ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 8,
    1988
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
    )
    R87—37
    TITLE 35,
    SUBTITLE
    F:
    PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
    CHAPTER 1:
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL BOARD
    (PART 608)
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by B.
    Forcade):
    On May 5,
    1988,
    the Chicago Association of Commerce and
    Industry,
    the Illinois Fire Chiefs Association,
    the Illinois Fire
    Inspectors Association, the Society of Fire Protection Engineers,
    the National Fire Sprinkler Association,
    and the Alliance of
    American Insurers collectively (hereinafter “Petitioners”)
    filed
    Proposed Amendments to Part 608.
    This filing requested public
    hearings,
    but did not submit a petition signed by at least 200
    persons.
    See
    35
    Ill.
    Adrn.
    Code 102.121(a)
    (1987).
    The
    Petitioners intended this as an alternative to the earlier
    proposed amendments to
    this Part filed December 28,
    1987
    by the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (hereinafter
    “Agency”).
    The Board conducted public hearings on the Agency’s
    proposal on May 25 and 26,
    1988.
    The Petitioners and various
    other members of the regulated community and general public
    participated in both days of public hearings.
    By its Agency Response of June 15,
    1988,
    the Agency objects
    to consideration of the Petitioners’ proposal as
    “a formal
    ‘counter—proposal,’” and would have the Board consider
    this
    document as a public comment.
    The Agency asserts the
    Petitioners’
    filing
    is untimely.
    The Petitioners filed a Reply
    on June 27,
    1988,
    together with
    a motion
    to file
    instanter.
    The
    Petitioners expressed concern that consideratioriof their
    proposal “only as a public comment” would lead to a disregard for
    this document by the Board.
    They point out that they are at
    liberty to file
    a separate petition
    for rulemaking under
    a new
    docket, which they assert would “create inefficiency.”
    The
    Petitioners believe filing
    their proposal as part of this docket
    is “the most direct and efficient route
    to present their
    concerns.”
    The Board
    initially notes that it has delayed dealing with
    the Petitioners’
    proposal and the Agency response
    for over one
    month.
    The Board
    received verbal representations that the
    Petitioners and the Agency would meet on or about July 28,
    1988
    in an attempt
    to seek some consensus.
    These included an
    indication that the Agency would shortly thereafter file an
    amended proposal for rulemaking.
    No document on the record
    92—241

    —2--
    reflects that this occurred.
    This delay has suspended the
    closing of the merit portion of the rulemaking.
    Section 28
    of the Environmental Protection Act,
    Ill. Rev.
    Stat.
    ch.
    ill 1/2, par.
    1028
    (1988),
    and Section 102.120 of the
    Board’s procedural rules,
    35 Ill. Mm.
    Code 102.120
    (1987),
    provide that any person may file a proposal
    for
    rulemaking.
    This
    Section of the Act and Section 102.121(a)
    of the Board’s rules
    both provide for public hearings on
    a rulemaking proposal
    submitted by the public accompanied by
    a petition bearing 200
    signatures.
    They also vest discretion
    in the Board
    in the
    conduct of its public hearings.
    Therefore,
    it is wholly within
    the discretion of the Board how it will dispose of the
    Petitioners’
    proposal.
    The Board
    finds that the Petitioners’ proposal
    is not
    plainly devoid of merit,
    it
    is supported by an adequate statement
    of
    reasons within
    its context,
    and
    it did not concern a matter on
    which
    the Board had conducted public hearing within
    the six
    months prior
    to
    its date of filing.
    Rather
    than docket the
    proposal with an independent number and consolidate
    it with this
    matter,
    the Board will consider the Petitioners’
    and
    the Agency’s
    proposals
    together.
    No prejudice or
    inefficiency would result at
    this time.
    The Board will not, however, set this matter for
    additional hearings at this time because the public hearings held
    21 days subsequent to the filing of the Petitioners’ proposal did
    consider this subject matter.
    Further,
    no person has
    subsequently requested additional hearings.
    The Board notes that it is Board
    rules which now undergo
    revision, and
    it
    is wholly within the discretion of the Board how
    it proceeds
    to decision.
    The Board also observes that the status
    of the Petitioners’ proposal
    as
    a rulemaking proposal or
    a public
    comment
    is immaterial
    in this instance and at this time.
    The
    Board will consider
    a public comment for what it offers, and the
    Board will decide on rules and regulatory language that
    is best
    supported by the record and which best suits
    the apparent
    needs.
    This
    is notwithstanding the language of the original
    proposal
    or the status of
    the chosen language “only as a public
    comment.”
    Finally,
    it
    is
    to be preferred
    that members of the affected
    public submit “counterproposals,” rather than mere assertions of
    dissatisfaction with
    a proposed rule.
    Alternative
    regulatory
    language is often the best form of criticism.
    It certainly gives
    the Board more with which to work, and
    in this proceeding
    it aids
    the Board
    in assessing the substance of both the Agency’s and
    Petitioners’ positions.
    It will aid the Board
    in selecting
    a
    regulatory structure that the Board
    feels is most acceptable.
    The Petitioners’ proposal
    of May
    5,
    1988
    is accepted as
    filed.
    The Board will schedule no additional hearings regarding
    92—242

    —3—
    Part 608 at this time.
    The merit portion of this proceeding will
    close September 23,
    1988.
    Any person desiring
    to supplement this
    record
    is hereby directed
    to submit any filings prior
    to
    September
    21, 1988
    for consideration at the September
    22,
    1988
    Board meeting.
    The Board will await notification from the
    Department of Energy and Natural Resources before scheduling any
    additional activity
    in this matter.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED
    I, Dorothy M.
    Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby certify th
    th
    above Order was adopted on
    the ~
    day of _______________________,
    1988, by a vote
    /L~
    Dorothy M. G~n, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    92—243

    Back to top