ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
29,
1988
TROJAN CORPORATION,
a Delaware Corporation,
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 88—136
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J. Marlin):
On November
7,
1988, Trojan Corporation
(Trojan)
filed
a
motion
to consolidate
the proceeding with the proceeding docketed
as PCB 88—68.
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency) filed
no response
to this motion,
In PCB 88—68, Trojan filed
a petition
to appeal
a March
7,
1988 denial by the Agency of
a closure plan modification
requested by Trojan.
That matter concerns Trojan’s Wolf Lake
facility.
Trojan asserts that its closure modification request
sought
a determination from the Agency that the Resource
Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) did not apply
to eight ponds
(Ponds
A,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F,
G and H) operated by Trojan.
Trojan
claims that those ponds do not contain hazardous waste
materials.
(PCB 88—68,
Pet.,
p.
2—3).
The Agency does not agree
with Trojan that these ponds are not RCRA surface impoundment
units.
In this matter, Trojan filed
a petition
for review of
a July
22,
1988 denial by the Agency of
a permit requested
to allow the
land application of waste found ,in Trojan’s ponds
(Ponds A,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F,
G,
H,
I,
3,
K,
L,
M,
and N).
In the July 22,
1983
letter,
from the Division of Water Pollution,
the Agency states
that the Division of Land Pollution has already determined
that
Ponds
A,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F,
G, and H are hazardous waste units.
The
letter goes on
to state
that the Division
of Water Pollution
“will not issue
a permit for land application of the liquid from
these ponds
if the liquid
is
a hazardous waste.”
In addition,
the Agency cites
a number of the concerns dealing with Ponds
I,
3,
K,
L,
M,
and N.
(Pet.,
Attach.
C.)
Trojan claims that the instant case should be consolidated
with PCB 88—68 because
the cases involve:
Activities at the same
facility; substantially the same documents
(and witnesses);
and
the same determinations
of waste types
and closure methods.
93—675
—2—
While some
of the issues
in this proceeding involve
determinations of the Agency which were made
in
the Agency’s
disposition of
Trojan’s closure modification request
(now issues
in PCB 88—68),
not all of the Agency’s concerns regarding the
land application request
(specifically, matters dealing with
Ponds
I,
3,
K,
L,
M,
and N) are involved
in PCB 88—68.
The Board must review Agency permit decisions by evaluating
the decision with respect to the record that was before
the
Agency and that which
is generated by the Board’s own hearing.
The record filed by the Agency in PCB 88—68
is substantially
different form the record filed
in this proceeding.
It
is
essential that these records be kept distinct and that the
Agency’s decisions are evaluated against their respective
records.
The Board notes
that a hearing
in this matter
and one
in PCB
88—68 has been scheduled for May
1,
1989.
Iri
addition, both
cases will be heard by the same Hearing Officer.
This will
facilitate
the presentation of Trojan’s cases
and resolve any
possible scheduling conflicts.
However,
the Board will not
consolidate this proceeding with PCB 88—68.
Trojan’s motion
is
denied.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk of
the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that
e above Order was adopted on
the
~
day of
____________,
1988 by a vote
of
-o
.
Dorothy M.,/Gunri,
Clerk
Illinois Yollution Control Board
93—676