ee~ee~4rtg7
    pwflp±r~g7
    ~fea?~g7
    Of
    ~spes~g
    0?
    was~ewa~efs
    Of
    ?Of
    the ~eeeve~y e? bypfo~e~s?fem
    sue~was~ewathfAs defined
    in
    35
    Ill. Adm. Code 310.
    REPEAL OF SECTION 304.140
    Section 304.140 deals with
    the conditions under which delays
    in upgrading
    of effluent discharges are allowable.
    The proposal
    is
    to repeal
    the entirety of the Section,
    or,
    in the alternative,
    to replace
    it with
    a shortened version.
    Section 304.140 appears
    to apply
    to actions and possible actions now entirely past, and
    therefore may be surplusage.
    If so, removal of
    it
    from the
    regulations would be justified as
    a matter of clarity and
    efficiency.
    However, the Board does request that interested
    parties closely review this Section
    to ascertain whether
    the
    entirety of the rule
    is
    indeed superfluous,
    and alternatively
    whether some of
    it may be beneficially retained.
    REPEAL OF SECTION 304.301
    Section 304.301 deals with exceptions for ammonia nitrogen
    water quality violations.
    All of the provisions of the Section
    terminate after July 1,
    1988.
    Therefore,
    after that date
    the
    entire Section may become superfluous.
    The proposal
    is therefore
    to initiate repealing of this Section now, such that
    at. some date
    after July
    1,
    1988, when the instant omnibus rulemaking is
    completed,
    the surplusage may be removed from the regulations.
    SECTION 305.102:
    REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
    FOR PRETREAMENT WORKS
    This proposed amendment would
    remove the references to
    pretreatment works and operations found
    in existing Section
    305.102,
    and add
    a new subsection pertaining
    to pretreatment
    operations~
    The proposed changes are as follows:
    85—340

    —5—
    a)
    Every person within this State operating a
    pfe~fea~me~?
    wet~k~ytreatment works7 or
    wastewater source shall submit operating reports
    to the Agency.
    Such reports
    shall contain
    information regarding
    the
    quantity
    of influent
    and of effluent discharged,
    or wastes bypassed
    and
    of combined sewer overflows;
    the
    concentrations of those physical, chemical,
    bacteriological
    and radiological parameters which
    shall
    be specified by the Agency;
    and any
    additional
    information the Agency may reasonably
    require.
    This ~epof~±ng fequifemen~fef
    pfe~efea~meft~
    wofks sha~?ten~yapp’y ~e thes
    pfe~fee~men~
    wethe wh~e~
    ~
    W4sehafge ~e~e
    ~O
    U~8ft~57
    as defined 4~r~
    See~4:en5O~+
    of
    the
    ~WA7 ot~pe~ante
    wh4eh may in~ef?efewith
    the
    t~ea~men~
    pfeeess7 4~e the feee±
    rtg ~ea~mert~ wefks
    Of
    a~esub~ee~th ~egt~a~ens
    pfOffl~ga~ed
    ur~defGee~en~
    of
    the
    ~ean
    Wathf Ae?
    ;~
    s~-e~-
    ~
    e~seq7~~
    Of
    ~+
    B4sebafge 15
    Of
    mere of
    the
    ~o~a1 hydfae1~e
    flew feee4ved by the
    ~e&emen~
    wefke~
    Of
    ~
    B4sebefge 15
    Of
    ffl8f~
    ef
    the
    ~o~al
    b~eleg~ealleading feee4ved by the ~ea~men~
    wefks
    as
    meas~fed by
    5—day
    b~eebem~eal
    exyge~demand7
    b)
    Every holder
    of
    an NPDES Permit
    is required
    to
    comply with the monitoring,
    sampling, recording
    and reporting requirements set forth
    in
    the
    permit and this eChapter.
    C)
    Persons operating pretreatment works may be
    Subject
    to reporting requirements specified
    in
    35
    ill.
    Adrn.
    Code 310.
    The purpose of
    this proposed amendment is eliminate
    duplication and possible inconsistencies between the reporting
    requirements found
    at 305.102 and the new reporting requirements
    found
    in Part 310,
    as adopted by
    the Board in R86—44
    (In the
    Matter of: Pretreatment Regulations, December
    3,
    1987).
    SECTION 309.281:
    EFFECTIVE DATE OF
    PART 309
    (PERMITS),
    SUBPART
    8
    (OThER PERMITS)
    The present language
    in Section 309.281, which determines
    the
    effective date of
    Subpart B, does not reference the calendar
    85—34 1

    —6—
    date upon which Subpart
    B became effective.
    Rather, reference
    is
    to “the date of filing with the Secretary of State” and to “such
    time as the Agency adopts criteria to administer the permit
    program”.
    Thus,
    to identify the calendar date,
    an interested
    party must go outside of the regulations, which
    is an unnecessary
    inconvenience.
    Accordingly,
    it
    is proposed to amend
    the Section
    with the inclusion
    of the specific calendar dates
    in question,
    as
    follows:
    a)
    The effective date of
    th4s
    Subpart
    B shall be
    the
    date of f~l4ngwith
    the
    Seefe~afyof S~a~een an
    eme~geneybasis
    is
    March
    7,
    1972.
    b)
    Nothwithstanding
    (a)
    above,
    Section 309.208
    shall
    ~eeeme effee~4~ea~s~eh~me
    as the Ageney
    ~de~s
    ef~ef±a~e ad
    is~e~
    the
    pe~m±~
    ~~eg~am
    eon~a4nedthefe~nbecame effective with adoption
    by the Agency of
    35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code 391 on
    December 14,
    1983.
    SECTION 601.105:
    DEFINITION OF GROUND WATER
    This proposed change would amend the definition of ground
    water found
    at 601.105
    in the following manner:
    “Ground Water means all nathfal ef af~f±eally
    tn~fod~eedwa~e~s?et~ndhelew the gfoend s~r’feee7
    e3~d~ngwa~ef?fem dt~g7df~lled7befed
    Of
    wells7 ~n?~l~fa~en
    l~nes7and sp~~ngsunderground
    water which occurs within the saturated zone and
    geologic materials where the fluid pressure
    in the
    pore space is equal
    to or greater
    than atmospheric
    pressure.
    The amendment is occasioned by testimony received by the
    Board during hearings
    in R86—8,
    A Plan for Protecting IllinoiS
    Groundwater, which noted
    the inconsistency between the existing
    definition and other definitions of the same term.
    In response
    the Board noted
    (p.
    1—4):
    The
    ...
    definition
    is not only inconsistent with
    the
    conventional definition of groundwater,
    but also
    appears
    to be inconsistent with use and definitions
    found elsewhere within Illinois statutes
    Ill.
    Rev.
    Stat.
    ch.
    1111/2, par.
    1003
    and
    the Board’s regulations
    34
    Ill. Adm. Code 301.420.
    In particular, the
    Section 601.105 definition appears to establish an
    identity between “ground water”
    and “underground
    water”,
    whereas conventional use considers groundwater
    to be
    a subset of underground water
    (R.
    at 1531).
    Since these differences
    in definition appear to be the
    85—342

    —7—
    source of some confusion, the Board will propose
    to
    amend these definitions
    in the earliest possible
    regulatory proceeding.
    The replacement definition proposed here
    is that definition
    recently adopted by the Illinois General Assembly in the Illinois
    Groundwater Protection Act, P.A. 85—863.
    Although the Board
    realizes that there are several possible definitions of
    groundwater, each of some individual merit,
    the Board believes
    that utilization of this particular definition
    is preferable due
    to the consistency
    it provides between statutes and the Board’s
    regulations.
    The Board also notes
    that throughout the Public Water
    Supplies
    (Subtitle
    F)
    portion
    of
    the Board’s rules and
    regulations
    the
    term
    “ground water”
    is spelled as two words.
    In
    contrast, within the Environmental Protection Act and most other
    state statutes, as well as elsewhere within the Board’s rules and
    regulations,
    the
    spelling
    is
    in
    the
    more
    commonly
    encountered
    form of
    a single word,
    “groundwater”.
    Given that both spellings
    occur
    in technical literature,
    and that
    it
    is
    commonly
    understood
    that there
    is no distinction between the two terms other than in
    the spelling, the Board does
    not
    believe
    that
    changing
    the
    spelling within Subtitle F
    is justified.
    ORDER
    A comment period extending until April 30,
    1988, on the
    Board’s proposed rulemaking,
    R88—l,
    is hereby opened.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that
    the above
    inion and Order was
    adopted on the
    ~/‘~-~
    day of
    ___________________,
    1988,
    by a
    vote of
    7—O
    .
    /L~I
    Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    85—343

    Back to top