ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July 19, 1990
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE
    )
    OF ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 90—7
    (Enforcement)
    BLUE TEE CORPORATION (Azcon Scrap
    Division),
    a Maine corporation,
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION
    (by J. Theodore Meyer):
    I dissent from the majority’s
    acceptance
    of the settlement
    stipulation in this case.
    Neither the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    nor the Attorney General have articulated any standards as to what
    factors should be considered when negotiating a fine to be imposed
    pursuant to a settlement
    agreement.
    Additionally,
    although the
    proposed settlement agreement states that Blue Tee’s noncompliance
    was
    economically
    beneficial
    in
    that
    it
    conducted
    scrapping
    operations without expending additional money to manually remove
    wood
    sections
    of
    railroad
    cars,
    there
    is
    not
    any
    specific
    information on the amount of that economic benefit.
    Section 33(c)
    of the Environmental Protection Act specifically requires the Board
    to
    consider any economic benefits
    accrued
    by noncompliance.
    I
    believe that this provision contemplates
    a consideration of the
    amount of the economic benefit, not just a statement that that an
    economic benefit was realized.
    Without more specific information,
    it is impossible to know if the penalty of $11,500 even comes close
    to any savings realized by Blue Tee.
    Finally,
    I am frustrated that, although this case was brought
    in the name of the people
    of the State of
    Illinois,
    there
    is
    no
    recognition that costs and fees could have been assessed against
    Blue Tee.
    Ill.Rev.Stat.l989,
    ch.
    lii
    1/2,
    par.
    1042(f).
    I am
    pleased that the Attorney General is beginning to bring enforcement
    cases
    in the name
    of the People,
    but
    I
    believe
    that settlement
    agreements
    in such cases should,
    at a minimum, recognize that the
    Board could award costs and reasonable fees.
    113—3 19

    2
    For these reasons,
    I dissent.
    4
    ~
    J.
    ‘~‘heodoreMeyer
    Board Member
    I,
    Dorothy M.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that
    he above Dissenting Opinion was filed
    on the
    /9~
    day of
    ________________,
    1990.
    ç;;/
    //
    I
    V
    Dorothy M. )~unn, Clerk
    Illinois P~’1lutionControl Board
    113—321)

    Back to top