ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August 30,
    1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 90—84
    (Enforcement)
    WE-TOAST BREAD
    )
    COMPANY,
    INC.,
    Respondent.
    PAMELA
    CIARROCCHI, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    COMPLAINANT.
    ROBERT
    MELTZER, ROBERT MELTZER & ASSOCIATES, APPEARED
    ON BEHALF OF
    RESPONDENT.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    This matter is before the Board on a complaint filed April 26,
    1990 on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois (People),
    by
    and through its attorney, Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General of the
    State of Illinois, against We-Toast Bread Company (We-Toast).
    The
    We—Toast facility at issue
    in this case
    is located
    at 1038 South
    Kolmar,
    Chicago, Illinois.
    The complaint alleges that We-Toast
    has
    violated
    Section
    9(b)
    of the Environmental
    Protection Act
    (Act),
    Ill.Rev.Stat.
    1987,
    ch.
    ill
    1/2,
    par.
    1009(b),
    and
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    201.144.
    Those
    sections
    prohibit
    any
    person from operating
    existing
    emission
    sources
    and
    air
    pollution
    control
    equipment
    without
    an
    operating
    permit
    from
    the
    Illinois
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency
    (Agency).
    Hearing
    on this matter was held June
    13,
    1990,
    in
    Chicago,
    Illinois.
    At
    hearing,
    the parties
    submitted
    a stipulation
    and
    settlement
    agreement.
    According
    to
    the
    stipulation,
    We-Toast
    processes bakery waste for animal and poultry food at
    its Kolmar
    Avenue facility.
    The facility operates 8 air emission sources and
    3 pieces
    of air pollution
    control equipment,
    and operated those
    sources
    and equipment without
    permits
    from at
    least
    1972
    until
    April
    6,
    1990,
    when the Agency issued an operating
    permit.
    We-
    Toast admits to past violations of Section 9(b)
    of the Act and 35
    Ill.
    Adin.
    Code 201.144, and agrees to pay a penalty of $3,000.
    After reviewing the record
    in this case,
    the Board requires
    additional
    information.
    The record shows that We—Toast operated
    11 pieces of unpermitted equipment
    for a period of
    18
    years, and
    is now willing to pay a $3,000 penalty.
    Pursuant to Section 42(a)
    1
    14—7’)3

    2
    of the Act,
    as
    it existed
    at the time
    of
    these violations,
    any
    person who violates the Act or Board regulations
    is liable
    for a
    civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation and up to $1,000 per
    day for continuing violations.1
    A mathematical calculation shows
    that
    We—Toast
    is
    liable
    for
    up
    to
    more
    72
    million
    dollars
    in
    penalties,
    excluding
    interest,
    yet the stipulation
    provides
    for
    only
    $3,000--roughly
    $167
    per year
    for
    operating
    11
    pieces
    of
    unpermitted equipment.
    The Board has both the power and the duty
    to exercise independent discretion over settlement agreements, and
    is
    obligated
    to
    ensure
    that
    all
    penalties
    will
    aid,
    in
    the
    enforcement of the Act.
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    V.
    Archer Daniels Midland,
    68 PCB 501,
    503
    (PCB 80—151, March 27,
    1986), modified, Archer Daniels Midland v. Pollution Control Board,
    149 Ill.App.3d
    301,
    500 N.E.2d
    580,
    102 I11.Dec.
    687
    (4th
    Dist.
    1986).
    Although the penalty seems
    low in this
    case,
    the Board
    notes
    that
    the
    record
    does
    not
    contain
    any
    information
    on
    the
    existence
    of
    any mitigating
    circumstances,
    including We—Toast’s
    ability to pay.
    See Illinois Environmental Protection Agency v.
    Arnold’s
    Sewer
    and
    Septic
    Service,
    63
    PCB
    43,
    46
    (PCB
    83-23,
    February
    20,
    1985).
    Therefore,
    the Board directs the parties
    to
    file additional explanation
    in support
    of the stipulation.
    This
    explanation shall be received by the Board on or before October 15,
    1990.
    Finally, the Board notes that although the complaint
    in this
    case asks the Board to order We—Toast to pay all costs,
    including
    reasonable
    attorneys’,
    expert
    witness’
    and
    consultants’
    fees,
    expended by the People in pursuit of this action, the stipulation
    is completely silent on this issue.
    The People shall address this
    omission in its filing, due October
    15,
    1990.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    J.
    D.
    Dumelle
    and
    J.
    Marlin concurred;
    3.
    Anderson
    and
    R.
    Flenial dissented.
    I,
    Dorothy
    M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby
    cer
    fy
    that
    the
    above
    Order
    was adopted
    on
    the
    ‘.3O~~
    day of
    ç~~,’—
    ,
    1990,
    by a vote of
    5~~l
    /
    ‘~-~i~
    .
    V~A~
    Dorothy M. Gu)~n, Clerk
    Illinois Poll~tionControl Board
    1
    The
    Board notes that the penalties were raised to $50,000
    per violation and $10,000 per day,
    effective July
    1,
    1990.
    1
    1~—7~)4

    Back to top