ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
18,
1988
IN THE MATTER OF:
PETITION TO AMEND
35 ILL.
ADM.
)
R87—18
CODE PART 216,
CARBON MONOXIDE
)
EMISSIONS
(Midwest Grain Products
)
of Illinois)
PROPOSED RULE
SECOND NOTICE
PROPOSED OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.D.
Dumelle):
This matter comes before the Board upon
a proposal
for
a
site—specific rule change.
The proposal seeks
to amend 35
Ill.
Adm.
code 216.122
to exempt Midwest Grain Products
of Illinois
from the limitations set forth at
35
Ill. ~dm. Code 216.121,
which prohibits carbon monoxide emissions
in excess
of 200 parts
per million corrected
to
50 percent excess air.
On May 19,
1988
the Board proposed for First Notice a
rule which
is substantially
the same as that
initially proposed.
However,
in noting several
questions that remained outstanding, the Board’s Opinion
included
suggested alternative
language and requested comments by Midwest
Grain Products of Illinois (Midwest)
and the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA).
Comments were submitted by both Midwest and
the IEPA.
Both
contested the proposed alternative language
——
but for different
reasons.
This opinion will address only the comments submitted
by Midwest and IEPA.
The Board’s rationale
for proposing this
rule
is set forth
in the Proposed Opinion of May
19,
1988.
In its Opinion of May 19,
1988 the Board set forth the
following as possible alternative language:
Section 216.122
Exception, Midwest Grain Products
a)
Emissions
of carbon monoxide from the bubbling—bed
fluidized bed combustion boiler
of Midwest Grain
Products
of Illinois, located
in Pekin,
Illinois, shall
not exceed 700 ppm corrected to 50
excess air during
periods of load changes.
No more than 12
of
the
operation hours during any continuous 30—day period
shall exceed
the 200 ppm of CO corrected
to 50
excess
air emission limitation of Section 216.121.
On June
2,
1988, Midwest
filed
its response to the Board’s
request
for comment.
Midwest states that
it would be impossible
to guarantee compliance wiLh the suggested alternative rule for
91—427
—2—
two reasons.
Initially,
Midwest states that much
of
its recent
reduction
of carbon monoxide
is the result of using
“one specific
type of coal”.
Midwest further states that there
is no guarantee
that this coal will always be available:
“we must have an
alternate
.
.
.
supply
if we are
to continue operations
.
.
.
if
it became necessary
to use the alternate coal,
it may be
impossible to comply with the proposed alternate rule”.
Secondarily, Midwest states
that
it
is impossible to
maintain low CO levels during load swings, when CO levels can
rise above
700 ppm for short periods of time.
Midwest notes that
load swings are mandated by several factors,
including the
f011owing:
(a)
the process using
the boiler’s steam output
(b)
maintenance requirements
(c)
necessary shutdowns for cleaning
(d)
sales and production requirements
In summary Midwest reaffirmed
its stated intention to
“do
everything possible
to minimize
CO levels”
and reaffirmed
confidence
in its ability to comply with the rule as originally
requested.
On August
8, 1988 the IEPA filed
its response to the Board’s
May
19,
1988 Order.
In responding
to the suggested alternative
language the IEPA stated as follows:
“While the Agency is not
opposed
to the current wording
.
.
.
(it) suggests that a
one—
hour averaging time be applied
to the 700 ppm CO limit
so as
to
smooth out any short excesses over 700 ppm.
The Agency’s comments noted
some difficulty
in determining
what was or was not a “load change” as set forth in the suggested
alternate rule.
The comments stated that “even
if the boiler
were being held at
a constant load,
there would be some amount
of
fluctuation which would constitute a “load change”.
Determining
compliance with such
a
rule would be extremely difficult, ~ifnot
impossible.”
In recognizing
the Board’s concerns regarding sporadic,
temporary exceedances
the Agency’s comments noted
that use of the
one—hour averaging period would
be consistent with
the modeling
demonstrations, which relied upon one—hour averages
in
demonstrating no significant
impact upon ambient air quality.
Finally,
the Agency’s comments recommended
the following
language as an alternative
to the Board’s suggested alternative
language:
The standard
for carbon monoxide of Section 216.121 does not
apply
to emissions from the fluidized bed combustion boiler
of Midwest Grain Products of
Illinois,
located
in Pekin,
91—4 28
—3—
Illinois, where the emission of carbon monoxide shall not
exceed 700 parts per million, corrected
to
50 percent excess
air.
Compliance shall
be based upon a one—hour average.
The Agency’s suggested language addresses
the Board’s
concerns about exceedances of the 700 ppm limitation without
creating the difficulties referenced by Midwest
in its June
10,
1988 finding.
Therefore the Board adopts
the proposed language
from IEPA.
ORDER
The Board hereby proposes the following for Second Notice, which
are to be filed with the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules.
TITLE 35: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B:
AIR POLLUTION
CHAPTER
I:
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
c:
EMISSION STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS
FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
PART 216
CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSIONS
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Scope and Organization
Measurement Methods
Abbreviations and Conversion Factors
Definitions
Incorporations by Reference
SUBPART B:
FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSION SOURCES
Section
216.121
216.122
Fuel Combustion Emission Sources
Exception, Midwest Grain Products
SUBPART C:
INCINERATORS
Section
216.141
216.142
Section
216.361
216.362
Incinerators
Exceptions
SUBPART N:
PETROLEUM REFINING AND
CHEMICAL MANUFACTURE
Petroleum and petrochemical Processes
Polybasic Organic Acid Partial Oxidation Manufacturing
Processes
Section
216 .100
216.101
216.102
216.103
216.104
91—429
SUBPART 0:
PRIMARY AND FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS
Section
216.381
Cupolas
Appendix A
Rule into Section Table
Appendix B
Section
into Rule Table
Appendix C
Compliance Dates
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Section
10 and authorized
by Section
27
of the Environmental Protection Act (Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1981,
ch.
111 1/2, pars.
1010 and 1027).
SOURCE:
Adopted as Chapter
2:
Air Pollution,
Rule 206:
Carbon
Monoxide Emissions,
R71—23,
4 PCB 191, April
13,
1972, filed and
effective April
14,
1972;
amended at
3
Ill.
Reg.
47, p.
92,
effective November
8,
1979; amended
at
4
Ill. Reg.
24,
p.
514,
effective June
4,
1980;
codified at 7
Ill.
Reg.
13579; amended
in
R87—l8 at
____
Ill.
Reg.
___________,
effective
___________________
SUBPART B:
FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSION SOURCES
Section 216.122
Exception, Midwest Grain Products
The standard for carbon monoxide of Section 216.121 does not
apply
to emissions from the fluidized bed combustion boiler of
Midwest Grain Products of Illinois, located
in Pekin, I1lin~ii,
where the emission of carbon monoxide shall not exceed 700 parts
per million,
corrected
to 50 percent excess air.
Compliance
shall
be based upon a one—hour average.
(Source:
Added at
___
Ill.
Reg.
________
effective
_______________)
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify
that the above Proposed Opinion and Order
was adopted on the
______________
day of
~
,
1988 by
a
vote
of
______________.
~
*
Dorothy M. ~unn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
91—430