ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June 21, 1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    PCB 90—57
    (Enforcement)
    LIFETIME ROOFTILE COMPANY,
    )
    an Illinois corporation,
    )
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    I dissent from the majority’s acceptance of the settlement
    stipulation in this case.
    Neither the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    nor the Attorney General have articulated any standards as to
    what factors should be considered when negotiating a fine to be
    imposed pursuant to a settlement agreement. Additionally,
    although the proposed settlement agreement states that Lifetime’s
    noncompliance was economically beneficial in that it constructed
    and operated its unpermitted equipment without the delay of
    applying and waiting for the Agency to issue permits, and that it
    avoided the costs of preparing permit applications, there is not
    any specific information on the amount of that economic
    benefit. Sectjcn 33(c) of the Environmental Protection Act
    specifically requires the Board to consider any economic benefits
    accrued by noncompliance.
    I believe that this provision
    contemplates a consideration of the amount of the economic
    benefit, not just a statement that an economic benefit was
    realized. 1~ithout more specific information, it is impossible to
    know if the penalty cf $2,500 even ccmes close to the savings
    realized by Lifetime.
    Finally, I am frustrated that, although this case was brought
    in the name of the People of the State of Illinois, there is no
    recognitition that costs and fees could have been
    assessed
    against Lifetime. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. ill 1/2, par.
    1042(f). 1 air pleased that the Attorney General is beginning to
    bring enforcement cases in the name of the People, but I believe
    that settlement agreements in such cases should, at a minimum,
    recognize that the Board could awardcosts and reasonable fees.
    112—405

    2
    For these reasons, I dissent
    ~
    ~-~-
    ~
    J. ~rheodore Meyer
    Board Member
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, hereby certify that the above Dissenting
    Opinion was filed on the
    ~ ~
    day of
    ~ ~
    ,
    1990.
    Dorothy M.:~Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    112—406

    Back to top