ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 24,
    1988
    GUARDIAN PACKAGING CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 87—190
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR. CLIFTON
    A.
    LAKE AND HR.
    ERIC BOYD OF ROOKS,
    PITTS
    AND
    POUST
    APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER.
    MR.
    JOSEPH
    R.
    PODLEc~7SKI APPEARED
    ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT.
    OPINION
    AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Michael Nardulli):
    This
    matter
    comes
    before
    the
    Board
    upon
    a
    November
    30,
    1987
    Petition
    for Variance filed
    on behalf of Guardian Packaging
    Corporation (hereinafter
    “Guardian”).
    Guardian requests variance
    from the revised flexographic
    and rotogravure printing rule,
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 215.245, which requires that sources of volatile
    organic matter (hereinafter
    “VOM”)
    emissions be
    in compliance by
    December
    31,
    1987.
    The requested period for variance
    is until
    April
    1,
    1988.
    Public hearing was held on January 27,
    1988
    at 10;00
    a.m.
    at
    the Elgiri City Hall,
    Elgin,
    Illinois.
    Mr. Joshua Sachs was the
    presiding Hearing Officer.
    On January 19,
    1988, prior
    to the
    public hearing, the Board received
    a variance recommendation
    to
    grant, with conditions,
    from the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency
    (
    hereinafter “Agency”).
    The Statutory
    Decision Deadline for this request
    for variance
    is March
    29,
    1988.
    Based on the record,
    the Board finds that Guardian’s request
    for variance should be granted,
    subject
    to the conditions
    recommended
    by the Agency.
    The granting
    of the variance will
    allow Guardian
    to avoid an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship
    that would not be justified
    by the environmental impact.
    BACKGROUND
    Guardian is
    a flexible
    packaging manufacturing facility with
    three flexographic presses and three coating
    lines which have
    rotogravure printing capabilities.
    The plant is located
    in
    Batavia, Kane County,
    Illinois and employs ninety—nine
    (99)
    87—187

    —2—
    people.
    The so1ven~ fraction of the inks
    used
    in
    printing,
    coating
    and laminating
    of plastic
    film and paper
    include
    materials classified
    as VOM under
    the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board’s Air Pollution Control Regulations
    (35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    211.122).
    The VOM emissions from
    the facility are approximately
    450
    tons per year.
    Although Guardian
    is presently installing
    control equipment, VOM emissions from the Guardian facility
    in
    Batavia
    are still uncontrolled.
    VOM emissions from flexographic and rotogravure printing
    operations
    in Illinois are regulated under
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    215,
    Subpart
    P.
    Section 215.401
    imposes VOM emission limitation on
    rotogravure
    and flexographic printing
    operations; however,
    until
    recently,
    facilities such
    as Guardian, which emitted
    less than
    one—thousand
    (1000)
    tons of VOM yearly
    from rotogravure and
    flexographic printing operations, were exempt from these
    limitations
    (35 Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    215.402).
    Because Guardian could
    not comply with the requirements
    of
    35
    Ill. Adm.
    Code 215.401
    by
    December
    31,
    1987,
    it filed the instant petition
    for variance
    with the Board
    on November
    30,
    1987.
    In this petition, Guardian
    seeks relief from 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    215.245
    until April
    1,
    1988,
    to enable
    it
    to install VOM control equipment
    on its presses.
    Guardian believes that the proposed controls will
    satisfy the
    requirements of Section 215.401 and result
    in compliance with
    that rule
    at the end of
    the variance period.
    Guardian’s filing
    of
    a variance petition within twenty days of the effective date
    of Section 215.245 stays
    the enforcement of that rule as to the
    Petitioner during
    the pendency of this variance proceeding.
    Ill.
    Rev.
    Stat.
    ch.
    lll1/~ar1038(b)(l985);
    35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code 104.102.
    PETITIONER’S COMPLIANCE PLAN
    After
    a review of
    the commercially available control
    technologies applicable
    to
    their industry and plant, Guardian has
    decided
    to control
    the yaM emissions from its printing operation
    through
    a combination of thermal/catalytic
    incineration and the
    use of complying material
    in one of
    the flexographic presses.
    Guardian
    has contracted
    for the installation of an
    incinerator
    and ancillary equipment at the Batavia
    plant.
    The incinerator
    has been installed.
    Duct work,
    hooding
    and belt guards still
    need
    to be installed
    to complete
    the project.
    Guardian believes
    this work can be completed by April
    1,
    1988.
    The transfer
    to
    complying material
    in one of
    the flexographic presses has already
    been completed.
    HARDSHIP
    AND
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    IMPACT
    Absent
    a
    grant
    of
    variance,
    the
    Agency
    can
    not
    issue
    1988
    operating permits
    to Guardian.
    Absent operating permits,
    Guardian could
    not legally conduct
    its current operations.
    On
    this basis,
    there would be
    unquestionable hardship associated
    with denial
    of the requested variance.
    87—138

    —3—
    Contrasting with the hardship is the
    issue of environmental
    impact.
    The materials emitted
    from Guardian’s operations
    do have
    a
    slight
    solvent
    odor,
    although
    no
    odor
    complaints
    have
    been
    recorded.
    Additionally,
    Kane County and the nearby Chicagoland
    area have been designated
    as areas for which ambient
    air quality
    standards
    for ozone have not been attained.
    The ozone monitor
    located closest
    to
    the Guardian facility
    is at Larsen Junior High
    School
    in Elgin.
    In 1986 and 1987,
    no ozone exceedances were
    detected
    at this monitor.
    However, there were multiple
    exceedances of the ozone AAQS
    in the Chicago metropolitan area
    (Air Quality Control Region)
    in 1987.
    As
    a major hydrocarbon
    source
    in an ozone non—attainment area, Guardian contributes,
    to
    an unquantified degree,
    to
    the “frequent, pervasive
    and
    substantial” violations of the ozone ##?AAQS
    in northern
    Illinois.
    Granting
    of the requested variance therefore will
    adversely impact
    the air quality of Kane County,
    and surrounding
    regions.
    However, Guardian’s compliance program,
    if successful,
    will significantly reduce the amount of VOM emitted by this
    facility.
    AGENCY
    RECOMMENDATION
    In
    its variance recommendation of January 13,
    1988,
    the
    Agency agrees that the Petitioner’s compliance
    plan
    is
    a workable
    plan,
    that the reasons
    for delay
    in coming
    into compliance were
    unforeseeable,
    arid that the
    failure
    to grant
    a variance would
    result
    in an arbitrary or
    unreasonable hardship.
    The Agency also
    states that
    it has reviewed the petition for variance,
    the
    applicable air quality standards,
    the most recent Illinois Annual
    Air Quality report and all other
    information which would normally
    be necessary to obtain approval of a revision to the
    SIP by
    USEPA,
    and they believe
    that
    if the Board grants the variance
    as
    requested,
    it will
    be approved as a SIP revision should
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 215.245 be approved as part of the Illinois SIP.
    For
    the aforementioned reasons,
    the Agency recommended
    that the
    variance be granted subject to the conditions incorporated into
    this Order.
    SUMMARY
    The Board
    notes that the environmental impact
    is relatively
    small
    and the time over which Guardian would be out of
    compliance,
    by the terms of the variance, would be relatively
    short.
    On this basis, the Board must conclude that
    the hardship
    associated with denial
    a of
    the variance, would be
    arbitrary or
    unreasonable.
    The Board will grant the requested variance,
    subject
    to conditions intended
    to insure that Guardian
    expeditiously comes into compliance.
    This Opinion constitutes
    the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law
    in this matter.
    87—189

    —4—
    ORDER
    Petitioner,
    Guardian Packaging Corporation,
    is hereby
    granted variance from 35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code
    215.243 subject to
    the
    following conditions:
    1) The variance expires on April
    1,
    1988.
    2)
    During
    the term of this variance,
    Guardian
    shall submit monthly written reports to the
    Agency detailing all progress made
    in
    achieving compliance with
    35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code
    215, Subpart
    P at
    its plant located at 475
    Kirk Road,
    Batavia.
    The first monthly
    report will be due thirty
    (30) days
    from
    the date
    of
    the
    Board order granting the
    variance.
    These monthly reports shall
    include
    monthly
    VOM
    emission
    data
    from
    each
    printing
    press.
    The
    first
    monthly
    report
    shall
    also
    include
    copies
    of
    material
    data
    sheets
    showing
    the
    composition
    (in
    terms
    of
    percentage
    of
    solid,
    solvent
    and
    water)
    of
    all
    inks
    and
    coatings
    used
    during
    the
    flexographic
    and
    rotogravure
    printing
    processes.
    All of
    the
    above
    information
    shall
    be submitted to
    the Agency at the
    following address:
    A.
    Manager,
    Permit Section
    Division of Air Pollution
    Control
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency
    1340
    N. Ninth Street
    Springfield,
    IL
    62702,
    and
    B.
    Manager,
    Field Operations
    Section
    Division
    of
    Air
    Pollution
    Control
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency
    1701
    S.
    First Avenue
    Suite 600
    Springfield,
    IL
    60153
    3.
    Petitioner
    shall
    abide
    by
    all
    conditions
    of
    construction
    Permit
    No.
    86120041,
    issued
    April
    9,
    1987.
    87—190

    —5—
    4.
    Petitioner
    shall not operate
    the thermal
    incinerator
    until
    an operating permit is issued by Agency,
    pursuant
    to Section 35 Ill.
    Adrn.
    Code 201.143.
    5. Within forty
    five
    (45) days after date of
    the Board
    Order,
    the Petitioner
    shall
    execute and send
    to:
    Mr. Joseph
    R.
    Podlewski,
    Jr.
    Enforcement Attorney
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    1701
    S.
    First Avenue
    Suite
    600
    Maywood,
    IL
    60153
    A certification of its acceptance
    of this variance by
    which
    it agrees to be bound
    by its terms and
    conditions.
    This forty—five
    (45)
    day
    period
    shall
    be
    held
    in abeyance for any period during which this matter
    is being appealed.
    If the Petitioner
    fails
    to execute
    and forward
    this agreement within
    the forty—five
    (45)
    day period,
    the variance shall
    be void.
    The
    form of the
    Certification shall
    be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    Guardian Packaging Corporation hereby accepts and agrees to
    be bound by all
    terms and conditions of the Order of the
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    in
    PCB
    87—190
    dated
    March
    24
    ,
    1988.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized
    Agent
    Title
    Date
    Section 41
    of the Environmental Protection Act,
    Ill.
    Rev.
    Stat.
    1985 ch.
    l1l11’~par. 1041,
    provides
    for appeal of final
    Orders of the Board within
    35 days.
    The Rules of the Supreme
    Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    87—19 1

    —6—
    I,
    Dorothy
    ri.
    Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby
    certify
    that
    the
    above
    Opinion
    and
    Order
    was
    adopted
    on
    the
    _____________________
    day
    of
    _____________________
    1988,
    by
    a
    vote
    of
    ~,
    —c
    ~
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    87—1~2

    Back to top