ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September
    13, 1989
    CAN-AN INDUSTRIES,
    INC.,
    )
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 89—25
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by B. Forcade):
    This matter
    is before the Board on the February
    2, 1989
    petition of Can—Am Industries,
    Inc.
    (“Can—Am”).
    That petition
    seeks relief from 35
    Iii. Adm. Code 215.204(j)
    and 201.144 as
    they pertain to VOM (volatile organic materials)
    emission from
    various parts painting processes in Can—Am’s facility in Adams
    County.
    Can—Am submitted its filing fee on February 16, from
    which date the statutory time period began
    to run.
    See Ill. Rev.
    Stat.
    ch. lll~,par.
    1038(a).
    Two members of the public submitted objections on February
    27, 1989.
    The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (“Agency”)
    filed
    its recommendation on April
    3,
    1989,
    requesting
    that variance be granted with certain conditions.
    One of the
    reporting conditions of the recommendation was slightly modified
    at hearing.
    R.
    26—27.
    The public hearings occurred April
    24 and
    July
    17,
    1989.
    No member of
    the public attended.
    R.
    31.
    Neither
    Can—Am
    nor
    the Agency submitted post—hearing briefs.
    Can—Am Operations
    The Can—Am plant
    is located in Adams County, partially
    within the City of Quincy.
    Can—Am manufactures agricultural and
    off—road construction vehicle wheels.
    The plant
    is on about
    69
    acres,
    has a floor area of about 880,000 square feet, and employs
    about
    650 people.
    It
    is within a short distance of residential
    and commercial properties.
    Can—Am paints about
    98 percent of
    its metal products.
    It
    uses about 61,000 gallons per year of various types of coatings
    in numerous colors, avery small portion of which are specified
    by military contracts upon which Can—Am
    is bidding.
    It
    also uses
    about
    15,000 gallons per year of volatile solvent
    to clean
    its
    equipment.
    Can—Am applies these coatings by use of hand—held
    spray guns,
    automatic spray booths, direct application,
    and flow
    coaters.
    The coatings range
    in VOM content from 3.5
    to 7.0
    lbs/gal
    (pounds per gallon), Can—Am’s daily emissions average
    4.38 lbs/gal and range up to 6.0 lbs/gal.
    103—11

    —2—
    The nearest ozone monitor
    is in Quincy.
    The 1987 and 1988
    ozone data from that station indicate no excursions above the
    ambient air quality standard of 0.12 ppm (parts per million).
    The four highest of 1,500 1987 readings were
    0.09,
    0.089, 0.085,
    and 0.085 ppm.
    Adams County is an ozone attainment area.
    40 CFR
    81.314
    (1988).
    Can—Am submitted an air permit application to the Agency on
    July 13,
    1988, which the Agency denied on August 22.
    This
    variance proceeding followed a December 13,
    1988 compliance
    conference b2tween the Agency and Can—Am.
    The Regulations and Requested Relief
    Section 215.204(j)
    of the Board’s regulations would allow a
    maximum rate of
    3.5 lbs/gal VOM emissions from Can—Am’s
    miscellaneous metal parts coating operations.
    Section 201.144
    prohibits operation of an emissions source without first
    obtaining a permit from the Agency.
    Can—Am requests
    a variance
    from these provisions until December
    31,
    1989,
    at which time
    it
    will have achieved compliance with the VOM limitation of Section
    215.204(j).
    The Agency has recommended variance from the
    substantive provisions
    of Section 215.204(j)
    and from Section
    215.211(b), which sets the date by which compliance with the
    substantive rules must be achieved.
    The Board has been reasonably informed in this proceeding of
    the difficulties
    in achieving immediate compliance with the
    substantive requirements of Section 215.204(j); accordingly,
    the
    Board will evaluate relief from that provision.
    Neither party
    has articulated a rationale or supporting
    facts
    to justify relief
    from Section 215.211 or
    201.144.
    Therefore,
    the Board will not
    evaluate relief from those sections.
    Plan For Compliance
    Can—Am states that it has spent two years studying ways
    to
    comply with the limitations of
    35 Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 2l5.204(j)(4)
    and has been hampered by the fact it requires coatings in many
    different colors and the fact that it was unable to obtain
    compliant coatings to fulfill military contracts upon which
    it
    was bidding.
    The military contracts specify the coatings which
    it must use.
    Until
    recently, Can-Am has been unable
    to obtain
    coatings with VOM contents of less than 3.5 lbs/gal
    to offset the
    high—VOM coatings which are specified
    in contracts.
    In December,
    1988,
    Can—Am was informed by its supplier that new technology was
    available which would produce coatings with
    a VOM content below
    the 3.5
    lbs/gal,
    limit
    of
    35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code 215.204(j)(4).
    Can—Am has converted three of
    its coatings to
    a high—solids
    formulation.
    Can—Am has considered the installation of
    a carbon
    absorption system to control VOM emissions.
    However, because of
    the configuration of
    its plant,
    it would
    take three such systems
    103—12

    —3—
    to achieve compliance at a cost of $480,000 each which Can—Am
    considers prohibitive and the Agency agrees.
    In view of the fact that Can—Am has shown good—faith efforts
    to come into compliance and is constrained by military contract
    bidding,
    as well as that
    it employs 650 people, Can—Am believes
    that denial of the requested variance would result in the loss of
    its market and the consequent closing of its plant.
    The Agency
    believes that denial would constitute an arbitrary and
    unreasonable hardship.
    Can—Am proposes to come into compliance with 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 2l5.204(j)(4) through the internal offset provisions
    of
    35
    Ill. Adm. Code
    215.207.
    35
    Ill. Adm. Code
    215.207 states,
    in
    pertinent part:
    a)
    Owners
    or
    operators
    of
    coating
    lines
    subject
    to
    Section
    215.204
    may
    comply
    with
    this
    section
    rather
    than
    with
    Section
    215.204.
    The
    methods
    or
    pro-
    cedures
    used
    to
    determine
    emissions
    of
    volatile
    organic
    material
    under
    this
    Section
    shall
    be
    approved by
    the Agency
    in
    accordance
    with
    35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    201.
    Emissions
    of
    volatile
    organic
    material
    from sources
    subject
    to
    Section
    215.204
    are
    allowable,
    notwithstanding
    the
    limitations
    in
    Section
    215.204,
    if
    the
    combined
    actual
    emissions
    from
    selected
    coating
    lines
    at
    the
    coating
    plant, but not
    including coating lines
    or
    other
    emission
    sources
    constructed
    or
    modified after July 1,
    1979,
    is less than
    or
    equal
    to
    the
    combined
    allowable
    emissions
    as
    determined
    by
    the
    following
    equations:...
    Can—Am will convert
    16 of its highest usage colors
    to high—solids
    coatings on the following schedule:
    three colors by April
    1,
    1989 and three additional colors every
    two months
    thereafter,
    with compliance achieved by December
    31,
    1989.
    Can—Am proposes to limit
    its VOM emissions to 4.38 lbs/gal
    on a daily average during
    the term of
    the variance.
    To ensure
    VOM emissions are minimized,
    Can—Am states
    it will monitor
    its
    emissions on
    a daily basis;
    review its painting schedule
    in
    advance and revise
    the schedule to lower
    the daily average
    emissions whenever possible; and maintain and submit to the
    Agency emissions and usage
    reports.
    Can—Am
    has begun testing and formulating high—solids
    coatings and has set up a painting area for the applications of
    compliance coatings.
    Can-Am also proposes
    to install, by April
    103—13

    —4—
    1,
    1989, devices
    to reclaim the solvent
    that is used to flush
    painting lines and equipment when coatings are changed.
    The Agency believes that the requested variance need not be
    submitted as a SIP (State Implementation Plan)
    ,
    but should be
    approvable as a SIP revision, particularly since Can—Am is
    located in a long—standing ozone attainment area.
    Conclusion
    Based on the facts contained in the record
    the Board finds
    that immediate compliance would impose an arbitrary and
    unreasonable hardship on Can-Am.
    Therefore,
    the Board will grant
    Can—Am
    a variance from 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 2l5.204(j)(4)
    until
    December 31,
    1989, subject to the requested conditions.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s
    findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The Board hereby grants Can—Am Industries,
    Inc.
    a variance
    from 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 2l5.204(j)(4) until December
    31,
    1989,
    subject
    to the following conditions:
    1.
    By April
    1,
    1989, Can-Am shall install on
    its
    coating
    lines
    a
    system
    for
    the
    recovery
    of
    solvents
    used
    to
    clean
    and
    flush paint
    lines and equipment;
    2.
    By
    April
    1,
    1989,
    Can—Am shall convert
    3
    colors of
    its coatings
    to coatings with a
    VOM content of less than 3.5 lbs/gal;
    3.
    By
    June
    1,
    1989,
    and
    every
    two
    months
    thereafter,
    Can-Am
    shall
    convert
    3
    additional
    coatings
    to
    coatings
    with
    a
    VOM
    content
    of
    less
    than
    3.5
    lbs/gal,
    such that
    on December
    31,
    1989,
    Can—Am’s
    daily
    emission
    rates
    meet
    an
    average
    of
    3.5
    lbs
    VOM/gal,
    as
    required
    by
    35
    Ill.
    Adm. Code 215.207;
    4.
    Can—Am
    shall
    maintain
    daily
    records
    detailing
    the
    VOM
    content
    (lb/gal)
    and
    solids
    content
    (vol
    )
    of
    each
    coating,
    amounts
    of
    each
    coating
    used,
    and
    the
    actual
    and
    allowable
    VOM
    emissions
    (lb/day);
    5.
    Can—Am
    shall,
    to
    the
    extent
    possible,
    schedule
    its
    use
    of
    coatings
    so
    as
    to
    keep
    the daily average emission rate
    for
    VOM at or below 4.4 lb/gallon;
    103—14

    —5—
    6.
    Can—Am shall submit a quarterly report to
    Dick
    Jennings,
    IEPA,
    Air
    Division,
    5415
    North University, Peoria, Illinois 61614,
    beginning
    July
    1,
    1989
    detailin.g
    the
    progress achieved
    in converting to high—
    solids coatings; and
    7.
    Within
    45
    days
    after
    the
    date
    of
    this
    Opinion
    and
    Order,
    Can—Am
    Industries,
    Inc.
    shall
    ex-ecute and send
    to:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Attention:
    Thomas Davis
    Enforcement Programs
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield,
    IL
    62794—9276
    a
    certificate
    of
    acceptance
    of
    this
    variance
    by
    which
    it
    agrees
    to be bound
    by
    the
    terms
    and
    conditions
    contained
    herein.
    This
    variance
    will
    be
    void
    if
    Can—Am
    Industries,
    Inc.
    fails
    to execute
    and
    forward
    the
    certificate
    within
    the
    45—day
    period.
    The
    45—day
    period
    shall
    be
    in
    abeyance
    for
    any
    period
    during
    which
    the matter
    is
    appealed.
    The
    form
    of the certification shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We)
    ,
    having
    read
    the
    Opinion
    and
    Order
    of
    the
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    in
    PCB
    89—25,
    dated
    September
    13,
    1989,
    understand
    and
    accept the said Opinion and Order,
    realizing that such acceptance
    renders all terms and conditions
    thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
    Ill.
    Rev.
    Stat.
    1985,
    ch. l1l~,par.
    1041,
    provides for appeal of final
    Orders of the Board within
    35 days.
    The Rules
    of the Supreme
    Court of Illinois establish
    filing requirements.
    103—15

    —6—
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
    Clerk of
    the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above/Opi~gnand Order was
    adopted on the
    /2~-~-~
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1989, by a
    vote of
    ~—~o
    ‘.
    ~
    ~.
    Dorothy
    M. G~n, Clerk
    Illinois Pol~IutionControl Board
    103—16

    Back to top