ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October 11,
    1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    )
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    V.
    )
    PCB 90—120
    (Enforcement)
    WILLIAM J. LANGHEIM,
    )
    d/b/a LANGHEIM READY NIX,
    )
    PATRICK LAMGHEIM, d/b/a
    )
    LANGHEIM READY NIX, and
    )
    CONCRETE MIDWEST CO.,
    INC.,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION
    (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    I dissent
    from the majority’s acceptance of the settlement
    stipulation in this case.
    Although
    the
    proposed
    settlement
    agreement
    states
    that
    respondent’s noncompliance was economically beneficial in that it
    operated
    without
    expending
    money
    for
    particulate
    reduction
    equipment, there is not any specific information on the amount of
    that
    economic
    benefit.
    Section
    33(c)
    of
    the
    Environmental
    Protection Act (and new Section 42(h)(3), as contained in P.A.
    86-
    1363, effective September 7,
    1990) specifically requires the Board
    to consider
    any
    economic benefits accrued by noncompliance.
    I
    believe that this provision contemplates
    a consideration of the
    amount of the full economic benefit,
    not just a statement that an
    economic benefit was realized.
    Without more specific information,
    it is impossible to know if the penalty of $2,500 even comes close
    to any savings realized by respondent.
    Finally,
    I am frustrated that, although this case was brought
    in the name of the people
    of the State
    of Illinois,
    there
    is
    no
    recognition that costs and fees could have been assessed against
    respondent.
    Ill.Rev.Stat.l989,
    ch.
    111 1/2,
    par.
    1042(f).
    I am
    pleased that the Attorney General is beginning to bring enforcement
    cases
    in the name
    of the
    People,
    but
    I
    believe
    that settlement
    agreements
    in such cases should,
    at a minimum, recognize that the
    Board could award costs and reasonable fees.
    115—30 7

    2
    For these reasons,
    I dissent.
    J~4
    Theodoj~Never
    Board Member
    I,
    Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Dissenting Opinion was filed
    on the
    ~
    day of
    ________________,
    1990.
    Dorothy
    ~7
    Gunn,
    Clerk
    Illinois Thllution Control Board
    115—308

    Back to top