ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 30, 1990
RICHARD WORTHEN, CLARENCE BOHN,
)
HARRY PARKER,
GEORGE ARNOLD, CITY
)
OF EDWARDSVILLE, CITY OF TROY,
VILLAGE OF MARYVILLE, and VILLAGE
OF GLEN CARBON,
)
)
Petitioners,
)
PCB 90—137
)
(Landfill Siting
V.
)
Review)
VILLAGE OF ROXANNA and
LAIDLAW
)
WASTE SYSTEMS (MADISON), INC.,
)
Respondents.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J. Theodore Meyer):
This matter is before the Board on a motion to dismiss parties
to this appeal, filed by respondent Laidlaw Waste Systems
(Madison), Inc., (Laidlaw) on August 10, 1990. Laidlaw seeks to
dismiss four of the petitioners in this case. Those four
petitioners who are the subject of the motion to dismiss--Richard
Worthen, City of Troy, Village of Maryville, and Village of Glen
Carbon (collectively, petitioners) filed their answer to the motion
on August 22, 1990.
Section 40.1(b) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act),
Ill.Rev.Stat. 1989, ch. 111 1/2, par. 1040.1(b), which governs this
appeal, provides that this Board shall hear the appeal of any third
party who participated in the local hearings and is so located as
to be affected by the proposed facility. Laidlaw asks that the
Board dismiss the petitioners because they are not located so as
to be affected by the proposed facility.1 In support of this
claim, Laidlaw states that: 1) the City of Troy is located 7.5
miles from the proposed facility, and its municipal water supplies
are over 9 miles from the proposed facility; 2) the Village of
Naryville is located 6.2 miles from the proposed facility, and its
municipal water supplies are 5.2 miles from the proposed facility;
3) the City of Glen Carbon is 3 miles from the proposed facility,
and its municipal water supplies are 5.7 miles from the proposed
facility, and the City of Edwardsville is located between the
proposed facility and Glen Carbon; and 4) Richard Worthen lives in
the City of Alton, which is located 6.5 miles to the northwest of
the proposed facility. Therefore, Laidlaw asserts that these
1
Laidlaw does not contend that the petitioners did not
participate at the local level. As
the
Board noted in its August
9, 1990 Order in this case, it appears that the petitioners did
indeed participate in the hearing below.
2
petitioners are not located so as to be affected by the proposed
facility, and must be dismissed.
The Board will not rule upon the motion to dismiss at this
time, but will take the motion with the case. The Board believes
that there is insufficient information before it at this time to
determine whether or not the petitioners are so located as to
affected by the proposed facility. The parties shall address this
motion at the hearing and in their briefs. The Board notes that
it has previously addressed the issue of a complainant’s standing
in Valessares v. The County Board of Kane County, 79 PCB 106 (PCB
87—36, July 16, 1987)
Finally, on August 29, 1990, the Village of Roxanna filed a
motion to file a reduced number of copies of certain exhibits in
the record. Although the Board would prefer that all three of the
Board’s offices have copies of all exhibits available for Board and
staff review, the Board will grant the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby cer,~ify that the above Order was adopted on the
~O~—
day of
‘e-~ç
,
1990, by a vote of
7-~
Dorothy N. Gu~n, Clerk
Illinois Pollition Control Board
11 !~—~3~