ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 25,
1989
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN COMPANY,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 88—176
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
MR. MARK
J.
STEGER OF MCBRIDE, BAKER
& COLES, APPEARED ON BEHALF
OF PETITIONER;
MR. JOSEPH
P.
PODLEWSKI,
JR., APPEARED ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by R.C.
Flemal):
This matter
comes before the Board upon
a Petition for
Variance and Amended Petition for Variance filed November
1,
1988
and January 24,
1989,
respectively, by American National Can
Company (“ANC”).
ANC requests variance
until July
1,
1989
from
the requirements of
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 215.245
for flexographic
and rotogravure printing operations
in ozone non—attainment
areas.
On December
14,
1988 the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency
(“Agency”)
filed
a recommendation
that the requested
relief be granted subject
to conditions.
On February 24,
1989
the Agency submitted an amended recommendation continuing with
its position that the requested
relief be granted, but requesting
that an additional condition be imposed.
Hearing was held
on
April
18, 1989
in Elgin.
No members of
the public were
present.
At hearing
no information was presented
in addition
to
that already contained
in the documents submitted
to date.
BkCKGROUND
ANC’s Batavia Plant, formerly owned
by Guardian Packaging
Corporation (“Guardian”),
is located
at 475 Kirk Road,
Batavia,
Kane County,
Illinois.
ANC’s Batavia Plant
is
a flexible
packaging manufacturing facility with
flexographic
and
rotogravure printing capability
as well
as cast extrusion and
laminating capability;
the facility employs approximately 100
people.
In
the manufacturing process, various volatile organic
materials
(“VOM”)
are used
in the printing, coating,
and
laminating
of plastic film and paper
(Pet,
at
1).
ANC’s printing
99—265
—2—
operations
(both flexographic and rotogravure)
resulted
in VOM
emissions of over 425 tons
in 1986 and over 490
tons
in 1987 and
1988
(Agency Rec.
at 2).
Regulatory History
Prior
to November
9,
1987, ANC’s predecessor, Guardian, was
exempt from the requirements of
35
Ill. Adm.
Code 215, Subpart P
pursuant to the 1000 ton per year aggregate uncontrolled
emissions exemption found
at
35
111. Adm. Code 215.402.
However,
the Board on October
19,
1987 added Section 215.245
to,
inter
alia,
lower
the exemption applicable to Guardian (subsequently to
ANC)
and other similarly situated facilities to 100 tons per
year.
The amendment which became effective November
9,
1987,
required complaince ‘~iththe emissions limitations of Subpart P
by December
31,
1987
Prior Variance
In anticipation of the new requirements
to be imposed by
Section 215.245, Guardian filed a permit application
for
construction
of
an incinerator
and capture
system with the Agency
on December
12, 1986.
The permit was issued by the Agency on
April
9,
1987.
Due
to construction delays and work stoppages
associated with the installation of the control equipment,
Guardian filed
for variance from Section 215.245
to obtain an
extension of time
to achieve compliance.
On March 24,
1988,
the
Board granted Guardian, by then under ownership of ANC,
variance
from Section 215.245 until April
1,
1988
(see Guardian Packaging
Corporation
v.
IEPA,
Slip.
Op. PCB 87—190, March 24,
1988).
ANC
contends that “the majority of the incineration/capture system
was installed by April
1,
1988,
and has been run since April,
1988”
(Petition,
para.
3).
ANC itself now petitions
for
variance,
believing additional
time
is necessary to complete
furthar
dr~tqn,
installElt
ion,
and
dohugc~ing
of
oil
control
equipment,
especially due
to discovery of certain design
deficiencies,
as noted below.
*
The Board notes that ANC requests variance
only from Section
215.245,
the Section which renders
the Subpart P requirements
applicable
to the ANC. facility.
~t other points
in the record,
the requested variance
is
referred
to
as variance from Subpart P
or from Section 215.401.
Section 215.401 contains limitations
for flexographic and rotogravure printing and
is
itself contained
in Subpart P.
The Board
construes
these as
references
to
variance
from Section 215.245.
99—266
—3—
DESIGN DEFICIENCES AND COMPLIANCE PLAN
ANC acquired Guardian
in late 1987 and discovered several
design deficiencies in the control system.
In particular,
the
capture system did not afford adequate capture of VOM emissions
from the presses.
A consultant hired by ANC
in July 1988
examined the capture system and concluded that additional time
would be required
to redesign and install the capture system to
meet the requirements of
the regulations.
In addition,
in the course of debugging the operation of
the
control equipment on the rotogravure presses,
two solvent
explosions occurred.
To prevent such ocurrences
in the future,
ANC believes lower explosive limit
(LEL) sensors and drier
recirculation fans are necessary.
In
its amended petition,
ANC
states that these devices have been installed,
but require
further modification to ensure the proper operation of the VOM
control equipment (Amended Pet.
at
2).
Also
in its amended petition, ANC noted further
complications regarding the control equipment.
ANC states
that,
in the course
of operating the incinerator, excessive
temperatures have been experienced causing the incinerator
to
shut down.
ANC adds that the contractor who installed the
incinerator has agreed
to modify the incinerator system
to
install
a heat exchanger bypass whereby a portion
of the oven
exhaust air will bypass
the heat exchanger,
and that excessive
temperatures should not be experienced
in the future.
ANC anticipates that the modifications and debugging of the
control system will
be completed by May
31,
1989.
Thereafter,
ANC
will conduct
a compliance test and submit
a report to the
Agency by July 1,
1989.
Therefore, ANC anticipates compliance
by,
and requests variance until July 1,
1989 (Amended Pet.
at
1—
2).
The Agency notes
that once operational,
the thermal
incinerator will control VOM emissions from certain flexographic
presses and coaters.
As the Agency states,
“because
the
thermal incinerator
is expected to achieve 95
control, with
proper capture afforded by the redesigned capture system the VOM
emissions limits of 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 215 Subpart P should be met
easily”
(Agency Rec.
at 7).
The Agency believes ANC
is committed
to achieving compliance by
a date certain and deems ANC’s
compliance program acceptable as
amended.
HARDSHIP
In addressing the matter of hardship,
the Agency notes:
The Agency believes that immediate compliance with
the VOM emissions limitation of Section 215.401 would
99—267
—4—
create an unreasonable hardship for
(ANC
.
.
.
Since
April,
1988,
ANd
has taken steps to bring the VOM
control system into compliance
.
.
.
while minimizing
the adverse environmental affect of noncompliant
operations.
Unless
ANCI
were granted the requested
variance relief,
its only compliance alternative
would be
to shut down its printing operations.
It
is
likely that
a shut down of the non—complying
flexographic and rotogravure presses would cause a
shut down
of the entire
ANC
plant and
a temporary
loss of approximately 100 jobs.
(Agency Rec.
at
9—
10)
In its amended recommendation the Agency further states:
The Agency believes that immediate compliance with
the VOM emissions limitations of
35
Ill.
Adm. Code
215, Subpart P would
impose an unreasonable or
arbitrary hardship.
The
Agency
further believes
that the granting of the additional relief requested
would be consistent with federal
law.
(Agency
Amended Rec.
at
2)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
As noted earlier, ANC’s facility is located
in Batavia, Kane
County.
Kane County
is a non—attainment area for ozone.
The
ozone monitor located closest to the ANd facility
is in Elgin,
Illinois.
The Agency notes
that no ozone exceedences were
detected
at this monitor
in 1986 and 1987, with one exceedence
recorded
in
1988.
The Agency further notes that there were
multiple exceedences
of the ozone ambient air quality standards
(“AAQS”)
in the Chicago metropolitan area, and that
“as
a major
hydrocarbon source
in
an ozone non—attaincont
area,
Z~NC1
contributes,
to
a unquantified degree
to the
.
.
.
violations of
the ozone AAQS
in northern Illinois”
(Agency Rec.
at 7).
At the time ANC filed
its petition for variance in November
1988, ANC proposed
to be in compliance by April
1,
1989,
the
beginning of
the 1989 ozone season.
Under
its revised compliance
schedule, compliance will not be achieved until July 1989, well
within the 1989 ozone
season.
To lessen any adverse
environmental impact which may result from the uncontrolled
operation of ANC’s flexographic and rotogravure printing
processes during
the first
three months of the ozone season,
the
Agency recommends that the variance be conditioned
to require
operation
of the incinerator
from April
1,
1989 to July
1,
1989,
to the maximum extent possible given plant health and safety
concerns
(Agency Amended Rec. at
2).
This
is
in addition to
other conditions requiring submission of reports and testing.
The Board finds that this condition
is appropriate with the need
to minimize environmental
impact during the term of the variance.
99—268
—5—
CONCLUSION
Based
on the facts
in this record,
the Board finds that ANC
would
incur an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship
if denied the
requested
relief.
The Board also agrees with
the parties that
minimal environmental impact will occur, given that compliance
is
timely forthcoming,
and by ANC’s operation of
its incinerator
to
the maximum extent possible during that portion of the 1989 ozone
season included
in the term of
this variance.
Accordingly,
the
variance will be granted subject to conditions consistent with
this Opinion and the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law
in this matter.
ORDER
American National Can Company
is hereby granted variance
from 35
Ill. Adm.
Code 215.245 for
its facility located
in
Batavia, Illinois, subject to the following conditions:
1.
Variance expires on July 1, 1989,
or when compliance
with
35
Ill. Adm. Code 215.245
is achieved, whichever
occurs
first.
2.
During
the term of this variance, ANC shall submit
monthly written reports
to the Agency detailing all
progress made
in achieving compliance with 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code 215, Subpart P at its plant located
at 475 Kirk
Road, Batavia, Illinois.
The first monthly report will
be due thirty
(30) days from the date
of the Board
order
granting the variance.
These monthly reports shall
include monthly VOM emission data from each printing
press.
The first monthly report shall also include
copies
of material data sheets showing the composition
(in terms of percentage of solid,
solvent and water)
of
all inks used during the flexographic and rotogravure
printing processes.
All
of the above
information shall
be submitted to the Agency at the following address:
1)
Manager,
Permit Section
Division of Air Pollution Control
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1340 N. Ninth Street
Springfield, Illinois 62702
2)
Manager, Field Operations Section
Division of Air Pollution Control
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1701 5.
First Avenue
Suite 600
Maywood, Illinois 60153
99—269
—6—
3.
ANC shall give thirty
(30) days notice prior
to
the
expected date of any stack test to the Agency’s regional
office and Emission Source Specialist at the address
provided
in Condition 2(2).
The Agency’s Emission
Source Specialist shall
be further notified within
a
minimum of five
(5) working days of the exact date,
time,
and place of these
tests,
to enable Agency
to
witness these
tests.
4.
During
that portion of the 1989 ozone season covered
by
this variance
(April
1,
1989 to July
1,
1989), ANC shall
operate
its incincerator
to
the maximum extent possible,
given plant health
and safety concerns.
5.
Within
45 days of the date of
this Order,
Petitioner
shall execute and forward to Joseph
P. Podlewski,
Jr.,
Enforcement Attorney,
Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency,
1701 S.
First Avenue, Suite
600, Maywood,
Illinois 60153,
a Certification of Acceptance and
Agreement to be bound to all terms and conditions
of
this variance.
The 45—day period shall be held in
abeyance during any period that
this matter
is being
appealed.
Failure
to execute and forward the
Certificate within 45 days renders this variance void
and
of
no force and effect
as
a shield against
enforcement of rules from which variance was granted.
The form of said Certification shall
be as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I
(We),
,
hereby
accept and agree
to be bound
by all terms and conditions
of the
Order
of the Pollution Control Board
in PCB 88—176, May 25,
1989.
Petitioner
Authorized Agent
Title
Date
Section
41
of the Environmental Protection
Act,
Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1987
ch.
lll1/2par.
1041, provides
for
appeal
of
final
Orders of
the Board within 35 days.
The Rules
of the Supreme
Court of Illinois establish filing
requirements.
99—271)
—7—
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby cert~~that the above Opinion and Order was
adopted on
the
5~-’
day of
________________,
1989,
by a vote
of
7—c~
~
)7),
//~~
Dorothy M./~ónn,Clerk
Illinois Po3lution Control Board
99—271