ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September
    22,
    1988
    I~THE MATTER OF:
    )
    PROCEDURAL RULES REVISION,
    )
    R88-5
    35 ILL. ADM. CODE 101, 102,
    )
    106 and 107
    )
    CONCURRING OPINION
    (by
    3.
    Anderson,
    3.
    Dumelle,
    3. Marlin):
    The sole reason for this concurring opinion
    is
    to elaborate
    on the concept of including in the Board’s procedural
    rules
    a
    provision for an “informal request for regulation”;
    the greater
    detail
    is intended
    to provide a better
    focus
    for public comment.
    Subpart B of Part 102
    of the R88—5 proposal, entitled
    “Proposal of
    Regulations of General Applicability”,
    would require
    proponents
    in regulatory proceedings
    to collect data
    in support
    of
    a proposed change
    and to frame
    the language
    of that change
    before the proposal would be aired at hearing.
    This may well
    contribute
    to the efficiency of the hearing process.
    However,
    this may not be an unalloyed benefit;
    these procedural
    requirements may unnecessarily limit the access of
    the general
    (non—government, non—industry) public
    to the rulemaking
    process.
    The Board has,
    after
    all,
    in the past received
    proposals for rules which could be characterized as meritorious
    in concept, even though incapable of implementation as drafted;
    some of these have been successfully reworked and adopted as
    a
    result of the hearing process.
    Yet
    it
    is also the case that
    protracted rulemakings can be
    a serious drain on the resources of
    government,
    the regulated community and
    the public alike.
    Therefore,
    rather than reduce procedural requirements
    in all
    rulemaking proceedings, comment
    is requested ~9ncezning th~e
    merits of establishing an “informal request for regulation”
    procedure whereby
    a person can have
    an idea for
    regulatory change
    considered without involving
    a substantial
    “upfrorit” commitment
    of time and resources by that person, but also without
    necessarily committing substantial governmental resources to
    consideration of the idea either.
    The conceptual prototype for this procedure
    is the
    informal/formal complaint system which
    the Board has long had
    in
    the enforcement arena,
    wherein an informal complaint triggers an
    investigation of
    a problem,
    but
    a formal complaint triggers a
    formal proceeding at which
    the complainant bears the burden of
    litigating
    the problem.
    In brief,
    the filing requirements for the “informal request”
    include identification of the regulation
    to be
    added or amended,

    —2—
    specification of the envLronmental problem and remedy sought,
    and, submission of data gathered by the requester concerning
    the
    problem.
    The informal
    request would be required
    to be
    accompanied
    by 200 signatures,
    to deter
    the filing of frivolous
    requests.
    The informal request would be placed on the Board’s agenda
    for consideration, and the Board would,
    by Order, make some
    appropriate disposition of the request.
    As the consideration of
    an informal request would be a discretionary practice on the part
    of the Board since
    it does not flow from a mandate contained
    in
    Title VII of the Act, the Board would not consider any Order
    responding to an informal request
    to be
    a “final Order” which
    could be appealed pursuant to Sections
    29 and 41 of the Act.
    In summary, participants are requested
    to address both the
    concept and the suggested regulatory language set forth below:
    PART 102, SUBPART X:
    INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REGULATION
    Section
    102.XXX
    Informal Request For Regulation
    Any person may submit an informal request for the adoption,
    amendment,
    or repeal of
    a regulation.
    The purpose of such an
    informal request is
    to ask the Board
    to initiate action on an
    area of concern
    to the person filing the request.
    The person
    submitting such a request shall
    be known as the proposer, but
    shall
    bear only the responsibilities set forth
    in this Subpart.
    An informal
    request for
    rulemaking will not in itself result
    in
    an adopted
    rule,
    but may lead to the opening of a formal
    rulemaking docket.
    Section 102.XXX
    Contents And Filing Of Informal Request
    a)
    Each informal request shall be titled’~Info.rmalRequest
    For Regulation.”
    Each such request shall include~
    1)
    The identity of the person or persons making the
    request;
    2)
    An identification of the regulation to be adopted,
    amended,
    or repealed, including suggested language;
    3)
    The nature of the environmental problem to be
    addressed by the request;
    4)
    The suggested remedy for the environmental problem;
    5)
    Any data which petitioner has gathered
    in support
    of the request; and
    92—600

    —3—
    6)
    Any other
    relevant information.
    b)
    The petitioner
    shall file 10 copies of the request with
    the Clerk, and one with the Agency and DENR.
    The
    request shall be accompanied by a petition in support of
    the request,
    signed by at least 200 persons.
    Section l02.XXX
    Board Action
    a)
    All informal requests for regulation will be placed on
    the Board’s agenda
    for consideration.
    The Board will
    issue a written order specifying
    its response to the
    informal request for regulation.
    b)
    The Board will respond
    to an informal request as the
    Board,
    in its discretion, deems appropriate, considering
    the nature of the request and supporting data
    presented.
    The Board’s may include but not be limited
    to:.
    1)
    A request for public comment concerning
    the
    request;
    2)
    A direction
    to
    the Board’s Scientific/Technical
    Section
    to conduct a literature search;
    3)
    The scheduling
    an inquiry hearing concerning
    the
    request;
    4)
    A request that the Agency or another person propose
    a formal regulation;
    5)
    A request that DENR conduct research on the issues
    raised by the request;
    6)
    The dismissal of a frivolous or non—meritorious
    request;
    7)
    A statement that the Board declines to take action,
    for reasons including but not limited to lack of
    resources, lack of statutory authority to regulate,
    or pendancy of federal
    regulatory proposals.
    Section 102.XXX
    Appeal
    Orders issued by the Board pursuant
    to this Subpart are not final
    Orders for the purpose of appeal pursuant to Sections
    29 and
    41
    of the Act.
    92—60 1

    —4—
    ~
    Joan G. Anderson
    f
    Board Member
    Q~~
    ~/
    Jacob
    D. Dumelle
    Chairman
    John C. Marlin
    Board Member
    /
    I,
    Dorothy
    M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereb
    certify
    at the above Concurring Opinion was filed
    on the ~~Jday
    of
    ~
    1988.
    Dorothy M.(çiunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    92—A02

    Back to top