ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August
    31,
    1989
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    )
    PROCEDURAL RULES REVISION
    )
    R88-5(B)
    35 ILL. ADM. CODE 102 AND
    )
    106
    (Subparts
    D,
    E, and F)
    )
    PROPOSED RULE.
    SECOND FIRST NOTICE
    CONCURRING OPINION (by B.
    Forcade):
    On page four of the Opinion,
    the majority declines
    to accept
    language offered by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    and the Department of Energy and Natural Resources that would
    have established detailed information requirements for the filing
    of site-specific regulatory proposals.
    I would have included
    such requirements.
    Since most Board denials of site—specific regulatory
    requests are based on failure to provide enough information to
    determine what the impact
    of the rule change would be,
    I believe
    we should have provided as much guidance as possible to the
    regulated community on what types of information the Board would
    like to see.
    Accordingly,
    I concur.
    Bill
    .
    Fo
    ,
    Boar
    Mémb
    I,
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby certify that the abov~,ConcurringOpinion was
    submitted on the
    j/~tday of _______________________,
    1989.
    /~
    Dorothy M.~unn, ~1erk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    102—327

    Back to top