ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 24,
1990
CARGILL,
INC.
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 87—89
(Permit-Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY and VILLAGE
OF CARPENTERSVILLE,
Respondents.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
Marlin):
On December
27,
1987,
the Board issued
its Opinion and Order
in this appeal
of
a permit
issued May
20,
1987.
Among other
issues
in the case was whether
the Agency correctly imposed a
condition requiring the stack on Cargill’s liquid waste
incinerator
to be
raised
to
100 feet,
and whether
the permit
condition preempted a zoning ordinance of
the Village of
Carpentersville which would
limit
the stack
height
to
35
feet.
The Board did not
reach the first
issue.
The Board
found
that
the permit condition preempted
the ordinance’s
35 foot height
restriction.
The Board went on
to state:
“Cargill’s position
is that
if
the Board
find~s
for Cargill on the
issue of preemption,
it has
no objection
to
the 100 foot stack
requirement.
Since
the Board has
found
that
the Agency’s permit condition preempts the
effect of Carpentersville’s ordinance
restricting
the stack height
to
35
feet,
the
Board need not
look at the question of whether
the 100 foot
stack height
is
indeed necessary
for the operation of
the incinerator
to
be
in
compliance with the Act and i~s regulations”.
Cargill,
tnc.
v.
IEPA and Villaae
of
Carpentersville,
PCB 87—89,
84 PCB 649,
657
(Dece~nber
7,
~987).
Due
to the effect of
its
ruling on CarDentersville’s
ordinance,
the Board
joined
the Village
(which had not previously
appeared in the case)
as
a party pursuant
to Section
41
of
the
Act
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
103.121 and 103.141.
The Village appealed.
The Second District Appellate Court
ii
1—:377
—2—
and the Supreme Court
reversed the Board’s Opinion and Order
in
Village of Carpentersville
v.
IPCB,
IEPA,
and Cargill,
Inc.,
176
Ill.
App.
3d 668,
531 N.E.2d 400
(2d Dist.
1988),
affd.
____
Ill.
2d_____
,
____N.E.2d_____
(No.
68074, March
29, 1990).
The
Supreme Court found that
the plain language of Section
39(c)
“makes clear
that permits
issued under
the Act no longer preempt
local
zoning ordinances”.
(No. 68074,
slip op.,
p.4).
On May
9,
1990 the Second District
issued its mandate
remanding the matter back
to the Board with
instructions:
“to make
a finding
as
to whether
the 100—foot
stack requirement
is necessary
for the
operation of the incinerator
to be
in
compliance with
the Act and the regulations.
531 N.E.2d at
403”.
Consistent with this
remand order,
the parties are directed
to file a statement,
to be
received in the Board’s Offices
on or
before June 15,
1990,
indicating
their views as
to how this
matter should best proceed,
addres:ing whether
they believe
additional briefing or hearing
is required
in
this matter.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy
M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify
that the above Order was adopted on.
the
~
~
‘
day of
_________________
,
1990,
oy
a vote of
_____
Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
111—378